The more details I run into on the FDA so-called approval of
the Pfizer Jab the more I have to keep updating. I BELIEVE I NOW HAVE A CLEAR
VISION of one of the most NEFARIOUS propaganda campaigns by a government agency
that is supposed to exist to protect Americans.
There are many exposing the FDA’s phony Jab approval, it is
my sense Leo Hohmann does a great job washing the muddy propaganda designed to
create sheeple to willingly take an mRNA that has had so many horrible
consequences that it should have been pulled from usage long ago.
A piece of advice: If you are one convinced the FDA has
authorized the Pfizer Jab, before you get stuck – MAKE SURE the Jab product
is labeled Comirnaty. If you are a victim of an under-reported side-effect
you can file a lawsuit. If you die, your family can file a lawsuit. IN AMERICA
you will not find a Comirnaty vial because it is a German/European product. YOU
CANNOT SUE for the American Pfizer Jab (or any mRNA jab for that matter – Big Pharma
has an EUA legal protection racket operating).
JRH 8/26/21
I need your generosity in 2021 via - credit cards, check
cards
& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account:
Or if donating you can support by getting in the Coffee from home
business earning yourself extra cash – OR just buy some TASTE GOOD healthy coffee,
that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive –
Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
**********************
FDA ‘playing bait and switch’ with Americans, tricking them into believing shots currently being offered have been granted full approval when they have not
By Leo Hohmann
August 25, 2021
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s announcement Monday
that it had granted “full approval” to the Covid shots being offered by Pfizer
is riddled with deceptions meant to trick the American public into thinking
they have no choice but to take the jab while at the same time protecting a
major pharmaceutical company from legal liability.
What was actually given full approval was a separate
Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine product which goes by the name Comirnaty.
But Comirnaty is not even currently
available in the U.S.
This is part of a cynical plot to protect Pfizer from broad
legal liability and also to snooker U.S. employers into mandating the vaccine
for their employees.
Watch Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology on
which the Covid vaccines are based, explain the chicanery the FDA is using to
fool the American people.
Rumble VIDEO: Dr.
Malone Sounds Alarm On Liability Coverage Of Pfizer Vax
[Posted by Bannons War Room
Published August 24, 2021]
The FDA on Monday approved a biologics
license application for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine. The
Biden White House, with cover from its corporate media shills,
immediately reported that vaccine
mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers,
college students and employees of just about any business.
But as Children’s Health Defense reports, “there are
several bizarre aspects to the FDA approval that will prove confusing to those
not familiar with the pervasiveness of the FDA’s regulatory capture, or the
depths of the agency’s cynicism.”
The FDA acknowledges that while Pfizer has
insufficient supplies of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine actually
available, there is “a significant amount” of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine
— which has been produced under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and will
continue to be offered under the same EUA status, CHD reports.
The FDA in its
convoluted letter of approval for the Pfizer vaccine under the
EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” (page 2,
footnote 8) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product [which is
currently unavailable]. [Blog Editor Emphasis]
According to the FDA, the newly licensed Pfizer Comirnaty
vaccine and the existing vaccine, while “legally distinct,” are not any
different in terms of their “safety or effectiveness.”
Here is the pertinent quote from footnote 8 that proves we
are talking about two separate shots and not just a “rebranding” of the same
shot as the mainstream media is reporting:
“The licensed vaccine has the
same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used
interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety
or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences
that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”
The “certain differences” are not specified, but it is
perfectly clear that the two jabs are legally distinct.
The below analysis by Children’s Health Defense explains the
trickery in which the FDA has engaged — all for the legal benefit of the Big
Pharma giant Pfizer and the detriment of American citizens.
There is a huge real-world difference between products
under an EUA compared with those that FDA has fully licensed. EUA products
are experimental under U.S law.
Both the Nuremberg Code and Federal Regulations provide
that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment.
Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III),
“authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to
deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental
subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA
vaccines.
U.S. laws, however, permit employers and schools to
require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.
EUA-licensed vaccines have an extraordinary liability
shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine
manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from
liability. The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove
willful misconduct, and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement
action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever
succeeded.
The government has created an extremely stingy
compensation program, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, to
redress injuries from all EUA products.
The program’s parsimonious administrators have
compensated under 4% of petitioners to date — and not a
single COVID vaccine injury — despite the fact that physicians, families and
injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000
COVID vaccine injuries.
At least for the moment, the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine has
no liability shield. Vials of the branded product, which say “Comirnaty” on the
label, are subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products.
When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s
(CDC) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices places a vaccine on the
mandatory schedule, a childhood vaccine benefits from an generous retinue of
liability protections.
But licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty,
do not enjoy any liability shield. Just as with Ford’s exploding Pinto,
or Monsanto’s
herbicide Roundup, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could
potentially sue for damages.
And because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to
show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards
could be astronomical.
Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to
take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this
product. [Blog Editor Emphasis]
Given this background, the FDA’s acknowledgement in its
approval letter that there are insufficient stocks of the licensed Comirnaty,
but an abundant supply of the EUA Pfizer BioNTech jab, exposes the “approval”
as a cynical scheme to encourage businesses and schools to impose illegal jab
mandates.
The FDA’s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly
unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting
System have exposed as unreasonably dangerous, and that the Delta
variant has rendered obsolete.
Americans, told that the Pfizer COVID vaccine is now
licensed, will understandably assume that COVID vaccine mandates are lawful.
But only EUA-authorized vaccines, for which no one has any real liability, will
be available during the next few weeks when many school mandate deadlines
occur.
The FDA appears to be purposefully tricking American
citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product.
While the media has trumpeted that the FDA
has approved COVID vaccines, the FDA has not approved the Pfizer
BioNTech vaccines, nor any COVID vaccines for the 12- to 15-year age group, nor
any booster
doses for anyone.
And FDA has not licensed any Moderna vaccine,
nor any vaccine from Johnson
& Johnson — so the vast majority of vaccines available in
the U.S., if not all, remain unlicensed EUA products.
Here’s what you need to know when somebody orders you to
get the vaccine:; Ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty,” it’s a licensed
product. If it says “Pfizer-BioNTech,” it’s an experimental product, and
under 21 U.S. Code 360bbb, you have the right to refuse.
If it comes from Moderna or Johnson & Johnson
(marketed as Janssen), you have the right to refuse. [Blog Editor Emphasis]
The FDA is playing bait and switch with the American
public — but we don’t have to play along. If it doesn’t say Comirnaty, you have
not been offered an approved vaccine.
Source: Children’s Health Defense
LeoHohmann.com is not supported by corporate advertisers
or sponsors, but depends solely on reader contributions. Donations of any size
may be sent c/o Leo Hohmann, PO Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or via credit card
below.
_______________________________
Leo Hohmann HOMEPAGE
Investigative reporting on globalism, Christianity,
Islam, Judaism and where politics, culture and religion intersect.
No comments:
Post a Comment