On Thursday (7/12/18) I watched about 98% of two House
Committees questioning Peter Strzok. That is nearly 10 hours of Republicans
trying to get answers and of Dems doing every parliamentary procedure possible
to obstruct those answers. ALSO, I was greatly disappointed of the FBI excuse
to prohibit Strzok answers in the name of an ongoing investigation.
I mean really, if some of those questions were answered by
Strzok, it would not have affected an ongoing investigation. For example off
the top of head: No investigative procedure would be exposed if the specifics
of who or how many people were involved in pushing the Steele Dossier as a
valid source for a FISA Warrant?
The Dems were so infuriating that my family may have thought
I was watching a football game loudly castigating numerous bad calls!
********************
Peter ‘Scoffer’ Strzok Kept People Awake with The Creeps
Last Night
Strzok Creeps [Photo edited by Editor]
By Judi McLeod
July 13, 2018
What the devil were former FBI agent Peter Strzok and the
Democrats trying for during Strzok’s appearance before the House Judiciary and
Oversight Committees yesterday?
This is one public Democrat Act that went well beyond the
main takeaway: that Strzok’s infamous message to mistress, former FBI lawyer
Lisa Page: “We will stop him” (Trump) was based not on his “bias” but on his
“deep patriotism”. The takeaway went well beyond because the manner in
which he gave it lived on to give people who watched it online night time
creeps and lurid nightmares.
Some Canada Free Press readers were sending in alerts—even
as the Hearing was in progress.
Others were contemplating in overnight wee hours just what
is it was that they saw on video.
“Scoffer” is the name of the
arrogant, haughty man who acts with arrogant pride”-Proverbs 21:24.
Scoffer is a name that fits Strzok to a ’T’. Scoffer Strzok
invaded citizen dreams last night.
“A video clip of Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok at Thursday’s marathon House hearing by the Judiciary and Oversight committees shows Strzok smirking and squirming in a manner that has given the creeps to people who have watched it online. Strzok was being questioned by Rep. Mark Walker (R-NC) late in the day-long hearing.” (Gateway Pundit, July 12, 2018)
“The clip was posted by a Twitter user, @Hollybowie, in
three versions, an eight-second clip, a seven second loop and a three second
loop.
— Holly Bowie (@Hollybowie) July 12, 2018
Actually had to fast forward through it. Had to replay this a few times. Did he really make this face?? pic.twitter.com/TV4fgBN47X— Holly Bowie (@Hollybowie) July 12, 2018
Completely real. I personally recorded it from my tv. I was so shocked when I saw it and played it back. I only cut the first part of the arguing. This is the full recording I captured. I couldn’t believe it. pic.twitter.com/fL3Ji16qP1— Holly Bowie (@Hollybowie) July 13, 2018
“In response to a query as to when in the hearing this took
place, Bowie said around 6:30 p.m. (EDT).
It was around 6:30 pm. if that helps. I can’t remember who was questioning. And now I can’t rewind to it.— Holly Bowie (@Hollybowie) July 12, 2018
“Imagine having to look at that creepy behavior by a senior
government official all day at the hearing.
“UPDATE: A TGP reader posted in the comments (thank you!) the YouTube video of Rep. Mark Walker (R-NC) questioning Strzok. The squirming smirking is at the end. The link is set to start the video just before then.
VIDEO: Rep.
Mark Walker Questions FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok on Text
Message and Bias
[Posted by Representative
Mark Walker
Published on Jul 12, 2018
July 12, 2018 | walker.house.gov]
“A version posted from CNN’s feed:
Does Peter Strzok know he's on live TV....? What a creep ROFL#CNNCredibilityCrisis pic.twitter.com/eq382kmpuZ— Raven (@KazeSkyz) July 12, 2018
And in slow motion close-up.
Does Peter Strzok know he's on live TV....? What a creep ROFL#CNNCredibilityCrisis pic.twitter.com/eq382kmpuZ— Raven (@KazeSkyz) July 12, 2018
“Pleasant dreams, everyone!”
“Strzok was on Mueller’s special
counsel team until the text messages were discovered. He was then
reassigned to the FBI’s office of human resources.” (Fox
News, July 12, 2018)
Hard to believe while watching him yesterday that just last
month he was escorted from the bureau and was relieved of his security
clearance.
The devil must have been doing gleeful cartwheels during
yesterday’s Hearing:
“Like many people, I had and
expressed personal political opinions during an extraordinary presidential
election. Many contained expressions of concern for the security of our
country,” Strzok said in his opening statement, adding that those opinions were
expressed “out of deep patriotism.” (Fox
News, July 12, 2018)
“We’ll stop it”—referring directly to Trump’s candidacy
expressed “out of deep patriotism”?
What kind of patriotism is THAT?
“In the exchange Strzok, also said
he doesn’t even remember sending the “stop” Trump text, noting it was written
late at night, “in shorthand”. (Fox News)
With the Deep State running the show, a lot of strange
things go on “late at night”.
Meanwhile, no matter how well meaning some of its
members, congress should toss ‘Peter Scoffer’ out of the limelight, bring down
the Final Curtain on him—thereby getting him out of our nightmares.
We should take solace of the soul in just knowing
that: “The haughty looks of a man shall be brought low, and the lofty
pride of men shall be humbled and the Lord alone will be exalted in that day”:
(Isaiah 2:11), and that “Everyone who is arrogant in heart is an
abomination to the Lord; be assured, he will not go unpunished.” (Proverbs
16:5)
It is high time to write the words “The End” on ‘Peter
Scoffer’s litany of alibis.
____________________
Judi McLeod
is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’
experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked
for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh,
Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com.
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C.
107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research,
critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use'
exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those
of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright
1997-2018 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2018 Canada Free Press.Com
No comments:
Post a Comment