Posted July 8, 2018
Even as the Mainstream Media (MSM) continues to harangue the
Trump Administration over Crooked Hillary’s loss to President Trump, more and more
documented information is rising to the top like scum purified out of metal.
Emails and memos substantiate just how corrupt the Obama Administration’s FBI,
DOJ, CIA, etc. leadership indeed was in creating ex nihilo
fake evidence of Trump wrongdoing with Russian help.
Below are three documented stories of where the actual
collusion originated and guess what? TRUMP IS NOT THE CULPRIT!
******************
Bombshell: Even More Evidence of FBI anti-Trump Bias
Uncovered!
By Onan
Coca
July 7, 2018
At some point, some rational journalist is going to have to
start openly wondering if they’ve been wrong about this FBI/DOJ/Mueller stuff
all along, won’t they?
The overwhelming majority of agents working for the FBI/DOJ
are wonderful, hard-working professionals, which begs the question, how did so
many anti-Trump, pro-Hillary Clinton agents get in on the Clinton
investigation, the Russia investigation, and the Mueller investigation?
The material that has leaked out over the last few months
has proven that at least 4-5 of the agents had a definite anti-Trump animus and
that animus was bad enough that Mueller canned them from his investigation.
Now, we’re learning that there is even more evidence of the
intelligence community working against Trump for partisan reasons.
Here’s what the Hill found in recently uncovered memos:
Multiple reviews of whether FBI
agents’ political bias affected the Russia-Trump collusion case remain in their
infancy, but investigators already have unearthed troubling internal
communications long withheld from public view.
We already know from FBI
counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok’s now-infamous text messages with his
fellow agent and reported lover, Lisa Page, that Strzok — the man driving that
Russia collusion investigation — disdained Donald Trump and
expressed willingness to use his law enforcement powers to “stop” the
Republican from becoming president.
The question that lingers,
unanswered: Did those sentiments affect official actions?
Memos the FBI is now producing
to the Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general and multiple Senate and
House committees offer what sources involved in the production, review or
investigation describe to me as “damning” or “troubling” evidence.
They show Strzok and his
counterintelligence team rushing in the fall of 2016 to find “derogatory”
information from informants or a “pretext” to accelerate the probe and get a
surveillance warrant on figures tied to the future president.
The memos prove that Strzok and his team railroaded Trump
associate Carter Page (who has still never been accused of any kind of wrongdoing)
and used him as a scapegoat to spy on the Trump campaign. Strzok’s own words in
the memos damn him for his immoral tactics and obvious partisan behavior.
The memos also indicate that certain FBI officials were
knowingly and maliciously leaking information from their investigations to
Democrats in Congress and to the media.
These and other documents are
still being disseminated to various oversight bodies in Congress, and more
revelations are certain to occur.
Yet, now, irrefutable proof
exists that agents sought to create pressure to get “derogatory” information
and a “pretext” to interview people close to a future president they didn’t
like.
Clear evidence also exists that
an investigation into still-unproven collusion between a foreign power and a
U.S. presidential candidate was driven less by secret information from Moscow
and more by politically tainted media leaks.
And that means the dots between
expressions of political bias and official actions just got a little more
connected.
In response to all of the bad news, Democrat leader Adam
Schiff (D-CA) has been trying to obfuscate what is really happening by
attacking Republicans for being on Trump’s side.
Schiff has even begun mocking a few GOP Congressional
leaders as ‘The Four Horsemen,” but Congressman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) isn’t worried
about anything Schiff has to say. In fact, to hear Gowdy talk about it… nobody
in the GOP “gives a damn” about what Schiff thinks.
From RCP:
“Let me tell you this about
Adam,” Gowdy began. “Adam’s had a terrible last couple of years. He wanted to
be the attorney general under Hillary Clinton and no one in the country worked
harder to protect her than Adam Schiff.”
“He wanted to be the head of the
CIA. He wanted to run for California and the run for Senate and the People’s
Republic of California, but he couldn’t win either of those seats. So, now,
now, he wants to be the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Speaking
of the apocalypse, Adam Schiff wants to be the chairman of the House
Intelligence Committee,” he said.
“If you ever have — I don’t know — a couple of three months with nothing else to do, I want you to go back, Jason, and think of all the things you would not know if you had taken Adam Schiff’s advice. You wouldn’t know the whole — the spontaneous reaction to a video was a hoax in Libya. You would never have read the first Chris Stevens email. You wouldn’t know that Hillary Clinton had this unique email arrangement with herself because Adam Schiff did everything in his power to keep you from finding out,” Gowdy continued.
“You wouldn’t know about the
dossier. You wouldn’t know who funded it. You wouldn’t know it was used in a
court proceeding. You wouldn’t know about Strzok and Page. In fact, you
wouldn’t even be having the show tonight. You wouldn’t be having the show about
Strzok and Page if Adam Schiff had had his,” Gowdy finished.
Posted by Fox News
Published on Jul 5, 2018
On 'Hannity,' the Republican sounds
off on the Democrat calling him one of the 'four horsemen of this apocalypse.'
+++++++++++
Emails Appear To Blow a Hole in Strzok’s Statement on
Page FISA
During a closed-door interview on June 27, former FBI
official Peter Strzok downplayed his role in obtaining surveillance warrants to
spy on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
The Daily Beast reported that Strzok, the
former deputy chief of counterintelligence, claimed in the interview that he
had no substantive input on drafting or securing Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants used to spy on Page, an energy consultant who
left the Trump team in September 2016.
Strzok also denied providing evidence for the FISAs, the
first of which was granted on Oct. 21, 2016.
A Republican in the June 27 interview confirmed that Strzok,
who oversaw the Russian investigation, denied having a direct role in the FISA
process. But the Republican was also incredulous at Strzok’s suggestion that he
had little to do with the spy warrants obtained against Page.
A new report appears to justify the Republican’s skepticism.
John Solomon reported on The Hill that Strzok exchanged emails with FBI
attorney Lisa Page regarding the Carter Page surveillance.
Strzok and Lisa Page exchanged numerous anti-Trump text
messages during their work on the Russia probe, which was codenamed “Crossfire
Hurricane.” In one Aug. 8, 2016, message, Strzok told Page that “we’ll stop”
Trump from becoming president.
Strzok, who was the FBI’s top investigator on Crossfire
Hurricane, sent an email with the subject line “Crossfire FISA” to Lisa Page
discussing a set of talking points aimed at getting then-FBI Deputy Director
Andrew McCabe to push the Department of Justice to approve a surveillance
warrant against Carter Page, according to Solomon.
“At a minimum, that keeps the hurry the F up pressure on
him,” Strzok emailed Lisa Page on Oct. 14, 2016, according to Solomon.
Strzok also commented on a letter that Lisa Page sent to
then-FBI Director Jim Comey offering to meet with the FBI to discuss
allegations made against him in a Yahoo News article published on Sept. 23,
2016.
“At a minimum, the letter provides us a pretext to
interview,” Strzok wrote to Lisa Page, with whom he was having an affair, on
Sept. 26, 2016.
The Yahoo News article claimed that U.S. government
officials were looking into allegations that Page met secretly in Moscow in
July 2016 with two sanctioned Kremlin insiders.
It would later be learned that the article, written by
Michael Isikoff, was based on information from Christopher Steele, the author
of the dossier.
The dossier claimed that Page was the Trump campaign’s
conduit to the Kremlin for the collusion conspiracy. Page has vehemently denied
all of the allegations, and no evidence has emerged to support the Steele
dossier’s claims about him.
The FBI and DOJ’s spy warrants relied heavily on the Steele dossier,
which remains largely unverified and uncorroborated, in order to persuade a
federal judge to allow spying against Carter Page. The FISA applications also
cited the Isikoff article that relied on the dossier, though without disclosing
that the article was derived from Steele.
The applications also did not disclose that the Hillary
Clinton campaign and DNC had financed the dossier. A law firm for both
organizations hired opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which in turn hired
Steele.
Despite Strzok’s suggestion of an interview with Carter
Page, the FBI did not meet with him until March 2017, six months after the
email and two months after BuzzFeed News published the dossier. Page has
questioned why the FBI waited so long to interview him.
The FBI used other methods to keep tabs on the former Trump
aide. As The Daily Caller News Foundation first reported, an FBI informant
named Stefan Halper made contact with Page during a conference at the
University of Cambridge on July 11, 2016, nearly three weeks before the start
of Crossfire Hurricane.
Halper, a veteran of three Republican presidential
administrations, maintained contact with Page for over a year, until September
2017. That was the same month that the fourth and final FISA warrant against
Carter Page expired.
Halper met with two other Trump campaign advisers, Sam
Clovis and George Papadopoulos. Halper paid Papadopoulos $3,000 in September
2016 to travel to London under the guise of writing a policy paper and
Mediterranean energy issues.
Papadopoulos has told associates that during dinner one
night in London, Halper asked him about Russian efforts to steal Hillary
Clinton emails.
Strzok’s attorney, Aitan Goelman, did not respond to an
email seeking comment for this article.
A version of this article appeared on The Daily Caller News Foundation website.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge
to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing
opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our
stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting
mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends,
however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and
consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
+++++++++++++++++++
Judicial Watch Sues CIA for Documents
on Dossier Leak to Senator Harry Reid
JW Press
Room
JULY 06, 2018
Reid Publicized Clinton-DNC Dossier Allegations
Following Brennan Briefing
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced
today it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) for records of communications with former Senator
Harry Reid (D-NV) and his staff regarding the anti-Trump dossier funded by the
Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (Judicial
Watch v. Central Intelligence Agency (No. 1:18-cv-01502)).
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid reportedly believed
then-Obama CIA Director Brennan was feeding him information about alleged links
between the Trump campaign and the Russian government in order to make public
accusations.
According to “Russian
Roulette,” by Yahoo! News chief investigative correspondent Michael
Isikoff and David Corn, the Washington bureau chief of the left-wing Mother
Jones magazine, Brennan contacted Reid on Aug. 25, 2016, to brief him on
the state of Russia’s interference in the presidential campaign. Brennan
briefed other members of the so-called Gang of Eight, but Reid is the only who
took direct action.
Two days after the briefing, Reid
wrote a
letter to then-FBI Director James Comey asserting that
“evidence of a direct connection between the Russian government and Donald
Trump’s presidential campaign continues to mount.”
Reid called on Comey to investigate the links “thoroughly
and in a timely fashion.”
Reid saw Brennan’s outreach as “a sign of urgency,” Isikoff
and Corn wrote in the book.
“Reid also had the impression that
Brennan had an ulterior motive. He concluded the CIA chief believed the public
needed to know about the Russian operation, including the information about the
possible links to the Trump campaign.”
According to the book, Brennan told
Reid that the intelligence community had determined that the Russian government
was behind the hack and leak of Democratic emails and that Russian President
Vladimir Putin was behind it. Brennan also told Reid that there was evidence that
Russian operatives were attempting to tamper with election results.
On August 27, 2016, Reid wrote a letter to
Comey accusing President Trump’s campaign of colluding with the Russian
government.
The Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit was filed in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia after the CIA failed to respond to
a February 12, 2018, FOIA request for:
§
All records of
communications, including but not limited to letters, emails, text messages,
and instant chats, between former CIA Director John Brennan and/or officials in
the CIA Director’s Office on the one hand, and Senator Harry Reid and/or
members of Senator Reid’s staff on the other hand, regarding, concerning or
relating to the Christopher Steele “dossier” and/or alleged “collusion” between
the Trump presidential campaign and Russia.
§
Copies of any reports,
memoranda or other materials provided to Senator Reid and/or members of his
staff by the CIA relating to alleged Russian “collusion” or cooperation between
the Trump presidential campaign and Russia.
§
All materials, including
briefing reports and memos, audio/video presentations, PowerPoint presentations
and any other records, used by CIA Director Brennan and/or other CIA officials
to brief Senator Reid and/or members of his staff on alleged “collusion”
between the Trump presidential campaign and Russia.
§
All notes, minutes,
transcripts, and audio and/or visual recordings made of any and all briefings
provided by the CIA to Senator Reid and/or members of his staff regarding
alleged “collusion” between the Trump presidential campaign and Russia.
Brennan has come under public scrutiny as one of the
suspected prime movers of the “Spygate”
scandal against then-candidate Trump and his team during 2015 and 2016 and
later against President Trump and members of his administration.
Brennan himself has revealed his deep-seated animus toward
President Trump and used his media platform as an MSNBC commentator to
repeatedly attack the president.
When President Trump tweeted about FBI
Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s firing in March 2018, Brennan retweeted
and responded:
When the full extent of your
venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will
take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history.
You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America…America will
triumph over you.
In response to the president’s tweet that former FBI
director Comey is a “proven leaker and liar,” Brennan retweeted
and responded in April 2018 that President Trump’s
administration is a failing “kakistocracy.”
“Obama CIA Director John Brennan’s unhinged attacks on
President Trump help explain the Obama administration spying abuses targeting
Trump,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The mere fact that we had to
file this lawsuit shows the CIA has something to hide on Obama-era abuses and
collusion with Democrats in Congress to target then-candidate Trump.”
Judicial Watch filed a separate FOIA lawsuit against
the CIA on March 6, 2017, for records related to the investigation of former
Trump National Security Advisor and retired United States Army Lieutenant
General Michael Flynn’s communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak (Judicial
Watch v. Central Intelligence Agency et al. (No.1:17-cv-00397)).
The National Security Agency refused
to confirm or deny the existence of intelligence records about
communications between Gen. Flynn and Amb. Kislyak.
________________
Bombshell: Even More
Evidence of FBI anti-Trump Bias Uncovered!
Onan Coca is the Editor-in-Chief at Romulus Marketing and Bravera
Holdings. He's also the managing editor at Eaglerising.com, Constitution.com,
Godfather.com and the managing partner at iPatriot.com. You can read more of
his writing at Eagle Rising.
Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their five wonderful children.
Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their five wonderful children.
About Eagle Rising
Eagle Rising seeks to share
commentary and opinion about culture, media, politics, etc., from a Christian
and politically conservative perspective. … READ THE REST
_________________
Emails Appear To Blow a
Hole in Strzok’s Statement on Page FISA
The Western Journal is a news
company that drives positive cultural change by equipping readers with truth.
Every day, WesternJournal.com publishes conservative, libertarian, free market
and pro-family writers and broadcasters.
As Americans — and indeed,
readers around the world — continue to lose trust in traditional newspapers and broadcast networks and their claims of
objectivity and impartiality, The Western Journal is rapidly filling the gap as
a trusted source of news and information. The Western Journal is … READ THE REST
________________________
Judicial Watch Sues CIA
for Documents on Dossier Leak to Senator Harry Reid
Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3)
nonprofit organization. Contributions
are received from individuals, foundations, and
corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.
Judicial Watch, Inc., a
conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency,
accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Through its
educational endeavors, Judicial Watch advocates high standards of ethics and
morality in our nation’s public life and seeks to ensure that political and
judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American
people. Judicial Watch fulfills its educational mission through litigation,
investigations, and public outreach.
The motto of Judicial Watch
is “Because no one is above the law”. To this end, Judicial Watch uses the open
records or freedom of information laws and … READ THE REST
No comments:
Post a Comment