John R. Houk
© April 5, 2017
Susan Rice is a typical lying Dem that unmasked Trump
campaign staff names that did NOTHING illegal while using an investigation
of Russian collusion/voting interference as a MERE excuse to politically
impugn Donald Trump during the 2016 election and during the Obama lame duck period
leading President Trump’s inauguration!!!!
AND even more reprehensible is the Left Stream Media either
didn’t report on Ly’n Rice or defended her for doing nothing wrong while
simultaneously still stick to the UNPROVEN – ergo lie – accusation the
President Trump colluded with the Russians to defeat Crooked Hillary in the
2016 election cycle.
For any American to believe Rice’s words that she “leaked nothing to nobody,"
were also duped by her lies about Benghazi and her lies the traitor Bergdahl
was an upstanding loyal American: “He served the United States with honor
and distinction …”
Posted by PoliticalTurkey1Published on Jun 2, 2014
Hmm … IF SUSAN RICE SAYS SHE DIDN’T UNMASK TRUMP
SURVEILLANCE FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES, I CAN CONFIDENTLY SAY “I DON’T BELIEVE
HER!”
I have found loads of
articles that question the veracity of Susan Rice and Barack Obama. The Left
Stream Media will not take up the question of reliability because they are
essentially a propaganda of Obama, The Dems and the Left in general.
I am cross posting two
articles. One from The Federalist posted today and another from Fox
News’ Adam Housley post on April third. At the end, I will provide some
links (perhaps some excerpts) from other sources that pretty much have the same
opinion about Susan Rice but may add some details lacking between each article.
*****************
April 5, 2017
Susan Rice was one Obama official who requested the
unmasking of Trump associates' information that was widely disseminated. Here's
why that's significant.
Since Donald Trump won the election for president in November,
U.S. media outlets have received and eagerly published selective, damaging
leaks about him from anonymous intelligence officials. The general effort,
which appeared highly coordinated, was an effort to delegitimize Trump’s
election and paint him as a stooge of Russia or otherwise unfit for office.
The media outlets claimed their information came from very
highly placed officials in the Obama administration. Even if they hadn’t
claimed their anonymous sources were Obama officials, the information they were
leaking, such as the name of a U.S. citizen caught up in surveillance by the
Obama administration, would have been known only by highly placed intelligence
officials.
As the publishers of the information that was illegally
disclosed, many media outlets weren’t keen to make a story, much less a big
story, about the leak campaign by Obama officials. This despite the fact that
the same Obama officials who had run the infamous Iran Echo
Chamber operation, in which reporters were duped into reporting the
Obama administration’s spin on the Iran deal, had bragged that they’d
continue a highly developed communications operation in the
Trump era.
In early March, Donald Trump tweeted out a series of
unsubstantiated claims:
Trump Tweets on BHO Wiretapping
Two weeks ago, the chair of the House Intelligence
Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes, revealed that
he’d seen dozens of reports featuring unmasked information on Trump and his
associates and family members. He said these reports arose out of incidental
collection during FISA surveillance, had nothing to do with Russia, were
disseminated widely throughout the intelligence agencies, and contained little
to no foreign intelligence value.
It should go without saying that the country’s powerful
surveillance capabilities are not to be used against American citizens so that
such unmasking should be exceedingly rare, be done for only the strongest
reasons, and make pains to avoid the appearance of politicization. Nunes said
the incidental collection might be legal but the unmasked dissemination of
information about political opponents was disconcerting.
Despite the bombshell allegations, many in the media
responded by downplaying or denigrating his news, distracting with process
complaints, or quickly thrown-together stories from anonymous sources with no
evidence claiming more breathless wrongdoing with Russia.
On Monday, Eli Lake of Bloomberg
Views reported that sources said “Susan Rice requested the
identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions
that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S.
officials familiar with the matter.” Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the National Security
Council’s senior director for intelligence, was conducting a review of
unmasking procedures when he “discovered Rice’s multiple requests to unmask
U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition
activities.”
Susan Rice was Obama’s National Security Advisor for his
second term.
Again, many in the media are attempting to downplay,
denigrate and distract, some are doing so shamelessly. Here are five reasons
why this is a story worth covering:
1) Susan Rice’s Story Changed Dramatically From Two Weeks
Ago
Two weeks ago, PBS’ Judy Woodruff asked Rice a very general question about
Nunes’ claims:
JUDY WOODRUFF: I began by
asking about the allegations leveled today by House Intelligence Committee
Chairman Devin Nunes that Trump transition officials, including the president,
may have been swept up in surveillance of foreigners at the end of the Obama
administration.
SUSAN RICE, Former U.S. National
Security Adviser: I know nothing about this. I was surprised to see reports
from Chairman Nunes on that count today.
I know nothing about this, she said.
Yesterday, in a damage control interview with prominent
Democratic journalist Andrea Mitchell, Rice admitted her unmasking efforts and
said they were routine. Mitchell’s 16-minute interview involved no tough
questions. Mitchell asked, “Did you seek to unmask the names of people involved
in the Trump transition?” Rice responded in the Clintonian fashion, “Absolutely
not for any political purposes.” A natural follow-up would have
been if she requested the unmasking for any other purpose. It didn’t occur to
Mitchell. Instead she followed-up with the related question, “Did you leak?” to
which Rice responded, somewhat confusingly, “I leaked nothing to nobody.”
Somehow Rice tried to claim later
that her initial statement of having no clue about Nunes’ earlier claim was not
at odds with her 16-minute answer about her unmasking efforts.
Rice has a reputation for dishonesty, most notably for her
claim that a September 11, 2012, attack in Libya that killed four Americans was
a spontaneous result of anger at a video critical of Islam. At the time she
said this, the State Department knew well that it was a
coordinated terrorist attack.
Rice also falsely claimed that Bowe
Bergdahl “served the United States with honor and distinction,” when critics
began raising questions about why President Obama traded high-value Taliban
detainees and a ransom for the Army deserter. Bergdahl is expected to face a
court-martial in August for desertion and misbehavior before the enemy. His
desertion was already known at the time Rice made her comments.
2) The Unmasking Was Related To Political Information
When Nunes first alerted the public about his concerns over
the unmasking and dissemination, he noted that the information had nothing to
do with Russia and had little to no intelligence value. Lake reported that
Rice’s multiple unmasking requests were related to reports on Trump transition
activities. She is said to have requested the identities of Americans in
reports of monitored conversations between foreign officials discussing the
Trump transition and in surveilled contact between the Trump team and monitored
foreign officials.
“One U.S. official familiar with the reports said they
contained valuable political information on the Trump transition such as whom
the Trump team was meeting, the views of Trump associates on foreign policy
matters and plans for the incoming administration,” according to Lake.
When Rice gave her interview to the friendly journalist
Mitchell, she gave a hypothetical example of when it would be appropriate to
request an unmasking of a U.S. citizen’s name that was caught up in foreign
surveillance. She said that if two foreigners were talking about a terrorist
attack to be committed with a U.S. citizen, she would seek out that name.
That’s a great hypothetical. And no one is making the claim that Susan Rice
sought to unmask a Trump family member or transition member’s name because she
believed they were about to set off a bomb. They are making the claim that the
information in the reports was politically valuable and related to the Trump
transition.
3) Susan Rice Worked In The White House
Rice was known as Obama’s “right-hand woman,”
“like a sister,”
and was his National Security Advisor throughout his second term.
Weeks ago, diplomat Richard Grennell said that if Rice were
involved, that would implicate President
Obama:
‘But within that realm there could
have easily been a political calculation to listen in, and then to take those
transcripts and the summaries of those transcripts, make sure that those in the
NSC and the political people – like Ben Rhodes and Susan Rice – make sure that
they have them so they can leak them to reporters.’
‘I think that it would be easy to
figure out if Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes knew about this,’ he added, ‘because if
they did, clearly President Obama knew about it.’
Even if Rice wasn’t working with Obama on this effort or
informing him of her activities, her role as National Security Advisor means
her unmasking request in this instance doesn’t make sense, according to Andrew McCarthy.
If the identities of U.S. citizens had intelligence value, it would have been
unmasked by agencies that conduct investigations, he wrote:
Consequently, if unmasking was
relevant to the Russia investigation, it would have been done by those three
agencies. And if it had been critical to know the identities of Americans caught
up in other foreign intelligence efforts, the agencies that collect the
information and conduct investigations would have unmasked it. Because they are
the agencies that collect and refine intelligence ‘products’ for the rest of
the ‘intelligence community,’ they are responsible for any unmasking; and they
do it under ‘minimization’ standards that FBI Director James Comey, in recent
congressional testimony, described as ‘obsessive’ in their determination to
protect the identities and privacy of Americans.
Understand: There would have been
no intelligence need for Susan Rice to ask for identities to be unmasked. If
there had been a real need to reveal the identities — an intelligence need
based on American interests — the unmasking would have been done by the
investigating agencies. The national-security adviser is not an investigator.
She is a White House staffer. The president’s staff is a consumer of
intelligence, not a generator or collector of it. If Susan Rice was unmasking
Americans, it was not to fulfill an intelligence need based on American
interests; it was to fulfill a political desire based on Democratic-party
interests.
It is unclear what President Obama knew about Rice’s
successful request to unmask information on Trump transition members.
4) This Substantiates Nunes’ Claim
When Nunes told the public that information about the Trump
team had been collected, unmasked, and widely disseminated, many media figures
questioned the legitimacy of his claim. With the news that no less than Susan
Rice requested unmasking of political operatives, it appears that Nunes was
onto something.
Also of note, Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking Democratic
member on the committee, had been very upset with Nunes for telling the public
and the White House about the reports he’d seen before briefing the committee.
However, after Schiff saw the information, he more or less went quiet. He
didn’t say the reports were a distraction or unimportant, unlike other
Democratic operatives.
5) Civil Liberties Questions Remain
The most frequent defense of the Obama administration’s
unmasking efforts is that incidental information collection on U.S. citizens is
routine, and that requests to unmask that information about U.S. citizens is
also routine. When we learn more about the widespread dissemination of such
information, we can anticipate that the media and other Democrats will say that
such dissemination is more than routine.
When Nunes revealed the collection, unmasking, and
dissemination news, he specifically referenced the incidental information collection
on members of Congress during the Iran deal. The U.S. spies on
foreign leaders, including Benjamin Netanyahu and his advisors. As a result,
the Obama administration picked up information on politically valuable
information:
White House officials believed the
intercepted information could be valuable to counter Mr. Netanyahu’s campaign.
They also recognized that asking for it was politically risky. So, wary of a
paper trail stemming from a request, the White House let the NSA decide what to
share and what to withhold, officials said. ‘We didn’t say, ‘Do it,’ ‘a senior
U.S. official said. ‘We didn’t say, ‘Don’t do it.’ ‘
Stepped-up NSA eavesdropping
revealed to the White House how Mr. Netanyahu and his advisers had leaked
details of the U.S.-Iran negotiations—learned through Israeli spying
operations—to undermine the talks; coordinated talking points with
Jewish-American groups against the deal; and asked undecided lawmakers what it
would take to win their votes, according to current and former officials
familiar with the intercepts.
The Bush administration also collected and used
information on members of Congress this way.
In some ways, this “routine” defense of collecting and
disseminating information on political adversaries is the most disconcerting.
The federal government’s surveillance powers are intense, from metadata
collection to surveillance of communications. Such information is easily weaponized and
exceedingly difficult to oversee for accountability purposes.
As one journalist who used to be worried about such
things wrote a
few years ago:
Instead, the NSA’s approach of
grabbing up every bit of information that it can guarantees that the metadata
and sometimes even the content of legislator communications are swept up, and
will continue to be available to a secretive class of executive branch
employees for years to come. There is obvious potential that this will be
exploited with abusive intent–it isn’t like we’ve never had a president try to
spy on his political opponents before! But even absent any nefarious motives,
incidentally collected data could damage the integrity of our political system.
Members of the media should try to cover, rather than cover
up, this aspect of the story. The civil liberties of U.S. citizens are of vital
importance and the unmasking of information on them should not be routine, not
regular, and not a light matter.
The media have thousands of questions to
force answers on regarding this important story. As Ari Fleischer wrote on
Twitter:
About Susan Rice: The President’s
National Security Advisor has authority to request unmasking of American names
from intel agencies.
But in this instance, I am stunned
by the lack of curiosity most media have shown about the facts and
circumstances present here.
This is a good example of media
giving soft coverage to President Obama while they’re hard on the GOP in
general & Trump in particular.
Bear in mind, Rice is the official
who praised Bowe Bergdahl for his ‘honorable service’ & claimed he was
captured ‘on the battlefield.’
She also said two weeks ago in a TV
interview that she didn’t know anything about the unmasking.
I would have thought the media
would ask tough questions. There is no reason this should be a FOX News and
conservative press issue only.
If I were a reporter, I would want
to know why Rice sought the unmasking. The FBI is investigating possible Trump
collusion, not the WH.
How often did she ask? What reasons
did she give? (Each request is tracked and catalogued in writing by the NSA. A
procedure exists.)
The info would have been provided
ONLY to her as the requester. It is highly classified. Did she share it? With
whom? Why?
If she shared it with anyone, why
did she do so? What did they do with it? Did they give it to the media or tell
media about it?
One of the reasons we live in a
polarized era is because too many reporters look the other way at issues like
this. Bias is real.
It’s not too late. The press knows
how to dig and get answers. I hope they do so.
It’s not just Rice. She wasn’t the only person to request
the unmasking of Trump officials regarding politically sensitive operations,
and she wasn’t the person who requested that Flynn’s name be unmasked, meaning
she requested at least one other Trump associate’s unmasking. We still don’t
know who committed the crime of leaking Flynn’s name to the Washington Post.
It’s time to start working on covering this story, rather than running interference for
anonymous sources.
Mollie Ziegler Hemingway is a senior editor at The
Federalist. Follow her on Twitter at @mzhemingway
+++
Susan Rice requested to unmask
names of Trump transition officials, sources say
By Adam Housley
April 03, 2017
Multiple sources tell Fox News that Susan Rice, former
national security adviser under then-President Barack Obama, requested to
unmask the names of Trump transition officials caught up in
surveillance.
The unmasked names, of people associated with Donald Trump,
were then sent to all those at the National Security Council, some at the
Defense Department, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and
then-CIA Director John Brennan – essentially, the officials at the top,
including former Rice deputy Ben Rhodes.
The names were part of incidental electronic surveillance of
candidate and President-elect Trump and people close to him, including family
members, for up to a year before he took office.
It was not clear how Rice knew to ask for the names to be
unmasked, but the question was being posed by the sources late Monday.
Such amazing reporting on unmasking
and the crooked scheme against us by @foxandfriends.
"Spied on before nomination." The real story.
"What I know is this ... If the intelligence
community professionals decide that there’s some value, national security,
foreign policy or otherwise in unmasking someone, they will grant those
requests," former Obama State Department spokeswoman and Fox News
contributor Marie Harf told Fox News' Martha MacCallum on "The First 100
Days. "And we have seen no evidence ... that there was partisan political
notice behind this and we can’t say that unless there’s actual evidence to back
that up."
White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, asked about the
revelations at Monday’s briefing, declined to comment specifically on what role
Rice may have played or officials’ motives.
“I’m not going to comment on this any further until
[congressional] committees have come to a conclusion,” he said, while
contrasting the media’s alleged “lack” of interest in these revelations with
the intense coverage of suspected Trump-Russia links.
When names of Americans are incidentally collected, they are
supposed to be masked, meaning the name or names are redacted from reports –
whether it is international or domestic collection, unless it is an issue of
national security, crime or if their security is threatened in any way. There
are loopholes and ways to unmask through backchannels, but Americans are supposed
to be protected from incidental collection. Sources told Fox News that in this
case, they were not.
This comes in the wake of Evelyn Farkas’ television
interview last month in which the former Obama deputy secretary of defense said
in part: “I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people
on the Hill – it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as
much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before
President Obama leaves the administration.”
Meanwhile, Fox News also is told that House Intelligence
Committee Chairman Devin Nunes knew about unmasking and leaking back in
January, well before President Trump’s tweet in March alleging wiretapping.
Nunes has faced criticism from Democrats for viewing pertinent
documents on White House grounds and announcing their contents to the press.
But sources said “the intelligence agencies slow-rolled Nunes. He could have
seen the logs at other places besides the White House SCIF [secure facility],
but it had already been a few weeks. So he went to the White House because he
could protect his sources and he could get to the logs.”
As the Obama administration left office, it also approved
new rules that gave the NSA much broader powers by relaxing the rules about sharing
intercepted personal communications and the ability to share those with 16
other intelligence agencies.
Rice is no stranger to controversy. As the U.S. Ambassador
to the UN, she appeared on several Sunday news shows to defend the
adminstration's later debunked claim that the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks on a U.S.
consulate in Libya was triggered by an Internet video.
Rice also told ABC News in 2014 that Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl
"served the United States with honor and distinction" and that he
"wasn't simply a hostage; he was an American prisoner of war captured on
the battlefield."
Bergdahl is currently facing court-martial on
charges of desertion and misbehavior before the enemy for allegedly walking off
his post in Afghanistan.
Adam Housley joined Fox News Channel (FNC) in 2001 and
currently serves as a Los Angeles-based senior correspondent.
+++
SOURCES: SUSAN RICE BEHIND UNMASKING OF TRUMP OFFICIALS
White House counsel reportedly ID'd former national
security adviser
By GARTH KANT
Updated: 04/03/2017 at 11:05 PM
WASHINGTON – Multiple reports indicate former National
Security Adviser Susan Rice was the Obama administration official who
requested the unmasking of incoming Trump administration officials.
Mike Cernovich broke the story in an article in Medium on
Sunday that said, “The White House Counsel’s office identified Rice as the
person responsible for the unmasking after examining Rice’s document log
requests.”
Unmasking is the revealing of names within the intelligence
community of U.S. citizens whose communications were monitored during foreign
surveillance.
According to Fox News, the
unmasked names of people associated with Donald Trump were sent widely to top
officials in the Obama administration.
That is a potential felony.
The unmasked names were reportedly sent to every member of
the National Security Council, former Rice deputy Ben Rhodes, then-Director of
National Intelligence James Clapper, then-CIA Director John Brennan and some
officials at the Defense Department.
The NSA is required to remove the names of Americans
incidentally collected during foreign surveillance before sharing intelligence
with other agencies unless there is an issue of national security, but Rice
reportedly requested the unmasking of the identities of Trump associates.
Sources said …….
+++
BOMBSHELL REPORT: Obama National Security Advisor SUSAN
RICE Behind Unmasking Of Trump Transition Team
By BEN SHAPIRO
APRIL 3, 2017
In a massive scoop, on Monday
morning Eli Lake of Bloomberg reported that Barack
Obama’s national security advisor, Susan Rice, repeatedly requested information
from the intelligence community on members of the Trump transition team and
campaign, unmasking them to an audience beyond the intelligence community in
the process. Normally, raw intelligence masks the identity of American citizens
caught up in legal surveillance of other targets.
Here’s Lake:
In February [National Security
Council senior director for intelligence] Cohen-Watnick discovered Rice's
multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related
to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White
House General Counsel's office, who reviewed more of Rice's requests and
instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy. The
intelligence reports were summaries of monitored conversations – primarily
between foreign officials discussing the Trump transition, but also in some
cases direct contact between members of the Trump team and monitored foreign
officials. One U.S. official familiar with the reports said they contained
valuable political information on the Trump transition such as whom the Trump
team was meeting, the views of Trump associates on foreign policy matters and
plans for the incoming administration.
Rice denied that she knew anything about members of the
Trump transition caught up in incidental intelligence gathering last month. As
Lake also points out, the revelation that Rice requested the documents would
explain House Intelligence Chair Devin Nunes’ trip to the White House two weeks
ago – he needed to go there to view Rice’s missives. It would also explain why
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the most ardent Trump critic on wiretapping and leaks,
suddenly went silent over the weekend after seeing documents the White House
presented to him.
This is indeed a huge story for the Trump White House. It doesn’t
change the inaccuracy of Trump’s accusations that he was wiretapped by the
Obama administration – there is still zero evidence to support that claim. But
it demonstrates that the Trump team was not only targeted by members of the
Obama intelligence community for unmasking and likely leaking, but that such
unmasking went to the very top of the Obama administration.
And here’s another inconvenient fact …
+++
Benghazi Liar Susan Rice's Treachery Continues
April 4, 2017
Call it the tale of two National Security Advisers, Michael
Flynn and Susan Rice. As much as Flynn has taken fire as being an architect of
unspecified "collusion" with the Russians, Susan Rice has been like
the iceberg that sank the Titanic -- barely visible above water but dangerous
enough to threaten the Trump administration’s ship of state.
As reported by Circa News, Rice, while serving
as Obama’s National Security Adviser, requested the unmasking of the names of
Team Trump officials mentioned in the so-called “incidental” surveillance
of the Trump transition team:
Computer logs that former President
Obama’s team left behind in the White House indicate his national security
adviser Susan Rice accessed numerous intelligence reports during Obama's last
seven months in office that contained National Security Agency intercepts
involving Donald Trump and his associates, Circa has learned.
Intelligence sources said the logs
discovered by National Security Council staff suggested Rice’s interest in the
NSA materials, some of which included unmasked Americans' identities, appeared
to begin last July around the time Trump secured the GOP nomination and
accelerated after Trump’s election in November launched a transition that
continued through January.
The intelligence reports included
some intercepts of Americans talking to foreigners and many more involving
foreign leaders talking about the future president, his campaign associates or
his transition, the sources said. Most if not all had nothing to do with the
Russian election interference scandal, the sources said, speaking only on
condition of anonymity given the sensitive nature of the materials.
Ordinarily, such references to
Americans would be redacted or minimized by the NSA before being shared with
outside intelligence sources, but in these cases names were sometimes unmasked
at the request of Rice or the intelligence reports were specific enough that
the American’s identity was easily ascertained, the sources said.
Well, isn’t that special? While Trump’s pick for this
sensitive post was under scrutiny, Obama’s adviser was doing opposition
research which involved data mining classified intelligence reports. Rice
requested the unmasking of names, something only three people, according
to Circa, were authorized to do:
Dozens of times in 2016, those
intelligence reports identified Americans who were directly intercepted talking
to foreign sources or were the subject of conversations between two or more
monitored foreign figures. Sometimes the Americans’ names were officially
unmasked; other times they were so specifically described in the reports that
their identities were readily discernible. Among those cleared to request and
consume unmasked NSA-based intelligence reports about U.S. citizens were
Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice, his CIA Director John
Brennan and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
If Susan Rice had worked for Richard Nixon, she could have
been one of his Watergate “plumbers”, perhaps retiring as plumber emeritus. We
are all familiar with Susan Rice’s tour of the Sunday talk shows after the
Benghazi terrorist attack. That was no accident, but a calculated part of the
Obama administration’s disinformation campaign to protect President Obama’s
reelection chances and …
+++
'Absolutely false': Top Obama adviser denies she 'unmasked'
Trump associates for political purposes
April 4, 2017
Former national security adviser Susan Rice told MSNBC on
Tuesday that allegations she "unmasked"
associates of Donald Trump for political reasons while she
served in the Obama administration were "absolutely false."
Bloomberg and Fox on Monday reported that Rice had tried to
unmask, or learn the identities of, officials on Trump's transition team whose
conversations with foreign agents — or conversations those agents were
having about the transition officials — were incidentally
collected during routine intelligence-gathering operations. The Daily Caller
then reported that Rice had created a "spreadsheet" with the names
she had unmasked.
"The allegation is that somehow Obama administration
officials utilized intelligence for political purposes," Rice told MSNBC's
Andrea Mitchell. "That's absolutely false. [Yeah right, & she never
lied about Benghazi either]
"I was the National Security Adviser. My job
is to protect the American people and the security of our country. That's
…
+++
Rand Paul calls for Susan Rice to testify on unmasking
Trump officials
By Juliegrace Brufke, DCNF
April 4, 2017
GOP Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said he believes
former National Security Advisor Susan Rice should testify before Congress
on her request to unmask the names of Trump transition officials collected
during routine intelligence-gathering operations.
Paul argued the situation should
not be downplayed, saying reforms need to be made to prevent individuals from
being blackmailed on personal aspects of their lives through unmasking. He
noted there was nothing stopping the former administration from looking through
Trump officials and national security advisors’ conversations during the
transition window.
“If it is allowed, we shouldn’t be allowing it, but I don’t
think should just discount how big a deal it is that Susan Rice was looking at
these,” he told reporters Monday. “And she needs to be asked, ‘Did President
Obama ask her to do this? Was this a directive from President Obama? I
think she should testify under oath on this.”
Paul said he has long thought there are too many people with
the ability to unmask individuals.
“The law says you
can’t reverse target people, but how would you know that once you get inside
the brain and the people that are unmasking people,” Paul continued. “So, what
if I decided to unmask and I’m there and I only unmask the conversations of my
Democrat opponents — shouldn’t there be more restrictions for unmasking people
in the political process?”
He said he believes there should be …
++++++++++
Posted by Lionel Nation
Published on Apr 3, 2017
BloombergView’s Eli Lake reports that White House lawyers
last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice
requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens
of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign,
according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.
The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One." Not this time. It was Suzie, kids.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-03/top-obama-adviser-sought-names-of-trump-associates-in-intel
The Official Lionel … READ THE REST
The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One." Not this time. It was Suzie, kids.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-03/top-obama-adviser-sought-names-of-trump-associates-in-intel
The Official Lionel … READ THE REST
+++
FORMER US ATTORNEY JOSEPH DIGENOVA: SUSAN RICE ORDERED
SPY AGENCIES TO PRODUCE ‘DETAILED SPREADSHEETS’ INVOLVING TRUMP
By ALICIA
APRIL 4, 2017
I CAN’T SAY I’M
REALLY SURPRISED CONSIDERING THIS IS THE SAME LYING FRAUD WHO GOT HER JOB AS
NSA ADVISER AS A POLITICAL FAVOR FROM OBAMA/CLINTON FOR BEING THE FRONT-PERSON
IN THE BENGHAZI VIDEO LYING SCHEME.
And she did this all on her own, huh? Do you believe
that?
Former President Barack
Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice ordered U.S. spy agencies to
produce “detailed spreadsheets” of legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and
his aides when he was running for president, according to former U.S. Attorney
Joseph diGenova.
“What was produced by the
intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of
intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal
conversations with individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation
Investigative Group Monday.
“The overheard conversations
involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they
were speaking with,” diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal
activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”
Other official sources with
direct knowledge and who requested anonymity confirmed to TheDCNF diGenova’s
description of surveillance reports Rice ordered one year before the 2016
presidential election. More
Posted by Fox News
Published on Apr 3, 2017
Multiple reports reveal the former Obama adviser requested the names of
Trump transition team members be unmasked.
+++
Former US Attorney:
Susan Rice Ordered Spy Agencies To Produce ‘Detailed Spreadsheets’ Involving
Trump
04/03/2017 10:08
PM
Update: In response to a question Tuesday from NBC News reporter Andrea
Mitchell, former Obama White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice denied
that she “prepared” spreadsheets of surveilled telephone calls involving Donald
Trump and his aides. The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group,
however, reported that Rice “ordered” the spreadsheets to be produced.
In addition,
former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova, one of TheDCNF’s sources, said
Tuesday in response to Rice that her denial “would come as quite a surprise to
the government officials who have reviewed dozens of those spreadsheets.”
…
+++
No Proof of Trump-Russia Collusion but Lots of Evidence
of Obama Spying
By Onan Coca
April 4, 2017
Fox News’ Tucker Carlson ripped the national media to
shreds while condemning the Obama era White House for wrongfully spying on
American citizens for political purposes.
Carlson argued that
while media continues to focus in on some phantom collusion between President
Trump and the Russian government, something for which they have NO PROOF,
they are actively ignoring the real scandal unfolding before their eyes. Susan
Rice, one of President Obama’s closest advisors, has been caught wrongfully
unmasking members of the Trump campaign and transition teams for what seem to
be nakedly political purposes. How do we know she did it for political
purposes? Many of the reports now being produced show that the data that Rice
was collecting had nothing to do with Russia or other national security issues,
meaning that she unmasked the names of members of the Trump team without cause.
This fact is what
Carlson finds most disturbing because it means that civil libertarians were
right all along – there really is NOTHING we can do to stop the government from
spying on us.
…
Posted by Fox News
Published on Apr 3, 2017
Carlson then
transitioned into a conversation with former Obama advisor David Tafuri, a
conversation that grew quite heated when Tafuri argued that the Russia story
was the real issue here. Carlson pressed, as he has done time and again with
liberals and journalists, for Tafuri to present ANY EVIDENCE that there
was collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. Or, for that matter, for
Tafuri to present any evidence that Russia had any impact on the recent
election. Of course, Tafuri could provide none, nor has any liberal politician
or liberal member of the media been able to show a tangible connection between
Russia and recent events.
…
Posted by Fox News
Published on Apr 3, 2017
+++
FAKE-NEWS GIANTS
CLAIM SUSAN RICE SPY SCANDAL IS 'FAKE'
Chorus of legacy
media: Nothing to see here
By ALICIA POWE
April 4, 2017
WASHINGTON – Is
it a real story, or is it fake news?
That’s the raging
debate about the exploding scandal over Susan Rice’s “unmasking” of incoming
Trump administration officials when she served as President Barack Obama’s
national security adviser.
Despite some
likening the White House use of classified leaks for political purposes to a
scandal bigger than Watergate, media outlets Tuesday were shooting down – or
flat-out ignoring – the blockbuster report that verified the Obama
administration surveilled the Trump team.
…
+++
Susan Rice Responds To Trump Unmasking Allegations:
"I Leaked Nothing To Nobody"
By Tyler
Durden
Apr 4, 2017 9:47 PM
If anyone expected
former National Security Advisor Susan Rice, the same Susan Rice who
"stretched the truth" about Benghazi, to admit in her first public
appearance after news that she unmasked members of the Trump team to admit she
did something wrong, will be disappointed. Instead, moments ago she told
MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell that she categorically denied that the Obama
administration inappropriately spied on members of the Trump transition team.
[Several MSNBC Tweets
of Mitchell/Rice interview]
We doubt that
anyone's opinion will change after hearing the above especially considering that,
in addition to Benghazi, Rice is the official who praised Bowe Bergdahl
for his "honorable service" and claimed he was captured "on the
battlefield", and then just two weeks ago, she told PBS that she didn't
know anything about the unmasking.
Unfortunately,
Mitchell's list of questions did not go so far as to ask about her false claim in the PBS interview,
in which she said "I know nothing about unmasking Trump
officials."
It is thus hardly
surprising that now that her memory has been "refreshed" about her
role in the unmasking, that Rice clearly remembers doing nothing
at all wrong.
On Monday night,
Rand Paul and other Republicans called for Rice to testify under oath, a
request she sidestepped on Tuesday. “Let's see what comes,” she told Mitchell,
when asked if she would testify on …
______________
Do YOU Trust
Benghazi/Bergdahl Liar?
John R. Houk
© April 5, 2017
___________
Why Susan Rice’s Role In
The Obama Spying Story Is A Big Deal
____________
Susan Rice requested to
unmask names of Trump transition officials, sources say
This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2017 FOX News
Network, LLC. All rights reserved.
[Blog Editor: FYI, I did
not get Fox News permission to cross post. If requested, this cross post will
be removed.]
No comments:
Post a Comment