John R. Houk, Bog Editor
April 1, 2024
If you are one of my readers, you will have noticed I took
Easter Weekend 2024 off from sharing. AND YET I was not totally inactive.
%20Parasites%20Fear%20Ivermectin.jpg)
Here are two posts focused on combatting Medical Tyranny
from that Easter timeframe that I’m posting just to plug up the void. I will
not be sharing widely as I typically do. SO, if you find this informative, you
should share this post on your favorite Social Media Platform.
o World-Renowned
Physicians Receive Public Apology from Accuser Admitting Allegations of
Academic Fraud Were Incorrect; FLCCC ALLIANCE; 3/30/24
o The Sovereignty Coalition/ Door
to Freedom backgrounder for lawmakers on the proposed transformation of the WHO:
Please read and share this brief but comprehensive summary of what is afoot
widely; By MERYL NASS;
The FLCCC Alliance Community
(Substack); 3/27/24
JRH 4/1/24
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED.
PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
******************************
World-Renowned Physicians Receive Public Apology from
Accuser Admitting Allegations of Academic Fraud Were Incorrect
March 30, 2024
Washington, D.C. – The source of a series of false
allegations often recited in media stories has publicly acknowledged her error
and apologized for questioning the integrity of the FLCCC Alliance and founding
members Paul E. Marik, M.D., FCCM, FCCP, chairman
and chief science officer, and Pierre Kory, MD,
MPA, president and chief medical officer.
In June of 2022, Allison Neitzel, a physician and author of
the blog, Misinformation Kills, made a series of false allegations of fraud in
reference to peer-reviewed published research of Drs. Marik and Kory. Dr.
Neitzel’s unsubstantiated claims also included accusing the FLCCC Alliance of
“grifting” when she falsely claimed that the organization is the “same” as
other organizations that sold ivermectin and telehealth services to the public.
Finally, Dr. Neitzel was a staunch supporter and promoter of false claims by
another online influencer, Kyle Sheldrick, a physician and Ph.D. candidate in
Australia, who made a series of unsubstantiated allegations of fraud committed
by Dr. Marik on social media and to the journal CHEST that he later retracted
following an investigation into his claims by the journal. Dr. Sheldrick
publicly acknowledged his mistake in a statement issued in May 2023.
Many of Dr. Neitzel’s and Dr. Sheldrick’s false claims were
often used by widely read media outlets, positioning them as authoritative
sources of such information.
Today, Dr. Neitzel issued a lengthy statement
acknowledging her mistakes and apologizing to Drs. Marik and Kory, and the
FLCCC Alliance that included the following [Blog Editor Bold Text
Emphasis]:
“A number of times in 2022 in
the MisinformationKills newsletter and on Twitter, I used terms like “fraud”
and “fraudulent” to criticize certain positions of and statements by the FLCCC,
Dr. Marik and Dr. Kory, and to criticize certain studies by Dr. Marik or Dr.
Kory. My posts have also characterized the use of ivermectin in treatment
with words like “grift.” I take this opportunity to clarify that I did
not mean my statements to be understood as conveying anything more than intense
criticism, and I regret if anyone understood the statements as accusations that
any of them had engaged in fraudulent professional or business
practices.”
Her statement concludes, “I apologize to the FLCCC,
Dr. Marik, and Dr. Kory for the statements that are the subject of this
update.”
“As physicians in the public discourse, we all have the
responsibility to not make accusations like fraud without first knowing all the
facts. To do otherwise is highly irresponsible and unprofessional, especially
when the media spread these accusations further,” said Pierre Kory, MD, MPA,
president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC Alliance. We accept Dr.
Neitzel’s apology. However, it is regrettable that it has taken almost two
years for her to acknowledge her mistakes.”
“We are always open to a professional debate on any of our
research. That is often how good science comes about,” said Paul E. Marik,
M.D., FCCM, FCCP, chairman and chief science officer of the FLCCC Alliance. “I
hope that Dr. Neitzel understands that accusations of fraud are not to be
recklessly made and can be particularly damaging during a public health crisis
when critical information among frontline physicians is being used to save
lives.”
A link to Dr. Neitzel’s statement can be found here: https://misinformationkills.substack.com/p/correction-clarification-and-update
Additional information on the resolution of Dr. Sheldrick’s
claims can be found here: https://covid19criticalcare.com/triumph-an-unconscionable-attack-against-dr-marik-ends-in-global-vindication-the-flccc-news-capsule-for-sunday-june-4-2023/
About the FLCCC Alliance
The FLCCC Alliance was organized in March 2020 by a group of
highly published, world renowned critical care physicians and scholars with the
academic support of allied physicians worldwide. Known for its lifesaving
protocols for preventing and treating COVID-19 in all stages of illness
including “Long COVID” and Post Vaccine Syndrome, the FLCCC has since developed
treatment guides for several conditions and illnesses, including sepsis,
metabolic disease, cancer and depression. For more information: www.FLCCC.net
©2020–2023 All
Rights Reserved FLCCC
Alliance. The information contained or presented on this website is
for educational purposes only. Information on this site is NOT intended to
serve as a substitute for diagnosis, treatment, or advice from a qualified,
licensed medical professional. The facts presented are offered as information
only in order to empower you – our protocol is not medical advice – and in no
way should anyone infer that we, even though we are physicians, or anyone
appearing in any content on this website are practicing medicine, it is for
educational purposes only. Any treatment protocol you undertake should be
discussed with your physician or other licensed medical professional. Seek the
advice of a medical professional for proper application of ANY material on this
site or our program to your specific situation. NEVER stop or change your
medications without consulting your physician. If you are having an emergency
contact your emergency services: in the USA that’s 911. … Please read our complete
disclaimers.
DONATE TO FLCCC ALLIANCE
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Sovereignty Coalition/ Door to Freedom backgrounder
for lawmakers on the proposed transformation of the WHO
Please read and share this brief but comprehensive
summary of what is afoot widely
By MERYL NASS
Cross posted from MERYL’S COVID NEWSLETTER
March 27, 2024
The
FLCCC Alliance Community (Substack)
Dr. Meryl Nass publishes urgent message on the proposed
changes to transform the World Health Organization. -
BACKGROUND PAPER ON THE PROPOSED TRANSFORMATION OF THE
W.H.O.
With the active support of the Chinese Communist Party, the
World Economic Forum, the European Union, Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Biden
administration, two accords are being finalized that would give the World
Health Organization (WHO) wholly unprecedented and actually
unconstitutional powers over the United States and her people.
If adopted, these two proposed governing protocols – a
package of major amendments to the WHO’s existing International Health
Regulations (IHRs) and a new treaty being described as the Pandemic Agreement –
could threaten national sovereignty, undermine states’ rights, and imperil
constitutional freedoms and basic individual liberties.
Specifically, the WHO and its unelected officials would be
granted the authority to restrict U.S. citizens’ rights to freedom of speech,
privacy, movement (especially travel across borders), choice of medical care
and informed consent. The WHO would also be empowered to ignore intellectual
property rights and impose a massive and unaccountable surveillance system on
the world. Most significantly, the proposed instruments would violate
Americans' basic civil rights under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Tenth and Fourteenth
Amendments.
The following are of particular concern:
1. If the two proposed governing protocols are
adopted, the WHO would be transformed from an advisory, charitable organization
into the world’s governor of public health, whose orders must be obeyed.
The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 as a
specialized agency of the United Nations with a mandate to coordinate
international health issues. The WHO carries out its mandate issuing guidance,
making recommendations, and establishing protocols for dealing with medical
emergencies. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) is in the final
stages of considerably amending its existing International Health Regulations
(IHR) and negotiating an international Pandemic Treaty. The ostensible purpose
is to enable a global response to “Public Health Emergencies of International
Concern” (PHEICs).
Although the WHO does not presently have the authority to
enforce its recommendations, under the proposed IHR amendments and new Pandemic
agreement, both of which would be binding, the WHO would gain the authority to
issue mandates, not simply give advice, transforming its role from an advisory
and charitable agency to one that will govern public health worldwide.
During a declaration of an actual or potential PHEIC, the
IHRs would be in force. The Treaty would always be in force.
2. The proposed IHR amendments and Pandemic Treaty
confer essentially unlimited powers over public health globally to the WHO’s
Director-General.
The IHR amendments would require states parties to surrender
sovereignty over public health to the WHO’s unelected and unaccountable
Director-General, who would – among other things – be empowered to direct
nations as to what laws they must pass and enforce. For example, the IHR
amendments insert the word “shall” a total of 168 times. The clear intent and
meaning of these changes is to establish that such dictates will be mandatory
for member countries to follow, especially during a declared “emergency.” (Note
that the protocols establish compliance and implementation committees, as well
as a "focal point" in each country to report back to the WHO on
compliance. Moreover, the defined scope of the proposed IHR has been
expanded to include "all risks with a potential to impact
public health" (Article 2, Scope and purpose).[1]
Moreover, if the proposed IHR changes and Pandemic Treaty
are adopted in late May 2024, America’s elected representatives would no longer
solely set our public health policies. Instead, they could be dictated by the
WHO’s Director-General, who would be authorized to declare unilaterally public
health emergencies of regional or international concern. Such declarations can
include perceived or potential emergencies other than pandemics, including for
example: climate change, immigration, gun violence or even emergencies
involving plants, animals, or ecosystems. And, under the WHO’s proposed
agreements, American citizens would be obliged to comply with whatever the
Director-General says must be done about these emergencies.
3. Both the proposed Pandemic Treaty and IHR indicate
a disconcerting intent to suppress free speech criticism of public health
concerns, establish global surveillance, and support the proliferation of
potential biological weapons.
Other problems abound with the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty and
International Health Regulations amendments. For example, they would require
the establishment of a global surveillance state that threatens the basic
privacy rights of all Americans and reflects the organization and its partners’
determination to suppress free speech that is at odds with the WHO's public
health policies. While nominally promoting "unhindered" access to
information (Treaty Article 3. General principles and approaches),[2] there
is a contradictory requirement for nations to “combat false, misleading,
misinformation or disinformation" (Treaty Article 18, Communication,
and public awareness).[3] Notably,
under these protocols, social media could be monitored and censored; citizens
could be inoculated and subjected to lockdowns at the sole discretion of the
WHO; and Americans’ medical data, from birth to death, could be shared
globally.
Both documents also support the proliferation of potential
biological weapons. While the stated goal of the Pandemic Treaty is to
reduce pandemics, it establishes a "Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing
System" (Treaty Article 12, Access and benefit sharing)4 that
requires nations to share "potential pandemic pathogens" – a formula
for proliferating potential biological weapons, which increases the risk of
pandemics.5
Furthermore, the WHO's Director-General would appoint
experts to supervise genetic engineering and Gain-of-Function research on
potential pandemic pathogens (Article 24, Scientific Advisory Committee),
which appeared in the February 14, 2024, draft of the Pandemic Treaty.6 Such
research will further increase the risk of escape of highly pathogenic
microorganisms. A serious effort to prevent pandemics would require the WHO to
end such dangerous research.
4. Implementation of public healthcare policy is a state,
not federal, responsibility.
The responsibility to define and implement public health
policies is not an enumerated power in the U.S. Constitution, and therefore is
an authority reserved to the states. The federal government cannot transfer
authority for U.S. public health policy to the WHO because it is not, in fact,
entitled to exercise such authority, let alone relinquish it to a foreign
entity.
The Biden administration is, nonetheless, strongly
supportive of both of the proposed WHO accords. The U.S. State Department has
indicated that it does not intend to request Senate advice and consent on the
IHR amendments or the Treaty. And the U.S. Senate has, to date, refused to
agree to require either or both to be submitted pursuant to its constitutional
role in the ratification of such accords.7 8
It falls, therefore, to the states’ Attorneys General to
stand against these agreements and thereby safeguard such state prerogatives
and their constituents’ medical freedom, lest one or both be irreparably
harmed.
[1] https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_7-en.pdf.
(page 3)
[2] https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb7/A_INB7_3-en.pdf.
(page 7)
[3] https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb7/A_INB7_3-en.pdf.
(page 22). The Treaty defines
"infodemic" as "too much information, false or misleading
information, in digital and physical environments during a disease outbreak. It
causes confusion and risk-taking behaviors that can harm health." It then
requires "Parties" to engage in "infodemic management at local,
national, regional and international levels. " Treaty at pp. 5, 13. The
Treaty also requires that Parties "harmonize … regulatory
requirements" (p. 20) so it contemplates that each government will bind private
parties, including any that contribute to the “infodemic.” The First Amendment
prohibits this kind of speech control.
4 https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb7/A_INB7_3-en.pdf.
(page 16)
5 https://brownstone.org/articles/who-amendments-increase-man-made-pandemics/
6 https://doortofreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/INB8_Chapter-III.pdf
7 https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/2023/2/sen-johnson-leads-colleagues-in-effort-to-protect-american-sovereignty-against-world-health-organization
8 https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/reforming-the-who-ensuring-global-health-security-and-accountability/
© 2024 FLCCC
Alliance
FLCCC Alliance
Substack HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT
FLCCC Alliance Substack
No comments:
Post a Comment