John R. Houk
Sifu Mode
© October 13, 2016
Sifu and I continue our debate on Donald Trump. He posted
the comment on the post that inspired the debate: “Trump vs.
Crooked Hillary – Conservative vs. Leftist”. However Sifu’s
thoughts are based on the cross post of his original comment on the newer post,
“Trump the
same as a Dem Administration?”
I thought Sifu was a Leftist the way he came after Trump,
but it appears I am mistaken. I went to his G+ page and it looks to me that
Sifu is a bona fide Conservative. I can only guess he is a NeverTrumper. That
is absolutely Sifu’s right, but I think NeverTrumpers will insure a Crooked
Hillary election even if they vote for neither Hillary or Trump. Crooked
Hillary will take America further down the tubes with a large amount of
certainty. I’m willing to give Trump a shot to follow through or modify his
campaign promises to make America great again.
If the NeverTrumpers turn out to be correct or Crooked
Hillary is indeed elected, then I will abandon the GOP completely as in never
voting for a Republican because of ineffectiveness. If bad scenarios evolve it
will be time to replace the Republican Party with politicians actually accountable
to Conservative voters rather than some elitist Establishment with an elitist
agenda out of touch with constituents.
Since I was unaware of Sifu’s political persuasion I am not
going to search for where I may have called him (or her) a Leftist.
NeverTrumper Conservatives are still Conservatives. It is my humble opinion an
elected Crooked Hillary will corrupt America absolutely. A corrupt America is
not a good America. On a personal level a Trump gamble is better than a crooked
and corrupt Hillary Clinton.
Sifu, if you are reading this, I have been researching and
writing this piece for the better part of the day. I am too lazy to fix any of
my accusations of you being a Leftist. I apologize ahead of time.
Sifu quotes me in italics text then offers his thoughts
criticizing Donald Trump. I answer Sifu in bold
text primarily defending Trump but also tossing in some Crooked Hillary
barbs.
JRH 10/13/16
*************
I don’t see any massive growth
of government
Look at everything he says he wants to do. Everything. It is by federal programs. He will have to create departments with staffs and budgets. He wants to continue Obamacare. He wants to raise the minimum wage. He wants to try to run the economy like it is one of his businesses. If you don't see it, that is you choosing not to.
I want Trump to run
the Executive Branch like his business. Efficient spending rather than wasteful
spending. If a project isn’t working, rather than making excuses or blaming
someone else then scrap and start over – much like a high dollar bankruptcy
restructuring for success. Frankly unlike most of my fellow Conservatives I
don’t have a problem Big Government. My problem with government is private
citizen intrusion and wasteful spending. Obamacare is a debacle of good
intentions ruined by lies and deception and worse – INEFFICIENCY. I have no
problem with healthcare reform, but a socialist system will be too costly and
inefficient much like Veteran’s Healthcare has led to deaths.
Obama’s military
reduction, idiotic rules of engagement and a strategy to lose rather than win
has made America less secure. AND I like the idea of our allies contributing a
fairer share of defense money or making a deal that makes our protection worthy
of our cost.
Donald does want a
higher minimum wage but not as high as the Dems AND he favors an Amendment 10 (10th Amendment Explained)
action rather than Federal action on a minimum wage.
Donald Trump on 5/8/16:
No, I’d rather have the states go
out and do what they have to do. And the states compete with each other, not
only other countries, but they compete with each other, Chuck. So I like the
idea of let the states decide. But I think people should get more. I think
they’re out there. They’re working. It is a very low number. You know, with
what’s happened to the economy, with what’s happened to the cost. I mean, it’s
just– I don’t know how you live on $7.25 an hour. But I would say let the
states decide.
I understand the
fiscal difficulties with rounding up illegal aliens and deporting them en
masse; however, preventing more illegal aliens should be preeminent then work
on getting rid of criminal illegal aliens then amnesty for working illegal
aliens so that they can pay taxes and responsible for the rule of law like
American citizens.
Blog Editor: I suspect Crooked
Hillary has her own version of cybersecurity that probably includes Bit Bleach
and a hammer.
Blog Editor: The Child Care
policy seems to me to be Liberal slanted rather than Conservative; however, it
is practical for lower income citizens.
All these policies
may have some government growth BUT they also enable government streamlining as
well as economic growth which means job creation which means more tax revenue
without raising personal taxes. That works for me as opposed to Hillary’s
Leftist Transformative Obama-utopianism that destroys social and personal
Liberty fabric of American culture.
Trump is not Hitler!
I never suggested he was. I pointed specifically to the fact that nationalism is not a binary good or bad, yet that is one of the only differences between him and Obama. This is not necessarily a good thing.
Hmm Sifu …
You said, “Maybe he will be rabidly
nationalist. How are those necessarily good? Putin isn't weak. Doesn't make him
good. Hitler was nationalist. Didn't make him good.”
Binary or not, the
imagery alludes to the picture that Trump’s nationalism is comparable to
Hitler’s Socialist Nationalism (Nazi: Comes the German “Nationalsozialist”, in English “National Socialist which is
derived from “National Socialist German Workers’ Party”).
It sounds like a Trump=Hitler image to me. I understand that “binary” in this
case refers to the potential of good and bad, but there is a large disparity
between Trump’s Nationalism and Hitler’s racial supremacist socialistic
Nationalism. Trump’s Nationalism makes America exceptional and Hitler’s Left
Wing Nationalism was imperialistic and genocidal.
Is Trump fascist? Well, remember, fascism doesn't have to include genocide as Hitler did.
Is Trump fascist? Well, remember, fascism doesn't have to include genocide as Hitler did.
But fascism is
despotic, supremacist and worse elitist statism as opposed to American
Constitutional Originalism that limits the power of National Government.
fascism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
So, if we made a checklist
1. Nationalist
2. What the leader says, goes
3. Not allowed to criticize the administration
4. Harsh social regimentation
5. Harsh economic regulation
6. Strong central government
fascism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
So, if we made a checklist
1. Nationalist
2. What the leader says, goes
3. Not allowed to criticize the administration
4. Harsh social regimentation
5. Harsh economic regulation
6. Strong central government
This description is
more relevant to the current makeup of the Obama/Crooked Hillary domination of
America rather than a limited government.
1. We know Trump is a nationalist, so CHECK
BUT not a
Socialist/Fascist National, so NOT CHECK!
2. He is constantly saying he will impose his ideas, regardless of anyone else's opinion, so the second point is CHECK
Again, NOT CHECK! If a person given a job fails,
they are fired. That has nothing to do with imposing Trump’s will on WE THE
PEOPLE such as Obama has done and the Obama third term via Crooked Hillary.
Counter Current News – really? Sounds more like a Leftist rag
concerned about litigation from a deep pockets billionaire when spin something
into a lie.
From the link:
It almost sounds like satire, but
during a speech in Texas on Friday morning, the Republican candidate and
frontrunner, Donald Trump said he wants to sue news outlets if
they negative stories about him.
He acknowledged that currently
the First Amendment of the Constitution protects a free press, and thus
shields journalists from suits like this.
But Trump said on Friday that he
would limit the press using litigation that would be permitted
due to “opening up” libel laws and allowing them to include things like
criticism and critiques that he doesn’t like.
“I think the media is among the
most dishonest groups of people I’ve ever met,” Trump stated.
“They’re terrible.” (Trump Promises Harsh Media Criticism of Him Will
Be ILLEGAL If He’s President; By Counter Current News Editorial Team [too cowardly to pin a
writer’s name]; Counter Current News; 2/27/16 9:51
am)
Time.com is a part of the Left Stream Media meaning it also
provides slanted anti-Trump and pro-Crooked Hillary news bytes was a bit more
even handed than Counter Current News:
Donald Trump won raucous cheers from his Fort Worth, Texas, crowd on
Friday when he promised supporters that he would make it easier for them to sue
journalists with whom they disagreed.
…
“One of the things I’m going to do if I win—and I hope we do, and we’re
certainly leading—I’m going to open up our libel laws so when they write
purposely negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win
lots of money,” Trump said of a litigation wave against major news
organizations. “So when The New York Times writes a hit piece,
which is a total disgrace, or when the Washington Post, which is
there for other reasons writes a hit piece, we can sue them and win money
instead of having no chance of winning because they’re totally protected,”
Trump said. (Donald Trump Promises to Make America Litigious
Again; By Philip Elliott; Time.com; 2/26/16)
How is this an attack on the First Amendment? Trump is
working within the law threatening litigation for a lack of honesty in
reporting. It would not be a questionable Executive Order such as has President
Barack Hussein Obama has done frequently in his bully politics.
4. Just look at how he intends to shape society. He isn't
planning to free us to shape ourselves. He wants to do it himself with
government authority.
Again Sifu you are
confusing Trump’s government streamlining and waste-fighting with the Big
Government despotism of Democrats under Obama. Which again, Crooked Hillary
vows to continue:
5. Trump plans to run the economy like he is used to running one of his businesses, NOT allowing the free market to work
https://fee.org/articles/trump-s-economic-plan-higher-taxes-higher-inflation-and-higher-minimum-wage/?gclid=Cj0KEQjw3s6-BRC3kKL_86XDvq4BEiQAAUqtZ08FoUgqKY9afGUHmbY-aMZ9I66G8_CYHEaYydTHH_4aAuKA8P8HAQ
Hmm…
The above link is largely the Dem talking points cherry picking Trump’s words
and twisting them to offend Conservative Less-Government proponents. The whole
article is such but here is an excerpt that mirrors Sifu’s above sentiments on
the economy:
Usually presidents run on a platform of reforming government, cutting
government, improving government, controlling government, etc.. After all,
government -- not the whole country -- is their bailiwick.
But not Trump. He posits himself as the head of the whole country,
running America the same ways he runs his businesses. He would stamp his name
brand on the nation, as he does with everything else he owns, thereby imparting
it with his own purported greatness. Probably the last president who was so
open about his belief that he runs the nation was FDR himself. (Trump’s Economic Plan: Higher Taxes, Higher
Inflation, and Higher Minimum Wage; By Jeffrey Tucker; Foundation for Economic Education;
5/9/16)
Now what gives weight
to this evaluation by FEE is that the organization is guided by the
Conservative/Libertarian thought of Austrian Economics. So the perspective
definitely not Leftist, ergo kudos to Sifu for finding the Trump criticism.
Nevertheless, I have said Trump is no Conservative in the traditional sense but
rather an apolitical realist on making profitable deals that have little to do
with ideology.
I wonder what FEE
profiles about Hillary Clinton?
…
After years of toiling in the halls of power, the presidency finally
seems hers for the taking. Yet, the closer Hillary comes to assuming the
presidential chair, the closer Americans examine her public pose only to
recoil.
…
In a word, many Americans find her “mendacious,” and the
revelations regarding the appearance of the Clinton State Department’s “pay-to-play” scheme –
delivering special access and favors to Clinton Foundation donors – is only the
latest episode in a long series of scandals besmirching her trustworthiness.
The revelations – and there are more to come and they will never end –
is shocking and not shocking. If you think government is good, clean, and
constantly striving for the public good, seeing all this up close must be
startling. Most thinking people long ago let go of their naïveté about
government and therefore find nothing particularly surprising about any of
this.
…
Where power may begin as simply a means to achieve one’s
dreams, winning and wielding power ultimately becomes the dream
itself. Compromise after compromise of principles is made for the
sake of power. Sacrifice after sacrifice of others is offered for the
sake of power. Lie after lie is told for the sake of keeping the truth of power-hungry
dreams alive. One’s ideals become hollow pretense, mere words, and the curse of
power takes hold, i.e. for every good deed done, two or three “necessary” evils
must be committed.
Such appears to be the tragic tale of Hillary Rodham Clinton.
The Radical Turned Establishment Figure
In 1969, Hillary Clinton wrote her senior thesis, titled “There Is Only
the Fight,” on the work of that now infamous radical, Saul Alinsky. …
At the beginning of his own book, Rules for Radicals, Alinsky quotes himself:
Lest we forget at least an
over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our
legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off
and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who
rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least
won his own kingdom — Lucifer.
That said, Hillary diverges with her role model Alinsky in her thesis
on one crucial point. Rather than rebelling against the
establishment to win her own kingdom, she would become the
establishment. …
…
At this point, Hillary Clinton is, indeed, the establishment. …
…
Power Corrupts
Do Hillary Clinton’s “noble” ends justify her choice of means, her
ambitions for state power?
In my opinion, the answer is a firm “no,” but I do not say this as
something unique to Hillary Clinton. She comes from a long line of murderers
and thieves dressed up in high ideals – the type of person Isabel Paterson once
called the “humanitarian with the guillotine,” – those
who, as Paterson wrote, cause great harm as “the result of their deliberate
actions, long persevered in, which they hold to be motivated by high ideals
toward virtuous ends.” In step, Hillary is quick to downplay her mistakes and
the “collateral damage” left in her wake in the name of her “virtuous ends.”
…
Faith in state power and the corruption that follows may not be unique
to Hillary Clinton – before writing Clinton Cash, author Peter Schweizer wrote another
excellent book, Extortion, outlining how our dear
public servants systematically use their political power to manipulate those
they supposedly serve – but Hillary’s career in politics certainly provides a
crash course in how such a faith corrupts.
Whether it be her support of NSA mass
surveillance programs, her penchant to centrally plan the American economy
through a morass of crony capitalists enabling
job-killing policies, or the Clinton Foundation’s global pay-for-play
scheme, Hillary has in many ways become the very establishment she used to
dream of replacing. She makes the ‘69 establishment President Richard Nixon
look like a domesticated pussy cat, as she escalates America’s imperial
wars, facilitates arms deals for
Clinton Foundation donors, and continually lies to
the American public about her own record.
Break with Alinksy [sic]
When did Clinton … READ ENTIRETY (Hillary Clinton: A Portrait of Power and Corruption; By Joey Clark; Foundation for Economic Education; 8/26/16)
Sifu, there is the
reality of the matter according to FEE. The Austrian Economic organization does
not Trump’s economic plan because the Trump numbers do not conform to the
Austrian model, BUT Mrs. Clinton is soooo Crooked that our government would
slide further into a quagmire of corruption and despotism to elicit Leftist
utopian ideology by hook or crook.
I’ll go with FEE’s
description of Crooked Hillary and give Donald Trump at least a chance!
6. Everything he says/promises, he intends to do through
government power. He intends to grow government and its authority.
Trump worked within the law.
Legal! = right
A thing can be legal and still not right. Look to his usage of eminent domain.
Hmm…
Trump has been criticized for using eminent domain to bulldoze widow Vera
Coking’s house for a Casino parking lot, right? Well, not actually factual:
A Ted Cruz TV ad says Donald Trump “colluded with Atlantic City
insiders to bulldoze the home of an elderly widow” for a casino parking lot.
Trump called that claim “false.” We wouldn’t go that far. He wanted to
bulldoze the home but lost an eminent domain case. However, the ad leaves the
false impression that the widow lost her home, and she didn’t.
After a long court battle, a New Jersey Superior Court judge ruled in
favor of Vera Coking of Atlantic City and said that she could keep her home.
Trump eventually decided not to fight the ruling.
…
Two months later, the CRDA officially dropped the case, deciding not to appeal the
judge’s ruling because the Trump organization said it was no longer interested
in the properties.
So, Coking was able to keep her home for more than a decade longer
until she moved to a retirement facility in California. Her house in Atlantic
City was purchased at auction for $530,000 in
2014…
(Widow’s Home Wasn’t Bulldozed; By D'Angelo Gore; FactCheck.org [A project of Annenberg Public Policy Center – biased to the Left];
1/25/16)
The Leftist Website Think Progress give Donald Trump kudos
for his eminent domain in a GOP Primary debate:
Donald Trump made the case for eminent domain at Saturday night’s ABC debate,
arguing for the government’s right to seize property for infrastructure
projects in exchange for appropriate compensation.
“Eminent domain is an absolute necessity for a country — for
our country. …
Trump is right. Eminent domain paved the way for major infrastructure
projects now taken for granted in the U.S. Water supplies, highways, subways,
and other sprawling public projects required the government’s power to buy
private land. … (Trump Makes Surprisingly Reasonable Defense Of
Government Power;
By Aviva Shen; Think Progress;
2/6/16)
I realize
the American Left will not agree but it is my opinion a President would utilize
government eminent domain for infrastructure and pipelines – job producing
projects that Obama failed to institute and undoubtedly so would Crooked
Hillary fail.
By the way Trump lost his
imminent [sic] domain case and complied
So losing means his unethical attempt never happened? His
character is less blemished because he was stopped by an external source? No,
he is still THAT slimeball.
Hmm…
Did Trump’s big business agenda kill anyone – ever? Crooked Hillary’s Foreign
Policy agenda did kill people – Benghazi! Compare Trump’s “slimeball”
accusation to nearly an entire adult life of Crooked Hillary scandals (right
along with Slick Willie):
1. Benghazi: Committing Perjury
or Lying Under Oath
Hillary has repeatedly committed perjury or lied under oath throughout
her career. One of the most telling examples was during her Benghazi testimony
when she claimed a video had inspired a protest that ended up killing
Ambassador Stevens and 3 other Americans. This was subsequently shown to
be a lie. Hillary
famously declared, “What difference does it make?” when the
questioning got too tough, in regards to the causes of the American deaths and
personnel she was supposedly in charge of protecting. She stated she had
submitted all documents, but 20 months later, FOIA requests uncovered 41 new
documents. Yet another lie.
2. Faking Uncontrollable Fits of
Coughing
Check out this compilation of clips where Hillary
pretends she can’t stop coughing in order to avoid answering tough questions or testify on an issue at
all. On the Benghazi issue, Clinton testified 4 months late to Congress.
3. Email Gate: Illegally
Mixing Government and Personal Emails
In the latest scandal over emails, dubbed Email Gate by some, Clinton set up a homebrew server to hold
official Government property in terms of classified information. She also used
her official Government work email to conduct private and personal business.
4. Email Gate: Endangering
National Security and State Secrets
Another aspect of Email Gate was the reckless endangering of
Governmental secrets Clinton engaged in. Although many readers of The
Freedom Articles will be all too aware of the way Government abuses
the concept of national security, the fact remains that there is some need for
it. Numerous officials have stated there is no doubt – zero ambiguity – that her emails endangered national security, due to the fact many
were classified SAP (Special Access Program). However, she may have been doing
this deliberately (see point 6).
5. Email Gate: Obstruction
of Justice, Destruction of Evidence
Email Gate has many aspects to
it. A further aspect is Hillary’s deliberate withholding
(and deleting) of around 30,000 emails. Her excuse was that these were the
personal, private ones, yet Congress had asked to see them all. Given what we
know of Hillary as a cover up agent extraordinaire, what are the chances that
she wasn’t deleting them to destroy information? It remains to be seen
what will come of the deletion, since the FBI is reported to have the
server and flash drives (with all the emails) in its possession.
6. Selling State Secrets to
Foreign Countries
Mike Rivero
(WhatReallyHappened.com) puts forth impressive evidence that Hillary
has deliberately sold US
Government State secrets to foreign countries. She and Bill did
this with China during Bill’s presidency.
Hillary may also have intentionally set up her homebrew server with weak
security that could easily be hacked, so that the hackers could get the
information and Hillary could claim the problem was “weak or flawed security”
rather than a deliberately set up situation to leak data.
7. Bill the Rapist, Hillary the
Coverup Agent
As I covered in the
article Billary Clinton: Rapist and
Coverup Team Par Excellence, Hillary has been covering up for
Bill’s violent sexual escapades and rape for decades, threatening his female
victims into silence, sometimes with death threats. Some of them have been
outright killed.
8. Failed Stint as Secretary of
State 2009-2013
A State Department spokesperson
could not point to a single tangible achievement by Clinton. Hillary wasted $80
million on an Afghan US consulate. She lost $6 billion due to improper filing
of contracts. She refused to classify Boko Haram as a terrorist group,
leading to the kidnapping of 300 school girls. She called off internal
investigations into her State Department involving the endemic
engagement of prostitutes by her security, drug use by State Department
contractors and the US Ambassador to Belgium soliciting male child prostitutes.
9. A Giant Whopper: Pretending
to be Under Fire in Bosnia
Hillary claimed
she was under attack by snipers when she landed in Tuzla, Bosnia, 1996, but subsequent CBS
footage showed her walking calmly along the tarmac there and even stopping to
greet a young girl. Liar, liar, pants on fire.
10. Flip-Flopping: NAFTA
This video (also embedded above)
shows how Hillary has flip-flopped on the issue of NAFTA, saying to some people
that she favored it (“NAFTA has proven its worth”) while saying to others she
opposed it (“I have been a critic of NAFTA from the
very beginning”). Anything to get elected!
11. More Lies: Gun or No Gun?
In the same video, Hillary claimed her
grandfather taught her to shoot, yet later on, claimed she grew up in a house
without any guns. Which is it?
12. More Lies: Bringing Peace to
Northern Ireland?
Hillary claimed she brought
Protestants and Catholics together in a Town Hall meeting for the first time.
However, as this video states, “negotiators
from the parties that helped broker the Good Friday agreement in 1998 told the
Daily Telegraph that her role was peripheral and that she played no part in the
grueling political talks over the years.”
13. Flip-Flopping: Marriage
Equality
Hillary has variously
claimed that she opposes gay marriage and supports gay marriage at different
times. It’s all about opportunism and pandering to a political base.
14. Hillary during Watergate
Investigations: An “Unethical, Dishonest Lawyer”
Bill Clinton was asked to
serve on the special staff to handle the Nixon impeachment inquiry. He declined
and suggested they hire his girlfriend Hillary Rodham instead. As Mike Rivero writes:
“Hillary Clinton was later
fired from the staff of the House Judiciary committee investigating the
Watergate scandal in 1974. She was fired by her supervisor,
lifelong Democrat Jerry Zeifman, who stated, “She was an unethical, dishonest
lawyer,” he said. “She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the
House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” Zeifman refused to give
Clinton a letter of recommendation, one of only three employees he
refused during his entire career.”
15. Blood Gate: Selling
AIDS-Infected Blood
When Bill Clinton became Governor of Arkansas, he awarded a fat
contract to a Little Rock company called Health Management Associates (HMA).
The company was paid $3 million a year for “medical services” for the
state’s prison system. The game was to pay prisoners for their blood ($7
per pint) then resell it at massive profits on the international plasma market
($50 a pint). HMA’s entry into the blood market coincided with the rise of AIDS
in America, but HMA did not screen the prisoners’ blood, even after the FDA
issued special alerts about the higher incidents of AIDS and hepatitis in
prison populations. In Canada alone, more than 7,000 people died from
contaminated blood transfusions, many of them hemophiliacs. More than 4,000 of
them died of AIDS. In 1986, public outrage forced the cancellation of HMA’s
contract.
16. Whitewater Scandal
The Whitewater Scandal involved Bill using the power of office of
Governor of Arkansas to build public roads to the Clintons’ private land. The
Clintons and McDougals made money with real estate contracts for Whitewater
property that included harsh clauses. This resulted in elderly buyers
defaulting on land payments and repossessions. The habit of using State power to personally enrich themselves is a very common theme running through the
Clintons’ careers.
Hillary was the first woman ever subpoenaed by a Grand Jury in relation
to Whitewater. Pervasive conflicts of interest were discovered between Rose Law
Firm (Hillary) and Madison Guaranty (McDougal). Billing records disappeared
(presumed stolen) from Vince Foster’s office the night he died. They reappeared
in the Clinton residence following their acquittal, covered with Hillary’s
fingerprints. Susan McDougal refused to testify against the Clintons, so went
to prison, but was pardoned by President Bill. 15 Clinton friends were found
guilty of 40 federal crimes. This cost US taxpayers around $145 million.
17. Cattle Gate: Insider Trading
– Hillary’s Magical Trade
Hillary invested $1000 and turned it into $100,000 through insider
trading. She entered and exited the market at the exact right time. According
to economists at Auburn and Nth Florida University, 1995, who concluded in
their study in the Journal of Economics and Statistics, the probability of
Hillary’s trade being genuine and not an insider trade was 1 in 250,000,000!
The broker involved was given a 3 year suspension.
The trade was connected to Tyson Foods, the largest employer in
Arkansas and a big Clinton donor.
18. Eliminating Drug Testing at
the White House
In an effort, no doubt, to avoid embarrassment over Bill’s
cocaine-snorting habits, the Clintons eliminated random drug testing at
the White House through the appointment Patsy Thomasson.
19. File Gate: The
Clintons’ Enemy List
The Clinton Administration improperly requested and received FBI
background reports on 900 Republican officials in 1996. These FBI files
contained sensitive information on average American citizens. It turned
into a “Compilations of Enemies” list. Hillary was the source of the requests.
The NYT called Hillary a “congenital liar”. Congressman Bob Barr commented:
“Clearly what the Clinton Administration is trying to do is an
orchestrated systematic effort to thwart justice, to thwart the rule of law, to
thwart legitimate investigations by the Congress, whether it is impeachment
proceedings or regular oversight … to
derail investigations (and) derail prosecutions.”
20. China Gate: The China
Connection
Bill Clinton and Al Gore took money from rich Chinese donors who ran
prostitution rings. Again in 1996, agents of the Chinese Government
and military funneled money into the Clinton re-election campaign, Clinton
Legal Defense Fund and Democratic National Committee, in violation of US law.
21. Prison Population
Explosion under Bill
The total prison population increased by 673,000 people under
Clinton’s tenure or by 235,000 more than it did under President Ronald Reagan,
according to a study by the Justice Policy Institute.
… READ 23 MORE (44 Reasons to NOT Elect Hillary Clinton; Makia Freeman – Editor; The Freedom Articles [Conspiracy Theory site, but I’m
smoke/fire kind of guy]; 2/4/16)
A Crooked Hillary/Slick
Willie list dwarfs any scandal linked to Trump primarily because the Clinton
scandals demonstrate a Teflon get-out-of-jail elitism. Trump hasn’t even been
close to felonious jail and potential treasonous activities.
He also donating money to Republicans. The donations demonstrate advancing his business goals and profiting his investors. That’s not politics,
Having no principles and going as the wind blows to maximize
your personal desires? That is the ESSENCE of "political".
Sifu there is a vast
difference office politics in business and politics in government or at least
government in America. Office politics is accountable to the Board of
Directors, Shareholders and/or the Boss. Politics in government in America are
accountable to the voters Constitutionally known as WE THE PEOPLE. The Dems
have lost the concept of voter accountability. Unfortunately, I believe, the
Establishment Republicans have lost that concept as well. Politics is the art
of power agenda to achieve an agenda that can be good or nefarious. I am
uncertain if Trump has use Office Politics to break any laws. He certainly has
been challenged on a civil level and he has done his share of civil challenges
as well. The Clinton clan can easily be called a crime family due to the
prosecutions they slinked out of and the prosecutions that never went forward.
THAT THE ESSENCE OF CORRUPTION IN GOVERNMENT!
Your blog is attempting to make me sign up for a new g+ account to comment, so my comments will have to remain here.
Your blog is attempting to make me sign up for a new g+ account to comment, so my comments will have to remain here.
Sifu I apologize for
your G+ issue. That is truly odd there is a Google demand to sign up for a new
account apart from the one you already have.
No comments:
Post a Comment