John R. Houk
© January 26, 2017
On January 24th I posted Justin
Smith’s memoriam of LaVoy Finicum’s assassination accomplished
under the nefarious regime of the Obama Administration. Shortly after Finicum’s
death the Malheur Occupation Ranchers began to be arrested. On 10/28/16 the OPB
(Oregon Public Broadcasting) reports that seven of the many
arrested were found not guilty by a jury of twelve:
A 12-person jury found
occupation leaders Ammon and Ryan Bundy not guilty Thursday of the government’s
primary charge: conspiracy to impede federal officers by force, threat or
intimidation. Their five co-defendants — Jeff Banta, Shawna Cox, David Fry, Kenneth
Medenbach and Neil Wampler — have all been found not guilty as well.
Jurors were unable to reach a
verdict on Ryan Bundy’s theft of government property charge. –READ ENTIRETY
Even after the leadership of the Malheur Occupation were
found not guilty, the government prosecutors insist on going after seven more
occupiers and to try to get something to stick added some misdemeanors to the
felony charges:
Defense attorneys denounced
the government's decision to move forward with a second trial.
“In my view, it defies logic
that they could profess respect for the jury’s verdict in the first trial, and
yet still be pursuing charges, and indeed more charges, against the lesser
players in the second trial," said Jesse Merrithew, the attorney for
defendant Jake Ryan.
The upcoming trial against
Ryan, Jason Patrick, Duane Ehmer, Dylan Anderson, Sean Anderson, Sandy
Anderson, and Darryl Thorn could also see the government charging several Class
B misdemeanors, including trespassing, tampering with vehicles and equipment
and destruction of property. -READ ENTIRETY (Prosecutors To Pursue 2nd Oregon Standoff Trial;
By CONRAD WILSON; Northwest Public Radio; 12/12/16)
Now my lack of keeping up has been apparent. I discovered
the Federal government (probably inspired by the Bureau of Land Management –
BLM) is still going after the Bundy’s and their supporters over the standoff at
the Bundy Ranch when the BLM tried to confiscate the Bundy cattle. AND the
Bundy prosecutors are to nail the family under the radar of Malheur not guilty
verdicts and adding some legal tricks to prevent public exposure of the truth. Below
is the story.
JRH 1/26/17
***************
Prosecutors Seek to Protect BLM from Scrutiny in Bundy
Ranch Trial
By TIM
BROWN
JANUARY 25, 2017
It appears the
government wants to hide the illegal actions it has taken, along with those of
the Bureau of Land Management in
the Bundy Ranch trial that is soon to begin.
On Tuesday,
Prosecutors in Las Vegas filed a Motion In Limine in the case of The United States vs Cliven Bundy et
al. They are hopeful that Nevada District Court Judge Gloria Navarro
will allow the US central government to “cover-up” any wrong doing by Bureau Of
Land Management agents during the 2014 Bundy Ranch siege.
An attorney for one
of the defendants told Guerilla Media Network, "It’s a shocking blatant
attempt by the Government to cover-up the brutal conduct of BLM agents
that caused a near catastrophe in Bunkerville, Nevada during the impoundment of
rancher Cliven Bundy’s cattle."
Guerilla Media
Network reports:
The motion is a draconian attempt at best to “protect” government agents
from being exposed to further scrutiny during the upcoming Nevada trials in
which they will be under-oath to tell the truth.
...
The defense in this case is centered around civil rights violations of
the Bundy family and protestors who came to Bunkerville, Nevada to protest an
overreaching government agency who had beaten and incarcerated Cliven Bundy’s
son Dave Bundy and other protestors, used a stun gun on his son Ammon Bundy,
viciously attacked Mr. Bundy’s sister Margaret, and terrorized peaceful protest
with threat of snipers and military force.
Further the government which successfully used the idea that some of the
defendants in the Oregon trial of the United States vs Ammon Bundy et al ..
were also involved in the Bundy Ranch “armed” protest as a reason to deny them
a pretrial release, now ask the Judge to not allow any reference to that case
including the fact they were acquitted.
Here's a copy of the
relevant portion of the motion.
"It is what it
is and we will fight it," said Chris Rasmussen, attorney for reporter and radio show host Pete Santilli. "The
government wishes to eliminate anything we could use that goes to the
defendants' state of mind .. and we cannot allow that to happen. These people
were frightened and there was a reason they reacted the way they did."
"Do we or do we
not still live in America?" said former Nevada State Assemblywoman Michele Fiore on Tuesday in response to the motion.
"One way or the other the truth will be told and I would like to see
them stop me from voluntarily giving my testimony when this trial begins."
Fiore has already told
about some of the evidence that is known to exist concerning the criminal BLM, including audio and video from body cameras,
and even spoken out on their crimes on the Nevada
Assembly floor.
Posted by Pete Santilli
Show
Published on Oct 3, 2016
*** Please help support our mission in Nevada by contributing at http://thepetesantillishow.com/donate or
direct to our Paypal acoount: peter@petersantilli.com.
Defendants in the case of United States vs Cliven Bundy et al .. are accusing the BLM [Bureau of Land Management] and the FBI of altering dashboard and body-cam video in an attempt to cover-up their aggressiveness during the 2014 protest that led to the arrest of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and 18 others.
Defendants are also accusing the FBI “infiltration team” who posed as a documentary film crew called Long Bow, of editing video at crucial moments to make defendants who gave interviews look guilty of crimes they did not commit.
On at least 5 different occasions the defendants in the case say that video used to gain their indictments and create the Governments narrative that has kept them all in jail pending trial, was clearly altered at crucial moments to hide what they believe would expose the BLM as the aggressors and not the “victims” as Prosecutor Steven Mhyre contends.
We have found at least 5 different clear cases of evidence tampering and have only viewed 1/4 of the discovery that was recently released to us by the Prosecutors office say defendants, who have begun the process of creating a power point demonstration that will be viewed by defense attorney’s on October 7, 2016.
Defendants in the case of United States vs Cliven Bundy et al .. are accusing the BLM [Bureau of Land Management] and the FBI of altering dashboard and body-cam video in an attempt to cover-up their aggressiveness during the 2014 protest that led to the arrest of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and 18 others.
Defendants are also accusing the FBI “infiltration team” who posed as a documentary film crew called Long Bow, of editing video at crucial moments to make defendants who gave interviews look guilty of crimes they did not commit.
On at least 5 different occasions the defendants in the case say that video used to gain their indictments and create the Governments narrative that has kept them all in jail pending trial, was clearly altered at crucial moments to hide what they believe would expose the BLM as the aggressors and not the “victims” as Prosecutor Steven Mhyre contends.
We have found at least 5 different clear cases of evidence tampering and have only viewed 1/4 of the discovery that was recently released to us by the Prosecutors office say defendants, who have begun the process of creating a power point demonstration that will be viewed by defense attorney’s on October 7, 2016.
This doesn't begin
to include the fact that the BLM engaged in the same actions that
landed Dwight and Steven Hammond in
prison.
Posted by Ammon Bundy
Published on Dec 5, 2015
This BLM fire reportedly killed more than 80 head of cattle. Put ranchers
trying to save their cattle in extreme danger, injured other cattle, burnt
homes and structures, burnt fences and power poles and threatened the town of
Frenchglen.
Additionally, no one
at Bundy Ranch did anything like what the BLM did, which
you can see here.
Posted by Pete Santilli
Show
Published on Apr 9, 2014
Contains Graphic images.
Protestors at the Bundy Ranch in Bunkerville, Nevada take on the Feds and stand their ground.
Video courtesy of the Pete Santilli Show and Guerilla Media Network http://guerillamedianetwork.com/
Please donate today to keep more videos like this coming tomorrow!! http://wp.me/P30jla-1JM
Protestors at the Bundy Ranch in Bunkerville, Nevada take on the Feds and stand their ground.
Video courtesy of the Pete Santilli Show and Guerilla Media Network http://guerillamedianetwork.com/
Please donate today to keep more videos like this coming tomorrow!! http://wp.me/P30jla-1JM
Carol Bundy, Cliven
Bundy’s wife, reacted in a similar manner, "So what kind of defense are we
allowed to have if we can’t tell the truth? Because if the Government has
it’s way it looks like we will not be allowed to have any defense at all."
The central
government has been at the center of coverups. Among them have been Waco and Ruby Ridge.
They have sought and are seeking to do the same in the Bundy case just as
they are attempting to do in the case involving the murder of LaVoy Finicum and as they have done concerning Daniel
P. Love, the man in charge of the aggressive nature against the Bundys.
I met with
Santilli on Saturday at the Southern Nevada Detention Center and he
informed me that he believes with the evidence they have, that everyone should
be acquitted of the charges against them.
He went on to state to GMN:
Sure, they would love it if we all just went into this trial docile and
defeated, not willing to fight them, but that just isn’t going to happen. The
Bureau of Land Management went to Bundy Ranch with a clear disdain and lack of
respect for the Bundy Family. Dan Loves Objective fell just short of scorched
earth policy; We can prove it, they know it and they are very, very afraid of
that. As I see it, we have them right where we want them, why would they
file such a ludicrous Motion otherwise? This Motion has the “BLM is
guilty” written all over it and I for one think that’s great news. If the
Government gets it’s way and eliminates the fact that Daniel P Love gave agents
the authority to beat up on Bundy Family members and was not acting in a
rational way during the impoundment, if the Jury is not allowed to hear what
elected officials told Love in response to his brutal actions, and if
there was never any reason whatsoever for protestors to be in fear for their
lives, then I believe any Jury worth it’s salt is going to be very suspect as
to the validity of this case. I mean, if nobody did anything wrong, then
why the hell are we having a trial?
Judge Navarro has
demonstrated that she is just as corrupt as the BLM and the politicians
surrounding what is going on in Nevada. Just look at what she has done to Santilli and Cliven Bundy. Does anyone
really believe she is not going to accept this motion?
________________
BLM Persecution of Western
Land Owners
John R. Houk
© January 26, 2017
______________
Prosecutors Seek to
Protect BLM from Scrutiny in Bundy Ranch Trial
About the Author Tim Brown
Tim Brown is an author and
Editor at FreedomOutpost.com, SonsOfLibertyMedia.com, GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com. He is husband to his "more precious than
rubies" wife, father of 10 "mighty arrows", jack of all trades,
Christian and lover of liberty. He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of
South Carolina. Tim is also an affiliate for the Joshua Mark 5 AR/AK hybrid semi-automatic
rifle. Follow Tim on Twitter.
No comments:
Post a Comment