.jpg)
John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© August 31, 2022
The UK Online info-source known as The Exposé is a great source
that posts actual science data that is not twisted by CONTROL-MINDED Globalist
science. True The Exposé leans toward exposing UK science hypocrisy, but
they also add a good deal of U.S. and Canadian science hypocrisy.
Today I am sharing two articles from The Exposé. The
later of which I noticed is actually from the Dr. Mercola website (The
Exposé failed to include the all important cited footnotes. Sometimes Dr.
Mercola archives his posts so while it is up you can check the footnotes under
the title, “Why
the COVID Jab Should Be Banned for Pregnant Women.”). The
Exposé articles:
o Proof
your Government is manipulating data to cover-up the lethality of COVID-19
Vaccination
Then I have a couple of Bitchute videos. The first video
actually uses some the charts found in The Exposé post I am sharing. The
Video: VAX
DEATHS: 691% INCREASE IN DEATH AMONG CHILDREN !! - WE MUST STOP THIS NOW!!
The second video is from Bitchute’s of The New American.
A big chunk of this video takes Tucker Carlson commentary on the growing
evidence of mRNA Jab damage that Global science is still trying to say is “safe
and effective” when the data is becoming glaringly clear the Jab is neither
safe nor effective. If you get to this video you will notice Carlson repeatedly
calls the mRNA Jab “Donald Trump’s vaccine.” The video title: EVIDENCE OF DEPOPULATION
Too be clear, as long as the Left hates President Trump, he’s
my hero. But this Jab thing – as long as Trump supports it – IT WILL COME BACK
TO BITE HIS BUTT. Ergo, when even the Left cannot deny the data, you begin to
see a “Blame-Trump-for-genocide” approach by the Left and their propagandists.
I’m not going to post it, but Wayne Allyn Root has a great
Pro-Trump rebuttal to the blame Trump for Jab injuries and deaths emerging as
fact rather than theory at The Gateway Pundit posted 8/28 entitled, “Here
is Who is to Blame for the Covid Vaccine Disaster and Coverup. Hint: It’s Not
President Donald J. Trump.”
JRH 8/31/22
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I
need Readers willing to chip in $5 - $10 - $25 - $50 - $100. PLEASE I need your
generosity. PLEASE
GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on
all social media platforms!
**************************
Proof your Government is manipulating data to cover-up
the lethality of COVID-19 Vaccination
Posted by THE EXPOSÉ [Staff]
By Dr. Wilson Sy
August 30, 2022
Despite widespread anecdotal and research evidence of
severe disease and death closely associated with COVID-19 injections, their
link to COVID mortality has been dismissed as rare and coincidental, because
comprehensive statistical evidence has not been obvious in official mortality
data.
A recent paper [1] solves this puzzle by identifying a
systemic data flaw in the reporting convention which obscures the immediate
fatal impact of COVID-19 injections, where substantial “vaccine” deaths have
been wrongly attributed to the “unvaccinated”.
Recently, Deborah Birx, coordinator of the White House
Coronavirus Task Force (WHCTF), who set the strategies for early US COVID
responses copied by much of the world, has publicly lamented the poor quality
of US COVID data and said [2] “It was a pandemic driven by assumptions and
perceptions, rather than data and science”.
On health agencies, she also said: “Data for publication,
not data for implementation change.” That is, COVID data are collected, not to
inform, guide and implement policy changes, but to manage public perception,
which could mean that data may be manipulated to mislead the public, as will be
shown below.
The official claim that “policy follows the science” is the
opposite of reality: “science follows the policy” i.e., the policy is first
supported later by fake science and manipulated data. Data analysts may not
realize that they could be aiding and abetting misinformation by publishing
misleading statistics of manipulated data. We provide evidence for the dramatic
consequences of the flaw in COVID data reporting [3] specified by the US CDC.
The CDC defines “vaccination status” as a 14-day lag from
the last COVID injection, with the rationale that it takes at least 14 days for
the injection to take effect. For example, a “breakthrough case” of a person
“vaccinated with a primary series” is specified by:
“Vaccinated case with a primary
series: SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected in a respiratory specimen collected
≥14 days after verifiably completing the primary series of an FDA-authorized or
approved COVID-19 vaccine.”
Such data collected are not raw data but manipulated data
because the adjusted data may distort the interpretation of the results. The
adjusted data is a data flaw in plain sight, because the adoption of a time lag
of 14 days, while widely accepted, has not been justified by scientific
research or by debate on its potential to mislead.
Scientifically, the concept of “vaccination status” is
entirely unnecessary in the raw data; all that is needed is simply to record
the “Date of injection” [4]. It has been impossible to determine scientifically
when the injections actually take effect when it is already pre-judged by the
“vaccination status” of the collected data.
The important distinction between raw data and manipulated
data, in this case, comes from the fact that adverse events and deaths have
occurred frequently soon after COVID injections, much less than 14 days, as the
CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database reported by
OpenVAERS [5] shows.
FG
1 VAERS Reported Deaths by Days After Injection
The VAERS data, which are reliant on voluntary reports,
therefore underreported and incomplete, clearly show the existence of an
immediate lethal effect of COVID injections, most likely in less than 14 days.
This evidence has been ignored as unrepresentative due to insufficient
fatalities compared with the large number of injections.
However, the evidence shows the 14-day time lag has a
confusing and significant impact on definitions of “vaccination status”, which
could have important ramifications. For example, if someone dies immediately
after a Pfizer booster, then the data would not be reported as the death of a
boosted person, but as the death of a double-dosed person. The recorded data
would mask the lethal effects of the booster since the death would not be
attributed to the booster.
The cited paper [1] has investigated this data flaw and has
shown that it is clearly evident in COVID data and that the data error has a
substantial impact on COVID mortality statistics and on our assessment of the
safety of COVID injections.
This article intends merely to describe the method of
analysis, summarize the main finding and indicate how the data flaw
significantly distorts the view on safety and the conduct of the COVID-19
pandemic. The main purpose is to urge others to replicate similar studies and
to seek further details of our method in the original paper [1].
Datasets requiring both numbers for populations and deaths
according to injection dosages or “vaccination status” are not often available.
Fortunately, there is a small amount of such data for a population of 8.2
million in New South Wales (NSW) in Australia, from early September 2021 to 2
July 2022 [6].
However, this NSW dataset is even more distorted [7], as a
person may be considered “unvaccinated” up to 21 days after the first injection.
The data will be shown to suggest many people died within this 21-day window
but were all classified as deaths of the “unvaccinated”.
Our method to expose the data flaw analyses the increases
and decreases in the populations of different dosages as shown in the following
table. After the first major injection campaign in NSW for several weeks, the
double-dosed population (second column) increased by a few million, at the
expense of both the single-dosed and un-dosed populations (negative numbers are
in brackets).
The two yellow columns highlight a data anomaly: the new
death counts for the “vaccinated” appear disorderly and potentially erroneous
(grey columns), with some resurrections (outside Easter) of the single and
double-dosed populations.
New deaths for the “unvaccinated” are consistently large,
for a shrinking population. Why should the dwindling “unvaccinated” population
have systematically large numbers of new deaths?
Over this period, the “unvaccinated” population reduced by
more than a million persons getting one or two doses of injection, the
double-dosed population increased by over three million, while the single-dose
population suffered a net loss of about two million.
When the combined one and two-dosed population is plotted
against the new deaths in the un-dosed, a very high correlation (>98%) is
observed in the following figure. In early 2022, the plunge in the combined
population of single and double-dosed persons, was due to the arrival of
booster shots, when the three-dosed population increased rapidly, reducing the
double-dosed.
New
South Wales Dosed & Undosed Chart
The pattern of data anomaly has occurred in every subsequent
injection campaign from the first booster (third dose) and then to the second
booster (fourth dose). The empirical evidence for these subsequent campaigns is
described in the original paper [1].
All data examined suggest that COVID injections systemically
have a significant and immediate lethal impact in agreement with the evidence
of the OpenVAERS report cited above.
Significant numbers of deaths within 14-21 days after
injections were reported not as caused by, or related to, the injections, but
rather reported as COVID deaths of those who have not yet had those injections.
The collected COVID data led to two false and misleading claims to drive the
injection campaigns.
·
The new injections were safe and associated with
few reported deaths;
·
The new injections were necessary, because of
the “waning” of previous injections with rapidly rising numbers of COVID
deaths.
The truth is just the opposite: new injections were unsafe
and associated with many deaths, but attributed wrongly to those yet to be
injected, creating an illusion of a deadly plague for the fearful to get the
first jab and subsequently an illusion of “waning” or “new variants” for the
“vaccinated” to get more jabs.
It is likely that first-hand experiences of health workers
who witness the immediate consequences of COVID injections may distrust
official reports and leave the industry rather than risking their own health by
submitting to “vaccine mandates”.
Initially, this scheme has worked wonderfully to drive the
uptake of billions of doses among world populations, but in recent times it has
started to fail because it has become evident that most COVID deaths were among
the “vaccinated”. Why?
Adjusting for larger “vaccinated” populations than
‘unvaccinated” populations, recent data still show that the “vaccinated” are
multiple times more likely to die than the “unvaccinated”.
The reason is that the proportions of the two populations
have stabilized, with relatively few first doses being administered and
therefore erroneous attribution of deaths to the “unvaccinated” has largely
ceased.
New injections have been given to the “vaccinated” as
boosters. Deaths from these new injections can now only be attributed to the
“vaccinated” populations. On a “vaccinated” versus “unvaccinated” mortality
comparison, the risk of dying for the “vaccinated” has been seen to rise
sharply, because those deaths could no longer be palmed off to the
“unvaccinated”.
If the scheme of inflating deaths of the “unvaccinated” were
to continue, then recruitment of more “unvaccinated” to get first jabs is
necessary. Perhaps campaigning against “vaccine hesitancy”, legislating
“vaccine mandates” and recommending childhood injections are all attempts to
keep the scheme going to inject the “unvaccinated”.
However, since those attempts have failed to convert enough
“unvaccinated” to accept COVID injections, COVID mortality risk among the
“vaccinated” has climbed visibly in the official data. A simple solution for
improved optics, at least temporarily, is to reduce the COVID death counts, by
shunting them off as non-COVID deaths, which is easy to do, given the ambiguous
definition of a “COVID death”.
A collateral consequence of the scheme has been a strong
correlation between new COVID injections and a rapid rise in non-COVID deaths,
eventually seen in the all-cause mortality data [8]. This observation solves a
puzzle raised in a recent PSI article [9] about ONS data, which appears more
accurate in small samples rather than in large samples [10]. The explanation
here is that the further back the data go, the more inflated and distorted the
mortality numbers of the “unvaccinated” due to the data flaw.
In conclusion, we have shown a data flaw exists in plain
sight in an official data collection. We have advanced Occam’s razor hypothesis
that the lethality of COVID injections, not officially recognized, can explain
several important, but puzzling, observations.
We encourage others to investigate this data flaw urgently.
For further details please see [1].
References
[1] Sy, W, Data reporting flaw in plain sight distorting
COVID-19 mortality statistics,
https://www.academia.edu/85597731/Data_reporting_flaw_in_plain_sight_distorting_COVID_19_mortality_statistics
[2] Igoe, M. Deborah Birx: US COVID-19 data was ‘worse than what I found
overseas’, Devex 15 July
2022, (See video, quotes at 11.32 and 8.16 min); available at: https://www.devex.com/news/deborah-birx-us-covid-19-data-was- worse-than-what-i-found-overseas-103640
[3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough
Case Investigation and Reporting (Updated June 23, 2022), https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/hd-breakthrough.html#report (accessed
15 August 2022).
[4] Yamamoto, K, Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and measures to prevent
them. Virology Journal 2022, 19(100), https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12985-022-01831-0.pdf
[5] OpenVAERS, VAERS COVID Vaccine Mortality Reports, https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality (accessed
15 August 2022).
[6] COVID-19 in Australia, https://www.covid19data.com.au/ (accessed
10 August 2022).
[7] NSW Health, IN FOCUS Vaccination among COVID-19 cases in
the NSW Delta outbreak Reporting period: 16 June to 7 October 2021, (see
p.9), https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/in-focus/covid-19-vaccination-case-surveillance-051121.pdf
[8] Australian Bureau of Statistics, Provisional
Mortality Statistics, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/provisional-mortality-statistics/latest-release (accessed
26 August 2022).
[9] Kirsch, S, Why UK ONS data shouldn’t be used to justify
public policy, https://principia-scientific.com/why-uk-ons-data-shouldnt-be-used-to-justify-public-policy/
[10] Sy W, Mortality risk of COVID-19 injections:
evidence from New South Wales and England, Academic.edu, https://www.academia.edu/83924771/Mortality_risk_of_COVID_19_injections_evidence_from_New_South_Wales_and_England
SUPPORT
THE EXPOSÉ
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Doctors are lying to you about the safety of Covid-19
Vaccination during Pregnancy; 90% of Pregnant Women lost their babies during
the Pfizer Clinical Trial
By Dr. J Mercola &
THE EXPOSÉ
August 31, 2022
Since the rollout of the experimental COVID shots, your
Government, your Medicine Regulator and your Health Officials have adamantly
claimed the shots are safe for pregnant women and their unborn babies.
But they have been lying to you.
A CDC-sponsored study that was widely used to
support the claim that the shot is safe during pregnancy misreported the data.
The actual miscarriage rate in that paper was 82%.
Now-released Pfizer court-ordered, released data — which
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration wanted to hide for 75 years — reveals the
miscarriage rate among women whose pregnancy outcomes were known was 87.5%.
And as of August 12, 2022, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting (VAERS) database listed 4,941 miscarriages post-COVID jab. But only
1% of adverse events are actually reported to the system. And for comparison,
the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in the last 30
years is 2,239.
Since the rollout of the experimental COVID shots, U.S.
health officials have adamantly claimed the shots are safe for pregnant women,
and have been urging all pregnant women to get the jab “to protect themselves
and their babies.” To this day, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention recommends the COVID shot for:1
“… people who are pregnant,
breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the
future.”
The CDC further recommends:2
“People who are pregnant should
stay up to date with their COVID-19 vaccines, including getting a COVID-19
booster when it’s time to get one.”
And claims:3
“Evidence continues to build
showing that:
· COVID-19
vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective.
·
There is currently no evidence that any
vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems in
women or men.”
All the while, they’ve had Pfizer data showing the shots
cause shocking rates of miscarriage which, adding insult to injury, have been
blatantly miscategorized as a “recovered/resolved” adverse effect.4 Who
in their right mind would consider DEATH a resolved side effect unless they had
a depopulation agenda in mind all along?
I don’t see how this could be described as anything but a
criminal cover-up. The only reason we know any of this is because U.S. District
Judge Mark Pittman ordered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to release
Pfizer documents at a rate of 55,000 pages per month. The FDA and Pfizer had
asked to release the documents at a pace of 500 pages per month, which meant it
would take 75 years to disclose them all.5
Criminal Cover-Up
Dr. Naomi Wolf recently reported that an analysis of Pfizer
data revealed 44% of the women in the trial suffered miscarriages.6 That
statistic turns out to have been the result of a miscalculation,7 as
Pfizer listed the miscarriages in two separate columns, resulting in them being
counted twice.
We’ve repeatedly found Pfizer’s data collection and
reporting to be all over the place, and seemingly on purpose, to make hazards
more difficult to ascertain. Wolf admitted the error and took down the original
report. However, while fact-checkers are gloating over the perceived victory,
there’s plenty of other evidence in the Pfizer material to demonstrate these
shots should be banned for all time.
In a May 9th, 2022 investigation
conducted by The Expose, they discovered absolutely horrifying
findings in the Pfizer data dump on the consequences of administering the
Covid-19 injection during pregnancy.
“The confidential Pfizer
documents that the FDA have been forced to publish by court order reveal that
82% to 97% of women who were mistakenly exposed to the mRNA Covid-19 injection
either suffered a miscarriage or suffered having to witness the death of their
newborn child upon giving birth.
But Pfizer claimed – “There were no safety signals that
emerged from the review of these cases of use in pregnancy.
Description
of Missing Information
One of the documents contained in the Pfizer data dump
is ‘reissue_5.3.6
postmarketing experience.pdf’. Page 12 of the confidential document
contains data on the use of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection in pregnancy and
lactation.
Pfizer state in the document that by 28th February
2021 there were 270 known cases of exposure to the mRNA injection during
pregnancy.
.jpg)
Description
of Missing Information (2)
One-hundred-and-forty-six of those mother cases did
not immediately report the immediate occurrence of any clinical adverse event.
But 124 of the 270 mother cases did. Meaning 46% of the mothers exposed to the
Pfizer Covid-19 injection suffered an adverse reaction.
Of those 124 mothers suffering an adverse reaction, 49
were considered non-serious adverse reactions, whereas 75 were considered
serious. This means 58% of the mothers who reported suffering adverse reactions
suffered a serious adverse event ranging from uterine contraction to foetal
death.
Pregnant
Mothers Pfizer Document
A total of 4 serious foetus/baby cases were reported
due to exposure to the Pfizer injection. The 4 serious cases involved the
following events –
·
Foetal growth restriction x2
·
Premature baby x2
·
Neonatal Death x1
.jpg)
4
Serious Foetus Baby Cases (Pfizer)
But here’s where things get rather concerning. Pfizer
state that of the 270 pregnancies they have absolutely no idea what happened in
238 of them.
Pfizer
Document - No Pregnancy Outcomes Tracked
But here are the known outcomes of the remaining
pregnancies –
·
Spontaneous Abortion (miscarriage) x23,
·
Outcome pending x5,
·
Premature baby with neonatal death x 2,
·
Spontaneous Abortion with intrauterine
death x2,
·
Spontaneous Abortion with neonatal death x
1
·
Normal outcome x1
Pfizer
Jab Known Pregnancy Outcomes Chart
Pfizer
Document - Spontaneous Abortions
There were 34 outcomes altogether at the time of the
report, but 5 of them were still pending. Pfizer note that only 1 of the 29
known outcomes were normal, whilst 28 of the 29 outcomes resulted in the
loss/death of the baby. This equates to 97% of all known outcomes of Covid-19
vaccination during pregnancy resulting in the loss of the child.
When we include the 5 cases where the outcome was
still pending it equates to 82% of all outcomes of Covid-19 vaccination during
pregnancy resulting in the loss of the child. This equates to an average of
around 90% between the 82% and 97% figures.”
To be perfectly clear, the failure to record and report the
outcomes of 238 out of 274 pregnancies during a drug trial is simply unheard
of. It’s shockingly unethical. And the fact that both the Food and Drug
Administration and the CDC accepted this, and claim there’s “no evidence” of
harm to pregnant women and their babies is proof positive of reprehensible
maleficence.
There’s no fixing what’s gone wrong at the FDA and CDC.
Their credibility with the public is ruined beyond any possible recovery. The
CDC can review and reorganize itself all it wants, but it changes nothing. They
are, to this day, urging pregnant women to take a shot that they KNOW will
cause babies to die. Calling it a dystopia of epic proportions is a profoundly
serious understatement.
CDC-Sponsored Study Also Tried to Hide Data
Need more evidence? How about the fact that the
CDC-sponsored study9 published in The New England Journal of
Medicine (NEJM) in April 2021 — which was widely used to support the U.S.
recommendation for pregnant women to get injected — also obfuscated data to hide a shockingly elevated miscarriage rate.
According to this paper, the miscarriage rate within the
first 20 weeks of pregnancy was 12.5%, which is only slightly above the normal
average of 10%. (Looking at statistical data, the risk of miscarriage drops
from an overall, average risk rate of 21.3% for the duration of the pregnancy
as a whole, to just 5% between Weeks 6 and 7, all the way down to 1% between
Weeks 14 and 20.10)
However, there’s a distinct problem with this calculation,
as highlighted by Drs. Ira Bernstein, Sanja Jovanovic and Deann McLeod, HBSc,
of Toronto. In a May 28, 2021, letter to the editor, they pointed out that:11
“In table 4, the authors report
a rate of spontaneous abortions <20 weeks (SA) of 12.5% (104 abortions/827
completed pregnancies). However, this rate should be based on the number of
women who were at risk of an SA due to vaccine receipt and should exclude the
700 women who were vaccinated in their third trimester (104/127 = 82%).”
In other words, when you exclude women who got the shot in
their third trimester (since the third trimester is after week 20 and therefore
should not be counted when determining the miscarriage rate among those
injected before week 20), the miscarriage rate is 82%. (The errors in that NEJM
article were also reviewed in a Science, Public Health Policy and the Law paper12 published
in November 2021.)
Of those 104 miscarriages, 96 of them occurred before 13
weeks of gestation, which strongly suggests that getting a COVID shot during
the first trimester is an absolute recipe for disaster. So, here was yet
another attempt to hide the fact that more than 8 in 10 pregnancies may be terminated
as a result of the jab.
As of August 12, 2022, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting (VAERS) database listed 4,941 miscarriages post-COVID jab.13 For
comparison, the fetal death reports for all other vaccines reported to VAERS in
the last 30 years is 2,239.14
Birth Rates Are Suddenly Plummeting Worldwide
In addition to miscarriages, we’re also looking at abruptly
plummeting birth rates, suggesting the COVID jabs are having an adverse impact
on future fertility as well.
“They are large drops, and they
are occurring, almost like clockwork, approximately 9 months after pregnant
women around the world started to be vaccinated,” Kory notes.15
For example, Germany recently released data showing a 10%
decline in the birth rate during the first quarter of 2022.16
IMAGE
The live birth rate graph for Sweden looks much the same,
with a 14% drop:17,18 According to Gunnar Anderson, a Swedish
professor in demographics at Stockholm University, “We have never seen anything
like this before, that the bottom just falls out in just one quarter.”19
IMAGE
Between January and April 2022, Switzerland’s birth rate was
15% lower than expected, the U.K.’s was down by 10% and Taiwan’s was down 23%.20,21,22 In
Hungary, MP Dúró Dóra has expressed concern about a 20% drop in the birth rate
during January 2022, compared to January 2021.23
The U.S. is also showing signs of a drop in live births.
Provisional data from North Dakota show a 10% decline in February 2022, 13%
reduction in March and an 11% reduction in April, compared to the corresponding
months in 2021.24
In a July 5, 2022, Counter Signal article, Mike Campbell reported
that in the five countries with the highest COVID jab uptake, fertility has
dropped by an average of 15.2%, whereas the five countries with the lowest
COVID jab uptake have seen an average reduction of just 4.66%. Below is a chart
from Birth Gauge25 on Twitter comparing live birth data for
2021 and 2022 in a large number of countries.
Many Women Report Menstrual Irregularities Post-Jab
High rates of menstrual irregularities post-jab are also a
warning sign that reproductive capacity may be impacted. As of August 12, 2022,
there were 31,443 VAERS reports of menstrual disorders.26
Changes include heavier and more painful periods27 and
changes in menses length, as well as unexpected breakthrough bleeding or
spotting among women on long-acting contraception or those who are
postmenopausal and haven’t had a period in years or even decades.28
Health officials have tried to brush off the reports, but a
study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology — funded by the National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the National
Institutes of Health’s Office of Research on Women’s Health — confirmed an
association between menstrual cycle length and COVID-19 shots.29
According to the authors, it’s possible that the immune
response created by the mRNA shots affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian
axis, which plays a well-known role in the timing of a woman’s cycle:30
“Our findings for individuals
who received two doses in a single cycle supports this hypothesis. Given the
dosing schedule of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the United States (21 days for
Pfizer and 28 days for Moderna), an individual receiving two doses in a single
cycle would have received the first dose in the early follicular phase.
Cycle length variability results
from events leading to the recruitment and maturation of the dominant follicle
during the follicular phase …”
Other Disturbing Evidence
A Japanese biodistribution study for Pfizer’s jab also
showed the COVID spike protein from the shots accumulate in female ovaries and
male testes,31,32 and there’s credible concern that the COVID jabs will cross-react with syncytin (a
retroviral envelope protein) and reproductive genes in sperm, ova and placenta
in ways that may impair fertility and reproductive outcomes.
A Pfizer-BioNTech rat study33 revealed the
injection more than doubled the incidence of preimplantation loss (i.e., the
risk of infertility), and led to mouth/jaw malformations, gastroschisis (a
birth defect of the abdominal wall) and abnormalities in the right-sided aortic
arch and cervical vertebrae.34,35 As noted by The Exposé:
“With this being the case, how
on earth have medicine regulators around the world managed to state in their
official guidance that ‘Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect
harmful effects with respect to pregnancy’? And how have they managed to state
‘It is unknown whether the Pfizer vaccine has an impact on fertility’?
The truth of the matter is that
they actively chose to cover it up. We know this thanks to a Freedom of
Information (FOI) request36 made to the Australian Government
Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).”
You can read more about that in The Exposé’s July 19, 2022,
article, “FOIA Reveals Pfizer & Medicine Regulators Hid Dangers of COVID
Vaccination During Pregnancy After Study Found It Increases Risk of Birth
Defects & Infertility.”37
We’re also seeing a sudden uptick in infant mortality. The
Exposé38 highlighted data from Scotland, showing neonatal
deaths were 119% higher above the annual norm in March 2022.
COVID Jab Affects Male Fertility Too
Rumble VIDEO: Amy
Kelly Reveals Shocking Discoveries of Male Fertility from the Pfizer Documents
[Posted by DailyClout
Published August 19, 2022
Male fertility is also under attack by these bioweapons.
Israeli research39,40 published in the journal Andrology found
the Pfizer COVID jab temporarily but significantly impairs male fertility,
dropping sperm concentration by 15.4% and total motile count by 22.1%, compared
to baseline pre-jab.
Both eventually recovered, some three months after the last
jab, but if you destroy a man’s sperm for three months every time he gets a
COVID shot, you’re significantly reducing the probability of him fathering a
child for a good part of any given year and the stats reviewed above support
this.
Remember, the mRNA shots are recommended at three-month
intervals for the original series, and boosters are now being recommended at
varying intervals thereafter. In the video above, Amy Kelly, project director
for the Daily Clout’s Pfizer document analysis team, reviews this study and other
post-jab male fertility concerns.41
End the COVID Shots Now, Before It’s Too Late to Recover
In October 2021, when the FDA was voting on whether to
authorize the COVID jab for children aged 5 through 11, Dr. Eric Rubin, an FDA
advisory panel member, Harvard professor and editor-in-chief of the NEJM,
stated:42
“We’re never going to learn
about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way
it goes … And I do think we should vote to approve it.”
So, in this and other instances, they’ve openly admitted
that anyone who takes the jab is part of an experiment. Yet at the same time,
the FDA and CDC have insisted that the jabs are perfectly safe — all while in
possession of data showing they’re anything but! In conclusion, I agree with
Kory, who writes:43
“… when a new medicine or device
is introduced, you must first assume any adverse effects or deaths reported to
be related to the intervention until proven otherwise. That is
what I am doing here.
We must assume the vaccines are
impacting fertility unless some other provable or credible explanations for a
sudden drop in month-to-month birth rates. So stop the shots until you can
prove they are not …
Too many young people dying,44 too
many becoming disabled, too many pregnancies resulting in fetal or neonatal
death as above, and now we find out that if we continue with this vaccine obsession,
they will not be replaced. This is a humanitarian catastrophe heaped atop the
one caused by dangerous gain-of-function research.
When will the world wake up to
this rapidly unfolding horror? For those of us who know what is going on, it is
hard not to feel helpless as we are forced to watch increasingly apparent and
widespread needless death. But we will continue to try to get these truths out
despite the massive censorship and propaganda overwhelming the globe.
We have a moral and ethical
obligation and take that responsibility seriously no matter what befalls us.
Stop the vaccines, now. And if we can’t stop them, we must try to convince
everyone we know to no longer agree to get vaccinated. Their lives and our
future depend on it.”
SUPPORT
THE EXPOSÉ
++++++++++++++++++++++
Bitchute VIDEO: VAX DEATHS: 691% INCREASE
IN DEATH AMONG CHILDREN !! - WE MUST STOP THIS NOW!!
Posted by 99Percent
First Published August 31st, 2022 08:37 UTC
Josh Sigurdson reports on recent data showing an increase of
691% in excess deaths among children SPECIFICALLY only following the vaccine
itself as the weeks are counted starting the week children were allowed to
inject themselves with the death shot versus the daily average previous to
this.
This must be dealt with and justice must prevail. We already know that children
who are vaccinated have a 303 times increased risk of getting so-called
"covid" which basically means they're 303 times more likely to get sick
in general.
We've already gone over the studies showing that children are 6.1 times more
likely to have a heart related condition if they're jabbed than be hospitalized
with so-called "covid" and that was an average. They're 22.8 times
more likely at low "covid" rates. That study was from a year ago. We
now have even lower rates.
A Taiwan study also recently revealed that 29% of teens
who've been jabbed have a heart related condition.
This is evil!
The decisions we make next will decide the future of humanity itself.
SHARE THIS WITH EVERYONE
++++++++++++++++++
Bitchute VIDEO: EVIDENCE OF DEPOPULATION
Posted by The New American
First Published August 29th, 2022 21:15 UTC
The vaccine is working, if you want less people on the
planet. If you ignore this information and get another jab, you will regret it.
DISCLAIMER: Views and opinions expressed on The Ben
Armstrong Show are solely those of the host and do not necessarily represent
those of The New American. TNA is not responsible for, and does not verify the
accuracy of, any information presented.
For more great content, visit www.TheNewAmerican.com
Video Sources:
1. Exposé - Official Government reports prove COVID-19
Vaccination is causing mass Depopulation
https://expose-news.com/2022/08/28/depopulation-covid-vaccination-gov-knew-happen/
2. Fox News, Tucker Carlson - Democrats alerted us the
COVID-19 vaccine wasn't properly tested
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6311408746112?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips
3. Exposé - UK Gov. confirms 9 in every 10 COVID Deaths over
the last year have been among the Fully/Triple Vaccinated
https://expose-news.com/2022/08/27/9-in-10-covid-deaths-past-year-vaccinated/
4. Real America's Voice, Dr. Peter McCullough with Dr. Gina
https://americasvoice.news/video/8ZQA21jdUdscumg/
.jpg)
