John R. Houk
© September 30, 2018
A couple of days ago I brought up the issue of both the Dems
and GOP allowing deference to the testimony of Christine Blasey Ford rape
allegations against Judge Kavanaugh: The Dems hammered Kavanaugh on his teenage
antics based on his High School Yearbook while ignoring any relation to Ford’s
character based on the data from her Yearbook. I pointed they were
both frisky teenagers that grew with respected characters.
YET THE DEMS decided to correlate Kavanaugh’s truthfulness
as flawed because portrayals in his Yearbook, presuming Ford’s antics in her Yearbook
must be ignored and her testimony to be the absolute truth. WHAT A BUNCH OF
BLATANT DEM HYPOCRISY! AND what an epic failure by the GOP to
NOT call-out the Dems on this blatant hypocrisy!
Now thanks to a little digital math and some leg-work by The
Gateway Pundit, the therapy incident that was supposed to trigger Ford’s
repressed memory are found to be inconsistent with her sworn testimony before
the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday 9/27/18. Here’s a short quote from The
Gateway Pundit on what that blog discovered:
Dr. Ford’s testimony does not add
up for many reasons.
This falsehood in her testimony
about the timing of the remodeling projects on her home is not accurate.
This is a national disgrace
thanks to the eager Democrats and their conflicted witness Christine Ford.
Hat tip Christina
UPDATE: Christine Ford
spoke about the second front door at least three times in her testimony.
So in a new clip, she talks about
it again here.
She says the incident in the 1980’s is in her medical records twice: “The first
time is in 2012 with my husband in couples therapy with the quibbling over the
remodel”. Very much present tense, as in remodel happening at same time as
couples therapy.
The link in the last paragraph is to a C-Span video of Ford
testimony. Here is that embed for this blog:
C-Span VIDEO: Blasey
Ford Describes Quibbling about Remodel in Therapy
And continued from The
Gateway Pundit:
Again, this is from her opening
statements:
“I had never told the details
to anyone, the specific details, until May 2012, during a couples counseling
session. The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had
completed a very extensive, very long remodel of our home, and I insisted on a
second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not
understand. In explaining why I wanted a second front door, I began to describe
the assault in detail.”
…
This implied that currently, today,
it does not look pleasing. But you can’t even see the 2nd front door anymore.
Back in the November 2011 google map shot, they already had started putting up
posts of the wooden wall, and the walkway and new flowerbeds are already in.
DiFi asks “And do you have that
second front door” – totally implying that she wants to know how the “quibble”
with her husband turned out.
The March 2011 picture shows the
new door, and you can see that the remodel (new space) was in the back of the
house; by comparing with 2007 photo, you can see the new roofline in the back.
The November 2011 image shows the wood wall posts and new pathway in front of
the new door area.
The pictures with time stamps must be looked at on The
Gateway Pundit.
The point being: Her rape that occurred when she was 15
inspired the home remodel WAY EARLIER than her claimed repressed memory
inspiration that took place in 2012.
Her therapist’s remarkable ability to enhance (or fabricate)
a repressed memory could not be the reason she wanted to build the 2nd
front door in 2012 because the 2nd front door was built in 2011.
I smell another blatant Dem lie!
Here’s some irony: Here are some quotes from Left oriented
sources who either quote from Ford’s opening Senate testimony or earlier sworn affidavits
related to the reason for building a second front door and what inspired the
completion of said door claimed completion in 2012:
“… I had never told the
details to anyone until May 2012, during a couples counseling session. The
reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had completed an
extensive remodel of our home, and I insisted on a second front door, an idea
that he and others disagreed with and could not understand. In explaining why I
wanted to have a second front door, I described the assault in detail." (Read
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and Brett Kavanaugh's Opening Remarks for Thursday's
Hearing; By MADISON FELLER;
Elle; 9/27/18)
+++
In all three otherwise everyday
scenes, Christine Blasey Ford described to others about being sexually
assaulted many years earlier by a future federal judge, according to sworn
affidavits her lawyers said Wednesday they submitted to the
Senate Judiciary Committee. A fourth from her husband says that during a
2012 couples therapy session, Ford named her attacker as Brett Kavanaugh. President
Donald Trump nominated Kavanaugh July 9 to the Supreme Court. (Bold text
Blog Editor’s - Here’s
what the 4 affidavits supporting Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford say;
By Laurie
Kellman, Associated Press; PBS; 9/26/18 11:31 AM EDT)
+++
Today, as Dr. Christine Blasey Ford
testified against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, giving
her recollections in heartbreaking detail of how he sexually
assaulted her as a teenager, she relayed a detail that spoke to the lasting
impact of her trauma: as an adult, while renovating the house she shared with
her husband, Dr.
Ford insisted on installing a second front door, wanting a second
escape route in the event of an emergency.
In a conversation with the Cut, Dr.
Tracey Shors, a professor of neuroscience and psychology at Rutgers University
who specializes in the study of stress, memory, and the
lasting impact of teenage sexual assault, explained the
evolutionary logic behind that second door, and other measures women take to
assert some sense of control in the wake of trauma. (The
Meaning of Christine Blasey Ford’s Second Front Door; By Katie Heaney; The
Cut; 9/27/18)
+++
Her “proof” that this story is true
is that she had to have two front doors installed in her home.
That, in turn, is what led to her
attending marital counseling. A marital spat over a home remodel led to
emergence of the alleged attack in “recollected memories.” But then, a little
later in her testimony, Ford changed her story and claimed that her second door
is actually there for “sponsored interns from Google and students” to use.
Really?
Seems like the purpose of the
door is not exactly as Ms. Ford would ask us to believe. It was not installed
as a second escape route for a person suffering from claustrophobia as a result
of an attack. It was installed to give the interns and students they sponsored
a private door to enter their area of the house.
How convenient that no one caught
that little omission of fact.
To date, there is no one willing to
stand up and confirm her story. In fact, those she has identified as witnesses
have all – to a person – denied being present or seeing Brett Kavanaugh ever
act in the manner in which she describes. (The
quavering voice of Blasey Ford and the railroading of Brett Kavanaugh;
By Jacquie Kubin;
Communities Digital News; 9/27/18)
And now, The Gateway Pundit cross post.
JRH 9/30/18
In this current state of media censorship & defunding, consider chipping
in a few bucks for enjoying (or even despising yet read) this Blog.
************************
BREAKING: Christine Ford Caught
in MAJOR LIE – Photos Prove House Updates Occurred Much Earlier Than Claims in
Senate Testimony
Posted by Jim Hoft
By Joe Hoft
September 29, 2018
The address has been widely reported online and the home
was pictured in the local news.
Dr. Christine Ford’s last minute accusations against
squeaky-clean Judge Brett Kavanaugh stunned the political world.
But Ford’s accusations were questioned when she provided no
date, no location and all of the alleged witnesses, including her friend,
denied the allegations.
We now have information that shows Christine Ford lied
about the entire story.
In her testimony
on Thursday, Dr. Ford stated that she put a second door on her
house in 2012:
Over the years, I told very,
very few friends that I had this traumatic experience. I told my husband before
we were married that I had experienced a sexual assault. I had never told the
details to anyone — the specific details — until May 2012, during
a couples counseling session.
The reason this came up in
counseling is that my husband and I had completed a very extensive, very long
remodel of our home and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and
others disagreed with and could not understand.
In explaining why I wanted a
second front door, I began to describe the assault in detail. I recall saying
that the boy who assaulted me could someday be on the U.S. Supreme Court, and
spoke a bit about his background at an elitist all-boys school in Bethesda,
Maryland. My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh.
We now have proof that this was a lie — a major lie.
This was the basis for the entire story she told the US
Senate Judiciary Committee under oath — And this is a lie.
Christine Ford perjured herself.
The problem with Ford’s testimony is that the the second
front door was built on their home long before that date.
According to online queries and pictures of the property
from as early as 2007, the house in question had two doors in the front since
at least 2011 and probably earlier.
Thanks to time stamps available on the Internet, we can
determine roughly when the 2nd door was put in Dr. Ford’s house.
A simple query of Palo Alto, CA building
inspections of properties related to Dr. Ford and her husband result in an
inspection in 2007. When you link on the same address on Zillow,
you see that this
house was last remodeled in 2008.
Ford’s house
in 2007 – there was only one door pictured.
Ford’s house
in March 2011 – This clearly shows the second front door is
already there.
Ford’s house
in November 2011 – The second front door is there.
Here is the same address in 2015 — the same home where
the protests took place last week.
Dr. Ford’s testimony does not add up for many reasons.
This falsehood in her testimony about the timing of the
remodeling projects on her home is not accurate.
This is a national disgrace thanks to the eager Democrats
and their conflicted witness Christine Ford.
Hat tip Christina
UPDATE: Christine Ford spoke about the second
front door at least three times in her testimony.
So in a new clip, she talks about it again here.
She says the incident in the 1980’s is in her medical records twice: “The first
time is in 2012 with my husband in couples therapy with the quibbling over the
remodel”. Very much present tense, as in remodel happening at same time as
couples therapy.
Again, this is from her opening
statements:
“I had never told the details to
anyone, the specific details, until May 2012, during a couples counseling
session. The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had
completed a very extensive, very long remodel of our home, and I insisted on a
second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not
understand. In explaining why I wanted a second front door, I began to describe
the assault in detail.”
And then this
clip with Dianne Feinstein during her testimony.
“Our house does not look
aesthetically pleasing from the curb.”
This implied that currently, today, it does not look
pleasing. But you can’t even see the 2nd front door anymore. Back in the
November 2011 google map shot, they already had started putting up posts of the
wooden wall, and the walkway and new flowerbeds are already in.
DiFi asks “And do you have that second front door” – totally
implying that she wants to know how the “quibble” with her husband turned out.
The March 2011 picture shows the new door, and you can see
that the remodel (new space) was in the back of the house; by comparing with
2007 photo, you can see the new roofline in the back. The November 2011 image
shows the wood wall posts and new pathway in front of the new door area.
_______________________
TGP Finds Christine Ford
Lie
John R. Houk
© September 30, 2018
____________________
BREAKING: Christine Ford
Caught in MAJOR LIE – Photos Prove House Updates Occurred Much Earlier Than
Claims in Senate Testimony
No comments:
Post a Comment