John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© May 13, 2022
The FBI has turned into a Gestapo-like organization that has
become a political weapon for Dem-Marxists to stay in power. A FBI
Whistleblower has come forward exposing FBI & DOJ corruption practices
targeting otherwise law-abiding American citizens.
Included in this cross post is a Bitchute version of the
Project Veritas interview (because I am a Bitchuter), A Bongino
Show on the FBI (FBI corruption focus at about the 23-minute
mark) and as a bonus a NWO
Report pick up of Jonathon Moseley exposing LYING Leftist Fact Checkers
who criticize 2000 Mules data but miss the irony the corrupt FBI use the exact
same tracking methods to try to frame January 6 peaceful protestors for
insurrection over the 2020 Election Coup.
JRH 5/13/22
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 -
$10 - $25 - $50 - $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE
GIVE to overcome research expenses:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
**************************
Bitchute VIDEO: FBI WHISTLEBLOWER LEAKS DOC
SHOWING BUREAU TARGETS “NEWS MEDIA” AS "SENSITIVE INVESTIGATIVE
MATTER"
Posted by Banned Youtube Videos
- specializedtom
First Published May 12th, 2022 08:10 UTC
BREAKING: FBI Whistleblower Leaks Document Showing Bureau
Targeting ‘News Media’
• Document reveals the FBI labeled Project Veritas as “news media,” and
categorized the probe as a “Sensitive Investigative Matter” due to Veritas
being journalists. This is a direct contradiction of the U.S. government’s
in-court position that Project Veritas are not journalists.
• The whistleblower, who has several years of experience as
an FBI Special Agent and is still on payroll with the Bureau, came to Project
Veritas with the document after seeing what he calls “a number of troubling
things that are happening in the FBI.”
• The document also shows the federal investigation was
launched into Project Veritas the same day Ashley Biden’s Attorney, Roberta
Kaplan, said, “This is insane. We should send to SDNY” in response to a request
for comment on the contents of Ashley Biden’s abandoned diary.
• Additionally, the FBI categorized the investigation into
an abandoned diary under Threat Band I, which is usually reserved for “threat
issues that are likely to cause the greatest damage to national interests or
public safety in the coming year.”
• The Whistleblower also revealed how the document shows
surveillance of Project Veritas included use of CAST tools, an analysis which
includes cellular geolocation tracking of phone devices.
• FBI Whistleblower: “Tyranny happens incrementally, and it
happens by a bunch of people agreeing to small injustices over and over simply
to keep their paycheck and their pension...to maintain your paycheck and
pension that gives you the Holocaust”
[NEW YORK – May 11, 2022] A source within the Federal Bureau
of Investigation has come forward to expose the FBI’s targeting of members of
the “news media” including information about what the FBI calls a Special
Investigative Matter (“SIM”) regarding their investigation into Project Veritas
over Ashley Biden’s abandoned diary.
According to a document obtained and published by Project Veritas,
the FBI opened an investigation into Project Veritas knowing full well they
were journalists as the document is labeled under a “news media”
classification.
This classification is a direct contradiction to the
government’s court filing where they argued that actions taken by the
government to surveil, raid and seize materials from Project Veritas
journalists were appropriate. The government’s filing stated, “Project Veritas
is not engaged in journalism within any traditional or accepted definition of
that word,” because it’s reporting is “non-consensual.”
The whistleblower, who has several years of experience as an
FBI Special Agent, came to Project Veritas because, “The direction that the
agency has headed troubles a vast majority of the agents.”
Something else the whistleblower called “alerting” was the
fact that the FBI categorized the investigation into Ashley Biden’s diary under
Threat Band I, which is usually reserved for “threat issues that are likely to
cause the greatest damage to national interests or public safety in the coming
year.”
The document, which lacks certain information due to the
restricted classification of the file, also shows the investigation was
launched the same day Ashley Biden’s Attorney, Roberta Kaplan, said, “This is
insane. We should send to SDNY,” in response to a request for comment on the
contents of Ashley Biden’s diary.
The FBI also used its Cellular Analysis Survey Team (CAST)
tools, which includes cellular geolocation tracking of phone devices, to
secretly surveil Project Veritas journalists, according to the whistleblower
and as revealed on the leaked document.
The whistleblower, who is still on the Bureau’s payroll, sat
down for an interview with Project Veritas CEO and Founder, James O’Keefe.
“Tyranny happens incrementally, and it happens by a bunch of people agreeing to
small injustices over and over simply to keep their paycheck and their
pension,” said the whistleblower, adding, “To maintain your paycheck and
pension that gives you the Holocaust.”
At the time of this writing, the FBI has not yet responded
to a request for comment.
++++++++++++++++++
Rumble VIDEO: Ep.
1767 Explosive FBI Whistleblower Testimony Emerges - The Dan Bongino Show
Posted by The
Dan Bongino Show
Published May 12, 2022
+++++++++++++++++++
The Fact-Checker Fail: 2000 Mules vs. the Media
Fact
Checker Fail- 2000 Mules vs Media
Posted by Nwo
Report
Source: Jonathon Moseley
May 12, 2022
In a familiar pattern, left-wing fact checkers furiously
try to hide the damning proof of election fraud in the 2020 election presented
in Dinesh D’Souza’s documentary 2000 Mules. But those “fake
checkers” clearly did not actually watch the film. See, e.g., Ali
Swenson, Associated Press, reprinted at U.S. News and World Report or at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Initially, one should note that 2000 Mules is
not a Western movie. It refers to the term developed decades ago of “drug
mules” who carry illegal drugs for criminal cartels such as smuggling drugs
across the border.
With 2000 Mules the leftists desperate to
hide voter fraud clearly only watched the free trailer for the movie and did
not spring for the $20 to $29 to actually see the entire film. The film can be
purchased from the Salem
radio network from Dinesh D’Souza on “Locals”
at or at the main
website. [Blog Editor: Can be watched free HERE.]
After mainstream journalists became discredited as biased,
left-wing propagandists, very suddenly a new fad sprung up: fact checkers. Now,
the same journalists whom we stopped believing in the normal news are suddenly
believable because they call themselves “fact checkers.”
But if there is anything that presumably a fact checker
would do is actually carefully read and analyze a claim and compare it point by
point to determine its truth. (Typically, fact checkers specialize in being
distracted by a minor detail. For example, a news story might report that Sen.
Nogood smashed into a green-colored van full of nuns while driving drunk. The
fact checker would then spend pages discussing how there is “no evidence” that
the van was colored green. The van might have been blue. So rating: False.)
True The Vote did what the government failed to do. They
purchased through commercial brokers the cell phone “geotracking” or
“geolocator” data from specific cities in particular states where the election
was decided. They then analyzed the GPS data to show the paid “mules” who
visited left-wing nonprofit organizations and then drove to many different
ballot drop boxes on the same day — then did it all over again the following
day, day after day, for weeks.
While ballot “harvesting” is illegal in the states sampled,
one is allowed to deliver ballots from their family members or a voter for whom
they are officially-designated caregivers. Otherwise, it is a crime to drop off
someone else’s ballots in an election drop box.
But under no circumstances would one legally or legitimately
do that again and again, day after day, for weeks or months. The fake checkers
discuss the data as if these mules made only one trip, on one day, to only one
drop box location. They didn’t watch the film.
The film explains that the analysis filtered out people who
were driving past drop boxes, or whose routines did not fit a voter fraud
hypothesis. Only those driving straight up to a drop box carrying their cell
phones were included.
The analysis considered the “pattern of life” routines of
cell phone users. Those going to work or shop near a drop box would be
excluded, as opposed to those who spent only a few minutes at the drop box and
then immediately turned around and drove on to the next drop box location. A
person parked for a long time for an appointment or shopping would be excluded.
(The fact checkers also skip over the fact that — by my
rough estimate — perhaps around 10% of those mules active during the election
season were also located in the middle of violent ANTIFA riots throughout the
year 2000.)
The documentary carefully explains how they filtered out the
possibility of anyone dropping off ballots for their family. Only mules who
visited 10 or more ballot drop boxes were included in the analysis. For
example, one “mule” visited drop boxes in six different counties.
Ballots are different for different counties, congressional
districts, and state legislative districts. So no one dropping off legitimate
ballots would go to drop boxes in six different counties. Someone dropping off
grandma’s ballot would not visit ten to one hundred different drop boxes — and
do this over again the next day and the next and the next.
The fact checkers tell us that geotracking is not that
accurate. Oddly, the FBI is prosecuting peaceful, nonviolent protestors from
January 6, 2021, based on that same “imprecise” geotracking data allegedly
showing people inside the U.S. Capitol. Oops. Never mind. So, geotracking cell
phone locations is very precise, except when it isn’t. Depends on the needs of
the moment.
But it doesn’t actually matter, because True the Vote set
such a high bar that the data cannot be dismissed. Only those mules who visited
left-wing, election-related nonprofit offices and then went from there straight
to election drop boxes were included.
The film repeatedly explains how they obtained over four
million minutes of official government surveillance video viewing the ballot
drop boxes (promiscuously deployed due to COVID-19). The trailer only shows a
few snippets out of four million minutes. Even the documentary barely scratches
the surface of that ocean of data.
Yet, the fact checkers “analyze” the surveillance videos as
if the few examples shown are the only surveillance videos. That is, they
dismiss the examples shown only in the movie trailer. Had they actually watched
the documentary, they would have known that the same mules are showing up again
and again in various surveillance videos at different drop boxes all over the
city. Not just once, as in the movie trailer.
The four million minutes of video show mules stuffing dozens
of ballots into drop boxes, not two or three. Often, we see ballots falling all
over the sidewalk. The governmental surveillance video shows sometimes twenty
or thirty ballots at a time getting stuffed into boxes already full.
The surveillance videos repeatedly show mules taking
photographs of themselves putting the ballots into the drop boxes or just
photos of the drop box itself. The only reason to take photographs of the drop
boxes is because the mules are being paid and are presenting proof that they
delivered the illicit ballots.
Oh, and not to mention that this is often happening between
1 AM and 4 AM in the morning.
The surveillance videos show mules wearing surgical gloves
as they stuff illicit ballots into the drop boxes. Then they remove the
surgical gloves and toss them into nearby trash cans — all caught on government
surveillance videos. The film explains that this started the day after ballot
harvesters were arrested in one state based on fingerprints on the ballots. In
one case, a woman never looks at the trash can until after taking off her
gloves, indicating that she had done it before at that same location.
Finally, True the Vote concentrated only on specific cities
or areas within the battleground states that decided the 2020 presidential
election. The fact checkers are again off base. D’Souza’s excellent documentary
is a call for honest law enforcement (if there are any left) to conduct a full
analysis of the entire country. There is one indisputable conclusion: This must
be thoroughly investigated in full.
© 2022 NWO REPORT
No comments:
Post a Comment