John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© January 11, 2023
The tyranny Americans and citizens of the once Free World
Western nations now face has a twisted new look on the same old bad tasting
fruit. The “fruit” is an Elitist control of the – considered – non-elite
people. For the Elite to control the non-elite, ALL forms of individual
thinking must be eliminated, beliefs must conform to Elitist paradigms, actions
must conform to the Elitist will AND societal-culture is determined by State-Controlling
Oligarchical -Elites.
THAT IS A BAD FRUIT! Hello
Eden, the Serpent, Adam, Eve and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
So, let’s examine some 21st century Bad Fruit
from more erudite fellows than I:
o The
Digitization Of Humanity Shows Why The Globalist Agenda Is Evil; By Brandon Smith; Activist Post; 1/10/23
o Shedding
Innocence: Propaganda and censorship in the garden of good and evil;
By Robert
W Malone MD, MS; (Substack) Who is Robert Malone; 1/9/23
The above is from the realm of the highly credible due to
documentation and credentials. Below is a bit more speculative and hence to
many (if not most) is in the realm of the incredulous (H/T: Mike
Adams – Natural News).
I grew up on science fiction and Chariots
of the Gods literature, ergo this information has more credibility
with me than a majority of critical thinking individuals. Mike Adams in his
1/9/23 Situation Update name dropped a video-on-demand (COST - $30.00)
entitled, “LIES OF MEN & GODS - THERE
IS A HUGE LIE...” It is produced by GENSIX
Productions. Steve Quayle is the name associated with the
documentary. Quayle believes all the chaos of today’s emerging tyranny is
because Aliens (NOT Illegal/Undocumented Aliens) will be hailed as saviors of the
Earth by Globalist Controllers.
I REALIZE this is the point most stop reading because the
concept is soooo incredulous.
ALSO I must point out that $Thirty Bucks$ is a bit out of my
budget for information that I am on the fence of Believing/Not-Believing.
And yet my former youth finds it fascinating.
As to Steve Quayle, here is a bit of a preview posted at USAWatchdog
on 5/29/21 by Greg Hunter: “Big Alien
Lies Revealed – Steve Quayle”.
After the Smith and Malone posts, I’m going to cross the purchase page for
“LIES OF MEN & GODS” followed by a Vimeo video Trailer of the
Documentary. But I thought I’d give you taste from the USAWatchdog post
above with Greg Hunter interviewing Steve Quayle on Rumble:
Rumble VIDEO: Big
Alien Lies Revealed - Steve Quayle
Posted by USAWatchdog
Published “1 year ago” (today’s
dated 1/11/23)
JRH 1/11/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I
need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE I
need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU
CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy supplements/products from Online stores
(mine & my Honey):
My Store (please use referral code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
My Better Half’s Store (please use referral code 3917004): https://dianahouk.shiftingretail.com/
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
*************************
The Digitization Of Humanity Shows Why The Globalist
Agenda Is Evil
JANUARY 10, 2023
In recent weeks I’ve been seeing an interesting narrative
fallacy being sold to the general public when it comes to the designs of
globalists. The mainstream media and others are now openly
suggesting that it’s actually okay to be opposed to certain
aspects of groups like the World Economic Forum. They give you permission to be
concerned, just don’t dare call it conspiracy.
This propaganda is a deviation from the abject denials we’re
accustomed to hearing in the Liberty Movement for the past decade or more. We
have all been confronted with the usual cognitive dissonance – the claims that
globalist groups “just sit around talking about boring economic issues” and
nothing they do has any bearing on global politics or your everyday life. In
some cases we were even told that these groups of elites “don’t exist.”
Now, the media is admitting that, yes, perhaps the
globalists do have more than just a little influence over governments, social policies
and economic outcomes. But, what the mainstream doesn’t like is the assertion
that globalists have nefarious or authoritarian intentions. That’s just crazy
tinfoil hat talk, right?
The reason for the narrative shift is obvious. Far too many
people witnessed the true globalist agenda in action during the pandemic
lockdowns and now they see the conspiracy for what it is. The globalists, in
turn, seem to have been shocked to discover many millions of people in
opposition to the mandates and the refusals to comply were clearly far greater
than they expected. They are still trying to push their brand of covid fear,
but the cat is out of the bag now.
They failed to get what they wanted in the West, which was a
perpetual Chinese-style medical tyranny with vaccine passports as the norm. So,
the globalist strategy has changed and they are seeking to adapt. They admit to
a certain level of influence, but they pretend as if they are benevolent or
indifferent.
The response to this lie is relatively straightforward. I
could point out how Klaus Schwab of the WEF savored the thrill of the initial
pandemic outbreak and declared that covid was the
perfect “opportunity” to initiate what the WEF calls the
“Great Reset.”
I could also point out that Klaus Schwab’s vision of the
Reset, what he calls the “4th Industrial
Revolution,” is a veritable nightmare world in which
Artificial Intelligence runs everything, society is condensed into digital
enclaves called “smart cities” and people are oppressed by carbon taxation. I
could point out that the WEF actively supports the concept of the
“Shared Economy” in which you will “own nothing, have no
privacy” and you will supposedly be happy about it, but only because you won’t
have any other choice.
What I really want to talk about, however, is the process by
which the elites hope to achieve their dystopian epoch, as well as the
globalist mindset which lends itself to the horrors of technocracy. The common
naive assumption among skeptics of conspiracy is that the globalists are
regular human beings with the same drives and limited desires as the rest of
us. They might have some power, but world events are still random and certainly
not controlled.
This is a fallacy. The globalists are not like us. They are
not human. Or, I should say, they despise humanity and seek to do away with it.
And, because of this, they have entirely different aspirations compared to the
majority of us which include aspirations of dominance.
What we are dealing with here are not normal people with
conscience, ethics or empathy. Their behavior is much more akin to higher
functioning psychopaths and sociopaths rather than the everyday person on the
street. We saw this on full display during the covid lockdowns and the vicious
attempts to enforce vaccine passports; their actions betray their long game.
Take a look at comments by New Zealand’s prime minister and
WEF attendee, Jacinda Ardern, from a year ago. She admits to the deliberate
tactic of creating a two-tier class system within her own country based on
vaccination status. There is no remorse or guilt in her demeanor, she is proud
of taking such authoritarian actions despite numerous studies that prove the
mandates are ineffective.
Youtube VIDEO: PM
Ardern on how NZ will look under the 'traffic light' system
[Posted by nzherald.co.nz
Posted Oct 22, 2021
Beyond the covid response, though, I suggest people who deny
globalist conspiracy take a deeper dive into the philosophical roots of
organizations like the WEF. Their entire ideology can be summed up in a couple
words – futurism and godhood.
Futurism is an ideological movement which believes that all
“new” innovations, social or technological, should supplant the previous
existing systems for the sake of progress. They believe that all old ways of
thinking, including notions of principles, heritage, religious belief systems,
codes of conduct, etc. are crutches holding humanity back from greatness.
Bk Cover -
Evil Twins: Technocracy & Transhumanism
The
Evil Twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism - by Patrick
Wood
But what is the greatness the futurists seek? As mentioned
above, they want godhood. An era in which the natural world and human will is
enslaved by the hands of a select few. Case in point – The following
presentation from 2018 by WEF “guru” Yuval Harari on the future of humanity as
the globalists see it:
Youtube VIDEO: Yuval
Noah Harari – FUTURE OF HUMANITY
[Posted by World Leader
Posted Mar 26, 2021
Harari’s conclusions are rooted in elitist biases and ignore
numerous psychological and social realities, but we can set those aside for a
moment and examine his basic premise that humanity as we know it will no longer
exist in the next century because of “digital evolution” and “human hacking.”
The foundation of the WEF vision is built on the idea that
data is the new Holy Grail, the new conquest. This is something I have written
about extensively in the past (check out my article ‘Artificial
Intelligence: A Secular Look At The Digital Antichrist’) but it is
good to see it expressed with such arrogance by someone like Harari because it
is undeniable evidence – the globalists think they are going to build a
completely centralized economy and society based on human data rather than
production. In other words, YOU become the product. The average citizen, your
thoughts and your behaviors, become the stock in trade.
Globalists also believe that data is most valuable because
it can be exploited to control people’s behaviors, to hack the body and mind in
order to create human puppets, or create super-beings. They dream of becoming
little gods with omnipotent knowledge. Yuval even proudly proclaims that intelligent
design will no longer be the realm of God in heaven, but of the new digitized
man.
While Harari pays lip service to “democracy” vs “digital
dictatorship,” he goes on to assert that centralization may become the de facto
system of governance. He says this not because he fears dictatorship, but
because that has always been the WEF’s intent. The globalist argues that
governments cannot be trusted to hold a monopoly on the digital wellspring and
that someone needs to step in to regulate data; but “who would do this?” he
asks.
He already knows the answer. The UN, a globalist edifice,
has consistently said it should be the governing body that takes control of AI
and data regulation through
UNESCO. That is to say, Harari is playing coy, he knows that the
people who will step in to control the data are people just like him.
At no point in Harari’s speech does he suggest that that any
of these developments should be obstructed or stopped. At no point does he
offer the idea that the digitization of humanity is wrong and that there are
other better ways of living. He actually mocks the concept of “going back” to
old ways; only the future and the Tabula Rasa (blank slate) hold promise for
the globalists, everything else is an impediment to their designs.
But here’s the thing: what the globalists are trying to
accomplish is a fantasy. People are not algorithms, despite how much Harari
would like them to be. People have habits, yes, but they are also unpredictable
and are prone to sudden awakenings and epiphanies in the moment of crisis.
Psychopaths tend to be robotic people, acting impulsively
but also very predictably. They lack imagination, intuition and foresight, and
so it’s not surprising that organizations of psychopaths like the WEF would
place such an obsessive value on AI, algorithms and a cold technocratic
evolution. They don’t view their data Shangri-La as humanity’s future; they see
it as THEIR future – the future of the non-humans, or the anti-humans as it
were.
Who will produce all the goods, services and necessities
required in this brave new world? Well, all of us peons, of course. Sure, the
globalists will offer grand promises of a robot-driven production economy in
which people no longer need to engage in menial labor, but this will be another
lie. They’ll still need people to plant the crops, maintain infrastructure,
take care of manufacturing, do their fighting for them, etc.; they’ll just need
less of us.
At bottom, an economy built on data is an economy dependent
on illusion.
Data is vaporous and oftentimes meaningless because it is
subject to the biases of the interpreter. Algorithms can also be programmed to
the biases of the engineers. There is nothing inherently objective about data –
it is all dependent on the intentions of the people analyzing it.
For example, to use Harari’s anecdote of an algorithm that
“knows you are gay” before you do: any twisted group of people could simply
write code for an algorithm that tells the majority of easily manipulated kids
that they are gay, even when they are not. And, if you are gullible enough to
believe the algorithm is infallible, then you could be led to believe that
numerous falsehoods are true and be convinced to behave against your nature.
You have allowed a biased digital phantom to dictate your identity, and have
made yourself “hackable.”
In the meantime, the elitists entertain delusions of
surpassing their mortal limitations by “hacking” the human body, as well as
reading the minds of the masses and predicting the future based on data trends.
This is an obsession which ignores the unpredictable wages of the human soul,
that very element of conscience and of imagination which psychopaths lack. It’s
something that cannot be hacked.
The legitimacy of the data-based system and the hacking of
humanity that the WEF aspires to is less important than what the masses can be
convinced of. If the average person can be persuaded to implant their cell
phone in their skull in the near future, then yes, humanity might become
hackable in a rudimentary way.
The algorithms then supplant conscience, empathy and
principles. And, without these things all morality becomes relative by
default. Evil becomes good, and good becomes evil.
By the same token, if humanity can be persuaded to set down
their cell phones and live a less tech-focused life, then the digital empire of
the globalists comes crashing down quite easily. There is no system the elites
can impose that would make their digital consciousness a reality without the
consent of the public at large.
Without a vast global framework in which people willingly
embrace the algorithms rather than their own experience and intuitions, the
globalist religion of total centralization dies. The first step is to accept
that the conspiracy does indeed exist. The second step is to accept that the
conspiracy is malicious and destructive. The third step is to refuse to comply,
by whatever means necessary.
If you would like to support
the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics
for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The
Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE.
You can contact Brandon Smith
at:
You can also follow me at –
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AltMarket1
Gettr:
@Altmarket1
Source: Alt-Market
ACTIVIST POST -
ALTERNATIVE INDEPENDENT NEWS - CREATIVE COMMONS 2019
+++++++++++++++++++++
Shedding Innocence
Propaganda and censorship in the garden of good and evil
Adam,
Eve & Serpent - The Fall
January 9, 2023
As we move through January 2023, and additional details
about the lies our
governments have told us are revealed daily, I keep getting
questioned about how it feels to be vindicated. I wrote
about this last year, at a time when the approved narrative
appeared to be failing, and my deep ambivalence remains. To my surprise,
governments, the World Health Organization (WHO), and various non-governmental
organizations (WEF, BMGF etc.) have managed to keep the COVID crisis alive and
weaponized to justify policies which do not advance public health objectives,
but which they use to advance their own political and financial interests. Like
tossing offal over the transom, “Never let a good crisis go to waste” seems to
have provoked a shark feeding frenzy which humanity may require decades to
recover from.
Assuming we ever do.
The apple of knowledge about the depths of what the US
government, the Uniparty, the “Administrative state” will do has been well and
truly bitten into now. None who are “awake” to the damage done (to individuals,
families, and communities) in the name of public health will ever be able to
return to what (in retrospect) seems like the Eden of our prior innocence.
Now we are finally seeing the patient council of Augustine
of Hippo come to pass — ‘The truth is like a lion;
you don’t have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself.’ Like so many
others, I had naively assumed that this process would require months, not
years.
Just to make the point yet again, the COVID crisis was never
really a crisis in the way it was portrayed. It was always a house of cards
built upon (USA and CCP) government propaganda as well
as grossly overstated risk modeling and projections from the Imperial College,
London developed by the Neil
Ferguson research group.
Layers and layers of propaganda. Deep, harmonized,
simultaneous collusion, enticement, censorship, malicious defamation and
gaslighting across all western political organizations and their paid toadies
in corporate and social media- propagated and coordinated by the UN, WHO, EU,
USA, former “British Empire” governments and the new wannabe corporatist world
government body known as the “World Economic Forum” (WEF).
A comprehensive, global “shock and awe” fifth
generation warfare action the likes of which the world has
never seen before. All justified as necessary to protect us from a pathogen
which was never a threat in the sense of Ebola (for example) or even the
fentanyl flooding across the US southern border.
A pathogen which (current information suggests) many of
these governments had a hand in creating. A pre-planned (Event 201)
authoritarian totalitarian response resulting in a massive upwards transfer of
wealth largely to those who funded the planning (that being the WEF and Bill
Gates). Was the over-reaction and authoritarian mismanagement a psychological
projection of their guilt about having created and loosed this slouching beast
on all of us? Or was the virus just a strategy to enable a broader agenda? Or
one of many possible strategies developed and waiting to be deployed? I suspect
that Dr. Anthony Fauci would plead a failure of memory if
asked to testify to those questions under oath.
Or perhaps (just as internet haters are going to hate),
authoritarians and monopolists when given an opportunity will enable
Totalitarian states and Corporate monopolies.
It has been over three years now during which we have all
been banished to inhabit dark crevices and cracks in the garden of good and
evil. Forced into our homes and the fringes of society while psychopathic
devils who normally inhabit Dante’s nine circles of hell openly danced a global
bacchanal of death, destruction, and greed. And as they danced, they steadily
advanced their long anticipated “Great Reset”
.
Any so bold as to question the approved narrative, to alert chained fellow cave
dwellers that they are only being allowed to see shadows on the wall projected
by these dancing devils, have been further ostracized to the depths of their
own personal hells. With swarms of paid demons unleashed to discover and
exploit any crack in their own personal armor (or history). And now these
devils assert that the whole sordid affair supports the need for the world to
grant them more money and power?
[Blog Editor: Youtube video not included in Dr. Malone
post:
Youtube VIDEO: Plato's Allegory of the Cave
Posted by Philosophy Vibe
Posted May 8, 2016]
Grasping for some frayed thread of a silver lining to their
dark cloaks, I suppose that you have to at least admire their chutzpa.
As my mind seeks refuge from my deep weariness, I often
recall the immortal dialog from the Dreamworks comedy “Shrek”;
Shrek: Ogres are like onions.
Donkey: They stink? Shrek: Yes.
No.
Donkey: Oh, they make you cry.
Shrek: No. Donkey: Oh, you leave
em out in the sun, they get all brown, start sproutin’ little white hairs.
Shrek: No. Layers.
Onions have
layers. Ogres have layers.
Innocence also has layers. And as I have
journeyed along the broad road of corrupt propaganda, censorship and defamation
hell over the last three years, each turn and twist has forced me to peel away
yet another.
Belief in the universal acceptance of bioethical truths.
Truths which had been so painstakingly developed since the end of World War II,
and then augmented after the CDC-sponsored Tuskegee study.
Faith in the integrity of international regulatory and clinical research norms,
and the absolute firewall around informed consent and avoidance of compulsion,
coercion as well as mandated medical and surgical procedures. Faith in the NIH,
previously damaged by decades of personal experience, shattered into a thousand
fragments by Robert F Kennedy Jr’s meticulously documented inditement titled “The
Real Anthony Fauci”. Faith in the integrity of the FDA and CDC, and
their commitment to stand as bulwarks to insure public safety under the
pressure of a rapacious pharmaceutical industry. Faith in the integrity and
commitment of my fellow scientists and physicians to the Hippocratic oath.
And now I confront a complete loss of faith in the
commitment of the United States Government and its officials to protect and
defend the US Constitution. Earlier in this twisting journey, this broad road
to hell, I had taken risks to openly discuss the growing threat of
totalitarianism. I received a call from a decades-long colleague employed at a
senior level (GS-15) at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) darkly
warning me to not discuss Dr. Michael Callahan or his activities in China
during 2019-2020, or there would be consequences. I was warned by a well-known
broadcaster to “stay in my lane” and not discuss the World Economic Forum, its
plans and activities. In a world where the term “Fascism” had been twisted and
distorted beyond recognition, early on I insisted on returning to the original
definition (attributed to Benito Mussolini) that the proper name for Fascism
was Corporatism, and discussing the widespread acceptance of globalist
corporatism as the new model for replacing the autonomous nation state as the
dominant political structure.
And then there were the more mundane, transparent lies and
propaganda regarding the lack of repurposed early treatment medical
interventions and the safety and efficacy of the genetic “vaccine” products
which all have come to clearly see (in our daily lives!) do not protect against
infection, replication or spread of this cluster of novel coronavirus variants
which we call SARS-CoV-2. Hour after hour spent on innumerable radio,
television, and podcast interviews trying to break through the wall of
propaganda erected by governments colluding with big tech and corporate
press/TV.
I wish to acknowledge and thank Joe Rogan for allowing his
Spotify platform to break through that firewall, and allow me to speak my
truths to the world. Although I have not been welcomed back since, I suspect
what happened over the subsequent days, weeks, and months was the clearest
tolling of the bell for current corporate media (and 60s rock and rollers) that
has ever been heard.
Youtube VIDEO [WARNING profanity]: Joe Rogan: Reflecting on the Neil Young
& Spotify Drama
[Posted by JRE Daily Clips
Posted Jan 8, 2023
Yesterday, I was asked to participate in a “Twitter Spaces”
discussion regarding the censorship which has been experienced by so many who
have tried to break through the propaganda firewall of the last three years.
Asked to discuss my own experiences, I went on and on. The words poured out.
This was a question no-one had ever really asked me before,
and I have been asked so many questions over the last three years that I feel
like someone who has been subjected to a strip search by the US Transportation
Security Administration (TSA). No body cavity left unprobed. Except for this
one.
Event
Promo - Censorship Killed Millions
Here is the link for the
recording.
So much to cover. Amazon deleting Jill’s book in March 2020
for irreconcilable (but undefined) “violation of community standards”. My 2020
manuscripts warning about risks encountered in prior coronavirus vax development.
The original Famotidine/Mast cell hypothesis paper that got rejected again and
again. The repeated rejection of high-quality clinical studies demonstrating
the effectiveness of early treatment using celecoxib, famotidine +/-
ivermectin. Repeated inexplicable intransigence of FDA to allow DoD funded
clinical trials to proceed. The Nobel Prize marketing campaign to promote the
false valor of Kariko and Weissman as having originated the mRNA platform
technology which necessitated belittling, defaming, and gaslighting my own much earlier contributions.
The systematic
evisceration of my Wikipedia page. The reactions of Spanish and
Israeli governments to my “hostage” video warning parents about the risks of
the vaccines. The YouTube demonitization of Dr. Bret Weinstein after the
infamous “save the world” podcast with Steve Kirsch and myself. The backlash
after Joe Rogan
podcast #1757. The relentless unqualified “factchecker” attacks
(justified by Facebook in court as narrative reinforcement activities, not
“fact” checks). The Atlantic Monthly, Rolling Stone, New York Times, Washington
Post, and even Santa Barbara News Press (my home town) malicious defamation and
slander. It all continues unabated to this day, now augmented by professional
infiltrator/disruptors who carefully troll for tidbits in my CV that can be
weaponized while continually shouting “controlled opposition” and “deep state”
as a chorus to the usual lyrics of mis- dis- and mal- information accusations
coming from mainstream government-sponsored press outlets.
But caught like a deer in the headlights, unprepared for
this inquiry into what censorship I have experienced over the last three years,
I completely forgot to cover the outcome of the huge amount of time I (together
with other colleagues) had invested in establishing a special edition of
“Frontiers in Pharmacology” dedicated to publishing academic manuscripts
concerning repurposed drugs and protocols effective against COVID. We had
invested more than six months of effort in getting the necessary permissions,
soliciting and reviewing manuscripts, and building a solution to address the
unwillingness of journals all of the world to publish information about life
saving treatments. And then during December 2020, Pierre Kory testified in the
US Senate about the potential of Ivermectin. The DoD-funded group I was working
with to identify and test repurposed drugs was very aware of the potential of
the repurposed agent, and when Dr. Kory and colleagues posted a summary of
their findings on the web, I reached out (as an editor of this special
“Frontiers” volume) and encouraged him to reformat and submit as an academic
review for consideration by Frontiers in Pharmacology for our special volume.
The rest is history. A somewhat biased account of what then took place can
now be found published in “The Scientist”. The subsequent cascade
of events are summarized in the following resignation letter (redacted
below, full
text available here):
23rd April 2021
Dear Dr. Fenter, Ms.
Sorokowska-Yammin, Dr. Vicario, Prof. Montuschi, Topic Authors,
It is with sincere regret that
we write at this time to resign from our roles as founding topic editors for
the Frontiers in Pharmacology Research Topic “Treating COVID-19 With
Currently Available Drugs”. Since developing this topic and associated
justification documents and applying to and receiving permission to proceed
with this special topic volume from “Frontiers in Pharmacology“ for publication
under the “Frontiers in Pharmacology (Respiratory Pharmacology)” we have
invested many hundreds of volunteer hours in soliciting manuscript submissions,
identifying reviewers for submitted manuscripts, and managing the peer review process.
We took this action not for any commercial gain, but rather to address an unmet
need. This has been done in full and careful compliance with all
“Frontiers” criteria, and with approval by “Frontiers”.
The Topic had been created with
the aim to contribute to identification of better and more effective
pharmacological treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic by suggesting
repurposed drugs. Our goal has been to reduce the barriers to publishing
earlier stage clinical research regarding repurposed drugs, and in this way
help reduce the terrible burden of global death due to COVID-19. While awaiting
development of herd immunity (during vaccination), we wanted to contribute in
COVID-19 therapy. In proposing the guest topic, we noted that Frontiers purports
to provide rapid review, and explicitly allows publication of earlier stage
clinical research findings including case series reports. CVs of each
guest editor and the Topic proposal were accepted after evaluation and Mr.
Nathan Watkins was assigned by the Frontiers organization to support the guest
editors.
The recent extraordinary and
unprecedented actions by Frontiers in the rejection of the review manuscript
“REVIEW OF THE EMERGING EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATING THE EFFICACY OF IVERMECTIN IN
THE PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF COVID-19” and the original research manuscript
“HOSPITALIZED COVID-19 PATIENTS TREATED WITH CELECOXIB AND HIGH DOSE FAMOTIDINE
ADJUVANT THERAPY SHOW SIGNIFICANT CLINICAL RESPONSES” after review and
acceptance of each manuscript by four/five well qualified peer reviewers
(during final validation) is what has prompted our collective resignation.
To place this into context of
the Frontiers review process, the papers have been rejected during the final
validation phase, having previously passed the evaluation (peer review) phase.
In general, the Frontiers review process consists of the following steps:
initial validation, editorial assignment, independent review, interactive
review, review finalized (acceptance/rejection), final validation (this last
step is the final editorial review decision prior to invoicing and finalizing
manuscript proofs before actual publication). The initial
validation step performed by Frontiers is independent of the Guest
Editors’ evaluation and is performed prior to editorial assignment to
Guest Editors. Guest Editors are then asked to look for reviewers for independent
review and manage interactive review. Review is
finalized by guest Editors but the final validation depends on
Frontiers decision.
Redacted …… (see full letter
text for details)
Upon reviewing these events,
some might conclude that the journal is practicing extraordinary and
unprecedented censorship of fully peer reviewed manuscripts. The
rationale for doing so is speculative, and the journal has communicated that
these actions are justified by the following considerations:
1) “The papers
considered for publication in this Research Topic will require more specific
oversight, as the subject and aim of the collection has an important
involvement with the ongoing public health crisis. Frontiers aims for editorial
independence while also being ultimately responsible for all article
publications. We need to anticipate potential impact on the population and
maintain standards of rigour for our Journals and the scientific record
overall.”
2) “Moving
forward, the Editorial Office will continue to monitor submissions to this
topic. Articles will be screened at submission, with the support of our
Specialty Chief Editor, to ensure that all articles submitted are valid, and
fulfil our acceptance criteria. We ask that, as you continue to act as Handling
Editors for articles, you remain vigilant and ensure that any serious
recommendations for rejection are addressed swiftly. These steps, combined with
increased awareness and participation from all parties involved, will help
ensure the recent situation around the ivermectin paper is not repeated. We
hope that you understand the rationale behind these additional measures, which
are in place in the interest of maintaining scientific integrity, both for your
collection, and Frontiers in Pharmacology as a journal.”
The Guest editors reject any
assertion that scientific integrity was compromised or breached during the
review process for either of these submissions, or that this special edition
has not been managed with full integrity, except in the case of the unethical
breach of the journal itself and its senior management in performing an
extraordinary, arbitrary and capricious post-peer review process.
At this point, based on these
many actions, we are unable to assure scientific integrity of the peer review
process on the part of the journal for this special topic. Our time and that of
the peer reviewers has been donated to the journal, and our reputations used
without compensation. We ask to be removed from association with this
special topic area, that an apology be issued to ourselves and our respective
institutions for the actions of the journal in this matter, and that the
special topic (which we had developed with full approval by the journal) be
discontinued effective immediately. Having communicated to Frontiers that
this would be our collective action if corrections were not made to this
extraordinary re-review process, Frontiers has elected to expel each of the
guest editors from any ongoing or future role as editors, and to close down and
wipe all electronic evidence that the special topic had ever even been approved
or had manuscripts submitted under the topic approved. This decision was
disclosed in email communications with all corresponding authors of published,
approved, or pending manuscripts, but not with the guest editors who had
created the topic and solicited and managed review of the manuscripts.
The scientific process requires
fair, open, and transparent peer review to proceed effectively and efficiently
– particularly at this time and for this topic. The actions of “Frontiers” in
this matter clearly violate well established norms and processes for peer
review and publication of scientific works and intellectual contributions, and
instead have substituted a unilateral, arbitrary, and capricious process. On
behalf of our peers, our institutions, and our scientific and medical
colleagues we cannot allow this precedent to remain unchallenged. In our
opinion, these unfortunate events constitute gross editorial misconduct by
“Frontiers”.
How many lives could have been saved if publication of
this volume had been allowed to proceed in a normal fashion?
An unanswerable hypothetical. But as we watch the daily drip
of information concerning the role of governments, non-governmental, and
transnational organizations and cabals in actively suppressing information
which clearly could have saved lives, colluding with corporate media and big
tech to deploy a massive military-grade fifth generation propaganda and psy-ops
campaign on their own citizens, enforcing medical treatment with protocols
which clearly lead to widespread slaughter of elderly and other vulnerable
populations, and working to destroy the reputations and livelihood of anyone so
bold as to question their ‘Scientism” based on substitution of hope for data,
please keep the silent dead and silenced vaccine injured in your mind.
These are the people that have paid the ultimate price for
the mismanagement. These are the true victims. The hurt and widespread
destruction of reputation and professional standards consequent to what has
been done to myself and my colleagues will be tempered with the passage of
time.
Innocence has been peeled away to the point where we may
never be able to trust governments, our peers in the medical and scientific
professions, or the corporate “press” again.
But who will be left to stand up and speak for the dead
and the damaged?
SUPPORT
- Who is Robert Malone
© 2023 Robert W
Malone, MD
+++++++++++++++++++
LIES OF MEN & GODS – VOD
THERE IS A HUGE LIE...
GENSIX
Productions Purchase Description
Lies
of Men & Gods cover photo
As in the Days of Noah...
In the twilight of mankind's existence, the War Against
God's Creation Rages.
Boldface Lies
Aggregated deceit and accumulating falsehoods from our
governments, our militaries, the Vatican, our churches, by so-called medical
professionals, and "science" stack up before us. They say that they
do not know what UFOs are, that mankind is causing climate change and that
Covid vaccines are necessary to safeguard man's future.
A Shot in the Arm, A Shot in the Head – Either Way You
Wind Up Dead
The Vatican reshapes the world's perspective of aliens,
governments around the globe, spy on citizens, the stage is set for World War
3, the global economy teeters on the brink and the medical establishment compel
people to corrupt themselves by injecting a COVID MRNA Vaccine that will change
their DNA – Just like in the Days of Noah.
Pulling Strings
The World Economic Forum are the Puppet Masters who pull the
strings that will starve and kill billions. But is there someone more sinister
lurking in the shadows?
An Agenda of Death
With a Vatican core belief in Zecharia Sitchen's Anunnaki,
we learn that there is an Entity physically living on planet earth and
everything occurring is designed to kill most of humanity and corrupt the DNA
of those that remain. Weather warfare, the decimation of crops, livestock and
the supply chain, the enslaving of billions, and the outright corruption of
mankind's DNA are all part of this Entity's Agenda of Death.
Last Chance?
GenSix Productions blows the lid off a supernatural
conspiracy that is thousands of years in the making and nearing its
culmination. With never seen before footage of evidence pointing to the genetic
corruption of humans, this film endeavors to give you the unfiltered Truth
about who and what is really controlling our planet.
"The Lies of Men and Gods" – Quite
possibly the last chance to expose the incomprehensible Evil that now envelops
the world.
++++++++++++++++++++
Vimeo VIDEO: (Trailer)
Lies of Men & Gods
(Trailer) Lies of Men & Gods from GenSix Productions on Vimeo.
Posted by GenSix
Productions
Posted 11/29/22 4:43 PM EST
No comments:
Post a Comment