Editor John R. Houk
October 4, 2016
Over the last few days I have posted some info that shows
Comey, his FBI or both involved not only in a cover-up to protect Obama and
Crooked Hillary’s hindquarters but also to make Crooked Hillary untouchable
enough to get elected. Shades of Obama Administration 2012 Benghazi lies to
reelect Barack Hussein Obama.
Here are some examples of Comey corruption from those two
posts:
The more that details about the
FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email practices come to light, the
more their efforts appear to have been a sham designed to exonerate her of
wrongdoing from the very beginning. …
…
Upon further review, it appears
that Mr. Comey’s investigation was highly unusual, given the five immunity
agreements that were handed out. …
“Instead of asking Attorney General
Loretta Lynch to revoke his immunity deal and squeezing him, Comey let
[Combetta] go because he was a ‘low-level guy,’ he testified at the House
hearing. …
…
Comey insisted that the immunity agreement was necessary to ensure that the FBI
got the facts.
“There’s no doubt Combetta was
involved in deleting emails,” said Comey. …
…
Secretary Clinton’s former chief of staff Cheryl Mills and Clinton aide Heather
Samuelson also received immunity agreements meant to ensure that they gave the
FBI access to their laptops. …
…
To add insult to injury, the
FBI allowed Samuelson and Mills to
sit in on Hillary Clinton’s interview with the bureau.
…
(Was
The Fix In On FBI Investigation Of Hillary Clinton’s Emails? By Roger Aronoff; SlantRight 2.0; 10/1/16)
And the other post:
Gowdy was after a document called a 302, which is essentially a summary
of interviews of key witnesses. The FBI wasn’t giving those to Congress, and
instead was getting a “summary of a summary of an interview” instead. This is
something the Committee, and Gowdy in particular, was not pleased with. …
…
FBI Director James Comey appeared before Congress for the third time.
Once again, he fumbled through another session, trying to explain away
the reasons why he overlooked Hillary Clinton’s criminal behavior.
…
Suspicions were raised when the FBI handed out five grants of immunity to
Hillary’s underlings – including former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, who was
the mastermind behind the private server.
Many wondered why immunity was given to so many people and no charges
were filed.
…
“GOP lawmakers focused in particular on the Justice Department’s decision
to give a form of immunity to Clinton lawyers Cheryl Mills and Heather
Samuelson to obtain computers containing emails related to the case.
“Laptops don’t go to the Bureau of Prisons,” Rep. Trey Gowdy
(R-S.C.) said. “The immunity was not for the laptop, it was for Cheryl Mills.”
The FBI director repeated an explanation he gave for the first time
at a Senate hearing Tuesday, that the deal to get the laptops was wise because
subpoenaing computers from an attorney would be complex and time consuming.”
NOW I FIND OUT that
the immunity deals were based ONLY on a limited search AND that after the
limited search the laptops were to be destroyed by THE FBI! Here’s the story.
JRH 10/4/16
*****************
FBI, DOJ Make Side Deal To Destroy Clinton Aides’ Laptops
"... doesn't
that undermine the claim ...?"
October 3, 2016 at 2:16pm
Sources from the
House Judiciary Committee told Fox
News Monday that the immunity deals struck with Hillary
Clinton’s top aides, Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, included the Justice
Department agreeing to destroy their laptops after they had been turned over to
federal investigators.
The House Judiciary
Committee sent a letter Monday to Attorney General Loretta Lynch inquiring
about the arrangement, and why it also included a limited search of
computers files dating no later than Jan. 31, 2015.
“Please explain why
DOJ agreed to limit their search of the Mills and Samuelson laptops to a date
no later than January 31, 2015,” Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte wrote in the
letter, which was first reported by Fox News.
Goodlatte states
that the agreements, which were signed on June 10, meant that investigators
could not review documents after the email server became public and they
abandoned “any opportunity to find evidence related to the destruction of
evidence or obstruction of justice related to Secretary Clinton’s unauthorized
use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State.”
“Why was this time
limit necessary when Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson were granted immunity for any
potential destruction of evidence charges?” he added.
It was revealed last
month that the DOJ granted Mills and Samuelson immunity for any information
recovered from their laptops.
The House Oversight
Committee exposed the
immunity agreements publicly, and it raised questions about why two Clinton
aides were given permission to sit-in with Clinton during her July interview
with the FBI.
The FBI claimed that
because the interview was voluntary, the investigators had no control over who
Clinton brought with her.
“Doesn’t the
willingness of Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson to have their laptops destroyed by
the FBI contradict their claim that the laptops could have been withheld
because they contained non-relevant, privileged information? If so, doesn’t
that undermine the claim that the side agreements were necessary?” Goodlatte
wrote.
Last week, FBI
Director James Comey said that he agreed to grant immunity because he
wanted to avoid a drawn-out legal battle, but he also failed to mention that
part of the “agreement” was for the laptops to be destroyed.
After the news of
the laptops being destroyed broke, Twitter users expressed their
contempt for how the case has been handled.
BREAKING from Catherine Herridge: FBI made side
deals with 2 HRC associates to "destroy" their laptops after
inspecting them
+++
@ShannonBream I am soooooooooo sick of this corrupt "administration" I am getting physically ill.
+++
BREAKING from Catherine Herridge: FBI made side deals with 2 HRC
associates to "destroy" their laptops after inspecting them
+++
@ShannonBream @ByronYork I'm no
lawyer but I think James Comey & The FBI just committed SEVERAL FELONIES
“Like many things
about this case, these new materials raise more questions than answers,”
Coodlatte concluded.
__________________
Editor Intro to FBI,
DOJ Make Side Deal …
Editor John R. Houk
October 4, 2016
__________________
FBI, DOJ Make Side
Deal To Destroy Clinton Aides’ Laptops
About Western
Journalism
Western Journalism is a news company that drives positive cultural change
by equipping and informing people with truth. It hosts WesternJournalism.com, a
news website and blogging platform built for conservative, libertarian, free
market and pro-family writers and broadcasters. The platform hosts hundreds of
bloggers, and our content is widely distributed using social media. New blogs
are able to be successfully launched using the platform because of the large
audience actively served.
WesternJournalism.com is a property of Liftable Media Inc., a Top 100
digital publisher in the U.S. (Quantcast).
No comments:
Post a Comment