Posted by John R. Houk, Blog Editor
Posted July 25, 2023
Two-shares today.
The first is a Rumble video that is essentially a
1:49-minute campaign video (7/24/23)
for the actual President Donald Trump. The video is full of brief truth about
Deep State political persecution, I must share!
The second share is Dr. Joseph Mercola (7/25/23)
mounting an effective defense AGAINST the Dem-Marxist false claims of
Antisemitism smeared against Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. for simply sharing the
facts in a research paper showing COVID was more susceptible to Caucasians and people
of an African-heritage than Ashkenazi Jews, Chinese and Finns. The Dem-Marxist
were so intent on labeling RFK, Jr. a Jew-Hater, I think they forgot to call
him a racist against people of Chinese and Finnish descent. SO FULL of hypocrisy
those Dem-Marxists are (perhaps something fictional character Yoda would
have said)! Dr. Mercola opens the post with a 3:38-minute video of Rabbi Shmuley
Boteach (Bios from: ABOUT PAGE,
Wikipedia
& Wikiwand)
defending RFK, Jr.
IN FULL DISCLOSURE: I admire the RFK, Jr. stand against
Medical Tyranny, BUT HE IS RUNNING AS A DEM. Compared to today’s
Dem-Marxists, RFK, Jr. might be a moderate; NEVERTHELESS he still supports a
host of old Dem-Party talking points. As such – THE ONLY WAY I’ll ever
for a Dem is without my knowledge probably when already dead without consent
from the grave.
JRH 7/25/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is
appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen,
vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my wife’s Online store: My
Store (please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is
pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
**********************
Rumble VIDEO: If
I were the Deep State…
Posted by Lauren3ve
Published July 24, 2023
With Bad Carma & MAGADevilDog
++++++++++++++++++
Was COVID a Bioweapon That Targets Certain Races?
Racial Bioweapon [Photo from Mercola.com HOMEPAGE and nor original post page]
Analysis by Dr. Joseph
Mercola
July 25, 2023
Rumble VIDEO: Rabbi
Shmuley & Kennedy On NYPOST Smear
[Posted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Published July 17, 2023
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Ø According
to mainstream media, Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently made
claims about COVID-19 being an ethnically targeted bioweapon. That is false
Ø Kennedy
was discussing the threat posed by bioweapons development, and the need to
regulate this kind of research and “resuscitate” the 1972 international
bioweapons charter that forbids most of it
Ø Kennedy
cited a 2020 scientific paper, which found that ethnic Chinese, Finns, and
Ashkenazi Jews were the least susceptible to COVID-19, while people of African
descent and Caucasians were the most susceptible, due to ACE2 and TMPRSS2
polymorphism variations
Ø Because
we now have synthetic biology and a wide variety of genetic engineering
techniques, there’s a whole new retinue of bioweapons, and among the most
heinous are bioweapons that target specific ethnicities
Ø While
evidence from official sources are scant, high-level individuals insist that
race-specific bioweapons development is already underway, in one country or
another, and/or that ethnic-specific bioweapons may already exist
According to mainstream media, Presidential candidate Robert
F. Kennedy Jr. recently made claims about COVID-19 being an ethnically targeted
bioweapon. Yahoo! News,1 for example, reported that “Robert F.
Kennedy Jr. baselessly claimed COVID-19 may have been ‘ethnically targeted’ ...
He said Caucasians and black people were most susceptible, and Ashkenazi Jews
and Chinese people were most immune.”
The New York Post claimed “RKF Jr. Says COVID May Have Been
‘Ethnically Targeted’ to Spare Jews.”2
According to Yahoo! News, Kennedy “did not cite any specific
sources,” but this whole story turns out to be wrong. Kennedy was in fact
citing a very specific scientific paper, and his comments about that paper were
then taken out of context.
‘Wild Claims’ Taken Out of Context
Kennedy’s comments, which have been taken out of context by
mainstream media to paint him as an anti-Semite, were made during a July 13,
2023, after-hours campaign dinner at an Upper East Side restaurant.3,4 In
a July 17, 2023, Instagram video,5 Kennedy tried to set
straight “the inaccurate distortion” of his comments.
As explained by Kennedy, he was discussing the threat posed
by bioweapons development, which is being done by the U.S., China, Russia and
many other countries, and the urgent need to regulate this kind of research and
“resuscitate” the 1972 international bioweapons charter (the Convention on the
Prohibition of Biological Weapons,6,7 which took effect in
March 1975) that forbids much of this research.
Because we now have synthetic biology and a wide variety of
genetic engineering techniques, “there’s a whole new retinue and generation of
bioweapons,” Kennedy said in his Instagram reply, “and among the worst of those
are bioweapons that target ethnicities.”
Research Has Identified Genetic Predispositions to COVID
During the dinner in question, Kennedy cited a July 2020
study8 in BMC Medicine, which reported that, based on ACE2 and
TMPRSS2 polymorphism analysis, certain races, as well as people with certain
diseases, are more susceptible to COVID-19. As noted in that paper:9
“We found unique genetic
susceptibility across different populations in ACE2 and TMPRSS2. Specifically,
ACE2 polymorphisms were found to be associated with cardiovascular and
pulmonary conditions by altering the angiotensinogen-ACE2 interactions, such as
p.Arg514Gly in the African/African-American population.
Unique but prevalent
polymorphisms ... in TMPRSS2, offer potential explanations for differential
genetic susceptibility to COVID-19 as well as for risk factors, including those
with cancer and the high-risk group of male patients.”
In his Instagram rebuttal, Kennedy explained that, according
to this study, ethnic Chinese, Finns, and Ashkenazi Jews were the least
susceptible to COVID-19, while people of African descent and Caucasians were
the most susceptible.
“This is not a controversial study,” Kennedy
said. “Nobody has suggested that these were deliberately engineered
changes. And I certainly don’t believe that they were deliberately engineered.
But what they are is kind of a
proof of concept, that you CAN develop bioweapons that will attack certain
ethnicities, and this should be terrifying to all of us ... and [needs to be]
an object of discussion.”
Genetic susceptibilities to COVID-19 were also reviewed in a
March 2021 paper10 in the Annals of Laboratory Medicine. As
noted by Kennedy in his Instagram rebuttal, throughout history, powerful
individuals have sought to eliminate certain races or ethnicities, and
current-day bioweapons give them the ability to do that very efficiently.
For this reason, gain-of-function research and bioweapons
development must be guided by robust regulations and oversight. THAT was the
take-home point he was making during that dinner.
‘Disgusting Fabrication’
In a July 16, 2023, Twitter post, Kennedy wrote:11
“The insinuation by @nypost and
others that, as a result of my quoting a peer-reviewed paper on bio-weapons, I
am somehow antisemitic, is a disgusting fabrication ...
My father and my uncles, John F.
Kennedy and Senator Edward Kennedy, devoted enormous political energies during
their careers to supporting Israel and fighting antisemitism. I intend to spend
my political career making those family causes my priority.
I will fight relentlessly
alongside my Jewish brothers and sisters and friends against Jew-hatred and the
demonization of Israel. I have just recorded an interview with @RabbiShmuley,
whom the same New York Post just this month called, ‘the most famous Rabbi in
America.’
I have called upon the Biden
Administration not to consummate a second Iran deal that would give that
genocidal government a legitimized nuclear program. In the same interview, I
called upon the Democratic Party to return to the strong, unconditional support
of Israel that was the hallmark of the party under the leadership of my uncle
and my father.
Today I had a great conversation
with Rabbi Shmuley on Judaism and anti-Semitism. He had this to say: ‘Two
things bothered me about the reports I had read about what you had said at that
dinner on the upper east side. I said number one, again, this perception that
you’re anti-Semitic. I know you’re not.
And in fact, I know precisely
the opposite is true. I know that in your heart you feel a great closeness to
the Jewish people, to the Jewish community, and to Israel. And the second thing
that bothered me is, that you’re being portrayed as you said before, a crank,
as a loony toon … but you’re brilliant. You know your facts.’”
A Harbinger of Smears to Come
Is it possible that Kennedy’s pro-Israeli stance might in
fact be one of the reasons why the Deep State-shackled media try so hard to
smear him as an anti-Semite? Maybe, maybe not. What we do know is that Kennedy
poses a serious threat to more than a few corrupt institutions, and they’re
willing to use just about any smear tactic available, even if it makes no
sense. As noted by Roger Simon in The Epoch Times:12
“This isn’t, in the end, really
about anti-Semitism, real or imagined. It was just low-hanging fruit ... a
harbinger of many dastardly smears of the candidate to come.
If there’s one thing the
military-industrial complex (endless wars from Iraq to Ukraine) and the health
care-industrial complex (Big Pharma, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
et al.) do not want, it’s a Robert F. Kennedy Jr. presidency.
Big Tech probably isn’t very
keen on it, either. It would cost them all incalculable amounts of money, much
of it courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer and a complaisant government.
Most of all, the current
leadership of the Democratic Party — bent on exploiting every so-called
progressive policy, no matter how looney, for maximum gain and power — don’t
want anyone bringing their party back to sanity, under the leadership of Mr.
Kennedy or anyone else.”
Race-Specific Bioweapons Are a Reality
Getting back to Kennedy’s main point, there’s ample evidence
showing we have the ability to create race-specific or ethnicity-specific
bioweapons, and history tells us that race-specific targeting in war is nothing
new. This is precisely why we need to rein in this mad science.
As noted in a September 2000 report by The Project for the
New American Century, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,”13 “advanced
forms of biological warfare that can ‘target’ specific genotypes may transform
biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.”
In other words, if a particular race or ethnic group becomes
politically troublesome, an ethnic-based bioweapon could suddenly become a
“useful political tool” to restore order or power.
“Kennedy
is not saying that COVID-19 was an intentionally created race-specific
bioweapon. He merely pointed out research showing that different races did have
varying levels of susceptibility to it, and that race-specific or gene-specific
bioweapons are, in fact, in the works around the world — and must be stopped.”
Fast-forward to August 2019, and Cambridge University’s
Centre for the Study of Existential Risk warned humanity is unprepared for the
emergence of race-specific bioweapons. As reported by The Guardian:14
“Scientists warn that humans
should be worried about being wiped out by a killer pathogen that is
specifically designed to kill people of only a particular race, based on their
genetic material/ Deoxy ribonucleic Acid (DNA).
A new report from Cambridge
University’s Centre for the Study of Existential Risk says that world
governments have failed when it comes to preparing against threats like
futuristic bioweapons powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and genetic
manipulation. Such weapons would have to power to target specific DNA, and kill
certain races of people leaving other swaths of the population unharmed ...
The authors warn: ‘The
technology is becoming increasingly sophisticated at ever cheaper prices,
democratizing the ability to harm more quickly and lethally. In a particularly
bad case, a bioweapon could be built to target a specific ethnic group based on
its genomic profile.’”
According to The Guardian, an estimated 16 to 20 countries
have known biological warfare programs, but well over 100 have the capacity to
make bioweapons. Making matters more difficult, most labs are “dual use,”
meaning the work they do have both defensive and offensive uses, and there’s no
hard distinction between the two.
Genetic Data Collection Poses Serious Threat
Two years later, in July 2021, Dr. P.S. Venkatesh Rao, a
consultant endocrine, breast and laparoscopic surgeon, published an article15 in
The Sunday Guardian, warning that global genetic data collection, artificial
intelligence and genetic engineering techniques currently available allow for
the creation of race-specific bioweapons. He wrote, in part:16
“Global collection of genetic
data and genetic manipulation of humans, animals, plants, destructive insects
and deadly microbes is of dual use from bio-welfare to bio-warfare ...
It has become ridiculously
simple and cheap to misuse data and gene altering and synthesizing tools, as
simple as the use of an ordinary computer and a 3D printer. Big data,
artificial intelligence and gene synthesis are being misused to create racially
specific bioweapons ...
The International HapMap Project
of 2002 to 2010 developed a human genome map and provided a massive genotype
data from Caucasian, African and Asian population samples. Many differences in
susceptibility to some diseases, and response to certain drugs between
different ethnic groups were reported in a 2015 study in BMC Genomics.
Multiple reports in scientific
journals in 2016 such as in Oncotarget, in Cell and from Pasteur Institute in
Paris, found differences in antibody responses and cellular immunity between
those of African ancestry and Caucasians.
Those of African ancestry had a
stronger inflammatory response and immune overreaction like cytokine storm and
autoimmune diseases. Genetic differences affecting the immune system led to
racial differences in the response to infections, drugs and vaccines.
In a pandemic, racial
differences exist in mortality rates and vaccine efficacy and complications.
Genetic data from blood samples about racial differences can be used for
racially targeted biowarfare.”
China Accuses Pentagon of Making Race-Specific Bioweapons
Fast-forward yet again, to May 2023, and Newsweek reported17 that
a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry had accused the U.S. Pentagon
of creating “race-specific bioweapons.” The spokesperson, Wang Wenbin, told
reporters:18,19,20
“The U.S. widely collects and
uses genomic information. According to The Wall Street Journal, the Pentagon
has formulated R&D plans for hitting opponents with genetically engineered
weapons. Those involved disclosed that the genomic data of Asian Chinese,
European Aryans and Middle Eastern Arabs are all being collected by the U.S.
military.
According to the website of
Russia-based RT, the U.S. Air Education and Training Command (AETC) once issued
a tender seeking to acquire samples of ribonucleic acid (RNA) and synovial
fluid from Russians. It’s pretty clear who exactly is using genomic information
for secret purposes.”
Wenbin’s accusation came one day after U.S. Secretary of
State Antony Blinken accused China of collecting the genomic data of ethnic
minorities such as the Uyghurs in Xinjiang for the purposes of control and
surveillance.
A senior Pentagon official denied Wenbin’s allegation and
Newsweek was reportedly unable to locate The Wall Street Journal article cited
by Wenbin. I’ve had no luck locating it either. Whatever the truth may be,
there’s no doubt that race-specific bioweapons CAN be created though. We
certainly have the technologies required.
Do Ethnic-Specific Bioweapons Already Exist?
While evidence from official sources is scant — Blinken’s
and Wenbin’s mutual accusations notwithstanding — Kennedy and many others
insist that race-specific bioweapons are in active development, and some may
even exist already. In a June 20, 2023, appearance on Newsmax, Kennedy told On
the Record host Greta Van Susteren:21,22
“We know that the Chinese are
developing ethnic bioweapons. Bioweapons that are designed to attack people of
certain racial types. And we’re doing the same thing. We’ve been collecting
Chinese DNA. We’ve been collecting Russian DNA specifically for that. [This]
arms race is a catastrophe.”
Rumble VIDEO: RFK
JR - Says Ethnic Bioweapons that Target Specific Races Have been Developed
[Posted by MJTruth
Published June 6, 2023
Kennedy made the same claim in a June 5, 2023, live Twitter
discussion with Elon Musk, Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, venture capitalist
David Sacks, investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger and securities
attorney Omeed Malik (video above).
Ethic-specific bioweapons have already been developed,
Kennedy said, and exist in labs around the world. The Epoch Times also insists
that claims of China developing race-specific bioweapons are true (video
below).
Youtube VIDEO: China’s
New DNA-Based Bioweapons Target Specific Ethnic Groups, Races | Trailer | Facts
Matter
[Posted by The Epoch Times
Posted on Mar 21, 2023
Watch the full episode: https://ept.ms/DNABasedWeaponsRM
In an April 3, 2023, Wall Street Journal opinion piece,23 Paul
Dabbar, undersecretary of energy for science during the Trump administration,
also underscored this threat, writing, in part:24
“Around 2017, the Energy
Department’s national laboratories started having significant concerns about
biosecurity with regard to China. A Chinese general who was head of the
National Defense University in Beijing publicly declared an interest in using
gene sequencing and editing to develop pathogenic bioweapons that would target
specific ethnic groups ...
Taking note, the Commerce
Department ordered export restrictions of potentially dangerous biotechnology
to China. But the NIH and NIAID refused to believe that there was any risk
involved in collaborating with Chinese labs. Their indiscriminate commitment to
open science blinds them to threats, even when a country like China is open
about its intentions.”
Next-Gen Warfare Will Target Genes
The Chinese general in question is Zhang Shibo, who in 2017
published “New Highland of War,”25 a war manual of sorts that
discussed “new domains of warfare,” one being biology.
In the book, Shibo concluded that “Modern biotechnology
development is gradually showing strong signs characteristic of an offensive
capability,” including the possibility of “specific ethnic genetic attacks.”26
The same terms, “specific ethnic genetic attacks” can be
found in the People’s Liberation Army’s textbook, “Science of Military
Strategy,” also published in 2017. It too looks at biology as a military domain
and mentions that biological warfare may eventually include race-specific,
gene-based weapons.27
In June 2021, biosecurity specialist Michael Knutzen, a
former Army intelligence officer and a Presidential Management Fellow at the
Department of Homeland Security, wrote:28
“The COVID-19 pandemic has
revealed critical weaknesses in the human domain of warfare at just the moment
technology has emerged that gives bad actors new power to exploit those
weaknesses.
Developments in synthetic
biology will create next-generation bioweapons, ‘human-domain fires’ that will
fundamentally change the strategic environment ... Recent developments in
synthetic biology ... pose a profound threat ... Of those dangers,
next-generation bioweapons are the most serious ...
One threat that was once the
stuff of science fiction may soon become real. Some researchers (including
Lieutenant General Zhang Shibo, former president of the PLA National Defense
University) foresee the possibility of ‘specific ethnic genetic attacks’ on
whole racial or ethnic groups ...
And China may already have
hacked from medical records or purchased the genetic information of millions of
ordinary Americans through genealogical companies such as 23andme.
Bill Evanina, former director of
the National Counterintelligence and Security Center, warned against Beijing
Genomics Institute–linked COVID-19 tests, noting: ‘Foreign powers can collect,
store and exploit biometric information from COVID tests.’
Potential SBW effects include
not only incapacitation and death, but also boutique outcomes. Colonel Guo
emphasizes that ‘learning, memorizing ... and even the ‘bellicose character’
can be injured precisely without a threat to life’ ...
The ability to remotely hold a
person’s biology hostage — through degenerative, frustrating, or simply
embarrassing symptoms — but promising a personal cure (or enhancement) could
create enormous strategic leverage.”
We Must Protect the World From Targeted Bioweapons
In closing, Filippa Lentzos, associate professor in science
and international security at King’s College London, in December 2020 published
an essay in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, in which she discussed the
need to “protect the world from ultra-targeted biological weapons”:29
“As genomic technologies develop
and converge with AI, machine learning, automation, affective computing, and robotics,
an ever more refined record of our biometrics, emotions, and behaviors will be
captured and analyzed.
Governments and, increasingly,
private companies will be able to sort, categorize, trade, and use biological
data far more precisely than ever before, creating unprecedented possibilities
for social and biological control ...
These game-changing developments
will ... radically transform the dual-use nature of biological research,
medicine, and health care and create the possibility of novel biological
weapons that target particular groups of people and even individuals.
In the coming decade, managing
the fast and broad technological advances now under way will require new
governance structures that draw on individuals and groups with cross-sectoral
expertise — from business and academia to politics and defense — to identify
emerging security risks and make recommendations for dealing with them.”
This is essentially what Kennedy is calling for as well, but
he’s not content with recommendations alone. We need strict safeguards to
prevent one nation or another from obliterating entire ethnic groups from the
face of the earth.
We also need strict regulations to protect people’s genetic
data, seeing how such data can be used for global genocide. One loophole in the
Biological Weapons Convention is its “general purpose criterion,” which allows
most biological research as long as it’s for defensive or protective purposes.
As a result, the most hazardous biowarfare research in the
world is being conducted in the name of defense or vaccine research. And, as
noted by Lentzos, “Distinguishing permitted biodefense projects from those that
are prohibited is difficult; one cannot just assess the facilities, equipment,
material, and activities involved, but must also examine and interpret the
purpose, or intent, of those activities.”
Converging Risks
The fact that we need to start examining and interpreting
the purposes of biological research in earnest is quite clear. The escape of
SARS-CoV-2 from a biolab in Wuhan, China, highlights this need. We’re fortunate
that it wasn’t something with an exceptionally high mortality rate.
In her article, Lentzos reviews warnings about genetic
weapons issued by a wide variety of actors over the last three decades:30
“The possibility of ... ‘genetic
weapons’ was first discussed in the biological arms control community in the
1990s, as the Human Genome Project to map the full complement of human genes
got underway.
The UK government said ‘it
cannot be ruled out that information from such genetic research could be
considered for the design of weapons targeted against specific ethnic or racial
groups.’
The British Medical Association
cautioned that ‘the differential susceptibility of different populations to
various diseases’ had been considered in the past, and that ‘whilst we should
hope that genetic weapons are never developed, it would be a great mistake to
assume that they never can be, and therefore that we can safely afford to
ignore them as a future possibility.’
A report31 from
the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) spoke of the
potential for ‘future development of weapons of mass extermination which could
be used for genocide.’
Developments in genomic
technologies and other emerging technologies, especially machine and deep
learning, have spurred renewed concerns. ‘Access to millions of human genomes —
often with directly associated clinical data — means that bioinformaticists can
begin to map infection susceptibilities in specific populations,’ a recent report32 from
the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research warned.
A United Nations University
report,33 meanwhile, asserts that ‘deep learning may lead to
the identification of ‘precision maladies,’ which are the genetic functions
that code for vulnerabilities and interconnections between the immune system
and microbiome.
Using this form of
bio-intelligence, malicious actors could engineer pathogens that are tailored
to target mechanisms critical in the immune system or the microbiome of
specific subpopulations.’
A 2018 National Academies of
Sciences report34 suggests ‘[a]ctors may consider designing a
bioweapon to target particular subpopulations based on their genes or prior
exposure to vaccines, or even seek to suppress the immune system of victims to
‘prime’ a population for a subsequent attack.
These capabilities, which were
feared decades ago but never reached any plausible capability, may be made
increasingly feasible by the widespread availability of health and genomic
data.’”
A Blanket Ban Is the Safest Solution
Lentzos reviews many of the challenges involved in effective
oversight of potential bioweapons research. I, for one, believe we should opt
for the simplest solution, which would be to issue a blanket ban on all
gain-of-function research that involves equipping pathogens with novel
capacities.
As well as a blanket ban on all research that could be used
to develop a race-specific bioweapon, or a bioweapon intended to take out
people with a particular genetic makeup, regardless of how that target group is
defined.
We simply do not need this kind of research to live long,
fruitful, healthy lives. It’s unnecessary, and taxpayers should not be paying
for science that can result in their own demise.
Kennedy seems to be of like mind. As he stated in his June 5, 2023, live Twitter discussion, he wants to
see bioweapons development shut down worldwide. During a June 27, 2023, health policy roundtable discussion he
also promised to redirect federal grants away from infectious disease research
to study chronic disease instead, were he to gain the White House.
This would ensure that tax dollars are not siphoned into
biowarfare efforts veiled as vaccine research and the like. Scientists are
flocking into biowarfare research because that’s where the grants are, so we
need to turn off that tap and encourage scientists to engage in study that
leads us toward better health outcomes.
Again, to pull us full circle to where we started, Kennedy
is not saying that COVID-19 was an intentionally created race-specific bioweapon.
He merely pointed out research showing that different races did have varying
levels of susceptibility to it, and that race-specific or gene-specific
bioweapons are, in fact, in the works around the world — and must be stopped.
Sources and References
4, 12 Epoch Times July 17, 2023
5 Instagram
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. July 17, 2023
6 Convention on the Prohibition of Biological Weapons
8, 9 BMC Medicine
July 15, 2020; 18(1): 216
10 Annals
of Laboratory Medicine March 1, 2021; 41(2): 129-138
11 Twitter Robert F. Kennedy Jr. July 16, 2023
13 The Project for the New American Century, “Rebuilding America’s
Defenses” September 2000
14 The Guardian August 20, 2019
15, 16 The Sunday Guardian July 24, 2021
17, 19 Newsweek May 11, 2023
20 Twitter Spokesperson for China May 10, 2023
21 Rolling Stone June 20, 2023
22 Twitter Alicia Sadowski June 20, 2023
23, 24 Wall Street Journal April 3, 2023
25 Amazon.cn New
Highland of War
26, 27 National Review April 10, 2023
28 USNI.org June 2021; 147(6): 1420
29, 30 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists December 7, 2020
33 The New Geopolitics of Converging Risks
34 Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology 2018
© 1997-2023 Dr. Joseph Mercola.
All Rights Reserved.
Mercola.com HOMEPAGE
SUPPORT via Mercola
Market
No comments:
Post a Comment