Sex Revolution Father a Homosexual Pedophile?

John R. Houk
© July 20, 2010

Alfred Kinsey is the Left Wing father of the Sexual Revolution. Research he worked on in 1930’s, 40’s and 50’s led to the degeneration of accepted sexual morals in America. Kinsey’s research stretched from heterosexuals, homosexuals, pedophilia and many more aberrant behaviors. Kinsey’s research sent his conclusions to the public as well as to science. Many of those conclusions gave the green light to behavior to sexual lifestyles beyond heterosexuality. Some would say, hence the blight of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, transgender and pedophilia sex on course to cultural acceptability over traditional Christian Morality.

Since the majority of scientists tend to filter their research through Left Wing thought patterns, Kinsey’s research is still cited by the majority scientific community as ground breaking discovery in sexual mores of the American. Unfortunately the acquisition of Kinsey’s data has pretty much been withheld from the public. For instance Kinsey’s homosexual subjects were recruited from an area of homosexual debauchery and not exactly a representation of America’s general population. Child sex and man/boy sex was observed of children forced into sex by noted pedophiles who exacted sex from both boys and girls. Sex crimes law enforcement in the 30’s, 40’s and 50’s was focused on prostitution with the overt investigation of pedophilia being nearly non-existent as an embarrassment of society to be buried out of sight.

The gal that has dedicated her life to exposing Kinsey as a morally corrupt man was on a mission to justify lifestyles that personally subscribed to. That gal is Dr. Judith Reisman. Reisman has written books and articles exposing Kinsey’s research as fraudulent. Thus Reisman has become a darling to social Conservatives as I. From my brief Google searching Dr. Reisman I discovered that scientists or psychiatrists/psychologists in general has condemned her research on Kinsey methods and life as a Right Wing political agenda insinuating that Conservative affirmation is good enough to discredit her. As if Kinsey’s Left Wing agenda to socially transform America into the acceptance of immoral and/or deviant lifestyles was a justifiable political path that science must accept as valid.

Here are the sentiments of Dr. William Simon on an earlier expose of Dr. Reisman’s mission to enlighten the public of the reality of Alfred Kinsey:

The second speaks to impact of this kind of "inflated" exposé on our research efforts. The impact of this work on the general public will be minimal, despite the excessive endorsement of a knowledgeable critic like Patrick Buchanan. At best it will have a short life in book displays typically also featuring works on Communist-inspired conspiracies involving fluoridation of drinking supplies, attempts to demasculinize North American men by lacing their food with excessive amounts of estrogens, and the martyrdom of Ollie North. The real damage will occur were we to take such critics too seriously, were we to any degree to avoid the controversial, were we to lapse into the needlessly mystifying and obscuring mumbo-jumbo jargon that researchers have too often used in the past to protectively cloak their vision of the sexual experience. This book should be granted nothing but contempt.

Simon’s conclusion reeks of distaste of Conservatism.

Here are a few excerpts of a 2004 review by Daniel Radosh writing for The New Yorker about Reisman opinions on Kinsey:

“Dr. Kinsey’s most egregious fraud is that he wasn’t a scientist,” Reisman said the other day. “He was an ideologue who was most importantly a sex offender at best, and, beyond being a sex offender, he was certainly a child sexual abuser and/or solicitor and guide in the perpetration of that abuse.” At the root of this accusation is an interview that Kinsey conducted with a sexual predator who kept detailed records of his activities with hundreds of women, men, and children.


But it is not simply Kinsey’s neutrality toward such people that upsets Reisman. She claims that Kinsey actively solicited pedophiles to molest children and report back to him. In fact, she said, “there is absolutely no reason to believe that Kinsey himself was not involved in the sexual abuse of these children.” (None of Kinsey’s four biographers have turned up any evidence that he was.) Reisman also believes that Kinsey died not from heart failure but from what she calls “brutal, repetitive self-abuse.”

To a reader of Reisman’s scholarly papers, it sometimes appears that there is little for which she does not hold Kinsey responsible. In her research on gays, for instance, she has written that the “recruitment techniques” of homosexuals rival those of the Marine Corps. The Kinsey paradigm, she holds, created the moral framework that makes such recruitment possible. Reisman also endorses a book called “The Pink Swastika,” which challenges the “myths” that gays were victimized in Nazi Germany. The Nazi Party and the Holocaust itself, she writes, were largely the creation of “the German homosexual movement.” Thanks to Alfred Kinsey, she warns, the American homosexual movement is poised to repeat those crimes. “Idealistic ‘gay youth’ groups are being formed and staffed in classrooms nationwide by recruiters too similar to those who formed the original ‘Hitler youth.’ ”

…

Ultimately, Reisman and her colleagues hope to discredit not only Kinsey but the entire field of sexology which he created, and what she calls “the sexindustrial complex” that has grown out of it. “One doesn’t measure American sexual habits,” she said. “That’s not a science.”

I look upon Dr. Judith Reisman as a heroine fighting the crusade to reestablish Judeo-Christian American values reversing the curse of Secular Humanism. I do suspect Dr. Reisman be uncomfortable with the “Judeo-Christian” accolade; nonetheless a fight to expose Kinsey will results in points for Judeo-Christian Morality. In fact I urge you to buy Dr. Reisman’s new book, “Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America”.

Two YouTube videos exposing Kinsey: HERE and HERE.

JRH 7/20/10
***********************************
Meet ‘sex sugar daddy’ to Polanski, pedophile priests, predators everywhere

About Dr. Judith Reisman
Sent by: WorldNetDaily Blogger Email
Sent: 7/20/2010 3:00 AM

Sex Crimes against Humanity

Behind the vaunted ‘research’ that incorporated, encouraged and justified the sexual abuse of children

They are the voiceless victims whose horror in many ways mirrors what children in concentration-camp “experiments” suffered during the Holocaust. But the mastermind behind such horrid crimes of sexual abuse and rape of children—some as young as 2-months-old—touts a legacy that’s lauded, lionized, bankrolled and celebrated in literature, science, industry and the arts.

Still, the perpetrator escapes even the scorn heaped on pedophile priests—though his work provides direct cover to the abusers.


So charges a shocking new book by an author who’s never allowed her critics’ tactics of ridicule and blackballing to silence her from exposing the darkest secrets of Alfred Kinsey’s sexual “research.” Dr. Judith Reisman’s relentless commitment to revealing Kinsey’s documented—yet studiously whitewashed—methodology will culminate Tuesday with the publishing of WND Books’ latest, Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America.


Kinsey’s career, asserts Reisman, was founded on such unfathomable crimes against innocent children that its true nature must no longer remain unknown to the masses. Reisman aims straight for Kinsey’s watershed work—“Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.” Released 52 years ago, “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” attained academic acclaim and sparked mass shock and intrigue, selling 200,000 copies in its first two months of release.

“’Sexual Behavior in the Human Male’ and ‘Sexual Behavior in the Human Female’ provide abundant evidence of child sexual torture by Kinsey’s ‘researchers,’ who engaged in brutal, sexual experiments on children,” Reisman reports. “’Kinsey says ‘the only ‘abnormal’ sex is no sex; that the ‘human animal’ needs orgasms; and that the earlier boys and girls have orgasms, the better for them.’”


Reisman recently lifted the veil on the “global pedophile movement” in condemning the Swiss refusal to extradite Roman Polanski, the film director and three-decade fugitive who fled conviction for drugging, raping and sodomizing a 13-year-old girl. Reisman’s devoted much of her life’s work to telling the truth behind Kinsey’s research and revealing how he provides academic cover to sexually abuse—psychologically as well as physically—children.

Even in death, Kinsey’s sexual torment of children persists today, Reisman warns, citing the controversial sex-education curriculum pending in Montana. The Associated Press reports that in the Helena school district, “kindergartners would be taught proper anatomical terms, first-graders would learn sexual relations could happen between two men or two women, and fifth-graders would learn the various ways people can have intercourse.”

“Montana,” Reisman told EducationNews.org, “is seeking to impose an unscientific, Kinseyan ideological model of pathological sexual instruction on the undeveloped, immature brains of vulnerable children. …Their imposition of sexplicit and indeed deviant forms of sexual conduct on captive schoolchildren is institutional child sexual abuse. Were a man or woman to stop a child on the street and whisper the same information teachers will force on these school children, he or she could be arrested for child molestation.

“Since sex education only existed as ‘hygiene’ before 1950, (cleanliness habits and instruction to wait until marriage for sex unless one wanted to get VD),” she continued, “all sex ed had to come from some ‘expert.’ That ‘expert’ was Alfred Kinsey and his books.”

While many pinpoint the nation's seismic morality shift to the 1960s, Reisman presents different origins. Youthful rebellion, the rise of the counterculture and the Sexual Revolution remain mere symptoms of the cynicism that sprouted from the Kinsey Reports. The "Greatest Generation," Resiman (sic) maintains, absorbed a slander so damaging no jury could calculate the costs, as it inspired Boomers to see thier parents as perverted hypocrites.

“The World War II generation was trained to honor God, country, and family—and was thus trained to build a secure life for their children and, indeed, for us all,” she writes. “Kinsey … reported that nearly all American men—our ‘better angels’—were actually sex offenders, though he also claimed that no women or children were harmed by rape or incest.”

With attention lavished on Kinsey’s salacious charges of seldom-discussed sexual behavior as the closeted norm, few paused to ponder just how Kinsey drew such definitive conclusions about the sexual behaviors of children. Few except Reisman.

“’Sexual Behavior in the Human Male’ reports data “on 214 male children,” Reisman’s “Sexual Sabotage” reports, “the youngest only one year old. .. Kinsey asserted, ‘Of the 214 cases . . . all but 14 were subsequently observed in orgasm.’ Observed?! Who ‘subsequently observed’ (defined as ‘occurring or coming later or after’) these infants and boys being—yes—sexually tortured, timed, and recorded? Who, of Kinsey’s team, did this under his direction? The youngest boy tested to ‘climax’ is ‘2 mon.’ old.”

The pervasiveness of Kinsey’s research is pandemic, Reisman states, and even informs key advisors to the Catholic Church on matters of child sex abuse. One such advisor, Fred Berlin, MD, co-founded the celebrated Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic, with his mentor, John Money, PhD.

Money, “a dedicated Kinsey disciple” who mentored an early Kinsey Institute director, reports Sexual Sabotage, “said that their clinic was designed to offer ‘leeway to judges’ to free convicted child molesters.”


Tellingly, the Rev. Michael Peterson, founder of St. Luke’s Institute, warned clergy that they “should avoid potential abuse suits by following the well-qualified Money and Berlin.”
________________________
Sex Revolution Father a Homosexual Pedophile?
John R. Houk
© July 20, 2010
______________________________

Meet ‘sex sugar daddy’ to Polanski, pedophile priests, predators everywhere

Dr. Judith Reisman is a consultant and former president of The Institute for Media Education, and is the scientific advisor for the California Protective Parents Association. While her research and testimony prompted 7-Eleven to stop stocking Playboy and Penthouse magazines, she’s endured numerous attempts—including three congressional investigations—to squelch her findings on the dangers of pornography. A sought-after expert in the field of Media Forensics, Reisman served as a consultant to four U.S. Department of Justice administrations. Having been interviewed on countless major media outlets, she’s also authored or co-authored several titles, including:

* Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People

* Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences

* Soft Porn Plays Hardball: Its Tragic Effects on Women, Children and the Family.

Copyright 1997-2010 WorldNetDaily.com Inc. All Rights Reserved.