John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© November 2, 2023
I am concerned for the existence of the existence of the
Constitutional Republic of the United States of America. In my near 67 years of
life (birthday on 11/20), I’ve noticed a slow shredding of our Founders’
Original Intent Constitution and a Leftist relegation of America’s Founding
Documents (including the influences on our Founders) to a historical dust
bin of revision, condemnation, or just darn erasure. Documents to read they
probably don’t teach your children or are revamped in colleges: Short List, UShistory.org List,
The Patriot Post List,
AND constitutioncenter.org
‘Intellectual Foundations of the American Founding’ List.
Some of the documents on these lists I was taught even in Elementary School,
some I became aware in College (I have a BA in History), and admittedly
some I still need to examine. I suspect most of today’s academic dissemination of
American history is belittling. As an American, YOU should take at least a
brief look at one or more of the above lists to see if you were taught
patriotically or taught under the stigma of propaganda or even taught at all.
These introductory thoughts lead to what will be considered
a long post of mostly THE EXPOSÉ
articles on Globalist/Medical Tyranny infecting not only American culture but
the one-time Free Western World. For those unaware, THE EXPOSÉ is a
UK-based Online publication that dedicated to exposing the assault on Freedom
primarily in the UK sphere of influence which means an inclusion in the expanse
of what once the British
Commonwealth of Nations. Every once in a while THE EXPOSÉ
includes the USA in its reporting.
In full disclosure, I’m not on board with some of the views
of THE EXPOSÉ. Yet typically, the Online journal’s reporting on
Globalist/Medical Tyranny creep is something I appreciate. And so, over the
last couple of days THE EXPOSÉ has three posts on Globalist designs for
a world-wide dystopian future that will eradicate Freedom and incentivize some
of form of government control undoubtedly under the Globalist hope of a
One-World Government.
After the first THE EXPOSÉ cross post I’m sharing a copy
of Dinesh D’Souza’s Documentary “Police State” from the Bitchute video
platform. The D’Souza Documentary was released to the Big Screen theaters and
now is available to purchase the DVD. D’Souza is a movie producer is obviously
to both earn a buck and recoup funds for production costs and probably to fund
future documentary projects. AS SUCH, I am unsure how long the video will be
available on the Bitchute Channel I’m sharing. A copyright complaint could get
it removed. Either way you should support D’Souza by purchasing the DVD which
can be found on the “Police State” website HERE.
The Epoch Times has a 58-second “Police State”
trailer to the Documentary which includes a link to purchase the DVD. HERE
is the EPOCH TV description to that trailer posted on 10/30/23:
“Is the United States becoming a
police state? The answer would seem to be yes, because many of the features of
a police state—such as widespread surveillance of citizens, censorship and
suppression of free speech, ideological indoctrination in schools and the
media, political targeting of dissidents, and political prisoners—are now
present and observable in the United States.
Indeed, both sides of the
political aisle agree that America is in danger of losing its democracy and its
liberty. The only difference is that each accuses the other of seeking to
establish a police state. So who’s right? This film resolves that question by
helping define what the police state is, and showing how it got started and how
it operates—both behind the scenes and out in the open.
The film shows how the police
state emerged out of the ashes of 9/11, when citizens gave their government a
whole new set of police powers, intending that those be used against Islamic
terrorists from abroad. Over time, remarkably, those same powers were turned
against American citizens—patriots, Christians, and conservatives—who are
accused of being domestic terrorists.
The film also identifies Donald
Trump as the primary target of the police state, and the January 6
protesters—some serving long sentences for peacefully entering the Capitol to
make their voices heard—as the first political prisoners in U.S. peacetime history.
Working in collaboration with Dan Bongino—former NYPD officer, Secret Service
Agent, and now political commentator—Dinesh D’Souza burrows deep into the
bowels of the police state, interviewing insiders and whistleblowers, as well
as ordinary citizens who have been hounded, raided, and targeted by an
expansive police state apparatus that stretches across the public, private, and
nonprofit sectors.
This is Dinesh D’Souza’s most
terrifying and most timely film. It is an urgent warning to all Americans to
protect our basic liberties—before it’s too late.
🇺🇸Police State
DVD: https://www.epochtv.shop/policestate
[LIVE] Exclusive Q&A With
Dinesh D’Souza on 'Police State' https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/exclusive-live-qa-with-dinesh-dsouza-oct-30-1040am-et-crossroads-5519119”
AND NOW THE CROSS POSTS. If it’s too lengthy for you, you
should bookmark the post and go back and read as your time permits. FRIENDS AND
READERS – DO SOMETHING TO RESIST TYRANNY! Do not rely on outside help, you are
a free individual. Find other free individuals.
o The
Psychological Playbook: Brainwashing Techniques to Increase “Vaccine” Uptake
o Police
State Documentary
o Is
Deagel’s 2025 Depopulation Nightmare Unfolding?: A Startling Correlation with
Shocking Quadruple Vaccinated Mortality Rates Certainly Suggests So…
o Bill
Gates Pushes Digital ID for Newborns in Kenya
JRH 11/2/23
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to
Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously
on all social media platforms!
************************
The Psychological Playbook: Brainwashing
Techniques to Increase “Vaccine” Uptake
Psychological Playbook - Brainwash to Obey (THE EXPOSÉ Photo)
November 1, 2023
Dr William Makis has reviewed 8 published papers that
clearly show the techniques employed by governments world wide to ensure
vaccine uptake. From punishments and threats to employment and reputation, to
rewards for complying, studies show that the Covid vaccine rollout was aided by
the greatest psychological fear campaign in human history using tried and
tested brainwashing techniques.
Propaganda Series – Brainwashing Techniques Used to
Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake – 8 papers reviewed, looking at the
psychological manipulation of the masses.
This article originally appeared on makismd.substack.com by Dr.
William Makis
COVID & Jab Brainwashing toon (THE EXPOSÉ Photo)
Papers Reviewed:
· 2023
Jun – Steffens et al – “Testing persuasive messages about
booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines on intention to vaccinate in Australian
adults: A randomised controlled trial”
· 2023 Apr – Kleitman et al
– “The Psychology of COVID-19 Booster Hesitancy, Acceptance and Resistance in
Australia”
· 2023 Mar – Limbu et al –
“Why Some People Are Hesitant to Receive COVID-19 Boosters: A Systematic
Review”
· 2023
Jan – Fisher et al – “Impact of a physician recommendation on
COVID-19 vaccination intent among vaccine hesitant individuals”
· 2021 Dec – Erin
James et al – “Persuasive messaging to increase COVID-19
vaccine uptake intentions”
· 2021 Sep – Kachurka et al –
“Persuasive Messages Will Not Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance” (Polish
people say f**k you to propaganda)
· 2021 Jun – Scott
Ratzan et al – Missing the Point — How Primary Care Can Overcome
Covid-19 Vaccine “Hesitancy”
· 2021 Feb – Stacy
Wood et al – “Beyond Politics — Promoting Covid-19 Vaccination in
the United States”
2023
Jun – Steffens et al – “Testing persuasive messages about booster
doses of COVID-19 vaccines on intention to vaccinate in Australian adults: A
randomised controlled trial”
·
four propaganda messages were tested:
·
Personal health benefits – booster
gives you protection
·
Community health benefits – booster
reduces your risk of giving virus to your family, or people in the community
who could get sick and die
·
Non-Health Benefits – travel, go to
weddings, see family and friends, getting a booster reduces chance that
restrictions will return
·
Personal agency – getting booster is
a personal choice that give you control of your health and lets you protect
people you care about.
·
RESULTS:
·
“messages emphasizing non-health benefits of
getting a COVID-19 booster dose, like travelling, enjoying family
occasions like weddings, and seeing family and friends, may increase intention
to vaccinate, especially in hesitant populations.”
·
“At the time, the Australian population
had endured almost two years of public health restrictions, including lockdowns
and international and domestic border closures. Being able to live more
normally, free from restrictions, may have been top of mind, and hence what
participants found the most persuasive.”
·
“messages emphasizing personal agency may have
negative impacts, especially with hesitant individuals.”
·
“Hesitant individuals may have reacted
negatively (psychological reactance) to suggestions about how they
ought to behave, and what others approve or disapprove of regarding
vaccination decisions”
2023
Apr – Kleitman et al – “The Psychology of COVID-19 Booster
Hesitancy, Acceptance and Resistance in Australia”
·
Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) identified three
subgroups: Acceptant (61%), Hesitant (30%) and Resistant (9%).
·
Hesitant and Resistant groups were less
worried about catching COVID-19, used fewer official sources of
COVID-19 info, checked the news less, were lower on the
agreeableness personality dimension and reported more conservatism,
persecutory thinking, amoral attitudes and need for chaos.
·
Hesitant group (30%) also reported
checking the legitimacy of information sources less, scored lower on
the openness to new experiences personality dimension and were more
likely than the Resistant and Acceptant groups to report regaining
freedoms (e.g., travel) and work requirements or
external pressures as reasons to get a booster
·
Resistant group (9%) were higher on
reactance, held more conspiratorial beliefs and rated their
culture as being less tolerant of deviance than the Hesitant and Acceptant
groups
Booster Chart - Acceptance, Hesitancy & Resistance
Booster Chart – Finding & Policy Recommendations
2023
Mar – Limbu et al – “Why Some People Are Hesitant to Receive
COVID-19 Boosters: A Systematic Review”
· COVID-19
Booster Vaccination Hesitancy Rate:
·
North America is highest at 41%
·
Europe 35%
·
Asia 28%
·
South America 28%
·
younger people more reluctant to
take boosters
·
single or never married adults were
more likely to be booster hesitant
·
research on education and men vs women is mixed
·
Compared to other occupations, health
care workers, allied health professions, housewives, administrative staff &
service workers were more likely to be booster hesitant.
·
Vaccine Adverse Events were the most
frequently reported predictor of hesitancy
·
Reduced booster hesitancy: government
mandates, booster recommendations from family or health care and community
workers
·
Increased booster hesitancy: when social
networks or social media served as an important info source, or other factors:
·
political messages discouraging boosters
·
belief in natural immunity
·
boosters are unnecessary
·
personal health is in God’s hands
·
COVID-19 is similar to seasonal flu
·
“interventions that can harness normative social
influence should be powerful. For example, information campaigns that rely on
recommendations from celebrities, political figures, or groups trusted
by the target audience should be more effective at reducing hesitancy”
·
“Additionally, campaigns can explain how
to overcome booster hesitancy among family and friends by
providing information and strategies for effective normative influence on the
booster hesitant from those close to them.”
2023
Jan – Fisher et al – “Impact of a physician recommendation on
COVID-19 vaccination intent among vaccine hesitant individuals”
·
Physicians and other healthcare providers are
the most trusted source of information about the COVID-19 vaccine
·
Recommendation from a physician has
consistently been associated with higher rates of vaccine uptake for other
vaccines such as the human papillomavirus (HPV) and influenza vaccines
·
strong recommendation from a physician or
healthcare provider may be influential in increasing COVID-19 vaccine
uptake and an important tool in fostering COVID-19 vaccine acceptance
·
A presumptive style recommendation (e.g.,
“you are due for a flu shot”) is associated with increased vaccine
uptake compared with a participatory style recommendation (e.g., “are you
interested in getting a flu shot?”)
·
Results: 33% became less hesitant
following a doctor message
·
39% “as safe as the flu shot” message
was most effective in reducing hesitancy
·
36% “I acknowledge your concerns, I’ve
reviewed the studies” message
·
35% “protect others” message
·
34% “I recommend that you get it”
·
20% “What do you think?” message was
least effective in reducing hesitancy
·
Conclusion: “Encouraging physicians to
provide an explicit recommendation is a promising means of increasing COVID-19
vaccine uptake in the US”
2021 Dec – Erin
James et al – “Persuasive messaging to increase COVID-19
vaccine uptake intentions”
·
“Vaccination is both a self-interested
and pro-social action – people protect themselves, but they also
reduce chance of spreading disease to others”
·
“people view vaccination as a social
contract and are less willing to cooperate with the unvaxxed”
·
“highlighting the reputational costs of
choosing not to vaccinate could be an effective strategy for
increasing uptake”
·
“appeals to herd immunity and the pro-social
aspect of vaccination have been shown to increase uptake”
·
“messages that explain herd immunity increase
willingness to receive a vaccine”
·
“effective public health messages would also
increase people’s willingness to encourage those close to them to
vaccinate and to hold negative judgments of those who do not vaccinate”
·
“by encouraging those close to them to
vaccinate, people are both promoting compliance with social norms and
increasing their own level of protection”
·
“by judging those who do not vaccinate more
negatively, they apply social pressure to others to promote
cooperative behavior.”
·
“free riders should be punished or ostracized
for their past actions, to encourage pro-social outcomes” (a FREE
RIDER is an unvaxxed person who is getting a “free ride” by getting
protection from herd immunity that was created by the vaccinated around them
who did the right thing”)
THE EXPERIMENTAL PROPAGANDA MESSAGES:
·
baseline info = to end COVID-19
outbreak, must get jabbed, stops transmission, safe and effective, save
millions of lives
·
self-interest = reduces your risk of
getting sick and dying, or long term disability
·
community interest = reduces risk
that members of your family and community could get sick and die (vaccination
is a cooperative action to protect others)
·
community interest + guilt = how
guilty would you feel if you didn’t jab and gave COVID to someone you care
about? (invoke emotion)
·
community interest + embarrassment =
how embarrassed and ashamed would you be if you didn’t jab and gave COVID to
someone you care about? (emotion)
·
community interest + anger = how
angry will you be if you didn’t jab and give COVID to someone you care about?
(invoke emotion)
·
not bravery = military, doctors,
firefighters risk their lives to serve others, that’s bravery. Not getting
jabbed is reckless, you risk health of your family, friends and community. To
get jabbed is to show strength. (reputation, social image concerns)
·
trust in science = unvaxxed are
ignorant or confused about science, and you’ll show others how ignorant or
confused you are (reputation, social image concerns)
·
personal freedom = unvaxxed increase
risk we lose our freedoms or govt lockdowns will return. We all keep our
freedom by getting jabbed.
·
economic freedom = unvaxxed increase
risk of govt lockdowns returning, getting jabbed means we all keep our ability
to work and earn a living.
·
community economic benefit = getting
jabbed strengthens national economy
Most effective brainwashing techniques:
·
to increase your willingness to jab: embarrassment,
community, not bravery
·
Guilt and embarrassment were most
effective to increase your willingness to advise a friend to vaccinate
·
Not bravery message was most
effective to increase your negative judging of the unvaxxed.
·
women responded more to the Trust in
Science and Embarrassment, than men
·
men responded more to the Not Bravery
and Community Interest (without embarrassment) messages.
·
Democrats were most easily brainwashed and
responded to all messages
·
Republicans appeared to react only to Community
Interest, embarrassment
·
Those high in vaccine confidence responded
to all messages (all types of brainwashing)
·
those low in confidence responded only to
the Community Interest messages
·
CONCLUSION: Experiment findings support the “idea
that vaccination is often treated as a social contract in which people are
expected to vaccinate and those who do not are sanctioned”
·
“messages that invoked reputational
concerns were successful at altering judgment of those who would free
ride on the contributions of others”
·
propaganda must be tailored to target women
differently than men
2021
Sep – Kachurka et al – “Persuasive Messages Will Not
Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance” (Polish people reject propaganda)
·
6000 Polish internet users were sampled
·
Propaganda Messages tested:
·
reputation of vaxx makers: they’re
American Pfizer and German Biontech
·
efficiency: over 90%
·
safety: European Medicines Agency
confirms they’re safe, mild side effects
·
others want it: 75% of people want to get
jabbed as soon as possible
·
Science authority: scientists say it’s
the only rational choice
·
vaccine passport convenience: vaxxed
will be able to travel, not wear mask, not quarantine, will make everyday life
easier
·
scarcity: not enough jabs for everyone
·
thoroughly tested: over 100,000 people
were tested in clinical trials
·
Price (they show you one): jab is
free, free and you get 15 Euro, costs 2 EUR, costs 15 EUR
· RESULTS: 45%
of respondents were unwilling to get vaccinated
·
none of the messages were effective in
reducing this hesitancy
·
politically aligned left or center meant
60-80% were willing to get jabbed
·
politically right or “ultra-right” or “none” or
“other” 30-50% were willing to get jabbed
·
up to 70% said they didn’t trust the
government.
AUTHORS SUGGEST METHODS TO INCREASE VACCINE UPTAKE:
·
Focus on individual reasons – have their
doctors try to convince them.
·
Turn those willing to be jabbed into “champions
of the campaign” – through facebook stickers and physical stickers –
and encourage them to talk to family and friends
·
Use reminders to ensure those who want to
vaccinate actually follow through.
2021 Jun – Scott
Ratzan et al – Missing the Point — How Primary Care Can
Overcome Covid-19 Vaccine “Hesitancy”
·
Among unvaccinated patients, there is a spectrum
of vaccine “hesitance,” ranging from being “vaccine ready” to “vaccine neutral”
to “vaccine resistant
·
“vaccine ready” – must have ready access
to vaccine to get them vaccinated
·
“vaccine neutral” – may accept
vaccination when seeking care for other problems, if vaccine is available and
they get a “nudge” from a trusted clinician
·
“vaccine resistant” – they must have
“regularly scheduled doctor visits” – family doctors have a “core
responsibility” to make preventive services including vaccination
available, and persuade patients.
·
“Primary care clinicians and trusted health
care organizations often have the working relationships with community
leaders to create solutions that fit local needs and preferences.”
·
when boosters come, must put more focus on doctors,
nurses, and community leaders who know how to create access, convey
persuasive messages, and deliver care.
2021 Feb – Stacy
Wood et al – “Beyond Politics — Promoting Covid-19 Vaccination
in the United States”
·
“Any successful marketing strategy will be
multifaceted”
·
“Consumer research and behavioral economics
suggest 12 key strategies for an effective vaccine-promotion effort”
·
Segment public by identity barriers –
must tailor propaganda to various groups (some incorporate masks into
self-image as symbol of community responsibility, others see wearing masks as
cowardice or weakness)
·
Find a common enemy – try to make
the virus threat the common enemy
·
Use analogy – “war against COVID”
·
Increase observability – make vaccine
status observable – vaxxed should wear tokens, bracelets, stickers,
pins (like those given to voters), or “DIGITAL BADGES” – such as frames
or banners for one’s social media profile photo – consumers’ ability to observe
others’ choices can increase rate of adoption
·
Leverage Vaccine Scarcity – frame
early access to vaccines as a mark of honor or respect for people we want to
protect (first responders, older Americans, medical staff, teachers, essential
workers). First responders who are healthy – getting vaccine priority is a sign
of respect awarded to them.
·
Predict Negative Attributions –
delays can be seen as govt incompetence, deployment in poor neighbourhoods can
be seen as “experimentation” – must address these
·
Prompt Anticipated Regret – push
fear that someone you love will die from the illness, potential guilt of losing
a family member, or guilt of getting Long COVID
·
Avoid conveying piecemeal risk info –
get bad info out there in one piece, instead of an ongoing trickle of
information
·
Promote compromise options – coffee
shops use three serving sizes because consumer research shows it helps people
make decisions – make vaccination a three option choice to
avoid depicting jabs as the most extreme of two.
·
Create FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) –
employees can offer incentives like a day off, Universities can offer tickets
to sports events or cultural events, tax benefits, insurance rebates, etc.
Create “fear of missing out” on perks and benefits.
·
Combat Uniqueness Neglect – many
people believe they’re unique, so a once-size-fits-all option to mass vaccinate
may not appeal to them – train medical professionals to identify these people,
offer them unnecessary modifications to vaccine delivery (create “special
treatment” to trick them into vaccination)
·
Neutralize the Case versus Base-Rate
Heuristic – people put more weight on anecdotes, especially on vaccine
injury – force medical personnel to counter this with their own anecdotal
stories (the pregnant woman who died because she didn’t get vaccinated
My Take….
I wish I had read this literature early on in the
pandemic, to realize and understand how truly evil and psychopathic the
COVID-19 Propaganda and the Psychological Warfare on the population was.
From the brainwashing techniques outlined here, some of my
observations:
·
The appeal to “protect the community” was
probably the most effective brainwashing technique – mainly to protect family,
friends, the community, the healthcare system – they knew that this would
pressure many vaccine hesitant to get the shots (especially concern about
family members with medical conditions)
·
this worked even better when they attached an
emotion to it
·
“The increased observability” was
the most effective brainwashing technique to get people to adopt a brand
new technology (LNP/mRNA), a technique that was used by Apple and its
Ipod – and this was employed via “DIGITAL BADGES” on facebook that we
now use to identify vaccine status of the thousands who are dying
suddenly from COVID-19 Vaccine injuries.
·
This also involved “PHYSICAL BADGES”
which were in the form of vaccine cards that people proudly
photographed and displayed on social media
·
Finding a common enemy – went from a
“novel Coronavirus” to the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” and
this was tied in with:
·
judging negatively those who refused
to be vaccinated, the “free riders” who benefited from the herd immunity
created by the vaccinated
·
the unvaccinated once identified as
“the common enemy” were punished and sanctioned by being excluded
from society
·
the poor treatment of the unvaccinated undoubtedly
forced some to get vaccinated to avoid such a fate
·
reputation concerns – doctors and
scientists who did not conform to the Propaganda had their reputations smeared
and destroyed and were made examples of by mainstream media to keep other
doctors scared and sticking to the narrative, even at the cost of their or
their own patients’ lives
·
Justin Trudeau created a smear campaign of the
unvaccinated, calling them names such as “fringe minority” and
claiming that they were racists and misogynists
·
thus “reputation destruction” was a
strong brainwashing tool that probably forced some to get vaccinated
·
vaccine scarcity was leveraged as
first responders were given “hero” status and were the first ones lined up to
get the vaccines as a sign of honor and a reward
·
they were basically held up as examples for the
rest of the population to follow
·
REWARDS – ability to travel, go to
restaurants, go to stadiums, concerts, participate in physical activities and
sports – that, for a time, were only given to the vaccinated as
“rewards” for being “good citizens”
·
donuts, burgers & fries, ice cream for kids
– predatory behavior
·
$100 incentive or entry into a million dollar
lottery
·
PUNISHMENTS – vaccine mandates,
employment termination, removal of unemployment benefits, decreased ability to
travel, inability to find new employment, etc.
·
Fear of loss of freedoms – this was
another major driving factor, people didn’t want to lose the freedom to travel,
the freedom to enjoy life (restaurants, concerts, sports, stadiums), the
freedom to take care of loved ones
·
this is now being contemplated as one of the key
fear tactics in getting people to take COVID-19 boosters again.
·
people will be reminded of lockdowns and
the message will be: “you don’t want us to bring lockdowns back, do you?
Then get vaccinated”
·
Brainwashing by a trusted doctor – this
is currently seen as one of the few plausible avenues to bring the COVID-19
vaccine hesitant back into the fold and get them to start taking mRNA vaccines
regularly again.
·
There will be huge pressure on doctors to get
COVID-19 vaccine uptake up to 85% again
·
this will be tied to regular doctor visits,
physicals, annual doctor visits, etc.
In the next part I will closely examine the DIGITAL
BADGES that were used as propaganda to convince and pressure others into
getting COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated.
SUPPORT THE EXPOSÉ
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Bitchute VIDEO: POLICE STATE - A FILM BY DINESH D'SOUZA - FULL DOCUMENTARY
Posted by TRUTH MEDIA - Viral Myth
First Published October 31st, 2023 05:40 UTC
Is the United States becoming a police state? This film
resolves the question by defining what a police state is, how it got started,
how it operates, and who’s in charge.
"Copyright Disclaimer, Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976,
allowance is made for 'fair use' for purposes such as criticism, comment, news
reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by
copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational
or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."
+++++++++++++++++++
Is Deagel’s 2025 Depopulation Nightmare Unfolding?: A
Startling Correlation with Shocking Quadruple Vaccinated Mortality Rates
Certainly Suggests So…
By THE EXPOSÉ [Staff]
October 31, 2023
In April 2021, the enigmatic intelligence firm Deagel.com
quietly erased its staggering 2025 global depopulation forecast, a document
forecasting a dramatic decline in populations of key countries like the United
Kingdom, United States, Germany etc.
This drastic prediction, which vanished from the public
eye after garnering huge attention during the alleged COVID-19 pandemic, has
since been shrouded in whispers and theories, only to resurface amidst
startling new health data.
Gates in Deagle.com Depopulation Photo (THE EXPOSÉ Photo)
The latest official Government figures suggest an
alarming pattern: significantly higher mortality rates in vaccinated
individuals compared to the unvaccinated, echoing the ominous tones of Deagel’s
predictions. But what’s even more concerning is that the disparity in mortality
rates increased ten-fold the more Covid-19 vaccinations that an age group was
given.
This means we are now seeing quadruple vaccinated
teenagers up to 318% more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers,
As we delve into this mysterious intersection of
prediction and present reality, a question arises:
Could the once-dismissed forecast of Deagel.com be an
unfolding truth hidden in plain sight?
Big Pharma & Depopulation Coincidence? (THE EXPOSÉ Photo)
The Shocking Forecast of 2025 by Deagel.com and Its
Disappearance
In an age where forecasting and data analysis hold
significant sway over public perception and policy, Deagel.com, a renowned
global intelligence and consulting firm, made headlines with its startling
prediction concerning global depopulation.
Particularly, its 2025 population forecast captured
widespread attention. This prediction, which was suspiciously removed from
their website in April 2021, once it garnered attention in the middle of the
Covid-19 pandemic has thankfully been preserved by
Nobul Art, allowing continued access to this troubling piece of
depopulation forecasts.
The Stark Numbers: United Kingdom and Germany’s Predicted
Plight
According to Deagel’s 2020 forecast, the United Kingdom was
on course to witness an extraordinary decrease in population by 77.1% by the
year 2025.
United Kingdom Population Change Map (THE EXPOSÉ Photo) SOURCE
Similarly, Germany was expected to see its population
diminish by 65.1% within the same timeframe.
Germany Population Change Map (THE EXPOSÉ Photo) SOURCE
Meanwhile Deagel predicted in 2020 that the United States
would see its population decline by 68.5 % by the year 2025.
USA Population Change Map (THE EXPOSÉ Photo) SOURCE
While predicting that Australia would see its population
decline by 34.6% by the year 2025.
Australia Population Change Map (THE EXPOSÉ Photo) SOURCE
Such figures, unsurprisingly, sparked intense debate and
speculation regarding the underlying causes and the accuracy of these
predictions.
A Chilling Correlation with Vaccine-Related Mortality?
In an unexpected twist, recent health data appears to lend a
disturbing credence to Deagel’s dire predictions.
According to a dataset released by the UK
Government’s Office for National Statistics (ONS), there’s an
alarming trend observed in mortality rates among different vaccination
statuses.
This data indicates that Four-Dose COVID-19
COVID-19-vaccinated teens and young Adults have up to a 318% higher likelihood
of death compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.
Chart Mortality Rate Ages 18 - 39 Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed UK Govt (THE EXPOSÉ Photo) SOURCE-Excel Doc from UK ONS Download
In every single month, four-dose vaccinated teenagers and
young adults were significantly more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers
and young adults.
Chart Mortality Rate Ages 18 - 39 4-DOSE Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed UK Govt (THE EXPOSÉ Photo) SOURCE-Excel Doc from UK ONS Download
The difference in mortality rates was so stark that the
unvaccinated only managed to reach a mortality rate of 31.1 per 100,000
person-years in January, whereas the four-dose vaccinated managed to reach a
shocking mortality rate of 106 per 100,000 person-years in the same month.
For the remaining months, unvaccinated teens and young
adults mortality rate remained within the 20-something per 100,000
person-years. Whereas four-dose vaccinated teens and young adults’ mortality
rates only went as low as 80.9 per 100,00 in April and remained within 85 to
106 per 100,000 for the remaining months.
Moreover, the mortality rate for one-dose COVID-19
Vaccinated Adults aged 40 to 49 shows a 185% higher risk of death than those
unvaccinated within the same age group.
Chart Mortality Rate Ages 40 - 49 One-DOSE Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed UK Govt (THE EXPOSÉ Photo) SOURCE-Excel Doc from UK ONS Download
While the mortality rate for four-dose COVID-19
COVID-19-vaccinated adults aged 40 to 49 shows a 104% higher risk of death than
those unvaccinated within the same age group.
Chart Mortality Rate Ages 40 - 49 4-DOSE Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed UK Govt (THE EXPOSÉ Photo) SOURCE-Excel Doc from UK ONS Download
Both one-dose and four-dose vaccinated adults aged 40-49
were significantly more likely to die than unvaccinated adults of the same age
every single month since the beginning of 2023.
January was the worst month for both vaccinated groups as a
mortality rate per 100,000 of 411.3 was recorded among the one-dose vaccinated
and a mortality rate of 258.5 per 100,000 was recorded among the four-dose
vaccinated.
Whereas a mortality rate of just 144.5 per 100,000 was
recorded among the unvaccinated.
Chart Mortality Rate Ages 40 - 49 One-DOSE, 4-DOSE Vaxxed & UnVaxxed UK Govt (THE EXPOSÉ Photo) SOURCE-Excel Doc from UK ONS Download
The January to May average mortality rates were 132.08 per
100,000 among the unvaccinated, 264.14 per 100,000 among the one-dose
vaccinated and 225.2 per 100,000 among the four-dose vaccinated. Meaning, on
average, over five months the one-dose vaccinated were 100% more likely to die
than the unvaccinated, and the four-dose vaccinated were 71% more likely to
die.
These startling statistics have led to rising concerns and
debates regarding the safety and long-term impacts of the COVID-19 vaccines.
The correlation between the increased mortality rates among the vaccinated and
Deagel’s prediction of a drastic population reduction presents a scenario that
is as concerning as it is controversial.
Unraveling the Truth Behind the Numbers
The emergence of such data inevitably leads to questions
about the nature of COVID-19 mRNA and viral-vector vaccines and their role in
public health.
While correlation does not necessarily imply causation,
these figures undeniably demand a thorough and unbiased investigation into the
vaccine’s impact on health and mortality.
The idea that COVID-19 vaccines could potentially increase
mortality and be harmful, as implied heavily by the official Government data,
adds a complex layer to the already heated debate surrounding vaccine efficacy
and safety.
Navigating a Path Forward
This scenario underscores the necessity for transparent,
rigorous scientific inquiry and open discourse. It challenges the global
community to look beyond the surface of public health policies and predictions,
urging a deeper understanding of their potential implications.
As we edge closer to 2025, the predictions of Deagel, though
shrouded in controversy, call for a vigilant examination of emerging health
trends and a critical assessment of our responses to global health crises.
In conclusion, while the correlation between the reported
increased mortality among the vaccinated and Deagel’s grim depopulation
forecast for 2025 remains a subject of intense debate and
scrutiny, it highlights a pivotal moment in our contemporary history.
It beckons us to navigate these complex times with a
balanced approach, grounded in scientific integrity and a commitment to
uncovering the truth.
And even if Deagel’s 2025 depopulation forecast turns out to
be largely overstated, we still have to worry about the fact that U.S. Centers for Disease
Control data officially confirms that COVID-19 vaccination can reduce your
lifespan by at least 24 years.
This means billions of people have been injected with a
poison that is killing them slowly.
SUPPORT
THE EXPOSÉ
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bill Gates Pushes Digital ID for Newborns in Kenya
October 31, 2023
Bill Gates Pushed Newborn Digital ID in Kenya (THE EXPOSÉ Photo)
Bill Gates is still pushing his digital ID programmes that
are essentially tools to that make “governments more efficient at what they are
already doing,” according to the Financial Times, “and can be used as a tool to
suppress or discriminate against certain citizens.” This time the Gates
development and rollout of a government-backed digital ID programme was
announced in Kenya after a recent series of “closed-door meetings” with
President Ruto. It includes a biometric
vaccination system for newborns to replace birth certificates
while also helping to track children from birth to 5 years old to ensure all
children receive their vaccines.
Michael Nevradakis says “We have to wake up many more folks
with truth from the non-conspiratorial trenches. The wireless devices that
folks are adamant they unequivocally require to count their steps, run their —
and their children’s — lives and homes, and keep them current with society are
the same devices from which society is already set up for
techno-totalitarianism.”
The following article was originally published in the
Defender by senior reporter Michael
Nevradakis, Ph.D.
Bill Gates Pushes Digital ID for Newborns in Kenya as
Critics Warn of Surveillance Risk
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is continuing its
global push to support government-backed digital
ID programs — this time setting its sights on Kenya, where it
will advise the government on that country’s “Maisha Namba” digital ID
initiative currently under development, Reclaim the Net reports.
According to the Kenyan
Daily Post, Gates’ role in assisting the Kenyan government in its
development and rollout of Maisha Namba was announced after a recent series of
“closed-door meetings” with Kenyan President William Ruto.
“The billionaire, who is known to champion GMO
[genetically modified organism] foods, has met Ruto in a series of
meetings since he came to power with most of the engagements shrouded in
secrecy,” the Kenyan Daily Post wrote.
“The deal will connect the government to key technical
experts and partners who will offer professional advice to guarantee a smooth
rollout,” Kenyans.co.ke
reports.
Alexis Hancock, director of engineering for the Electronic Frontier Foundation,
told The
Defender that such secrecy between governments and private
entities is common.
“Outside companies often pitch solutions to various
governments that they can solve their problem with their product,” she said.
“If governments are to implement this, the technology involved should be
allowed scrutiny by the people first before anything is deployed, and delayed
if it is not considered safe and equitable.”
According to Biometric Update, Maisha
Namba is “expected to address different challenges such as identifying
and authenticating citizens, safeguarding primary registration
documents such as birth certificates and national identity cards and improving
the management of social programmes and government operations.”
The identification number attached to Maisha Namba “will
also be used to register for government services, including education, health
insurance, tax and social security.”
But some experts said they believe the Maisha Namba program
has other, unannounced, aims. Dr. Wahome Ngare, chairman of the Kenya Catholic
Doctors Association, told The Defender that Maisha Namba will operate as a
vaccination tracking program.
“Maisha Namba — Kiswahili for ‘life number’ — is a biometric
vaccination system for newborns that will replace birth
certificates and help track children from birth to 5 years of age,” Ngare said.
“It will be used to monitor and ensure all children receive their vaccines.”
Ngare said the Maisha Namba trial was conducted between
February and March and is now being rolled out by the government, most likely
as part of Universal Health Coverage.
He attributed Gates’ involvement with Maisha Namba to the
involvement of entities such as Microsoft and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
Gavi says it “helps vaccinate almost half the
world’s children against deadly and debilitating infectious
diseases.” It was established in 1999, with the Gates Foundation as one of its
co-founders and one of its four permanent board members.
Gavi maintains a core partnership with UNICEF, the World
Bank and the World
Health Organization (WHO), which includes Gavi in its list of
“relevant
stakeholders.”
“On a deeper level and based on my understanding, Maisha
Namba and the Maisha card are part of the larger international ID2020
initiative, sponsored by Gates through Gavi and Microsoft and their
failed vaccine
passport,” he said.
“For this reason, the full value and pain of the digital ID
system will become known when the next
pandemic is announced by the World Health Organization,
especially if the International Health Regulations are adopted next year,”
Ngare added.
Ngare was referring to amendments to the existing International
Health Regulations, currently under negotiation by WHO members
alongside a proposed “pandemic treaty.”
The ID2020 Alliance previously
promoted the development
of digital ID and vaccine passports. Microsoft
is a founding member of the ID2020 Alliance, as are Gavi, the
Gates Foundation, the World Bank, Accenture and the Rockefeller
Foundation.
“If all goes according to plan, Bill Gates will not only
inject billions of Africans with his mRNA vaccines,” Ngare said. “He has
created a digital
ID system for governments around the world to ensure nobody
misses their vaccines and that those who refuse vaccination can be restricted
from traveling or from accessing government services.”
Gates supported biometric
digital ID initiatives around the world, including the first
such program, Aadhaar, launched in India in 2009. Aadhaar enrolled
over 99% of all Indian adults, linking them with many public
and private services. The program has generated controversy,
which Gates
has dismissed.
Other experts also expressed concerns similar to those of
Ngare. California-based privacy attorney Greg Glaser told
The Defender, “Vaccine passports were a test run for global biometric ID,”
adding:
“Biometric ID is to future dystopian society as batteries
are to your TV’s remote control. Without the batteries, the remote control does
nothing. Without biometric ID, dystopian technology fails: social
credit scores, central
bank digital currencies [CBDCs],
smart devices in the Internet of Things.
“All of these are rendered useless without the ability to
integrate the masses into new technology systems through biometric
identification.”
According to Glaser, there is a larger purpose to such
efforts.
“Transhumanism is
the endgame, and biometric ID is its Achilles heel,” Glaser said. “All of these
things in our lives fundamentally depend on ID today: rights, citizenship
status, affiliations, standing in court, accounts, privileges, services, land
title and more. A person can hardly access any of the above without some form
of ID, mostly meaning name but often numbers, which are increasingly linked to
biometrics,” he said.
“Controlling people means controlling ID,” he added. “Even
national governments are now wholly dependent on their organizational and
corporate IDs.”
Similarly, Irene Polansky, a citizen who routinely
participates in the National
Call for Safe Technology hosted by Wired Broadband Inc.
and Virginians for Safe
Technology, told The Defender that COVID-19 was
“a beta (compliance) test for what’s to come,” and to be wary of the touted
benefits of new technologies such as digital ID.
“Otherwise, we — and our children’s lives and bodily
autonomies and innate rights — and our pieces of the planet, our properties and
our civil rights and our wallets — our hard-earned monies and financial means —
will be collectively and tyrannically coerced and devoured to our objection or
surprise,” she said.
Digital ID for newborns part of ‘vast opportunities’
Gates sees in Africa
Mark Suzman, CEO of the Gates Foundation, told Business
Daily Africa that his organization will connect the Kenyan
government with technical experts and partners.
“Our role is always as an adviser. We can connect the
government to key technical experts and partners, but we’re very encouraged by
what we see and by the President’s commitment. We have a number of specific
investment support on digital identity. We actually provide it to broader
platforms,” he said.
According to Business Daily Africa, such assistance to the
Kenyan government is part of what the Gates
Foundation sees as “vast opportunities that can be unlocked
through the existence of a digital identity in Kenya.”
“This is a huge priority of President Willam Ruto, and we
think very appropriately so because a strong, robust, open-source digital
identity system actually becomes a platform that not only leverages financial
inclusion, where Kenya is already a global leader, but can be a platform that
actually drives important advances in health care, in education and other
services,” Suzman said.
But the Gates Foundation is not the only global actor
involved in the rollout of Maisha Namba. According to Kenya’s Capital News, the
Kenyan government and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) signed
a memorandum
of understanding in August to support the fledgling digital ID
program.
According to Reclaim
the Net, “The plan envisages every newborn being assigned a Maisha
Namba, which stays with them throughout their life.” Nyandarua County Deputy
Commissioner Rukia Chitechi said, “The system shall be run through schools by
ensuring every child born is assigned a maisha
namba.”
Target
16.9 of the U.N.’s
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
calls for the provision of a digital legal identity for all, including
newborns, by 2030.
According to Glaser, “The UN’s
SDG Target 16.9 confirms that governments will be issuing
everyone biometric ID by the year 2030, including babies … That means the UN is
partnering with corporations and local governments to issue you and your
children a biometric ID by 2030, whether you want the IDs or not.”
In a tweet, Julius Kibet
Bitok, Kenya’s principal secretary for immigration and citizens
services, said, “The digital identity system will provide Kenyans with a secure
and reliable way to verify their identity for a variety of purposes, including
accessing gov’t services, opening bank accounts, and traveling.”
“It will also help to reduce fraud and corruption, and
improve efficiency,” he added.
Ngare questioned that theory. “On face value and if the
government is the holder of the data and not third parties such as Microsoft or
its minors, it may improve service delivery and reduce fraud as stated by
government operatives,” Ngare said, adding that he doubted this would be the
case.
Similarly, Hancock said, “If [digital ID is] done correctly,
a factor of convenience may benefit people from having to travel long distances
for renewing important documents, or issue temporary credentials as they await
their official documentation. There are other methods, like ‘selective
disclosure,’ where you do not have to display the entirety of your information
but only what is required for a certain transaction.”
Hancock said she was concerned about how a “long-term,
persistent identifier” could “be used to track people and create a surveillance
state or be compromised over time by a bad actor looking to leak information
tied to these unique identifiers.”
“Every time a digital ID holder uses their ID, there is an
opportunity for the ID issuer and the ID verifier to gather personal data about
the ID holder,” she added.
Concerns digital ID will lead to ‘permanent structure for
state-level surveillance’
According to Biometric Update, “As the government
seeks to win the trust and confidence of the population with
regard to the Maisha Card, it has also clarified that its issuance will not be
compulsory,” but will instead be accepted as proof of legal ID alongside
existing identification documents.
Yet, a separate Biometric
Update report states, “A two-to-three-year transition is
planned, with legacy national IDs being phased out.”
Hancock said she prefers “ephemeral IDs for transactions and
the ability to discard them or change them when they get compromised.” She is
“also concerned about mandates around digital ID and it possibly leading to a
permanent structure for state-level surveillance.”
“People should have the ability to opt-out of digital first
systems and a right to paper if they are not comfortable,” Hancock said.
Similar claims regarding optionality had been made about
India’s Aadhaar digital ID program, according
to The Economist, which wrote, “Though Aadhaar was supposed to be
optional, it is hard to function without it.”
The Kenyan government claims the implementation
of Maisha Namba is also intended to bring the country into
compliance with international
standards on global travel as determined by the International
Civil Aviation Organization and other agencies.
Maisha Namba is funded with a budget
of 1 billion Kenyan shillings (approximately $6.8 million),
Biometric Update reports. The program was initially set to launch on Oct. 2,
according to Business Daily Africa, but its rollout
was postponed on Sept. 29.
According to Reclaim the Net, Kenyan officials “stress that
the new system is aimed at addressing a host of issues such as the
authentication of citizens, protection of primary identification documents,
improved governance of social programs and operations, and simplification of
access to services such as healthcare, education, taxation, and social
security,” but public concerns may have contributed to the postponed launch.
“Despite these concerns, government officials have made
attempts to assure its citizens of their commitment to privacy
protection and the inclusivity promised by the Maisha Namba,”
Reclaim the Net added.
Glaser called into question such claims of “inclusivity.”
“‘Inclusivity’ is … a fake talking point politicians use on
camera,” he said. “The reality is that biometric ID brings everyone down to the
lowest common denominator of government welfare recipients … Inclusivity is
political-speak for the government forcing itself on your family and treating
your children like wards of the state.”
Glaser also criticized public-private partnerships. “As I
researched biometric ID, I learned that governments are not at the top of the
food chain. It’s actually private companies at the top — such as Microsoft,
Oracle, Accenture — because they create and own the technology and they manage
the data at the top.
Some Kenyans ‘very worried and suspicious’ of Gates’
endeavors in Kenya
Kenyan officials have sought to reassure the public that
their personal information would be safe on the new digital platform.
Kenyan National Registration Bureau Registrar for the
Kipipiri region, Joel Muchunu, said the Maisha Namba program will incorporate
advanced security features, including cryptographic technology for data
security, Kenya
News Agency reported.
Irungu Houghton, executive director of Amnesty
International, “applauded” the Maisha Namba program and the Kenyan government’s
digital transformation efforts, according
to Biometric Update, but “raised concerns about the safety of data
that will be collected for the Maisha Namba scheme” and said it is important
Kenyans are “comfortable they understand and are aware of the opportunities of
this digital platform.”
Such reassurances have not convinced all Kenyans, however.
According to Reclaim the Net, “There is an evident wave of skepticism,” with
activists from certain regions “expressing concerns about inadequate
infrastructure, unreliable network access, and privacy and civil liberties
concerns.”
Some activists argued that the Maisha Namba is
indistinguishable from a previous digital ID effort attempted by the Kenyan
government, the Huduma Namba, according to Kenyan outlet The
Star. That program was declared unconstitutional by Kenya’s
High Court in October 2021, for conflicting with the
country’s Data
Protection Act.
Ngare said Huduma Namba “failed because [the
government] intended
to include DNA.”
Other activist groups, led by the Kenyan Human Rights Commission, are
“calling for a stronger legislative basis” and “warn of the possibility of
discrimination and the erosion of privacy,” warning that public engagement has
been “lacking,” as have “procedural and legal safeguards,” Biometric
Update reported.
Other activists “accused the government of backtracking on
its promise to do away with vetting for persons seeking identification cards”
and claimed “rogue government officials were using the vetting exercise to
demand bribes,” according to The Star.
Kenyan
officials claimed the country “is lagging behind” in digital
implementation, “putting Kenya at risk of non-compliance with international
enforcement agencies’ standards.”
Ngare said the Kenyan public at large isn’t highly familiar
with Gates, but those who are familiar with him “are very worried and
suspicious.” He said there isn’t extensive opposition to Maisha Namba “because
at face value, it sounds like a good idea.”
“Most people don’t know the dark side of Bill Gates and his
link to the depopulation agenda,” he said. “To the beneficiaries of the NGOs
[non-governmental organizations] his foundation supports and some beneficiaries
of his philanthropy, he is admired. To those who know the deeper undertones of
the eugenics agenda, he is loathed.”
According to The
Financial Times, Gates “acknowledges that digital ID could be
abused,” saying that “Anything that makes the state more effective is good for
the things you like the state to do, and bad for the things you don’t like the
state to do.”
“But, if you believe in a state that should provide you
education and should let you vote and should give you health services, there’s
got to be some notion of, ‘Who are my citizens and are they eligible for this
benefit?’” he added.
Ngare said that Gates’ involvement with Maisha Namba is just
one of his many interests in Africa, having previously been involved with “The
clandestine administration of fertility
regulating Tetatus [sic] vaccines to Kenyan women in
2014-2015, facilitated by Gavi and the WHO,” which he says “is still fresh in
our minds.”
“He has many interests in Africa, including health and
nutrition, gender equality, disease prevention, treatment and research,
water, sanitation and hygiene, agriculture and financial services for the
poor,” Ngare said, adding that the Gates Foundation announced in 2022 that
its African
headquarters will be located in Kenya.
The Gates Foundation is also “spearheading the funding to fight HIV,
tuberculosis and malaria” in Africa, Ngare said, and is “injecting
more funds ‘to advance
access to mRNA research and vaccine manufacturing technology
that will support low- and middle-income countries’ … capacity to develop
high-quality, lifesaving vaccines at scale.”
“He is heavily invested in vaccine development, production
and distribution through Gavi … and makes the vaccines ‘available’ to
‘low-income countries’ at affordable or subsidized prices,” Ngare added. “The
U.S. and European governments fund the vaccine development that enriches the
developers and sponsors such as Gates.”
“Expanding the mRNA technology to tuberculosis, malaria and
HIV would afford Gates an opportunity to develop vaccines specifically targeted
at Africans,” Ngare said.
Kenyan author Nanjala Nyabola, author of “Digital
Democracy, Analogue Politics: How the Internet Era is Transforming
Politics in Kenya,” said “Digital identity systems will only make governments
more efficient at what they are already doing,” according to The Financial
Times, adding that digital IDs could be used as a tool to suppress or
discriminate against certain citizens.
Polansky said digital ID technology helps facilitate “a
centralized, government- and corporate-accessible database network already
built into the wireless network.”
“We have to wake up many more folks with truth from the
non-conspiratorial trenches. The wireless devices that folks are adamant they
unequivocally require to count their steps, run their — and their children’s —
lives and homes, and keep them current with society are the same devices from
which society is already set up for techno-totalitarianism.”
Source Michael
Nevradakis, Ph.D. senior reporter for The Defender
THE EXPOSÉ HOMEPAGE
SUPPORT
THE EXPOSÉ
No comments:
Post a Comment