Justin Smith discusses the acts of war conducted by North
Korea that includes nuclear ICBM nuclear provocations.
******************
Flight of the Hwasong-14
By Justin O. Smith
Sent 7/9/2017 3:50 PM
Hwasong-14
& Kim Jong UN
America can no longer afford to hurl ineffective economic
sanctions at North Korea, that are too often violated by nations like China,
while North Korea and its malevolent dictator, Kim Jong Un, prepare to let
nuclear armed missiles fly at their leisure. The United States government and
President Donald Trump must give some hard, serious and real consideration on
striking at the heart of Pyongyang North Korea, Kim Jong Un's regime and all
North Korean missile launch sites and nuclear facilities, since placing our
country's fate in the hands of a murderous and unstable dictator, who has
murdered senior officials and family members on a whim, and a regime capable of
reckless behavior would be beyond egregious and a monumental mistake.
On July 4th 2017, North Korea conducted a missile test of the
Hwasong-14 that was a success in many ways. There is little reason
to question North Korea's claim that the missile reached an altitude of over
1700 miles and hit a target 580 miles away, in light of the fact that North Korea placed two satellites in space
in 2012. This demonstrated that, at a lower altitude and straighter
trajectory, Anchorage Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, Japan and even Queensland Australia
are within range of Pyongyang's nuclear missiles, once it perfects the process
of miniaturizing the nuclear warheads. Washington was also served a warning.
An intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) launched from North Korea would hit Los Angeles within
thirty minutes. Riki Ellison, chairman of the nonprofit Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, asserts that North
Korea already has miniaturized warheads capable of delivering 20 kilotons of
destruction, similar to the bomb detonated over Nagasaki during WWII, and many
other experts predict that Kim Jong Un will have the capability to hit
America's West Coast before President Trump completes his first term.
A nuclear armed and unpredictable rogue state, North Korea
will not be deterred along similar lines as the former Soviet Union and China
have been. They have less to lose than any previous nuclear power, and
Pyongyang will most certainly attempt nuclear blackmail at best. In the worst
case scenario, Pyongyang will give nukes to our Islamic enemies and third party
terrorists, to insert in our harbors and cities.
North Korea has pursued nuclear weapons, since the day it
acquired nuclear technology from the Soviet Union in the 1950s. It is too close
to success to stop. And besides, Kim Jong Un's survival depends on a viable
nuclear weapons system.
According to Sue Mi Terry, a former CIA analyst,
who met with North Koreans and a group of Western experts last month in Sweden, at the
Asia Society, "The North Koreans emphasize over and over,
denuclearization is completely off the table ... they say it's not negotiable."
Last month, Michael Auslin, from the Hoover Institute, bluntly told a
group of journalists in Washington, "Negotiations won't work".
This rogue nation knows no bounds, when it comes to
committing acts of evil. Not only did they slowly murder [HERE and HERE] Otto Warmbier, a U.S.
citizen and college student, over an eighteen month period, the Kim Family
regime has committed numerous flagrant violations of the July 7th 1953 Korean
War Armistice. This regime killed thirty-one U.S. Airmen,
when it shot them down in South Korean airspace in 1969, and thirty-five North Korean soldiers hacked U.S. Captain
Arthur Bonifas and First Lieutenant Mark Barrett to death in 1976,
near the Demilitarized Zone. Also, in 1968, this regime captured the USS Pueblo
in international waters and held 82 Navy crewmen for eleven months.
And North Korea has never met with any meaningful consequences for their acts
of war.
North Korea was already blatantly defiant and violently
aggressive without nukes and a missile delivery system. Just imagine how far
Kim Jong Un will go, once he has a fully operational nuclear arsenal at his
fingertips.
Does anyone really believe a nuclear armed North Korea won't
exact a heavy price from the free world?
An April 15th 2017 editorial in the Chinese Communist newspaper, the 'Global
Times', essentially stated that Beijing would not militarily
intervene, if Washington conducts a preemptive strike against North Korean
nuclear facilities. However, China won't accept a non-communist regime in North
Korea or U.S. troops crossing the 38th Parallel. If the U.S. strikes the Kim
regime, China would likely focus on instituting a pro-China regime and possibly
seizing North Korea's missile and nuclear sites, rather than a war with U.S.-South
Korea joint military forces.
The Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) is less than forty miles from
Seoul's 25 million inhabitants and lined with 8,000 pieces of North Korean
artillery and rocket launchers. Within the first hour of any renewed
conventional war between the two Koreas, North Korea has the ability to unleash
the equivalent of 300,000 tons of TNT on Seoul, possibly killing as many as
100,000 people. For this reason, during a May 2017 press conference, Secretary
of Defense James Mattis stated, "If this goes to a
military solution, it's going to be tragic on an unbelievable scale".
Seoul has much to lose, however, any military move against
North Korea doesn't necessarily have to be the tragedy some U.S. officials have
suggested it would be. And while America may be bound by treaty to defend South
Korea, our leaders and President Trump cannot allow South Korean President Moon
Jae-in's conciliatory policy towards North Korea
to place the U.S. in the untenable position of accepting a capable nuclear
armed North Korea and any consequences that follow.
On Wednesday, the Fifth of July, U.S. Ambassador to the
United Nations Nikki Haley told the U.N. Security Council
that our "considerable military forces" were an option. Continuing,
Nikki Haley stated, "We will use them if we must, but we prefer not to go
in that direction".
A preemptive strike is not a good option, and nobody assumes
it would be easy. People will die on both sides, but North Korea's nuclear
threat is one that must be destroyed, before it grows too much stronger, or
exponentially more lives will be lost in its wake years hence. America can do
it without near the tragic results for Seoul that Secretary of Defense Jim
Mattis states, if the U.S. will resolve to drop tactical nukes and MOABs on the nuclear facilities, the launch sites at Sohae and Tonghae [aka Donghae] and the
eight thousand pieces of artillery and military units along the Demilitarized
Zone simultaneously.
One should note that prior to the signing of the Armistice
in 1953 and the cease-fire that followed, President Dwight D. Eisenhower
considered using nukes against North Korea to end the war. Secretary of State
John Foster Dulles agreed that the United States should not shrink from using
nuclear weapons, especially if their use prevented a greater loss of life over
time, but he did favor limited use.
Kim Jong Un arrogantly fired Hwasong-14 on America's
Independence Day, in utter contempt of any objections from either China or the
Free World. America answered with U.S. Air Force B-1B Lancer bombers and South
Korean and Japanese jet fighters joint flights over the Korean Peninsula on
July 7th 2017, the sixty-fourth anniversary of the signing of the
Korean War Armistice.
Is it not apparent to the world that America is one of the
last nations standing between tyrants and freedom?
War should never be a first, second or even third choice.
The Land of the Free, America cannot and must not tolerate a nation that
enslaves and murders its own people and citizens from other nations. The Home
of the Brave, America cannot and must not lapse into a fool-hardy and cowardly
repose in the face of a fat boy tyrant, who called the Hwasong-14 test a
"gift to the American bastards". America must not find Herself firing
off more sanctions on the day Kim Jong Un detonates a bright glowing nuke over
one of our cities. Stopping North Korea requires war.
By Justin O. Smith
______________
Edited by John R. Houk
Text within brackets and all source links by the Editor.
© Justin O. Smith
No comments:
Post a Comment