I’ve read Crooked Hillary is using the Dem-Marxist tactic
that goes something like, “Nothing to see here, just move along and ignore
the facts coming to light.” Crooked Hillary might also whisper, “Adding
to the Clinton body-count will vindicate me.”
[Even Dem-Marxists & Big Tech Clients work overtime
to bury the Clinton Body Count, the list is quite vast and nothing legally ties
any member of the Clinton family. It is the incredulous numbers of deaths that
have proven a legal boondoggle for the Clintons it persists. So here’s places I
was able to locate (not from Google) if your curiosity is piqued:
o Clinton Body Count; author listed
as ETHER ZONE; Ether Zone (last active 2017); dated
listed “21 years ago” 2001
o Clinton
"Friends" Who Knew Too Much; The Patriot
Post; no date
o List
Of Clinton Associates Who Allegedly Died Mysteriously Or Committed Suicide
Before Testimony; Cape
Charles Mirror; 12/1/19
o Clinton
Body Count Grows: Reporter Found Dead; Posted by Ryan
James; FreedomWire;
6/14/21
o Clinton body count; Conservapedia; Last moderated
7/27/21 08:40]
Even so, let’s look at some known Durham details Crooked
Hillary wants you to ignore.
JRH 2/18/22
I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome expenses:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
***********************
How The CIA Spied On President Donald Trump
By Techno Fog [Substack Profile Page]
February 17, 2022
On Friday, Special Counsel John Durham filed a motion
relating to a defense firm’s potential conflict of interest in the Michael
Sussmann case. The conflict itself is certainly intriguing, with Sussmann’s
lawyers at Latham & Watkins LLP (Latham) having represented potential witnesses
in the case, including Perkins Coie, former Perkins Coie (and Clinton Campaign
general counsel) Marc Elias, the Hillary Clinton Campaign, and Hillary for
America.
The issue that made more noise, however, was Durham’s
disclosure that Rodney Joffe – a contractor with
deep ties to the Clintons, and what appears to be a deep hatred for Trump – had
exploited Executive Office of the President of the United States data he obtained
from a “sensitive arrangement” with the U.S. Government to damage President
Trump. Here
is our initial post on the topic.
And here is the talented Lee Smith providing a great
explanation on Tucker:
.@LeeSmithDC says he keeps hearing people comparing the scandal to Watergate when it doesn’t compare to Watergate at all. We are talking about some of the most secure communications in government been Surveiled by political operatives. pic.twitter.com/f22h5V92vV
— The Dirty Truth (Josh) (@AKA_RealDirty) February 15, 2022
Yet the data from the Executive Office of the President
wasn’t all that Joffe had obtained. He also collected domain name system (DNS)
internet traffic pertaining to a healthcare provider; Trump Tower; and Trump’s
Central Park West apartment building.
Durham
Filing screen Capture 1
Yesterday, February 14, Sussmann’s attorney’s disputed the
Durham filing – to an extent. They said Sussmann provided the CIA with
Executive Office of the President data from “when Barack Obama was president.”
I have a theory about this.
If Sussmann’s attorney is telling the truth (never a given),
then we suspect the Executive Office of the President data included that from
the 74 day the Trump transition period (between the November 8, 2016 election
and the January 20, 2017 inauguration) – which would still be spying on the
incoming Trump Administration.
For background, the Executive Office of the President includes a
number of Executive councils (National Security Council, Office of Management and
Budget, etc.) that support the President. It is involved generally in the transition from
one president to the next.
What about the data involved with the Trump transition? On
August 1, 2016, Trump reached an agreement with the General Services
Administration (GSA) “for telecommunication and internet technology services
for both the pre- and post-election transition period.” This is the
agreement. Fool
Nelson pointed out to me that Joffe’s other company, Packet
Forensics, has a 2010 – 2025 contract with
GSA. I wonder if Joffe’s company, Neustar, helped the GSA in the execution of
the transition agreement. Maybe. Maybe not. I’m not sure it matters, as Neustar
already had an agreement to provide “DNS resolution services” to the Executive
Office of the President.
Regardless, the “transition theory”, if we can call it that,
matches the timeline in the Sussmann indictment, which states that Joffe and
his team continued to target “Trump-related computer networks” in late 2016 and
early 2017. And it makes sense in context of Sussmann’s conduct, as Sussmann
tried to put this information out there in late December 2016.
Durham
Filing screen Capture 2 Sussmann False Statement
Anyway, back to the point of this post.
According to Durham, Joffe and his associates manipulated
that data to make it seem like Trump, and those in Trump’s world, had
suspicious interactions with internet protocol (IP) addresses affiliated with a
Russian mobile phone provider. They then combined those allegations with the
Alfa Bank hoax materials (the subject of Sussmann’s Fall 2016 meeting with
then-FBI General Counsel James Baker).
This damaging information, purporting to demonstrate at
least circumstantial evidence of Trump/Russia collusion, was presented on
February 9, 2017 to what Durham describes as U.S. Government “Agency-2.”
That agency was the CIA. We know for sure that
Sussmann met with the CIA General Counsel. We learned in January 2022 that, if
Sussmann is to be believed, there were two other CIA employees at that meeting.
In other words, a Clinton supporting contractor (Joffe) obtained
sensitive information (perhaps unlawfully) about the Office of the President of
the United States (Trump), manipulated the information, passed it to a
DNC/Clinton lawyer (Sussmann), who then delivered it to the CIA.
All on American soil.
This is important because the CIA is generally prohibited
from conducting domestic operations. The FBI explains:
“The CIA collects information
only regarding foreign countries and their citizens. Unlike the FBI, it is
prohibited from collecting information regarding ‘U.S. Persons,’ a term that
includes U.S. citizens, resident aliens, legal immigrants, and U.S. corporations,
regardless of where they are located.”
In the CIA’s own words:
“The FBI is responsible for
coordination of clandestine collection of foreign intelligence through human
sources or human-enabled means and counterintelligence activities inside the
United States.”
Yet when it came to Trump, here was the CIA doing what it is
prohibited: “collecting information regarding U.S. persons” inside the United
States. (See also the CIA’s
bulk surveillance program.)
A top CIA official answered the call of a DNC lawyer who
alleged that these suspicious internet “lookups” proved “that Trump and/or his
associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the
vicinity of the White House and other locations.” Accusations that were
baseless, according to Durham.
In other words, the secret police was more than willing to
accept politically damaging information against the President. I’m curious what
they did with it. It seems naive to think the information stayed at the CIA. I
bet it was passed onto the FBI or DOJ, who may have used it to further the
Trump/Russia investigation.
The scandal we are seeing come to light just isn’t about
Hillary and Joffe and Sussmann. It’s not limited to Fusion GPS, FISA abuse, or
Igor Danchenko.
It’s also about the willingness of U.S. intelligence to
target the President. And on that topic, the CIA has some serious questions to
answer.
Techno
Fog is a Lawyer, Writer, and Researcher. Also seen at twitter.com/techno_fog. This
article was originally published on Substack.
We need your support to carry on
our independent and investigative research based journalism on the Deep State
threats facing humanity. Your contribution however small helps us keep afloat.
Kindly consider supporting GreatGameIndia.
© Copyright 2020 – GreatGameIndia - Journal of
Geopolitics and International Relations.
ABOUT GreatGameIndia
No comments:
Post a Comment