John R. Houk, Blog Editor
May 25, 2023
I want to share two posts today that many may think are
unrelated but if you dive deep with your noggin, you’ll hopefully realize the
relationship is battling tyranny from corrupt governments trying to silence
individuals from truth telling - in one case – and the other case is about
governments being corrupted by the Elitist tyrannical few.
o Why
Prof Bhakdi's Court Ruling Will Empower The Great Freeset: Dear Prof
Bhakdi, we thank you for your strength, perseverance, love for the truth, and
language of compassion for life in all its forms; Posted by WCH - By Christof Plothe; World Council for Health
(Substack); 5/24/23
o The
Sinister Symphony Behind a Dystopian Agenda: Exploring the True
Origins of the Great Reset Agenda; By Lily; A Lily Bit (Substack);
5/24/23
JRH 5/25/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers
willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is
appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin
supplements/products, coffee from my Online store: My Store (please use referral
discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
***********************
Why Prof Bhakdi's Court Ruling Will Empower The Great
Freeset
Dear Prof Bhakdi, we thank you for your strength,
perseverance, love for the truth, and language of compassion for life in all
its forms.
Prof Bhakdi - Empowering Great Freeset
Posted by WORLD COUNCIL FOR HEALTH
By Christof Plothe DO, Steering Committee World
Council for Health
Yesterday, millions of people all over the world directed
their attention to a small courtroom in Germany. In it was a man who had dared
to question the saga of a so-called vaccine being the solution for a so-called
pandemic right from the beginning. His professional background would have been
enough to take his voice seriously.
Still, thousands of scientists and clinicians who warned of
a genetic experiment without proper testing on humanity were silenced, their
licenses withdrawn, or sent to prison.
Prof Dr Sucharit Bhakdi has always invited dialogue but
science, politics, and the media have refused to engage in an exchange.
Instead, humanity was thrown into fear, deactivating our rational frontal lobes
and falling back into instinctive but not reflective behavior by obeying one
solution for everybody on this planet—a concept the World Health Organization
wants to impose on all of us for any medical issue declared for plants,
animals, or humans in the future.
Prof Bhakdi was alleged to have violated German law by
downplaying the Holocaust, which in Germany is a crime that can be punished
with up to five years in prison. Interestingly, none of his scientific
conclusions on the danger of the injections was the topic of the trial.
Substack
Photo of WCH & Taylor Hudak Twitter Capture
Anyone who has personally encountered Prof Bhakdi knows that
his deep love for humanity excludes prejudice, hatred, or moral wrongdoing. The
accusations against him were taken entirely out of context, and the lawyers
admitted in the courtroom that they had failed to listen to the entire
interview, out of which a mere two sentences were taken to create the
accusations.
The motives around filing this court case remain mysterious,
but it was not based on facts. It seemed the ultimate attempt, after ongoing
public degradations, to silence an important global voice. But this attempt may
ultimately be a big mistake.
Countless doctors, nurses, and scientists have witnessed the
evident ineffectiveness and dangers of this medical experiment, the so-called
Covid-19 vaccine. While one year ago, many could have assumed benign but
ignorant motives to save humanity from a threat, we now know that with so many
significant safety signals showing serious risk, any other drug would have been
taken off the market immediately. But as the injections and, in some countries,
even mandates continue, we must question the real motives around this experiment.
More than one thousand studies prove the dangers of this
injection for pregnant women, fetuses, children, and all of us. Even the
findings of plasmid contamination in the vials and the potential
lifelong production of mRNA and toxic viral particles within our bodies
have not stopped these injections.
Unfortunately, rational arguments currently seem ineffective
in changing this crime's course. But Prof Dr Sucharit Bhakdi's court case has
seen millions worldwide lighting a candle for this brave man and creating a
field of compassion and truth. May all the voiceless people who did not
speak out in fear for their reputation and livelihood find encouragement.
Alistair Williams, the most censored comedian in the UK,
powerfully reminded us at the last WCH General Assembly Meeting: “Darkness is
nothing but the absence of light”.
Shortly before the court hearing, Prof Bhakdi said he was
probably the only person not nervous about the imminent
ruling. Let us all keep the vision of our future for our children and for all
of us as a clear and beautiful picture in our imagination. And Let us leave
fear and enter trust so that we can do so. Let us all feel inspired by entering
this trust and clarity.
Taylor Hudak
Twitter Capture of Bhakdi Judged Not Guilty (Substack
Photo)
Dear Prof Bhakdi, we thank you for your strength,
perseverance, love for the truth, and language of compassion for life in all
its forms. Using truth in combination with the language of our hearts is the
Better Way forward. The truth will prevail.
Together, let us be the light that guides our destiny.
© 2023 World Council for Health
SUPPORT/SUBSCRIBE
to WCH
+++++++++++++++++
The Sinister Symphony Behind a Dystopian Agenda
Exploring the True Origins of the Great Reset Agenda
By LILY
May 24, 2023
It is crucial to comprehend that Klaus Schwab's purported
Great Reset agenda, Fourth Industrial Revolution agenda, and his claim of
inventing Stakeholder Capitalism are not characterized by any truly novel or
original ideas. These concepts are not unique to Schwab, as they have been in
existence for quite some time.
In reality, Klaus Schwab can be regarded as a proficient
public relations agent who promotes a global technocratic agenda. This agenda
entails a consolidation of corporate power and government, including the United
Nations, leading to a corporatist unity. The origins of this agenda can be
traced back to the early 1970s, and even further.
The Davos Great Reset serves as an updated blueprint for a
global dystopian dictatorship, under the control of the United Nations, which
has been under development for decades. Key figures involved in its formulation
were David Rockefeller and his protégé, Maurice Strong.
.jpg)
Schwab-Panda (Lily Substack Photo)
The Club of Rome's Grand Delusion
During the early 1970s, it could be argued that few
individuals held greater influence in global politics than the late David
Rockefeller, who was predominantly recognized as the chairman of Chase
Manhattan Bank at the time.
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the circles closely
associated with David Rockefeller initiated an impressive array of exclusive
organizations and think tanks. Among them were The Club of Rome, The 1001: A
Nature Trust affiliated with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), the Stockholm
United Nations Earth Day conference, the influential MIT-authored study called
“Limits to Growth,” and David Rockefeller's renowned Trilateral Commission.
In 1968, David Rockefeller, along with Aurelio Peccei and
Alexander King, established The Club of Rome, a neo-Malthusian think tank.
Aurelio Peccei, a senior executive at the Fiat car company, which was owned by
the influential Agnelli family of Italy, played a key role in the organization.
Gianni Agnelli, a close friend of David Rockefeller and a member of the
International Advisory Committee of Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan Bank, had a
longstanding friendship with Rockefeller since 1957. Agnelli also became a founding
member of David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission in 1973. Alexander King,
the head of the OECD Science Program, also served as a consultant to NATO. This
marked the emergence of the neo-Malthusian “people pollute” movement.
In 1971, the Club of Rome released a controversial report
titled “Limits to Growth,” which made predictions about the potential collapse
of civilization due to rapid population growth and finite resources like oil.
However, the report was criticized for its flawed methodology. It suggested
that without significant changes in resource consumption, there would likely be
a sudden and uncontrollable decline in both population and industrial capacity.
“Limits to Growth,” relied on questionable computer
simulations conducted by a team of MIT computer scientists. It boldly predicted
that if the ongoing trends of population growth, industrialization, pollution,
food production, and resource depletion persisted without any changes, the
planet would reach its limits within the next century. This prediction was made
in 1971. In 1973, during Klaus Schwab's third annual Davos business leader
meeting, he extended
an invitation to Peccei to present the findings of “Limits to Growth” to a
gathering of corporate CEOs.
In 1974, the Club of Rome made a bold declaration stating,
“The Earth has cancer, and the cancer is Man.” They emphasized that the world
was confronting an unprecedented and interconnected set of global issues, including
overpopulation, food shortages, depletion of non-renewable resources (such as
oil), environmental degradation, and inadequate governance. They
argued that a “horizontal” restructuring of the global system was necessary.
According to their perspective, substantial changes in societal norms, values,
and goals were needed to address energy, food, and other crises. They believed
that social transformations and shifts in individual attitudes were essential
for facilitating the transition toward sustainable, organic growth.
In their 1974 report titled “Mankind at the Turning Point,”
The Club of Rome put forth the following argument: The increasing
interdependence among nations and regions necessitates a corresponding decrease
in independence. They asserted that nations cannot achieve interdependence
without relinquishing or recognizing the limits to their own independence. They
advocated for the development of a comprehensive master plan that would
encompass organic and sustainable growth, as well as global allocation of all
finite resources. Moreover, they called for the establishment of a new global
economic system. This early formulation presented ideas that later influenced
initiatives such as UN Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the 2020 Davos Great Reset.
The Oil Tycoon Turned Environmental Crusader
Playing a significant role in organizing Rockefeller's ‘zero
growth’ agenda during the early 1970s was Maurice Strong, a billionaire oil
tycoon and long-time friend of David Rockefeller.
Maurice Strong, a Canadian figure, played a crucial role in
promoting the scientifically flawed theory that human-induced CO2 emissions
from transportation, coal plants, and agriculture were causing a rapid and
escalating global temperature increase, commonly referred to as Global Warming.
As the chairman of the 1972 Earth Day UN Stockholm
Conference, Strong advocated for an agenda centered around population reduction
and the lowering of living standards worldwide in an effort to “preserve the
environment.”
Maurice Strong expressed his radical ecological agenda with
the following statement:
“Isn't the only hope for the
planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our
responsibility to bring that about?”
Interestingly, under the guise of a highly publicized global
pandemic, we were witnessing the realization of such intentions.
Covid-19
Implemented the Backbone of Technocracy — Climate Change will Help to Finalize
it
When COVID-19 came along, the
WEF took many of the outcomes it wished to achieve with climate change — less
driving and flying, narrative control, and track-and-trace digital surveillance
— and imposed them onto the pandemic response, so that the differences in
desired outcomes became almost indistinguishable. –Read Full
Story
It is noteworthy that Strong, despite his career and
substantial wealth amassed through oil exploitation, was chosen to lead a
significant United Nations initiative aimed at mobilizing environmental action.
This selection raises questions about the motivations and contradictions of
prominent figures like David Rockefeller, Robert O. Anderson of the Aspen
Institute, and John Loudon of Shell, who, despite their ties to oil, embraced
the cause of ecological purity.
Following his initial encounter with David Rockefeller in
1947, Maurice Strong, then eighteen years old, became intricately connected to
the Rockefeller family's network. Through his newfound friendship with David
Rockefeller, Strong obtained a significant position within the United Nations
under UN Treasurer Noah Monod. Notably, Rockefeller's Chase Bank conveniently
handled the UN's funds, exemplifying the “public-private partnership” model
that Strong would later employ, allowing for private gain derived from public
governance.
During the 1960s, Strong ascended to the presidency of Power
Corporation, a prominent energy conglomerate and oil company based in Montreal.
At that time, Power Corporation was owned by influential figure Paul Desmarais.
According to investigative researcher Elaine Dewar, Power Corporation allegedly
functioned as a political slush fund, financing the campaigns of specific
Canadian politicians, including Pierre Trudeau, the father of Justin Trudeau,
who is closely associated with Davos.
In 1971, Maurice Strong assumed the role of Undersecretary
of the United Nations in New York and was appointed as the Secretary General
for the upcoming United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, commonly
known as Earth Summit I, held in Stockholm, Sweden. It is worth noting that in
the same year, he became a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation, which
provided funding for the Stockholm Earth Day project initiated by Strong.
Additionally, during the Stockholm conference, the United Nations Environment
Program (UNEP) was established, with Strong appointed as its head.
In 1989, Strong was chosen by the UN Secretary General to
lead the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development, also known as Rio
Earth Summit II. During this conference, he played a significant role in the
development of the UN's “Sustainable Development” goals, resulting in the
creation of the Agenda 21 for Sustainable Development. This agenda serves as
the foundation of Klaus Schwab's Great Reset. Furthermore, Strong was
instrumental in establishing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
under the UN. It is worth mentioning that Strong also served as a board member
of the World Economic Forum and had facilitated Schwab's involvement as a key
advisor to the Rio Earth Summit.
During his tenure as Secretary General of the UN Rio
Conference, Maurice Strong commissioned a report titled “The First Global
Revolution” from the Club of Rome, with authorship attributed to Alexander
King. This report made a startling admission, suggesting that the claim of
CO2-induced global warming was essentially a contrived pretext to compel
societal transformation:
“The common enemy of humanity is
man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that
pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and similar
concerns would suffice. All these perils are caused by human intervention, and
it is only through altered attitudes and behaviors that we can overcome them.
Therefore, the true adversary is humanity itself."
This candid statement within the report raises questions
about the motivations and underlying agenda surrounding the climate change
narrative, implying that it may have been devised as a means to manipulate
public opinion and induce societal change rather than being solely based on
scientific evidence.
During the Rio Conference, President Clinton's delegate, Tim
Wirth, made a similar admission, acknowledging the strategic use of the global
warming issue. He stated:
“We have got to ride the global
warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing
the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”
At the Rio Conference, Maurice Strong introduced the concept
of a “sustainable society,” which was defined in relation to the arbitrary goal
of eliminating CO2 and other greenhouse gases. This notion laid the groundwork
for Agenda 21, which later evolved into Agenda 2030 in September 2015, in
Rome, with
the approval of the Pope. Agenda 2030
encompasses 17 “sustainable” goals. Among its declarations, it emphasizes:
“Land, because of its unique
nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlement, cannot be treated as
an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to market pressures
and inefficiencies. Private land ownership is also a significant factor in the
accumulation and concentration of wealth, contributing to social injustice…
Achieving social justice, urban renewal, and development, as well as providing
decent housing and favorable living conditions for the people, can only be
accomplished if land is used in the best interests of society as a whole.”
In essence, the idea advocated at Rio in 1992, where Maurice
Strong held the positions of chairman and General Secretary, was that private
land ownership should be transformed into a collective endeavor for the benefit
of “society as a whole.” This concept bears similarities to the notion of
socializing land that was prevalent during the days of the Soviet Union, and it
forms an integral part of the Davos Great Reset.
The Dire
Truth About Agenda 21
There’s a sinister plan
festering beneath the superficial quarrel about abortions, gender identities
and immigration. It is an inventory and control plan; inventory and control of
all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction,
all means of production, all food, all energy, all information and all human
beings in the world.… --Read Full
Story
During the conference, Strong made the following
declaration:
“It is evident that the current
lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class, which involve
high meat consumption, excessive reliance on frozen and convenience foods,
extensive use of fossil fuels, widespread use of appliances, air-conditioning
in homes and workplaces, and suburban housing, are not sustainable.”
This statement reflects Strong's perspective that the
consumption patterns and behaviors associated with a certain affluent middle
class lifestyle are deemed environmentally unsustainable and in need of change.
By that point, Maurice Strong had assumed a central role in
the transformation of the United Nations into a platform for implementing a new
global technocratic “paradigm” through covert means. Utilizing alarming
predictions of planetary extinction and global warming, Strong worked to merge
government agencies with corporate power, establishing an unelected control
over various aspects of society in the name of “sustainability.” In 1997, he
supervised the creation of The Global Diversity Assessment, an action plan
following the Earth Summit, which served as a blueprint for implementing the
Fourth Industrial Revolution. This assessment outlined how every resource on
the planet would be controlled and how this revolution would be achieved.
During this time, Strong held the position of co-chairman at
Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum in Davos. Following Strong's passing in
2015, Schwab, the founder of the Forum, expressed his deep regard for
Strong, describing
him as a mentor, a close friend, an invaluable advisor, and a longstanding
member of their Foundation Board.
Prior to his departure from the United Nations amidst an
Iraq Food-for-Oil corruption scandal, Maurice Strong held memberships in
various influential organizations, including the Club of Rome. He served as a
Trustee for the Aspen Institute, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rothschild
Foundation. Additionally, Strong held a directorship at the Temple of
Understanding, which operated under the name Lucifer Trust (also known as Lucis
Trust) and was located at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York
City. The “Temple of Understanding” was known for its pagan rituals, which
included the ceremonial blessing of sheep and cattle at the altar. It is worth
noting that Vice President Al Gore once delivered a sermon there, during which
worshippers marched to the altar with bowls of compost and worms.
In the shadows of secrecy and hidden agendas, a web of
powerful individuals and organizations have woven a sinister tapestry that
threatens the very fabric of our existence. From the manipulative maneuverings
of David Rockefeller to the devious orchestrations of Maurice Strong, a dark
origin emerges, casting a chilling pall over Klaus Schwab's Great Reset agenda.
Behind the grandiose promises of sustainability and progress
lies a malevolent plan, veiled in the guise of environmental stewardship. The
aspirations of a select few, driven by greed and control, seek to reshape our
world into a dystopian nightmare, where worms are praised as a culinary
solution and private property is stripped away.
Ordinary humans, billions of us, are regarded as mere pawns
in their sinister game, disposable in their pursuit of a global technocratic
order. The stage is set for a tragic showdown between the forces of freedom and
the relentless march of oppression.
As the truth unveils, we are left to question: Will we
succumb to this dark destiny, or will we rise against the shadows and reclaim
our autonomy, our dignity, and our very humanity? The choice is ours, for the
dramatic conclusion of this tale has yet to be written.
© 2023 Consolidated
Frontiers
A Lily Bit HOMEPAGE
SUPPORT/SUBSCRIBE
to A Lily Bit
No comments:
Post a Comment