Hillary is a crook so crooked that she makes Richard Nixon
look like an amateur. Justin Smith pointed these thoughts out to me in a submission
intro of the post below:
How can any self-respecting
American cast a vote for such a wretched human as Hillary, especially for the
Office of the President of the United States?
I don’t know if Justin meant for to share that above quote,
but I think that it is a great intro on Hillary’s crooked nature in this exposé
opinion piece.
JRH 4/23/16
******************
Hillary Clinton for
Prison
By Justin O. Smith
Sent: 4/23/2016 1:41
PM
Beyond sad and heartbreaking, many millions of patriotic
Americans watch in dismay and anger, as millions of other citizens of our
nation cast votes to make Hillary Clinton the next U.S. President, even though
she is the consummate Machiavellian liar and takes to anti-American agendas,
corruption and treason like a bear to a honey pot. But FBI scrutiny
intensified in March, and according to statements made by U.S. Attorney General
Loretta Lynch, former U.S. Attorney Joseph DiGenova and former U.S. Attorney
General Michael Mukasey, Hillary's lies have paved the path towards a criminal
prosecution. And, the surfacing truth concerning many of Clinton's past and
present activities suggests Hillary must be given a prison cell, rather than
handed the most powerful position in the world.
Although Obama is trying to minimize the serious national
security implications and ramifications of Hillary Clinton keeping top secret
information on her personal phone, BlackBerry and server, making light of the
"top secret" classification, the beginning of her end, if it comes
around, may be found in this reply to a July 2014 Freedom of Information Act
request from the House Select Committee on Benghazi: "no records
responsive to your request were located."
Last month, the Los
Angeles Times, the Washington Post
and the New York Times reported that
FBI immunity was granted to Bryan Pagliano, former Hillary
staffer, who implemented her illegal national security breaching email scheme.
It is also highly likely, given the circumstances, that Department of Justice
prosecutors have already convened a grand jury, as the FBI prepares to
interview top senior Clinton aides.
During her tenure as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton
used her private server in Chappaqua, NY exclusively, in a self-serving act
motivated by her desire to hide questionable and illegal acts, like the
approximate $3 million in kickbacks the Clinton Foundation received after
Secretary Clinton signed off on a deal between Uranium One, Rosatom and the Russians. She established this
entire system to avoid the law, and she might have succeeded, if not for the
efforts of groups like Judicial Watch
and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and their numerous
unanswered FOIA requests that opened suspicion of official misconduct and
criminal activity by Secretary Clinton.
Hillary's first known BlackBerry communication through her
basement server was a January 28th, 2009 exchange with Gen. David Petraeus,
then Chief of U.S. Central Command, and yet, she falsely testified before
Congress under oath that she didn't use "clintonemail.com" prior to
March 18th, 2009. She did not want Americans to know that she had been warned
on February 13th, 2009, her BlackBerry and email were not secure.
Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security Eric Boswell had explained to Hillary and
Cheryl Mills, Clinton's Chief of Staff, on several occasions that
her BlackBerry and private server were vulnerable to security breaches. State
Department security officials, including Clinton, were also aware of a February
24th, 2009 speech by Joel Brenner, Chief
Counter-Intelligence Officer at the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence, that explained a BlackBerry can be easily tagged, tracked,
monitored and exploited as one moves about in public; Brenner also observed the
technological fact that this malware can migrate to one's home server.
On March 10th, 2015 at a news conference, Hillary, in flat
denial, stated "There is no classified material" [on her server].
Cheryl Mills audaciously filed a letter with the State Department and U.S.
District Judge Emmett Sullivan (overseeing Judicial Watch lawsuit) that states,
in part, "On matters pertaining to the conduct of government business, it
was her practice to use the officials' government email accounts." Both
statements have proven to be false, and along with numerous other false
statements from Clinton and Huma Abedin and Mills, her co-conspirators, they
are felonies under 18 United States Code
Section 1001.
Twenty-two Clinton emails were
so highly classified that they were withheld in their entirety from public
release and elicited this response from Rep. Chris Stewart (R-UT), a member of
the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, who told The Post,
"... sensitive and obviously classified. This information should have been
maintained in the most secure, classified, top secret servers."
Hillary's assertion that these 22 emails were not
"marked top secret" is dishonest, and the State Department clarified
and certified on April 15th that they were in fact marked "top
secret", having been sent to or received from Pres. Obama. Marked top
secret or not, the oath Hillary took on January 22nd, 2009, charges her under
the law to recognize state secrets when she sees them by assessing an email's
potential to harm the government's national security mission.
On March 4th, 2015, CBS News
reported that Clinton's private email was reconfigured two on two separate
occasions in 2012 and 2013, to provide a backup server, in case her server
failed. However, using this system at MX Logic, her emails were open to
being read, tapped or forwarded to anyone across the globe without anyone
knowing, since MX decrypted them to check for viruses before reencrypting them
and sending them on.
The transmission and removal of information relating to the national
defense from its proper place of custody is a criminal offense
under the Espionage Act. So too is the abstraction and willful destruction of
such information. See also 18 U.S. Code 2071 -- prohibiting destruction of records.
Time and again, Hillary Clinton flouted U.S. law through her
blatant refusal to follow the guidelines of the Federal Records Act and her
impediments to numerous FOIA requests; and, she and her co-conspirators,
Abedin, Mills and others, violated the Espionage Act, as they removed all
Clinton email records from the State Department from the beginning. Clinton's
willful and arbitrary destruction of thousands of other emails compounds her
crimes, since they more than likely contained incriminating evidence that
pertained to the Benghazi investigation.
Lt. Col. Ralph Peters bluntly and boldly told Fox
News, "Hillary Clinton is a criminal."
Hillary Clinton's numerous devil-may-care violations of the
Espionage Act are criminal acts and an arrogant abuse of power, which warrant
the appointment of a Special Counsel and Hillary's prosecution, if only
Americans will generate a public outcry and a demand for her indictment.
Obama's administration saw fit to prosecute nine lesser cases involving state
secrets, so certainly Hillary should not be allowed to escape prosecution
simply by virtue of her popularity with those citizens, who do not value honor
and integrity and who do not care about national security and that her gross
negligence and Muslim appeasement policy at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi
resulted in the murders of four brave Americans, or that a conspiracy in the
Obama administration sought to hide the truth afterwards. Rather than chant
"Hillary Clinton for President", many Americans are now chanting
"Hillary Clinton for Prison."
By Justin O. Smith
________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Source links are by the Editor.
© Justin O. Smith
No comments:
Post a Comment