John R. Houk
© August 4, 2017
Now that Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller (James Comey
good friend) has impaneled a Grand Jury giving him the power of the
government with search warrants and subpoenas, it is time to look at the
tainted witch hunt team Mueller has assembled.\
Michael Dreeben
Dreeben is a Dem donor meaning he is a Trump hater:
A fourth lawyer on Mueller's staff,
Michael Dreeben, donated $1,000 to Clinton 2006 and $250 to Obama in both 2007
and 2008. (Robert Mueller Stocks Staff with Democrat
Donors; By Brendan Kirby; Lifezette.com;
Update 6/13/17 10:30 AM)
And here:
Dreeben donated $1,000
dollars to Hillary Clinton’s Senate political action committee (PAC), Friends
of Hillary, while she ran for public office in New York. Dreeben did so while
he served as the deputy solicitor general at the Justice Department. (SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TEAM IS FULL OF HILLARY
CLINTON SUPPORTERS; By BRIAN ANDERSON; DownTrend.com; 6/12/17)
Andrew Weissmann
Weissmann donated a combined $2,300
to Obama’s campaign in 2008. In 2006, Weissmann contributed at least $2,000 to
the DNC. (Mueller probe: Meet the lawyers who gave $$
to Hillary, now investigating team Trump; By Brooke Singman; Fox News; 7/24/17)
And here:
…
Andrew Weissmann, who gave six donations to PACs for Obama in 2008, totaling
$4,700 … (Ties to Comey Suggest Conflict of Interest
for Special Counsel Mueller; By Joshua Philipp; Epoch Times; 6/15/17 12:19 PM – Updated 12:38 pm)
And here:
Andrew Weissmann defended the federal government’s surveillance rights in a
panel discussion at the George
Soros-funded New America Foundation, is also an Obama donor. (CONFIRMED: Mueller Team Can Be Disbarred
For Clinton Conflicts In Trump Case; By Patrick Howley; Big
League Politics; 7/23/17 5:07 am EST)
Jeannie Rhee
…
Rhee represented Hillary Clinton in a 2015 lawsuit that sought access to her
private emails. She also represented the Clinton Foundation in a 2015
racketeering lawsuit.
…
She maxed out her donations both in 2015 and 2016 to Clinton's presidential
campaign, giving a total of $5,400. (Meet the all-star team of lawyers Robert
Mueller has assembled for the Trump-Russia investigation; By Michelle Mark and Madeleine Sheehan Perkins; Business Insider; 8/1/17 8:31 PM)
And here:
One of the hires, Jeannie Rhee,
also worked as a lawyer for the Clinton Foundation and helped persuade a
federal judge to block a conservative activist's attempts to force Bill and
Hillary Clinton to answer questions under oath about operations of the
family-run charity.
Campaign-finance reports show that
Rhee gave Clinton the maximum contributions of $2,700 in 2015 and again last
year to support her presidential campaign. She also donated $2,300 to Obama in
2008 and $2,500 in 2011. While still at the Justice Department, she gave $250
to the Democratic National Committee Services Corp. (Mueller staffs up to pursue obstruction of
justice; By Thomas Lifson; American Thinker; 6/13/17)
James Quarles
According to data compiled by the
Center for Responsive Politics, Quarles had made significant donations to
Democratic candidates, including former President Barack Obama and Clinton.
Most recently, in October 2016, Quarles donated $2,700 to Clinton’s
presidential campaign. Quarles also donated over $7,000 to Obama over the last
decade. Quarles did, however, donate $2,500 to former Rep. Jason Chaffetz,
R-Utah, in 2015. (Mueller probe: Meet the lawyers who gave $$
to Hillary, now investigating team Trump; By Brooke Singman; Fox News; 7/24/17)
And this:
Starting in 1987, Quarles donated
to Democratic candidate Michael Dukakis’s presidential PAC, Dukakis for President. Since
then, he has also contributed in 1999 to Sen. Al
Gore’s run for the presidency, then-Sen. John Kerry’s (D-Mass.) presidential bid in 2005, Obama’s
presidential PAC in 2008 and 2012, and Clinton’s presidential pac Hillary for
America in 2016. (CORRECTED: Three members of Mueller's team
have donated to Democrats; By OLIVIA BEAVERS; The Hill;
6/12/17 02:23 PM EDT)
Aaron Zebley
Aaron Zebley, who repped Clinton
aide and key email-scandal figure Justin Cooper …
(CORRECTED: Three members of Mueller's team
have donated to Democrats; By OLIVIA BEAVERS; The Hill;
6/12/17 02:23 PM EDT)
More specifically:
Aaron Zebley represented Justin
Cooper, a Hillary aide and one of two people with access to Clinton’s
clandestine and illegal email server. Cooper helped set it up. (Corruption: 3 Reasons to Reset the ‘Russia’
Investigation; By Craig Huey; Election Forum; 6/21/17)
Greg Andres
A search of federal election
records shows that Andres has donated at least a total of $3700 to federal
Democratic candidates, including $2700 to New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
in March 2017.
…
Andres, 50, also has another
connection to the Democratic Party as his wife, Ronnie Abrams, is a federal
judge that was nominated by President Barack Obama in 2011. (Mueller Hires Yet Another Democratic Donor;
By Alex Pfeiffer; Daily
Caller; 8/1/17 7:36 PM)
Andrew Goldstein
Goldstein contributed a combined
$3,300 to Obama’s campaigns in 2008 and 2012. (Mueller probe: Meet the lawyers who gave $$
to Hillary, now investigating team Trump; By Brooke Singman; Fox News; 7/24/17)
And this:
During his [i.e. Goldstein]
time in the Manhattan attorney’s office, Goldstein served under Bharara, who up
until March served as the chief federal prosecutor in Manhattan. Bharara was
controversially fired by the Trump
administration, along with 46 other Obama-era U.S. attorneys,
earlier this year. (Robert Mueller just hired an Obama-era US
prosecutor for Trump-Russia investigation; By Chris Enloe; The Blaze; 7/3/17 9:52 am)
Elizabeth Prelogar
Prelogar is an appellate attorney
on detail from the Office of the Solicitor General. Prelogar donated $250 to
Clinton in 2016 and $250 to Obama in 2012. (Mueller probe: Meet the lawyers who gave $$
to Hillary, now investigating team Trump; By Brooke Singman; Fox News; 7/24/17)
And this:
Elizabeth Prelogar, an
appellate attorney on detail from the Office of the Solicitor General.
–Fluent in Russian; former law clerk to Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan. (Trump Team Digs Up Dirt on Mueller’s 15 Activist Attorneys; By Staff; The Daily Trump; 7/22/17)
In an attempt at fair and balanced, there are others on the
Mueller legal team that have donated to the Dems but only to the tune of
hundreds rather than thousands of dollars. I can’t believe any Dem will do a
fair investigation into a Trump/Russia collusion crime any more than I can
believe a Conservative (yet not necessarily a RINO GOP) would do a fair
investigation of either Russian collusion with Trump or the Clinton Crime
Syndicate. Conservatives would look for Trump exoneration or Crooked Clinton
conviction evidence. I know my view is skewed, but it is my opinion to connect
the Crooked Clintons/Obama and their minions to crimes more than there will ever
be credible evidence against the Trump organization.
The hugest problem of a conflict of interest is in Special
Prosecutor Mueller himself due to a close friendship to Comey. This is the kind
of friendship that convinces me Mueller will do all in his power to make sure
former FBI buddy Comey is not snared in any legal violations EVEN if Mueller
has to fabricate evidence against President Trump.
Check out these thoughts from Abe Hamilton:
"I think the president has
sound grounds to disqualify Mueller for a host of reasons," says
Hamilton," the least of which is his personal relationship with James
Comey."
There is no doubt, adds Hamilton,
that at the center of the ongoing investigation is Comey himself.
"Brothers in arms: The long
friendship between Mueller and Comey," reads
the headline of a May story at the liberal Washington
Post.
Meanwhile, fact-checking website
Snopes insists the claim they are "best friends" is "mostly false" despite
quotes from a former assistant FBI director who said they are close and
suggested a conflict of interest is obvious.
The law codifying the special
counsel would require Mueller to recuse himself, Hamilton advises, because his
friendship with Comey "would likely induce partiality."
"At a minimum," Hamilton
tells OneNewsNow, "the president has the legal grounds to remove him based
on that alone."
Beyond that relationship, he
further points out, is a conflict of interest with Rod Rosenstein, who hired
Mueller. (Attorney: Oh, yeah, Mueller definitely has
a conflict; By Chad Groening; One News Now; 8/2/17)
Mueller was involved in Crooked Hillary’s (then Secretary of
State) Russia/American-Uranium collusion:
A top national attorney in
consultation with U.S. attorneys confirmed to Big League Politics that special
counsel Robert Mueller and members of his team can be formally disbarred for
waging the “Russia” case against President Donald Trump. Mueller and his
associates have glaring conflicts of interest in the case concerning Trump.
Mueller’s team is tainted not only
by partisan political donations and activities, but by direct relationships
with former clients like Hillary Clinton, who is integrally involved in most of
the possible evidence in this case. These conflicts clearly violate American
Bar Association guidelines.
Hillary Clinton colluded with the
Russians in selling them our uranium.
Clinton handpicked Mueller to give a sample of uranium to the Russians, and
Mueller subsequently flew to Moscow, according to publicly available documents.
(CONFIRMED: Mueller Team Can Be Disbarred
For Clinton Conflicts In Trump Case; By Patrick Howley; Big
League Politics; 7/23/17 5:07 am EST)
Those on the Mueller witch hunt legal team that have Dem
Party agenda connections and/or connection to the Crooked Clintons have a huge
conflict of interest according Big League Politics:
The American Bar Association’s
Criminal Justice Standards for the Prosecution Function make clear that
Mueller’s team is in violation of standards, according to the top national
attorney. Here are the relevant sections (emphasis added):
“A prosecutor should not use
other improper considerations, such as partisan or political or
personal considerations, in exercising prosecutorial discretion. A
prosecutor should strive to eliminate implicit biases, and act to mitigate any
improper bias or prejudice when credibly informed that it exists within the
scope of the prosecutor’s authority.
(b) A prosecutor’s office
should be proactive in efforts to detect, investigate, and eliminate improper
biases, with particular attention to historically persistent biases like race,
in all of its work. A prosecutor’s office should regularly assess the
potential for biased or unfairly disparate impacts of its policies on
communities within the prosecutor’s jurisdiction, and eliminate those impacts
that cannot be properly justified.”
“Standard 3-1.7
Conflicts of Interest
(a) The prosecutor should
know and abide by the ethical rules regarding conflicts of interest that apply
in the jurisdiction, and be sensitive to facts that may raise conflict
issues. When a conflict requiring recusal exists and is non-waivable, or
informed consent has not been obtained, the prosecutor should recuse
from further participation in the matter. The office should not go
forward until a non-conflicted prosecutor, or an adequate waiver, is in place…”
“(c) The prosecutor should
not participate in a matter in which the prosecutor previously participated,
personally and substantially, as a non-prosecutor, unless the appropriate
government office, and when necessary a former client, gives informed consent
confirmed in writing.
(d) The prosecutor should not
be involved in the prosecution of a former client. A prosecutor who has
formerly represented a client should not use information obtained from that
representation to the disadvantage of the former client.”
“(f) The prosecutor should
not permit the prosecutor’s professional judgment or obligations to be affected
by the prosecutor’s personal, political, financial, professional, business,
property, or other interests or relationships. A prosecutor should not
allow interests in personal advancement or aggrandizement to affect judgments
regarding what is in the best interests of justice in any case.”
“g) The prosecutor should
disclose to appropriate supervisory personnel any facts or interests that could
reasonably be viewed as raising a potential conflict of interest. If it
is determined that the prosecutor should nevertheless continue to act in the
matter, the prosecutor and supervisors should consider whether any disclosure
to a court or defense counsel should be made, and make such disclosure if
appropriate.”
“(j) The prosecutor should
promptly report to a supervisor all but the most obviously frivolous misconduct
allegations made, publicly or privately, against the prosecutor. If a
supervisor or judge initially determines that an allegation is serious enough
to warrant official investigation, reasonable measures, including possible
recusal, should be instituted to ensure that the prosecution function is fairly
and effectively carried out. A mere allegation of misconduct is not a
sufficient basis for prosecutorial recusal, and should not deter a prosecutor
from attending to the prosecutor’s duties.” (Ibid.)
AND how can American voters ignore the conflict of interest
between Mueller and Comey:
Former FBI Director Jim Comey
"closely coordinated" with Special Counsel Robert Mueller before his
planned testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee about his
interactions with President Trump.
Fox News reported a source close to
Comey said the former FBI director consulted with Mueller about how to approach
Thursday's Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. (Comey 'closely coordinated' with Mueller on
Trump testimony: Report; By Josh Siegel; Washington
Examiner; 6/7/17 5:05
PM)
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) on Comey/Mueller collusion:
Rep. Louie Gohmert on Tuesday said
the only collusion that should be investigated is between the "dirty"
James Comey and Robert Mueller, who "conspired to violate the law" in
order to "blackmail" the president.
…
"This thing stinks to high
heaven," Gohmert said. "Comey is dirty, Mueller is dirty."
…
"Comey testified he ran things
by Mueller before he testified, also ran things by other people in the Justice
Department when he did the memo. There is so much collusion in the Justice
Department."
Further, there was obviously no
obstruction of justice or Comey would have acted long before he was fired.
Instead, Gohmert believes Comey's testimony last week before the Senate
Intelligence Committee further proves collusion.
"If (Comey) and the others at
the Justice Department with whom he colluded had felt like there had been an
obstruction of justice, then they conspired to violate the law by together
holding that back so they could blackmail (Trump) later," Gohmert said. (Rep. Gohmert: 'Dirty' Comey, Mueller
Colluded to 'Blackmail' Trump; By Mark Swanson; Newsmax;
6/13/17 01:13 PM)
I realize the Dems will go ballistic if Mueller is fired.
BUT you can expect the Trump base who elected him President will go medieval if
some kind of loose change is tossed at Trump that is absolutely irrelevant to a
Trump campaign colluding with Russia.
The lesser of two evils: Fire Mueller!
Then shut the Dems up by prosecuting real crimes like
Crooked Hillary, her minions, Deep State Obama anti-government treason and
Obama’s minions.
+++
WND has a great poll
pertaining to Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller.
Here is the poll question and choices:
Do you have faith in objectivity of Special Counsel
Mueller?
Yes,
of course. Trump just prefers someone whom he can manipulate
Yes,
he is the consummate professional
Yes,
he has a stable of great Democratic lawyers working for him
I'm
not sure yet
No,
he has a stable of hack Democratic lawyers working for him
No,
he's the ultimate Washington insider. He can't be trusted
No,
this is a witch hunt, and Trump needs to fire him posthaste
Other
Go HERE to place your WND vote
and get instant results
No comments:
Post a Comment