John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© April 4, 2026
Ever since the experience of the COVID Tyranny days under the installed Biden regime I have developed a huge distrust for Federal policing agencies and Federal Intel agencies. I suspect many of you developed that distrust long before the COVID Tyranny.
For me it became real when my questioning Election integrity and a refusal to follow medical narrative mandates publicly placed me in an Enemy of the State by the then ruling Dems. There I was, a Senior Citizen, feeling like I had got stuck into some kind of 1960s 1970s time warp in which dissent made me eligible for wiretapping, Internet spying and/or perhaps even a crazy domestic FISA search of my personal life.
DID THAT ACTUALLY HAPPEN? Probably not. On the scale of the Enemy of the State radar my existence as a blogging dissident was a very small potatoes blip. All Big Tech had to do to silence my dissent was to censor me. And that happened frequently to me on my Blogger blog and on Social Media.
Since President Trump has gained Office a 2nd time I’ve noticed the Community Guidelines violation accusations have trickled to almost nothing. It does still occasionally happen but hardly at all. And the Social Media I was censored and digitally-jailed often are places I have limited my presence on an extreme basis. I could whine more about that however it is not the point of this post.
A couple of days ago I ran into a Substack Racket News post informing readers the FBI bad actions of the past have not abated in the present. Couple that Racket News read with a Telegram (really an X-Tweet cross post) post that links the FBI with the CIA also in the continuation of bad activities against American citizens in the form of experimentation. KEEP IN MIND these were taxpayer funded operations against citizens that the Constitution says are supposed to be protected.
I am a President Trump guy. But the government that the Constitution says that he is in charge is currently too insidious with a Deep State infection for him to weed out unless extra-Constitutional means are employed. Some might call that a civil war.
Read the shared posts and I hope on a personal you choose dissent. Always begin dissent peacefully. When oppression is the response to dissent, what is the next step?
JRH 4/4/26
ALWAYS FREE TO READ yet READER SUPPORTED!
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100 (PAYPAL or CARD - one-time or recurring). YOUR generosity is APPRECIATED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements our income. Diana & I endorse Magic Functional Coffee and Matcha Tea. It’s MAGIC because there is a weight loss or weight control emphasis among other wellbeing benefits. Clicking the Diana Wellness Store will take you to the online store. CLICK the BUY tab and/or JOIN tab. Joining means you get COFFEE discount, can operate your store and recruit your own business & customers. Decide on a level to enter to Network your own Store. DRINK COFFEE and/or MAKE MONEY!:
https://dianawellnessstore.com
Have Coffee Customer Question or Earn Money Question - Ask Diana at Facebook Group Good Life Coffee
****************************
EXCLUSIVE: Exposing the FBI’s Human Experimentation Studies
"Who has my saliva from ten years ago?" On the FBI studies involving serial killers, twins, facial recognition, and genetics
Twins Days Double Take Parade (Racket News Photo)
April 1, 2026
Racket News (Substack)
“You’re only going to create a real problem for an FBI employee if you call ‘em direct this way.”
Senior FBI official Thomas Gregory Motta was upset that I dared to call him to talk about the bureau’s hidden experiments on humans.
He joined the bureau in 1998 and was promoted to the FBI’s senior ranks nearly 20 years ago. During his tenure, the bureau has grown proficient at snooping on journalists — as documented in a secret government report published by Racket — without having to face their questions.
Motta is a decorated FBI veteran, credited with an intelligence community award in 2007 for modernizing the American government’s most important foreign espionage tool and having worked on the secretive “going dark” national surveillance program.
After internal criticism surfaced more than a decade ago involving the bureau’s experiments on humans, the FBI put Motta in charge of an internal team revamping its approach to human subjects research.
In 2023, Motta delivered a presentation detailing the government’s work on secret human experiments, going all the way back to a catastrophic project that saw a CIA scientist drugged with LSD plunging to his death from a hotel room window 70 years earlier.
The government labeled his presentation, “NOT AUTHORIZED FOR POSTING ON THE INTERNET.” Here is Motta’s presentation to the Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research conference, posted on Racket in full, with only Motta’s personal information removed:
DOWNLOAD LINK TO PDF: “Institutional Review Board (IRB) For Human Subject Research (HSR) Protection” - Fbi Human Subject Research Presentation (22-pages)
Among the types of human experiments undertaken by the FBI, as detailed by Motta, are research involving facial recognition studies and algorithm testing, genetics, violent extremism, interrogation science, and more.
What is the bureau’s “oldest, continuous human subject research project?” It involves killers, namely the “Serial Homicide Interviews of Incarcerated Offenders” that Motta captioned with a photo of celebrated fictional monster Hannibal Lecter, as played by Anthony Hopkins in Silence of the Lambs.
Screengrab Photo from PDF (Racket News Photo)
The psychological thriller depicts a young FBI trainee, actress Jodie Foster as Clarice Starling, trying to get inside the head of the cannibalistic killer, Hopkins’ Dr. Hannibal Lecter.
Motta led the Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research Protection to oversee such studies at the FBI. In 2023, the secretive unit was moved under the auspices of the “Next Generation Technology Lawful Access Section.”
Motta told me he is no longer the chairman of the board, “not even at liberty to give the name of the chair” overseeing research now, and he said he “probably wouldn’t” speak to me if I approached him formally through the bureau’s press office.
He did not speak with me again and the FBI declined to answer all questions about the bureau’s human experiments. It also rejected Racket’s formal requests to interview those involved with experiments upon Americans.
We found some of the Americans the FBI is studying anyway: identical twins.
The FBI’s decades-long experiments on twins dwarf the scope of deadly Nazi studies
Throughout human history, twins have been the subject of intense interest for outlandish experiments on humans.
The German Nazis’ deadly human experiments researching genetics ensnared approximately 3,000 twins, 1,500 pairs of people, during the 1940s, according to the Children of Auschwitz Nazi Deadly Lab Experiments Survivors.
Fewer than 200 children are estimated to have survived, according to an investigation into the twins of Auschwitz authored in 1992.
In America, a major gathering of twins occurs every year, and the FBI looks to take advantage of the large pool of potential test subjects who consent to its experiments.
The Twins Day Festival in Twinsburg, Ohio, annually attracts nearly 2,500 sets of twins, or close to 5,000 people, according to the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division 2025 Year in Review.
The FBI’s review said it has sponsored the West Virginia University Twins Day Biometric Collection since 2010, involving those twins who voluntarily participate.
“This collaboration has resulted in the CJIS Division housing a vast dataset of twins’ biometrics with the only known twin age-progression dataset,” the review said. “The FBI uses the dataset to test its own capabilities to accurately identify individuals.”
One twin who grew suspicious of the FBI’s experiments at the Twins Day Festival’s 50th annual gathering in 2025 posted a video to TikTok showing some of the experiments underway.
The festival’s nondescript research sign did not carry the FBI’s insignia but it was adorned with bright red flags:
Bitchute/Rumble VIDEO: FBI at 2025 Twins Day Festival
[Posted by SlantRight2/SlantRight
Published April 3, 2026]
JoJo Gentry, a twin who has attended the festival for more than 20 years and participated in its human experimentation, told Racket she understood West Virginia University was conducting research with the FBI and signed consent forms.
But Gentry, a former sports anchor who now oversees a multimedia production company, said she is not so sure other twins read the fine print.
She said the research participants are typically hanging out while standing in line, enjoying the rare opportunity to meet other identical twins from near and far.
“You’re standing outside, it’s a hot summer day and you typically have ice cream while you’re waiting so usually your attention is just drawn to whoever is around you and having a conversation before you greet the people, whoever are at the front of the survey area,” Gentry said. “And they say, ‘Hi,’ and it’s brief, and say, ‘Sign this paperwork,’ and you sign it and you go in [and] say, ‘Here’s your 50 bucks,’ and you leave.”
Gentry said she and her sister gave saliva samples when they were younger.
“We thought extra money was cool and with an accreditation, with a higher education university and some corporations that were present. We felt like whatever they were offering was legitimate,” Gentry said. “And, of course, they had friendly faces there.”
Gentry said she has found the data collection process transparent, though she has some lingering questions.
“I’ve learned a little bit about what the government does and how it processes information so I’m like, ‘Oh, who has my saliva from 10 years ago?” Gentry said.
It’s an important question and a difficult one to answer. Data collected at Twins Day is “beneficial to other government agencies, trusted partners, and academic institutions,” according to the FBI’s CJIS 2025 Year in Review.
The identities of the other agencies and trusted partners are not clear. In March, FBI Director Kash Patel said on X the bureau, “expanded biometric collection overseas with foreign partners” to thwart bad guys, also without revealing the partners working with the U.S. government.
Biometric data from identical twins collected by the FBI goes into the CJIS’ Data Analysis Support Laboratory, according to a 2024 Privacy Impact Assessment.
“The multi-year dataset of identical twins’ biometrics in DASL enables the FBI to conduct various biometric algorithm evaluations,” the privacy assessment said. “Tests conducted using this data confirmed that fingerprints and iris biometrics are truly unique.”
Humans knowingly experimented upon by the FBI may expect more fulsome information about how the FBI is using their biometric data. Motta’s 2023 presentation said human subjects must have the right to opt out of future uses of their data and the scope of the future uses must be described to the test subjects.
.jpg)
Screengrab Photo from PDF (2) [Racket News Photo]
The FBI’s 2024 privacy assessment said the biometric data and personally identifiable information gathered in its lab will not be shared externally, “except when the FBI shares sanitized—that is, pseudonymized—biometric data from the [Next Generation Identification] System with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.”
Sanitized, pseudonymized, and anonymous no longer mean hidden, however.
Motta’s 2023 presentation said biometrics such as fingerprints, facial images, and DNA are not truly anonymizable, and artificial intelligence is complicating things further.
“AI is challenging the assumptions of anonymity in big data sets,” Motta’s presentation said.
The FBI’s security is also far from best-in-class. U.S. investigators reportedly suspect China of breaching an FBI computer network holding domestic surveillance orders, while Iran-linked hackers appear to be behind a breach of FBI Director Kash Patel’s personal emails that spilled online in March.
The FBI’s human experiments present a risky proposition for both the test subjects and those working in labs.
Motta’s 2023 presentation included a warning that said those who fail to get prior approval from his board before conducting such human research may be stuck with the blame and the financial burden if things go haywire.
“You could, in theory, be on your own if non-IRB-reviewed research creates financial liability,” Motta’s presentation said.
The emergence of data about the FBI’s human experimentation is just the latest in a series of leaks and revelations describing secret programs run by the FBI and other agencies that seem far from normal enforcement. From off-books “prohibited access” investigations to political surveillance to the buying of personal data like geolocation, Americans are increasingly subject to the same bizarre tactics intelligence agencies have deployed abroad or contracted out to other countries. What else is being hidden?
© 2026 Matt Taibbi
Racket News HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT Racket News
+++++++++++++++++++
From MK‑Ultra to TikTok: How the FBI Turned America Into an 80‑Year Human Experiment in Behavior Control
FBI Human Experimentation Continuum (Patriots Of Faith Hope Love Channel Photo [From X])
By Tony Seruga (from X)
Telegram Patriots Of Faith Hope Love Channel
It's bad. It's really, really bad! ☠️
For nearly eight decades, the FBI has occupied a quiet but critical place in the U.S. government’s covert history of human experimentation — not as a laboratory operator, but as the domestic enforcer and later data‑controller of programs that blurred the line between psychological research and social control.
The story begins in the 1940s, when Operation Paperclip imported wartime scientists whose “behavioral defense” research seeded CIA and FBI interest in manipulating minds rather than merely gathering intelligence.
Through the 1950s and 60s, the CIA’s MK‑Ultra and its sister projects experimented with LSD, hypnosis, and trauma to probe human compliance, while the FBI safeguarded the secrecy of these projects, tracking exposed subjects and silencing leaks.
When public outrage forced the CIA underground, the Bureau stepped to the front with COINTELPRO, turning psychological warfare into domestic policy.
Civil rights leaders, anti‑war activists, and intellectuals became involuntary participants in field experiments measuring how misinformation, surveillance, and constant pressure could fracture identity and morale.
After congressional investigations exposed these programs in the 1970s, Washington promised reform. Instead, the experiments were rebranded. The newly minted Behavioral Science Unit at Quantico continued studying manipulation, now under the respectable banner of “criminal profiling.” By the 1980s and 1990s, advances in electromagnetic and non‑lethal technologies blended psychology with engineering, creating the next frontier of “compliance research.”
FBI participation in DoD’s directed‑energy testing signaled the fusion of biophysics and behavioral science — invisible influence instead of interrogation.
In the 21st century, the entire apparatus migrated online. Under post‑9/11 counterterrorism authorities, the Bureau began feeding massive civilian datasets into AI systems funded by DARPA and IARPA.
Programs like Behavioral Sentiment Correlation Analytics and Applied Behavioral Influence Operations tested predictive algorithms able to sense, model, and nudge human emotion in real time. What began as Cold‑War hypnosis evolved into algorithmic conditioning — a seamless, 24‑hour experiment conducted through social media feeds, biometric data, and digital surveillance.
Declassified records and FOIA logs corroborate every phase of this metamorphosis: original MK‑Ultra memoranda, COINTELPRO field directives, Behavioral Science Unit research papers, and more recent entries describing “neuroresponse” and “human domain analytics.”
Each stage shows identical DNA — experimentation first justified by national security, sanitized by new terminology, and perpetuated through the fusion of intelligence agencies, defense contractors, and big data. The human body gave way to the human algorithm, yet the same pattern endures: consent absent, accountability nonexistent, secrecy absolute.
Today, the architecture of mass behavioral influence operates seamlessly behind the interfaces of phones, search engines, and social platforms. While officials claim these are protective counter‑extremism tools, their lineage reveals something darker — a civilization‑scale experiment measuring how far perception can be engineered before people even realize they’re subjects in a test.