John R. Houk, Blog Editor
September 21, 2023
When you hear or see this terminology on TV or some form of
digital print: “Trust the science” or “Safe and Effective”. The
odds are you are witnessing brainwash lies being jammed down your thought
processes! BELOW ARE A COUPLE OF
CRITICAL THINKING SCIENCE shares that I pray leads you to reject science brainwashing.
Particularly in regard to mRNA Jab science.
JRH 9/21/23
READER SUPPORTED!
Thank you to those who have stepped up! I
need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100.
PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for
Liberty:
YOU
CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen,
vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my wife’s Online store: My Store
(please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is
pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
***********************
90% of “COVID” deaths in past year occurred in fully or
triple vaccinated individuals
Natural News Telegram Photo
September 20, 2023 5:05:50 PM
Post Link: https://t.me/NaturalNewsMedia/4971
The latest data out of England shows that a whopping nine
out of 10 Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths in the past year occurred in
people who were fully, or triple, "vaccinated."
An astounding 91 percent of all COVID deaths in the United
Kingdom since the beginning of 2022 occurred in people whom the government
promised were "protected" against the Fauci Flu. Even worse, 94
percent of all COVID deaths since April 2022 have been in the fully jabbed.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS), a UK government
agency, published a dataset on July 6 of this year covering deaths based on
vaccination status up to May 31, 2022. Entitled "Deaths by Vaccination
Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022," the document unpacks what
many of us have long known: that the jabs are death jabs, not healing jabs.
If you want to live, DON'T get jabbed for COVID
The worst month up until now for deaths occurring in the
fully jabbed was January 2022, during which 3,914 COVID deaths were recorded
among the fully jabbed compared to just 693 deaths among the unvaccinated.
Comparatively, June 2021 saw the lowest number of fully jabbed deaths with just
224.
"However, the lowest number of deaths among the
unvaccinated population occurred in May 2022, with 82 deaths," explains The
Exposé, which closely tracks ONS data.
"For context, the vaccinated population recorded 1,282
deaths during the same month. This means the vaccinated accounted for 94% of
all Covid-19 deaths during the most recent month."
All in all, there were 29,915 COVID deaths recorded in
England between June 2021 and the end of May 2022. Of this, 25,280 deaths
occurred in the fully jabbed population while the remaining 4,635 deaths
occurred in the non-jabbed.
"This means the fully vaccinated population have
accounted for 85% / 9 in every 10 Covid-19 deaths over the past twelve
months," The Exposé explains.
What is worse, the Winter 2022 "booster" shot
campaign only made things worse. Instead of alleviating the huge number of
deaths occurring among the fully jabbed, the boosters only increased the number
of fully jabbed deaths.
"Overall, there were 15,113 Covid-19 deaths by 31st May
2022, and a shocking 13,666 of those deaths were among the vaccinated
population," The Exposé reports. "But what's even more
shocking than this is that 12,442 of those deaths were among the triple /
quadruple vaccinated population."
"This means the triple / quadruple vaccinated
population have accounted for a frightening 91% of all Covid-19 deaths among
the vaccinated since the beginning of 2022."
The fourth "booster" shot that was released in the
UK this past spring is only further driving the fully jabbed death rate. In
short, the more COVID jabs a person takes, the greater his or her likelihood of
succumbing to death by "COVID."
Recognizing that the data shows all this, the ONS has become
increasingly quieter with its data releases. One of the most recent data drops
shows that 94 percent of all COVID deaths in April and May 2022 occurred in
those who had taken all available COVID jabs.
"These aren't the kind of figures you would expect to
see if the Covid-19 injections really are up to 95% effective at preventing
death, are they?" The Exposé asks. "With news like this being swept
under the rug by the mainstream media, it makes you wonder what else you are
not being told."
In the comments at Natural News, one of our own added that
all of this is why Pfizer wanted to hide its clinical trial data – or lack
thereof – for many decades.
"They knew all along," this person wrote.
"And yes, the government was complicit. The jab never should have been
released."
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
++++++++++++++++++++
35,618,602 Victims Dead From the Covid-19 Vaccine. Is
This a Genocide Yet?
Some VAERS URF philosophical debates...
Posted by WELCOMETHEEAGLE88
SEP 20, 2023
VAERSAware.com
- WelcomeTheEagle88
This analysis is based on the VAERS Under Reporting Factor
(URF) study known as the 2010
Harvard Pilgrim Study aka The Lazarus Report. It is very
interesting that immediately after this study was published, CDC made a
gargantuan change to VAERS where “Only primary/Initial reports are
published”. It’s very important to understand this Harvard Pilgrim
Study did not have to contend with this paradigm shift we deal with today.
What’s worse, it seems like most of our so called experts do not even recognize
this paradigm shift even exists?
I want to be exact as I can on what this actually means and
what the VAERS system was doing prior to 2011 with respects to adding follow-up
data. Exactly speaking VAERS would append follow-up data to initial reports.
They would NOT delete initial reports to add or create a new appended report
with a different VAERS ID#. I will mention that Dr. Jessica Rose in her Oct
2021 Critical Appraisal of VAERS Pharmacovigilance - IPAK paper seems
to believe that VAERS deletes reports to then add new info/report when a victim
subsequently dies? I don’t know if she still feels this way or if I even
understand here paper correctly? I did a critical appraisal of her critical
appraisal here, just click the image [Blog Editor: Probably because Substack
does not embed Bitchute, the video link was embedded in the photo. Other than
my Substack page, I’m embedding the video itself]:
Photo
to VIDEO: THE EAGLE'S
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF A VAERS CRITICAL APPRAISAL
Bitchute VIDEO: THE EAGLE'S CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF A VAERS CRITICAL APPRAISAL - IRON SHARPENS IRON
[Posted by welcometheeagle88
First Published June 16th, 2022 23:32
UTC
So any who, here is the up close print where CDC tells us
five times that only initial reports are published, contrary to Dr. Rose’s
opinion.
I wonder how many victims are now since DEAD, but were alive
when reports were submitted? How many reports started out as Office Visit or
Emergency, but are now a seemingly permanent disabilities in reality? I know
many people in react19.org who would now like their reports upgraded to serious
or permanent. God bless them but that won’t happen. It’s super super rare.
So what do you think, do you think we can take the almost
18K dead and double the count based the information available? Do you think any
hospital CEO’s got a Fauci memo stating if you must file a VAERS report, at
least make sure the victim has a heartbeat when you hit the submit button?
Brain dead people are still alive so you don’t need to report them dead
anyways.
I have also studied the pre-2011 VAERS reports and explained
the data “addendum” process here.:
VAERS
biggest paradigm shift in 2011 everyone missed!
WELCOMETHEEAGLE88
· APR 13
Substack ScreenGrab to “VAERS biggest paradigm shift in 2011 everyone missed!”
I probably said this in one
hundred of my five hundred Bitchute videos, but who’s counting? I guess I will
bury this factoid here and wait for a celebrity analyst freedom fighter to
catch on. So check out blurb #4: “Since January 2011, only primary reports are
included in the data.” -- Read
full story
Doubling the death stats, based on the paradigm shift of
2011 is still conservative even before we begin attempting to calculate a URF
for the following reasons.
1. There is still about ~50
clearly dead victims per the summary narrative, because the “died” box is not
checked off. See
Here.
2. There is at least 100-150
Covid vax deaths in the UNKNOWN VAX TYPE. The clue is in the lot# and/or the
summary narrative.
3. The bundled deaths on one
report. There is as many 1,500-2,000 more deaths if we could ethically
unbundle.
4. ~1,400 fetal demise,
stillborns, spontaneous aborts, etc.. but NOT classified as death. Kids in the
womb is a big debate, kids out the vag canal for a month are struggling to be
counted as a person, and pretty soon you might not be counted as a person if
you haven’t grown pubic hairs or hair on your chest. Seems like they want to
abort everybody?
.jpg)
VAERS Data 9/8/23 (Table 2)
5. By CDC’s own admission VAERS
had received 19,476 DEATH reports by March 1, 2023 when they stopped making
these alerts:
.jpg)
VAERS Data 9/823 (Table 3)
Conclusions:
I conservatively doubled Kirsch’s 41x for all the reasons
listed above but for shits and giggles (nobody is laughing) let’s extrapolate
this 19,476 deaths up to March 1.
What if we apply a URF of 88x instead of 82x to 19,476 CDC’s
March 1st benchmark? From here forward I want the world to know this as The
Eagle’s URF based on doubling Kirsch’s URF and adding a few points to
compensate for the Tom Foolery the troglodytes at CDC are pulling with these
Vegas card tricks.
41,456,009 Extrapolated VAERS Dead
God Bless. Please support The Eagle!
© 2023 WelcomeTheEagle88
VAERSAware.com -
WelcomeTheEagle88 HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT
VAERSAware.com - WelcomeTheEagle88
No comments:
Post a Comment