Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions tasked Federal U.S.
Attorney John Huber (Office in Utah) to investigate FISA abuse allegations in
spying on the Trump campaign. The problem with Huber’s investigation: HE DIDN’T
DO SQUAT! Huber is either incompetent or a Deep Stater.
Thankfully President Trump now has a competent Attorney
General in William Barr. Barr removed Huber whose tasks were assigned to U.S.
Attorney John Durham. Story at The Gateway Pundit.
Today on CBS Attorney General William Barr disclosed that
the Huber investigation is over.
Huber was assigned to look at FISA applications and the
electronic surveillance during the 2016 election and actions by Hillary
Clinton.
Huber did not even start his investigation.
He didn’t do a damn thing!
AG Barr said this
morning on CBS News that Huber did nothing and
his work was taken over by the team he set up under US Attorney John Durham:
JAN CRAWFORD: Um,
what’s the status of Huber’s investigation in Utah? I think the former Attorney
General Sessions had asked him to look at this.
WILLIAM BARR: Right,
so Huber had originally been asked to take a look at the FISA applications and
the electronic surveillance but then he stood back and put that on hold while
the Office of Inspector General was conducting its review, which would’ve been
normal for the department. And he was essentially on standby in case Mr.
Horowitz referred a matter to him to be handled criminally. So he has not been
active on this front in recent months and so Durham is taking over that role.
The other issues he’s been working on relate to Hillary Clinton. Those are
winding down and hopefully we’ll be in a position to bring those to fruition.
JAN CRAWFORD: So
he won’t be involved in this really at all then?
John Huber was
the special prosecutor tapped by former AG Jeff Sessions to investigate FISA
abuses by Obama’s DOJ/FBI. Sessions nominated Huber to perform this
investigation after numerous calls for a special investigation into the Clinton
Foundation and the Deep State.
Mark Meadows
(R-NC), Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Doug Collins (R-GA) sent a letterto
special prosecutor John Huber on January 8th demanding answers by a January
21st deadline.
“Your investigation
has been ongoing for over nine months. During the course of our extensive
investigation we have interviewed more than a dozen current and former DOJ and
FBI personnel, and were surprised to hear none of these potentially informative
witnesses testified to speaking with you,” the GOP lawmakers wrote.
The Clinton
Foundation whistleblowers, Mr. Moynihan and Mr. Doyle told the committee they
had to send their evidence to the Huber investigation THREE TIMES because they
kept losing it.
In October,
Congressman Meadows and Jim Jordan said they wanted to haul John Huber in
before Congress to testify because they had not received any updates on Huber’s
investigation.
Now we know that
it was all a farce. Huber did NOTHING!
Huber and the
former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, should be brought before a grand jury
and investigated for their actions in obstructing justice.
The American
people are very angry about all that is going on in DC. We want OUR
country back! We DEMAND justice!
I was not surprised Dems – especially in the House – reacted
to Robert Mueller’s news conference with “impeach Trump”. The Dems and their
propaganda MSM wing have twisted, misrepresented facts and downright lied about
President Trump before, after and right up to the very present.
Mueller was forced to admit there was no crime of Donald
Trump working with the Russians to insure a 2016 election victory. Mueller did
inform what everyone has known for a long time – the Russians made an evil
effort to influence the 2016 election cycle. MUELLER’S EPIC FAILURE of what is probably closer to the truth: The
Russians gave aid to the Clinton campaign to influence the election and aid to
the Dems to make the effort to impeach President Trump after the election.
Trump committed NO election crime but because the President
wouldn’t fall for the perjury trap set for others involved in the 2016 campaign
with a personal interview, Mueller implied Trump made an effort to obstruct an
investigation where no crime existed.
AND THAT MY FRIENDS is why Mueller, Mueller’s 13 angry
Dem/Hillary donating Prosecutors AND the Dems are full of horse-pucky.
Since it is doubtful most news sources – spoken or written –
will let you know about Mueller/Dem horse-pucky, here are a series of
commentaries on the Mueller news conference.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller held a special news
conference on Wednesday saying he couldn’t reach a conclusion on whether Donald Trump obstructed justice, as he stopped short of
delivering a full exoneration of the president. Mueller, using the craftiness
of a career lawyer and political operative chose his words to allow Democrats
in Congress to continue their deranged pursuit of destroying the President
using the criminal justice system and the impeachment process.
“If we had had confidence the president clearly did not
commit a crime we would have said so,” Mueller said. His briefing — which
denied questions from reporters — on the investigation showed he was
disappointed in not proving anything against Trump.
“That’s why Mueller left open the obstruction question,
something the Democrats are using to harass a President they despise,” said
political strategist Mike Barker. “The only good news I heard was Mueller
announcing that he was closing his office and resigning from public service,”
he added.
Mueller sent a clear signal to House Democrats who have
demanded his testimony that he won’t provide any information that hasn’t
already been made public. “Any testimony from this office would not go beyond
this report,” he said.
The special counsel also said he found “insufficient
evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” on election interference.
President Donald Trump’s newly appointed Attorney General,
while keeping a relatively low profile in his first days on the job, now
appears to have hit the ground running in his investigation of what many are
now calling The Trump-Russia Hoax.
On Tuesday and Wednesday, the Trump-hating Democrats and
news media were taken-aback when they discovered Barr had already begun his
probe of the now-famous Hillary Clinton bought and paid for “dirty dossier.”
Barr selected U.S. Attorney for Connecticut John Durham to
investigate the origins of the Justice Department’s and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation’s probe of — and spying on —
the Trump presidential campaign in 2016. The questionable
investigation continued into the Trump transition and his early weeks as
Commander-in-Chief.
John Durham, who is the U.S. Attorney in Connecticut, was
appointed by Attorney General Bill Barr. He will examine the FBI’s decision to
open a counterintelligence investigation into the actions and motives for
interfering in the election and “chasing” members of President Donald Trump’s
campaign team using arguably misleading or false evidence to obtain warrants.
The now famous “dirty dossier” is based on lies and innuendo provided by a
foreign agent, a former British MI6 officer Christopher Steele.
Deep State Suspects in Conspiracy to Overthrow an Elected
President
Robert
Mueller is the leader of the Trump ouster who are now trying
to defend the Deep State’s control over American politics from Donald Trump’s
assault on its tyrannical vision. In the process Mueller also hopes to atone
for the firing of his friend and fellow conspirator, James Comey.
Unfortunately many Americans cannot see that this man is not a “pillar of
impartiality” as the corrupt media paint him. He is deeply committed to Deep
State corruption while impersonating a Republican.
Rod
Rosenstein is the Deputy Attorney General appointed by Obama.
This is one reason for his insistence on appointing Robert Mueller as a Special
Counsel to investigate Trump for alleged collusion with the Russians. His
agenda is preservation of the Deep State as is Mueller’s. He would have been
much happier if Hillary had won. In fact he was surely expecting it, as were
FBI personnel such as Andrew McCabe.
Andrew
Weissmann is the primary “witch hunter” on the Mueller team
assembled to investigate Russian collusion. He is a notorious pit bull
prosecutor with a record of suppressing exculpatory evidence in overreaching
prosecutions that have been overturned by judges. He was a “Gung-Ho” Obama
supporter. He is known to use questionable tactics in bullying a target’s
underlings to force their testimony.
Peter
Strzok was another Obama-loving FBI agent employed by Mueller
because of his experience in counterintelligence. He is known as a devout
Hillary Clinton supporter and one of the agents who interviewed Hillary about
the email scandal, which turned out to be a phony powder-puff interview. He
also edited Comey’s Clinton investigation resolution by replacing the words “grossly
negligent” with “extremely careless” because the former action can be
prosecuted in the handling of classified information while the latter cannot.
His investigation gave almost all of Clinton’s subordinates blanket immunity
even though none of them testified against Clinton.
Is this, as the media claims, a professional and objective
team of crimefighters committed to solving an alleged crime? or was this is a
coup d’etat to destroy the election of Donald Trump and and move to impeach
him, which Mueller and his cronies had hoped would discredit the “people’s
revolution” against the Deep State that Trump has fashioned.
“This horrendous nightmare is taking place because of the
collectivist corruption of the DOJ and the FBI under Obama, Clinton and the two
Bushes. Corruption in practice takes place in men’s institutions only after
corruption of ethics and ideology takes place in their minds. Moral
relativism (along with political collectivism) took over the minds of our
professors, politicians and prosecutors in the aftermath of World War II and
exploded throughout our culture from the 1960s to today. The chickens are now
coming home to roost and usher in an authoritarian society,” said Jeffrey
Longeran, a former criminal/civil investigations manager.
Conservatives in Congress should show they have spines and
they should counterattack Hillary Clinton a[t] the Deep State with an
investigation of the egregious “Uranium One” money grab in which she authorized
the sale of 20% of America’s uranium to Russia, which brought tens of millions
of dollars into the Clinton Foundation from Russian sources.
The fingerprints of Mueller, Weissmann and Rosenstein are
also on the Uranium One deal, for they worked assiduously to facilitate and
protect its completion, knowing full well but not caring that it compromised
American security. Because their stalwart political horse, Hillary Clinton, was
benefiting. Thus the Deep State’s aggrandizement was benefiting.
“This scenario is unbelievable. The Mueller Probe corruption
is something we would expect to find in an African or Latin American country,
or one of the Nazi Show Trials under judges who took an oath to serve Adolph
Hitler in the 1930’s. It is the result of obsessively partisan FBI leaders that
have let their ideology and hatred influence their role as policemen.
_______________________
Mueller:
‘I couldn’t find a Trump-Crime…so it’s Time to Impeach him!’
I have never before witnessed such a sham of a legal system
or—even worse—experienced the horror that the real criminals were the ones
running it. The additional horror is that other gangsters have and/or are
replacing those who have been fired (some likely awaiting the day when they
will be arrested) or have run for the proverbial hills upon realizing what may
soon be revealed. Having personally experienced this lifetime for not
quite—but getting closer each day—a century, I do have some small perspective
with regards to history. Mueller—with all of the Trump-haters on his
staff—could find that President Trump committed no crime. So, in his own
rather sleazy way, he turned it over to Congress to impeach him. This is
the caliber of human being we currently have in upper management within the
bowels of the US government.
I, and certainly others, have written about Robert Swan
Mueller III and his apparent crimes committed over the years under the color of
law. One of these was sending 4 innocent people to prison, in order to
protect the murderer Whitey Bulger who had been designated “an informer” to and
for Mueller’s FBI. Mueller had also interviewed with President Trump to
get his old job as FBI Director back. But, President Trump didn’t choose
him. Uh-oh! However, Mueller was chosen by Assistant Attorney
General Rod Rosenstein as “Special Counsel” to head up the investigation of
President Trump; whom he at the very least intensely disliked.
To briefly recap, this investigation was built upon a
foundation of sand which included the following:
·A self-proclaimed Trump-hater and (former?)
British MI-6 agent who worked with some Russians to create (out of whole cloth)
the now-infamous “Trump Dossier”:
·The Clinton Campaign and DNC funded the
“dossier”: “The DNC and Clinton campaign-funded research continued
through the end of October 2016, according to the Post’s report.
·The “dossier” was requested and paid for by the
Clinton Campaign. Excerpt: “According to the report, lawyer Marc E.
Elias, who represented both Clinton’s campaign and the DNC, and his law firm
Perkins Coie retained the firm Fusion GPS in April 2016 to investigate any
connections, according to the Post. Before then, a still-unknown Republican
client funded Fusion GPS’ research during the Republican primaries. Fusion had
hired former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele to conduct the
research.”
·The Mueller investigation began as a
counter-intelligence investigation which metastasized into a full-blown
criminal investigation…with NO CRIME mentioned! As a stated crime is
required by law before this type of investigation may begin, Mueller’s
investigation…was illegal from its inception. As a very large side-note
“collusion” is still not a crime.
·If there is no underlying crime…there can be
no “obstruction of justice!”
The crimes which were committed by members within our own
governmental agencies (DOJ/FBI, CIA, NSA etc.) are the greatest uncovered in
the history of our country and are vast to the point that the uncovering of the
worldwide Deep State conspiracy against POTUS Trump continues.
Note: Within the UK, it appears to reach the very highest levels of
government.
IMO, Mueller has been a dirty cop for decades (also remember
his “Uranium One” activities indicating alleged treason) and he doesn’t appear
to have any intention of changing. Our country was close to demise before
Donald J. Trump was resoundingly elected to the presidency of the USA.
Considering all of the blocks placed in his way by the DNC, RINOs and US
government “intelligence” agencies Trump’s accomplishments are nothing less
than remarkable…and legendary. Think what he will accomplish in his
second term of office…
“There are six things that the Lord
hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and
hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that
make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who
sows discord among brothers”—Proverbs 6:16-19
Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton called for an investigation into
Robert Mueller for suggesting “wrongdoing by an innocent person without any
foundation.”
...
“Well, I don’t know what reputation he had that deserved any credence until
now, but it’s no longer there,” Fitton told Dobbs. “He’s really destroyed
whatever reputation he’s had with this political attack on the president,
turning the rule of law on its head, suggesting the president is guilty and,
because he can’t prove otherwise, we should conclude that he should be
impeached.”
Calling it “an abuse of power,” Fitton said that Attorney General Barr has been
“too deferential” to Mueller and should have “shut down” the “report before it
was even written.”
“[I]t’s been abuse piled on top of abuse targeting President Trump,” Fitton
said. “And this Mr. Mueller, he needs to be investigated as well. The office of
professional responsibility should be asking, ‘Why did this Justice Department
prosecutor come out and suggest wrongdoing by an innocent person without any
foundation?’ Because there is no foundation. If there was a foundation, there
would have been indictments or requests for an indictment while highlighting
that. Outrageous.”
Fitton claims that
there is a strong possibility that Mueller and Comey could have colluded in
order to direct the investigation in a negative way against the president.
_____________________
DERSHOWITZ BLASTS MUELLER FOR
'EXCEEDING HIS ROLE'
Statement 'worse'
than Comey's regarding Hillary scandal
Then-FBI Director Robert
Mueller, left, acknowledges applause during then-President Barack Obama’s
remarks on June 21, 2013. Obama had announced James Comey, right, as his
nominee to succeed Mueller as FBI director (Official
White House photo)
Special counsel
Robert Mueller’s statement Wednesday that “if we had confidence that the
president clearly did not commit a crime we would have said that” is worse than
then FBI Director James Comey’s statement about the FBI’s probe of Hillary
Clinton, said Alan Dershowitz, emeritus professor at Harvard Law School.
“Comey was
universally criticized for going beyond his responsibility to state whether
there was sufficient evidence to indict Clinton,” he
wrote Wednesday in The Hill. “Mueller, however, did even more.”
Comey declared in a
July 2016 press conference that “although we did not find clear evidence that
Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the
handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely
careless in their handling of very sensitive highly classified information.”
Dershowitz said
Mueller, at his news conference at the Justice Department announcing his
resignation as special counsel, “went beyond the conclusion of his report and
gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute
impeachment proceedings against President Trump.”
“By implying that
President Trump might have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller
effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings,” he said.
Dershowitz noted
that obstruction of justice is a “high crime and misdemeanor” which, under the
Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president.
WND
reported earlier Wednesday Mueller’s claim that the Office of Legal Counsel guidance
specifying that a sitting president cannot be indicted was the reason for not
coming to a conclusion about obstruction conflicts with Attorney General
William Barr’s testimony.
Barr told Congress
on May 1 that at a March 5 meeting with Mueller, the special counsel told him “that
he emphatically was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have
found obstruction.”
No longer defending Mueller
Dershowitz said
he no longer is defending Mueller against the accusations that he is a
partisan.
“I did not believe
that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a
point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached. But I have now
changed my mind.”
The law professor
said Mueller revealed his bias by putting his “elbow” on the scale of justice.
Mueller also
has distorted the role of a prosecutor who “should never go beyond publicly
disclosing that there is insufficient evidence to indict.”
“No responsible
prosecutor should ever suggest that the subject of his investigation might
indeed be guilty even if there was insufficient evidence or other reasons not
to indict,” Dershowitz said.
He pointed out that
federal investigations by prosecutors, including special counsels, are by
nature one sided, hearing only evidence of guilt.
“They are not in a
position to decide whether the subject of the investigation is guilty or is
innocent of any crimes.”
Dershowitz said
he “cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and
gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help
Democrats in Congress and to encourage impeachment talk and action.”
“Shame on Mueller
for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for such
partisan advantage,” he wrote.
_______________________
Mueller Just Proved His Entire
Operation Was A Political Hit Job That Trampled The Rule Of Law
At a hastily arranged Wednesday press conference,
Special Counsel Robert Mueller proved that he was never interested in justice
or the rule of law.
If there were any
doubts about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s political intentions, his
unprecedented press conference on Wednesday should put them all to rest. As he
made abundantly clear during his doddering reading of a prepared statement that
repeatedly contradicted itself, Mueller had no interest in the equal
application of the rule of law. He gave the game, and his nakedly political
intentions, away repeatedly throughout his statement.
“It is important
that the office’s written work speak for itself,” Mueller said, referring to
his office’s 448-page report. Mueller’s report was released to the public by
Attorney General William Barr nearly six weeks ago. The entire report, minus
limited redactions required by law, has been publicly available, pored through,
and dissected. Its contents have been discussed ad nauseum in print and on
television. The report has been speaking for itself since April 18, when it was
released.
If it’s important
for the work to speak for itself, then why did Mueller schedule a press
conference in which he would speak for it weeks after it was released? The
statement, given the venue in which it was provided, is self-refuting.
Let’s start with the
Mueller team’s unique take on the nature of a prosecutor’s job. The standard
American view of justice, affirmed and enforced by the U.S. Constitution, is
that all are presumed innocent absent conviction by a jury of a specific charge
of criminal wrongdoing. That is, the natural legal state of an individual in
this country is innocence. It is not a state or a nature bestowed by cops or
attorneys. Innocence is not granted by unelected bureaucrats or federal
prosecutors.
At one point in his
remarks, Mueller seemed to agree. Referring to indictments against various
Russian individuals and institutions for allegedly hacking American servers
during the 2016 election, Mueller said that the indictments “contain
allegations and we are not commenting on the guilt or innocence of any specific
defendant.”
“Every defendant is
presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.”
Had he stopped
there, he would have been correct. But then he crafted a brand new standard.
“The order
appointing the special counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could
obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation and kept the office
of the acting attorney general apprised of our work,” Mueller said. “After that
investigation, if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a
crime, we would have said so.”
According to Mueller
and his team, charged Russians are presumed innocent. An American president,
however, is presumed guilty unless and until Mueller’s team determines he is
innocent. Such a standard is an obscene abomination against the rule of law,
one that would never be committed by independent attorneys who place a fidelity
to their oaths and impartial enforcement of the law ahead of their political
motivations.
The contradictions
and double standards didn’t stop there, though.
“It would be unfair
to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution
of the actual charge,” Mueller said, after all but stating that Trump committed
a crime for which Mueller never charged him. Just as Mueller’s own words and
actions at the Wednesday press conference prove that he didn’t want his team’s
report to speak for itself, the report itself proves that Mueller and his team
don’t believe it’s unfair to accuse somebody of something a court cannot
resolve.
If they actually
believed that, then the 240-page volume II of their report on their obstruction
investigation of the president would never have been authored. After all,
according to Mueller’s own statement, such an operation would be patently
unfair. And if it’s unfair to air dirty laundry against a target who was never
charged, surely it’s doubly unfair to do so in writing and on camera during a
press conference whose mere existence refutes the very claims of its host.
Mueller revealed
himself as little more than a clone of James Comey—the smarmy, scheming
politician who replaced Mueller as the head of the FBI. Recall that it was
Comey who assumed for himself powers that did not belong to him by law when he
declared at a 2016 press conference no “reasonable prosecutor” would charge
Hillary Clinton with criminal wrongdoing in her mishandling of classified information
and unsanctioned use of a secret, private email server to evade public records
laws. Just as Mueller did in his report and Wednesday press conference, Comey
followed up his declaration that Hillary would not be charged with statement
after statement after statement of all the awful things Hillary Clinton did.
“There is evidence
of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified
information,” Comey said of Clinton. He excoriated her for repeatedly sending
and receiving top secret information on her unsecured server which had never
been authorized to process classified information. He even said it was
possible, due to her “extreme” carelessness, that hostile foreign actors had
penetrated her system and obtained highly classified information about U.S.
national security programs.
Regardless of how
you feel about Clinton, Comey’s display at that press conference was an
embarrassment. He did an extreme disservice to the nation and the rule of law
by unilaterally declaring himself the primary arbiter of prosecutorial
decisions in the federal government when that authority belongs solely to the
Department of Justice. And he did an extreme disservice to Clinton herself by
dragging her through the mud in such a manner that clearing her name would be
impossible.
In fact, DOJ
guidelines expressly prohibit the actions of both Comey and Mueller in naming
and shaming individuals who were never formally charged with any wrongdoing.
“As a series of
cases makes clear, there is ordinarily ‘no legitimate governmental interest
served’ by the government’s public allegation of wrongdoing by an uncharged
party, and this is true ‘regardless of what criminal charges may . . . b[e]
contemplated by the Assistant United States Attorney against the [third-party]
for the future,'” states DOJ’s formal policy manual on the duties of federal
prosecutors and principles of federal prosecutions.
Nationwide bar rules
governing all practicing attorneys in the United States also explicitly
prohibit Mueller’s display during Wednesday’s press conference.
“The prosecutor in a
criminal case shall … refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a
substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused,”
states Rule 3.8(f) of the American Bar Association’s rules of professional
conduct.
Multiple federal
agents and prosecutors reached out to The Federalist after Mueller’s press
conference to express dismay at the former FBI director’s behavior.
“I’d have been
crucified under this rule for a ‘not innocent’ comment about an uncharged
party,” a former federal prosecutor told The Federalist. “I literally cannot
fathom holding a press conference to say that an uncharged person was not
innocent.”
“I wish these former
FBI directors would learn their lessons: keep your mouths shut unless you’re
referring a case for prosecution,” Jeff Danik, a retired FBI supervisor, said
during a phone interview with The Federalist on Wednesday.
Mueller’s
performance made it clear for all to see that what he ran for the last two
years wasn’t an independent investigation pursuant to the rule of law so much
as an inquisition motivated by political animus. Mueller and his team refused
to charge prominent Democrats for crimes he charged against Republicans. Paul
Manafort was charged with unregistered lobbying for foreign governments, while
Mueller left alone long-time Democrat donor Tony Podesta and former Obama White
House Counsel Greg Craig.
George Papadopoulos
and Michael Flynn were charged with making false statements to federal
investigators, while Clinton campaign cronies Glenn Simpson and Christopher
Steele’s false statements to Congress and the FBI were ignored. Trump’s
nonexistent Russian connections were plumbed while a dubious Clinton
campaign-funded dossier sourced directly to Russian officials was used as a
prosecutorial roadmap rather than rock-solid evidence of actual campaign
collusion with the Kremlin.
Mueller claimed his
report spoke for itself, then put together a completely unnecessary press
conference more than a month after his report’s public release, in which he not
just spoke for the report, but expounded on the new legal standards he created
to govern its conclusions.
These are the
actions not of an impartial and independent investigator, but of a scheming
political operative. None of this is any surprise to anyone who has followed
Mueller’s tenure in government. As FBI director, Mueller repeatedly misused and
abused the authority granted to him by Congress.
Mueller and Comey
utterly bungled the federal investigation into the 2001 Anthrax attacks,
resulting in a $5.8 million judgment against the government after the two men
falsely accused an innocent man of being behind the attacks.
Even after the court
judgment against him, Mueller was defiant.
“I do not apologize
for any aspect of the investigation,” Mueller said afterward. He then doubled
down and said it would be wrong to say there were any mistakes in how he
handled the investigation.
Then there was
Mueller’s handling as FBI director of a case in which FBI agents framed
innocent men of murders the FBI knew had been committed by their own
informants. One of the innocent men died in prison awaiting justice for a crime
he never committed.
Then, as special
counsel to investigate Russian collusion during the 2016 campaign, Mueller
promptly hired partisan Democrats to run his investigation. He tapped as
investigators FBI personnel who openly discussed their hatred of Trump and his
voters, as well as their plans to keep him out of office.
There’s no longer
any doubt about who Robert Mueller is or why he conducted himself the way he
did. As abominable as his press conference was, we should in many ways be
thankful that Mueller so willingly displayed for all to see his disdain for
basic rules of prosecutorial conduct, his total lack of self-awareness, and his
naked desire to stick it to Trump.
Now that Mueller has publicly affirmed there was a zero crime
relation between President Trump and the Russian government (meaning Putin) to conspire
together for an election victory in 2016. YET mystically implied President
Trump obstructed in the investigation of the zero crime. THEN WATCH THE VIDEO and
read the Western Free Press article
on how the Dems are smearing President Trump for their political objectives.
We have seen this on many different occasions. The Democrats
are on a “smear campaign” because they still can’t accept that their candidate
didn’t win in 2016.
In a video published last week, Nancy Pelosi admits that the
Democrats are using “smear tactics” to attack President Trump. In the video,
she makes bold confessions that should have all Americans on red alert. (RELATED: President
Trump Gives AG Barr Power to Declassify Russia Material)
“We call it the wrap-up smear–if you want to talk politics,”
Pelosi said. “You smear someone with falsehoods and all the rest, and then you
merchandise it” Pelosi added.
“Then you write it, and they see it reported in the press.
So now it is validated that the press reported the smear, that is called
wrap-up smear,” Pelosi continued. “Then you merchandise the report on the smear,”
Pelosi concluded.
Of course, President Donald Trump has said many times while
discussing continued aggravation, that nothing will satisfy the Democrats, even
after the Mueller investigation found nothing to justify the two-year probe of
allegations that he colluded with the Russians during the 2016 presidential
campaign.
The Dems are getting NOTHING done in Congress! They only
want a Do-Over on Mueller!
.@ianbremmer
now admits that he MADE UP “a completely ludicrous quote,” attributing it to
me. This is what’s going on in the age of Fake News. People think they can say
anything and get away with it. Really, the libel laws should be changed to hold
Fake News Media accountable!
When the Mueller report was released, they were in shock for
an entire day. Then they started doubling down. They claimed that they wanted
the whole (un-redacted) Mueller report before they would believe the
results. (RELATED: LEAKED:
Kellyanne Conway Shuts Pelosi Down in Oval Office Meeting)
AG William Barr made the un-redacted version of the report
available to key Democrats. However, the only two that have read the documents
are Republicans.
And on Wednesday, according to the Associated Press, when House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi answered a question as to what would satisfy the Dems, she pretty much
confirmed what the entire Russia probe — which has deeply divided Americans
along partisan lines — was all about: “I’ll be satisfied when we have a new
president of the United States who that is a Democrat.”
It is worthy of highlighting that in the last presidential
debate of 2016, candidate Dems asked Trump if he would accept the election
results if he were to lose. When Trump said he would have to see, based on
whether the authorities managed the election appropriately, the Democrats in
and out of the media rebuked him. Now that he won, they refuse to accept the
results. (RELATED: Hamas
Supporter Arrested for Threatening to Blow Up Trump Tower)
_____________________
James Ledbetteris a journalist who joined Western Free Press in 2018.
Since then, he has written extensively for Western Free Press on the Trump
administration as well as on other political issues. If you have a NEWS TIP,
send an email to james.ledbetter@westernfreepress.com
I read a post yesterday on the Facebook Group Our Country Our Law by Ivan Vivian (not sure if name is actual or pseudonym).
The post essentially voices the anger and frustration felt do to decades of Dem
Party corruption that has NEVER been held accountable.
The original post doesn’t have a title so I arbitrarily made
one. I pray Ivan approves. I use embedded links throughout the post which represents
my thinking as commentary. Ivan’s thoughts are his, the links are mine.
I hope you are moved to get your backs up against the Dem
agenda to smear President Trump and by extension the real America. The Dem America is a
transformed morally corrupt America.
Dare I say we had
indictments in Watergate only because Nixon was a Republican and The Mob Party
Democrats determine to use every means possible in the BolshevikLeniniststyle
of destroying their opposition? Establishment Republicans tend always give
Democrats a deep pass. They certainly knew Obama and Clinton were engaged sin
corruption and did nothing.
That which Obama and
Clinton were engaged in with FBI and CIA cooperation would make all that Nixon
did look like juvenile tiddlywinks.
The Nixon burglars
we’re discovered by journalists engaged in their own espionage against Nixon,
much as they are against Trump. While they had a little justification going
against Nixon because he did have his black list, our modern day Main
Stream Media we’re creating pseudo-events
to frame
President Trump. Utilizing fabricating
misinformation and disinformation with The Mob Party Democrats Fake
News Against Trump was reported as real live events.
Will we have
indictments against insidious Mob Party Democrats and the Main Stream Media who
make all Nixon did look quite pale and insipid in comparison? Knowing the
Establishment Republicans, I think not.
Nixon resisted the
probes into his administration. The Mob Party Democrats have not only resisted
a probe into their treasonous attacks against President Trump but have, in true
Alinskyism,
have waged a full war against the President accusing him of all
that they were doing themselves. The horror of this Russian Collusion-gate is
that The Mob Party Democrats secures a forty million [dollar] investigation,
not against guilty Obama-Clinton but against innocent President Trump. Still
worse, we allow it!
It was all a $40
million cover up for the Obama-Clinton corruption machine. A coverup
of their treasonous behavior and there ought to be indictments and
prosecution coming forth.
I pray those operating Creeping
Sharia are still looking for a permanent home because my experience with
Tumblr is they are more censorship oriented than WordPress. Time will tell.
The post at Creeping
Sharia expounds that Steve Amundson (the founder of
CJC) had set up an expose-Islam-info-booth at a mall. The booth was accosted by
a couple of Muslim gals and a Muslim man left a backpack under the booth. I’ll
let the cross post that will appear below give the details of what occurred,
but the point of the post was the incident motivated the mall to rescind its
approval for Amundson to have a booth citing security reasons. Amundson got the
Thomas Moore Law Center
(TMLC) involved in the mall censorship issue.
“I am very confident in
saying that if TMLC had not stepped in on behalf of us we would still be
fighting to gain back our First Amendment right of free speech.”
Chances are, if you speak boldly about the truth of Islam
and Sharia Law you’re bound to run into resistance and conflict. Steve
Amundson, the courageous and dedicated founder of the Counter Jihad Coalition
(CJC) knows this all too well. He experienced a particularly disturbing
incident recently that temporarily prevented him from setting up his booths and
getting his message out.
The CJC exists to educate people on the truth about Islam.
They do this by setting up tables at different venues, such as the shopping
mall shown in the photo above, and pass out factual, truthful brochures. On a
given day, they can give out as many as 1,000 brochures.
Although most people are grateful for the information on
Islam, Amundson is always on high alert for potential backlash. This past July
was no exception.
Amundson and his team, including a pastor, set up their
booth at the Los Cerritos Center in Cerritos, California, on July 7th. At one
point, two men began snapping pictures of the booth, then getting on their
phone.
Soon after, two Muslim women approached the booth and began
cursing and causing a scene. Mall security was nearby and began speaking with
the women. In the meantime, a white haired Muslim man walked over to the CJC
booth and slid a backpack he was carrying under the CJC table. He then began
speaking with the pastor from CJC.
After a short conversation, the Muslim man walked away from
the pastor.
When Amundson found out that the man was an irate Muslim
complaining about CJC’s activities, he became concerned for their safety and
called security.
According to Amundson:
“I told security he left a backpack
underneath our booth. The Muslim refused to take the backpack. We started to
take cover behind cement pillars and told security to either call the bomb squad
or have the guy pick up the backpack. He finally agreed to very carefully pick
it up and security escorted him away. Security will not say at least right now
if he was arrested, if the bomb squad was called or what. Was this a dry run or
the real thing?”
Amundson’s subsequent application to place his table at the
Mall was denied, citing security reasons.
That’s when Amundson reached out to the Thomas More Law
Center (TMLC).
Thomas More Law Center attorneys wrote a letter to the Mall
concerning its denial of CJC’s constitutional rights to free speech.
A few weeks after the Mall acknowledged receipt of the letter, CJC was
approved.
Amundson was so grateful to have his First Amendment rights
restored, that he recently sent an email out to his large group of supporters
and thanked TMLC directly, and kindly encouraged his friends to donate to us.
Your ongoing support of TMLC ensures we
have the resources to provide immediate legal assistance, to individuals like
Steve Amundson and the CJC team. Thank you for your continued support of
the Thomas More Law Center.
