Here is a compilation of comments from Tony Newbill on the
NCCR post “The
essential guide to Hillary’s high crimes, misdemeanors”. Newbill demonstrates Hillary Clinton
indeed is as crooked and corrupt as a nefarious person can be.
JRH 5/19/16
*******************
Hillary More Crooked than Anyone Realizes
By Tony Newbill
Economic Espionage
Economic espionage is a problem that costs the American economy hundreds
of billions of dollars per year and puts our national security at risk. While
it is not a new threat, it is a growing one, and the theft attempts by our
foreign competitors and adversaries are becoming more brazen and more varied in
their approach. The FBI estimates that hundreds of billions of U.S. dollars are
lost to foreign competitors every year. These foreign competitors deliberately
target economic intelligence in advanced technologies and flourishing U.S.
industries.
Definition
According to the Economic Espionage Act (EEA), Title 18 U.S.C., Section
1831, economic espionage is (1) whoever knowingly performs targeting or
acquisition of trade secrets to (2) knowingly benefit any foreign government,
foreign instrumentality, or foreign agent. And Theft of Trade Secrets, Title 18
U.S.C., Section 1832, is (1) whoever knowingly misappropriates trade secrets to
(2) benefit anyone other than the owner.
Historically, economic espionage has been leveled mainly at
defense-related and high-tech industries. But recent FBI cases have shown that
no industry, large or small, is immune to the threat. Any company with a
proprietary product, process, or idea can be a target; any unprotected trade
secret is ripe for the taking by those who wish to illegally obtain innovations
to increase their market share at a victim company’s expense.
The FBI’s role
Economic espionage falls under the Bureau’s Counterintelligence Program,
designated by the FBI Director as the Bureau’s number two investigative
priority—second only to terrorism.
In terms of our operational efforts, the FBI:
o
Conducts an increasing number of investigations
into suspected acts of economic espionage using our full arsenal of lawful
tools and techniques.
o
Takes part in the DOJ’s
Intellectual Property Task Force, which seeks to support
prosecutions in priority areas, promote innovation through heightened civil
enforcement, achieve greater coordination among federal, state, and local law
enforcement partners, and increase focus on international law enforcement
efforts, including reinforcing relationships with key foreign partners and U.S.
industry leaders.
o
Participates in the multiagency National
Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center, which facilitates
the exchange of intellectual property theft information, plans and coordinates
joint domestic and international law enforcement operations, generates
investigative leads from industry and the public, provides law enforcement
training, and works closely with industry partners on intellectual property
crime.
Beyond its investigative activity, the FBI works to counter the economic
espionage threat by raising public awareness and … READ
THE REST
Clintons make Mockery of FBI & Land of LAWS that DO NOT APPLY to Monarchy? #clintoneconomicespionagescandal
BOMBSHELL REPORT: CROOKED
HILLARY TOOK $100 MILLION FROM MIDDLE EAST REGIMES: “MASSIVE CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST”
How much more of Hillary Clinton’s scandals can America take?
A bombshell report from The Daily Caller says the Clinton
Foundation, a purported not-for-profit charity headed by Bill, Hillary and
daughter Chelsea, has reportedly amassed a fortune from oil-rich mid east
nations to the tune of $100 million.
National Security Analyst Patrick Poole says the amount of cash
donated to the Clintons is “simply unprecedented.”
“These regimes are buying access. You’ve got the Saudis. You’ve got the
Kuwaitis, Oman, Qatar and the UAE. There are massive conflicts of interest.
It’s beyond comprehension,” Poole told The Daily Caller.
A Daily Caller News Foundation investigation reveals that Bill and
Hillary Clinton received at least $100 million from autocratic Persian
Gulf states and their leaders, potentially undermining Democratic
presidential candidate Hillary’s claim she can carry out independent Middle
East policies.
The benefits for mid east oil producers amount to billions of dollars in
oil trade, and as you might expect, Hillary Clinton is more than happy to
oblige – at the expense of American energy companies and … READ
THE REST (BOMBSHELL REPORT:
CROOKED HILLARY TOOK $100 MILLION FROM MIDDLE EAST REGIMES: “MASSIVE CONFLICTS
OF INTEREST”; By MAC SLAVO; The Daily Sheeple;
5/12/16)
FBI made a Mockery
over #ClintonEconomicEspionageScandal
Major Hillary Clinton Donor
Caught Up in Fresh Panama Papers Scandal
The new leaks name hedge fund
manager Donald Sussman, who has contributed millions to Clinton's campaign.
A major donor to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's is
featured in the International Consortium of Investigative Journalist's records
on offshore bank accounts.
A major donor to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's is
featured in the International Consortium of Investigative Journalist's records
on offshore bank accounts.
Sussman heads the Paloma Partners, a holding company that provides
security brokerage, investment and management consultancy services. According
to OpenSecrets.org,
Paloma Partners has donated $4,007,900 to Clinton’s campaign during the 2016
election cycle...
Sussman is linked to two offshore holdings by ICIJ's Offshore Leaks:
Simply Radiant, Limited and New China Technology Licensing, Inc.
According to
ICIJ, Sussman is director of British Virgin Islands-based Simply
Radiant, which was founded in 1994 but which no longer operates. Paloma
Partners is also a Simply Radiant shareholder. Sussman is also named director of
China Technology Licensing, Inc., started in 2002 but … READ
THE REST (Major Hillary
Clinton Donor Caught Up in Fresh Panama Papers Scandal; teleSur;
5/10/16)
Shocked face: Hillary helps out
Swiss bank UBS and then UBS donates $600K to the Clinton Foundation, pays Bill
$1.5M
More problems for Hillary Clinton? Could be…
Today’s Wall Street Journal has a new
report out on Hillary Clinton’s time as Secretary of State and
potential conflicts of interest with donors to the Clinton Foundation. In
summary, Hillary
helped Swiss banking giant UBS negotiate a favorable deal with the IRS regarding
an investigation into Americans who had secret accounts at the bank and then —
surprise, surprise — donations from UBS poured into the Clinton Foundation as
well as $1.5 million paid to Bill Clinton in … READ
THE REST (Shocked face:
Hillary helps out Swiss bank UBS and then UBS donates $600K to the Clinton
Foundation, pays Bill $1.5M; Posted by Greg P.; Twitchy; 7/30/15 7:53 am)
The Clintons: is the Oregon
standoff really about uranium?
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)
Note: This article was written before the Oregon shootout in which one man was killed and another wounded.
Is uranium at the heart of the Oregon Malheur federal-protestor standoff?
That’s the question I’m asking. It isn’t a flippant question.
I realize there are many other issues swirling around this event. The
Hammonds, the Bundys, militias, the feds, cattle grazing on federal lands,
federal land grabs, and so on. This article isn’t meant to take apart those
matters.
It’s meant to follow up on my previous article, in which I present a
circumstantial case for the Clintons’ heavy involvement in a scheme that’s
transferred 20% of US uranium production to Putin and Russia. And the key
company in that piece is Uranium
One. Remember the name. It’s apparently a major clue in what I’m
about to discuss.
I also want to say … READ
THE REST (The Clintons: is
the Oregon standoff really about uranium? By Jon Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog;
1/27/16)
Caught! Clinton taking cash from DoJ
[Blog Editor: The tinyurl is actually to a comment to “Caught!
Clinton taking cash from DoJ.” The comment itself links to a
petition which is the title below.]
Assign Special Prosecutor 2 Clinton Investigation DOJ
holds conflict of interest
Created by S.Z. on May 10, 2016
Should the FBI move to prosecute Hillary Clinton due to her use of a
private email/server, a special prosecutor should be assigned. The DOJ employs
a sizeable number of individuals who've donated to the Clinton Campaign. Many
of them have donated the maximum allowable amount of $2,700 -(http://www.opensecrets.org/)
Loretta Lynch is affiliated with Hillary Clinton via Bill Clinton; who
appointed her the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York in 1999.
Objectively speaking, Loretta Lynch and her history with the Clintons could
potentially cause a conflict of interest. To allow Loretta Lynch and the DOJ to
handle this is not in the best interests of the American People. We, The
American People, demand that this case is handled in a manner in which true
justice is the priority.
What Kinda Police State would we have with Hillary????
#HILLARY BLACK PEOPLE ARE JUST PREDATORS FIRST WE HAVE TO
BRING THEM TO HEEL.
#CROOKED HILLARY 2016
TWITTER VIDEO of Crooked Hillary in 1996
#HILLARY BLACK PEOPLE ARE JUST PREDATORS FIRST WE HAVE TO BRING THEM TO HEEL.#CROOKED HILLARY 2016#TRUMP2016#MAGA pic.twitter.com/ewuUJUpGSp— #BLACKS FOR TRUMP!!! (@mtoneyshae) May 13, 2016
Bill Clinton was frequent flier on pedophile’s private jet
Bill Clinton was frequent flier
on pedophile’s private jet ‘Lolita Express’
Newly released flight logs show
former US president Bill Clinton flew on convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s
infamous “Lolita Express” jet at least 26 times.
Initial reports in January
suggested Clinton was on board the billionaire’s Boeing 727 on “only”11
occasions, but documents obtained by Fox News show he flew with
Epstein more than two dozen times.
… READ THE
REST (Bill Clinton was frequent flier on pedophile’s private jet ‘Lolita
Express’; RT.com/usa;
5/14/16 15:48)
Are Hillary Clinton’s China ties behind a dropped espionage
investigation?
·
It’s always a possibility that cases are
dropped because of national security concerns regarding other operations that
are ongoing, but sometimes the U.S. government makes decisions based purely on
political considerations, especially when it comes to China
Few Americans could fathom the
notion that the United States is so indebted to China that one of Beijing’s
spies could get away with espionage – especially with an White
House in love with espionage prosecutions. But that might be the
only reasonable explanation for the Obama administration’s decision to pass on
prosecuting a State Department contractor who was allegedly paid thousands of
dollars to someone believed to be a Chinese agent seeking information on
Americans.
According to Fox
News, a November
2014 FBI affidavit that was filed in U.S. district court in
Maryland indicates that the FBI launched a probe into the matter but that the
Justice Department eventually decided not to prosecute.
The affidavit shows that the FBI
investigated the contractor after she admitted she was in contact with
individuals she believed were Chinese intelligence officers. Fox News further
reported:
The affidavit from agent
Timothy S. Pappa states the translator, Xiaoming Gao, was paid “thousands of
dollars to provide information on U.S. persons and a U.S. government employee.”
According to the documents, she
admitted these meetings took place in hotel rooms in China for years, where she
reported on her “social contacts” in the U.S. to an individual who went by the
name of “Teacher Zhao.”
The affidavit, which was quite
detailed, even says that translator lived briefly “for free” with a State
Department employee who held a top-secret clearance and at the time designed
high-security embassies, including the U.S. compound in Islamabad, Pakistan
(which is a client
state of China’s).
The State Department employee was
not named in the affidavit, Fox News reported, but he initially told the FBI he
had not discussed his job with Gao, only to later change that statement.
The documents also note that Gao
told the FBI during interviews in 2013 that she once informed “Teacher Zhao” about
travel plans regarding an American and ethnic …
…
But sometimes the U.S. government
makes decisions based purely on political considerations, especially when it
comes to China, and here is where this unusual decision deserves more scrutiny:
— In recent days International
Business Times reported that Hillary Clinton, as secretary of
state (and head of the State Department), threw tech company Cisco “a lifeline”
in 2009 shortly after the company had undergone a high profile Senate hearing
regarding its Chinese operations. It seems Cisco had a large part in developing
China’s “Great Firewall that helps China’s authoritarian regime censor
information and surveil its citizens.”
… as IBT noted:
Cisco was honored as a finalist
for the State Department’s award for “outstanding corporate citizenship,
innovation and democratic principles.” The next year, the company won the award.
While the honors were for the company’s work in the Middle East, they gave
Cisco a well-timed opportunity to change the subject and present itself as a
champion of human rights.
The company’s ties to Clinton?
What Clinton did not say at the
State Department award ceremonies was that Cisco had been pumping money
into her family’s foundation. Though the foundation will not release an exact
timeline of the contributions, records reviewed by International Business Times
show that Cisco had by December 2008 donated from $500,000 to $1 million to the
foundation.
…
There are other potential Clinton-China ties as well. In March CBS
News reported that a Chinese firm with ties to North Korea had
donated heavily to the Clinton Foundation:
Rilin Enterprises- pledged $2
million in 2013 to the Clinton Foundation’s endowment. The company is a
privately-held Chinese construction and trade conglomerate and run by
billionaire Wang Wenliang, who is also a delegate to the Chinese parliament.
Public records show the firm has spent $1.4 million since 2012, lobbying
Congress and the State Department. The firm owns a strategic port along the
border with North Korea and was also one of the contractors that built the
Chinese embassy in Washington.
…
— Then there is the little-known 100,000
Strong Foundation, which was launched by Clinton at the State
Department during her final weeks there. The program focuses on sending
American students abroad to “study” in China, a program Clinton touted as
essential to improving future relations between both countries.
…
During her tenure as the nation’s chief diplomat, Hillary Clinton seems
to have had China’s support – and China’s back. READ
ENTIRE ARTICLE – Crooked Clinton is running POTUS election 2016 (Are
Hillary Clinton’s China ties behind a dropped espionage investigation? By Jon Dougherty;
Absolute Rights; 4/23/15)
Hillary and the Espionage Act of 1917
Last week I asked about Hillary Clinton’s email practices, Is it Espionage? Former
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton insisted that she “had broken no rules” to
conduct government business through the use of a private email service in lieu
of the U.S. government’s unclassified system, the Non-classified Internet
Protocol (IP) Router Network (abbreviated as NIPRNet) and the Secret Internet
Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet). These are a system of interconnected
computer networks used by the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S.
Department of State to transmit classified information.
…
The Democratic Presidential candidate under investigation by the FBI
has disclosed that her aides had deleted more than 30,000 emails that she
deemed personal. 30,000 emails printed out represents a stack of 60 reams
of paper, a stack 10 feet tall. …
Attorneys fresh out of law school are familiar with the legal issue
known as “spoliation of evidence.” When parties fail to produce relevant
evidence within their span of control, evidence which they are otherwise
naturally expected to possess, the U.S. legal system allows and even mandates
that unfavorable presumptions be drawn against them. So when some item of
relevant evidence -- whether documents, physical objects or data relevant to an
ongoing legal matter -- is destroyed, discarded or modified in some way, the
U.S. legal system allows us to presume that the missing evidence was
unfavorable to that party and allows us to draw conclusions accordingly. …
Spoliation of evidence is prohibited by an array of laws and
regulations. Also, anyone who destroys relevant evidence or assists in
such destruction is subject to criminal prosecution, civil fines, tort
liability, exclusion of testimony and dismissal of claims, as well as adverse
evidentiary inferences. Intentional destruction or negligent loss of
evidence suggests that the party in possession believed that it was harmful to
them, and that consciousness of guilt led them to destroy, hide or lose it.
…
… Emails now released reveal that her State Department minions were
directed to strip off the classification headers and footers off classified
documents and input those documents, or even essential information that would
make the information classified. Whether she directed others to do it or
she performed the action herself, the FBI has reported thousands of cases exist
where classified information was moved to an unsecured email server.
Seventy years ago, senior State Department official Alger Hiss found a way to
remove classified information from State Department offices. Hillary
Clinton found a way to remove classified information from State Department
offices. The essence of espionage is to get classified documents out of a
Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, a SCIF, and into the hands of
“someone not authorized to receive them.”
Among those charged under the Espionage Act of 1917 were … READ
ENTIRETY (Hillary and
the Espionage Act of 1917;
By Mark
A. Hewitt; American
Thinker; 3/4/16)
How the American
People get left out of their Political Process and LOSE their Liberties: http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/05/hedge-fund-megadonors-capitalize-on-offshore-opportunities/
Hedge fund megadonors capitalize on offshore opportunities
On the list of the largest U.S. companies by
market value, those in the $30 billion to $45 billion range are household
names: Capital One Financial, DirecTV, Phillips 66, Yahoo.
But far fewer people know much, if anything, about Citadel Multi-Strategy
Equities Master Fund Ltd., with a gross asset value of $33 billion, or Elliott
International, L.P., at $30.8 billion, or AQR Style Premia Master Account,
valued at $16.6 billion. All are hedge funds organized under the laws
of the Cayman Islands.
They’re also just a handful of the funds under the control of some of
the biggest political donors in the nation: Kenneth C. Griffin, Paul Singer and Cliff Asness.
…
(The fund once managed by George Soros, another major
industry donor, is now a family office and has no SEC Form ADV on file.)
The release of the Panama Papers has brought
fresh reminders of the stunning amount of wealth held offshore, but that’s
a world these donors and their firms navigate routinely as part of a
rarefied investment community far more wealthy and sophisticated than the
market to which most people have access.
…
All told, the value of their 151 hedge funds is as high as $390
billion. Most of that is in the funds based overseas, mostly in the Cayman
Islands. Of the 151 funds in the firms’ SEC reports, 67 are organized
under the laws of the Caymans, where the firms manage some $282 billion in
current asset value. About $103 billion of the wealth is held in Delaware-based
hedge funds.
…
A quarter of the funds report greater than 50 percent ownership by
non-U.S. investors (which could include offshore holding companies and other
entities), and foreign investors own at least part of 41 percent of the funds.
By far, most of the funds catering to these offshore entities are
organized in the Cayman Islands.
In the presidential contest, hedge fund managers have played an enormous
role in plumping up the coffers of several candidates’ super PACs. Sussman, for
instance, who has given out more than $7 million this cycle in all, has
contributed $4 million to Priorities USA Action, the
group backing presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.
Sussman and Simons combined have given Priorities $16 million in the past two
cycles. (Priorities supported President Barack Obama’s second campaign for
the White House before it pivoted to Clinton.)
Mercer, who socked $13 million into Keep the Promise I, one of the super PACs supporting Sen. Ted Cruz‘s (R-Texas) recently …
READ
ENTIRETY (Hedge fund
megadonors capitalize on offshore opportunities; By Will Tucker;
OpenSecrets.org;
5/12/16)
_______________________
Edited
by John R. Houk
Arbitrary
title by the Editor.
Compiled
by Tony Newbill
No comments:
Post a Comment