John R. Houk, Blog Editor
September 28, 2019
Here is some info on the Deep State mole Whistleblower trying to
bring down President Trump with fake news.
JRH 9/28/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:
Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in
******************************
Who's the Whistleblower's Puppet Master?
Another attempted coup against Trump, orchestrated by the deep state.
Sep. 27, 2019
Upon reading the publicly released whistleblower’s complaint about
President Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelenskyy, it’s patently obvious that the “whistleblower” — outed as a CIA
agent courtesy of The New York Times — is
well-versed in the art of political spin. Maybe this agent learned his (or her)
craft from those media spin-masters at the Times…
As we noted yesterday, the whistleblower’s
complaint appears to contain credible information corroborated by the record of Trump’s call with Zelenskyy.
However, it’s also clear that the whistleblower distorts and reads into the
phone conversation intentions and motives that are not present.
One of the most glaring examples of this spin comes from the whistleblower’s
description of the events surrounding the phone call. He claims that White
House officials were “deeply disturbed” by the phone call because they
supposedly viewed it as Trump abusing his office for personal gain. The reader is
to assume that “everyone” who heard the phone call immediately recognized that
a quid pro quo had just been demanded. Yet the record of the phone call does
not even remotely support such a damning conclusion.
To bolster the claim that all these officials knew Trump had just
engaged in a quid pro quo, the whistleblower alleges that senior White House
officials broke with normal record-keeping protocols to “lock down” all records
of the phone call. The whistleblower then insinuates a blatant attempt at a cover-up,
writing, “This set of actions underscores to me that White House officials
understood the gravity of what had transpired in the call.”
However, the Trump administration’s reason for filing the phone
call as highly classified is not so sinister as the whistleblower alleges. As
Fox News reports, “The Trump administration
reportedly began placing transcripts of Trump’s calls with several foreign
leaders in a highly classified repository after leakers publicly divulged the
contents of Trump’s private calls with the leaders of Mexico and Australia in
2017.” Object if you like, but evidently this has been common practice for some
time, and it was motivated by a perfectly understandable reason: to prevent
future leaks.
The real question is this: Who is the puppet master behind the
scenes, orchestrating this CIA whistleblower’s carefully crafted attempt to pin
an impeachable offense on Trump?
It’s likely a disgruntled
current or former deep-state actor — a Hillary
Clinton supporter in the intel community. Recall Sen. Chuck Schumer’s
chastising Trump for “being really dumb” following the president’s criticism of
some U.S. intelligence operations. He warned, “Let me tell you: You take
on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back
at you.” Daniel Benjamin, former senior adviser to Barack Obama, was even more
explicit: “Trump’s treatment of his spies will also come back to bite him in
the form of leaking and whistleblowing.”
Contemplate the lawless implications of the Schumer and Benjamin
assertions. These are bold face admissions that their deep-state operatives
within the CIA and FBI will use their positions to do exactly what they
have done with the Russian collusion charade, in order
to disable and undermine this presidential administration. They have outlined how
those corrupt officials, under former CIA director John Brennan and former FBI director
James Comey, have abused their
positions, endeavoring to take down the Trump presidency.
And lo and behold, here we are again.
Updated
+++++++++++++++++++
Whistleblower Account In Question, Ukraine
Did Not Know Funds Cut Off Until Month After Call
Sep 27, 2019
One of the problems we are facing today with the Trump
administration is the continued activism behind the scenes; now the GOP is starting
to hit back. According to FOX News ‘top Republicans on Thursday pushed
to identify the White House officials who told a whistle-blower of alleged
misconduct by the Trump administration, as Democrats ramped up their
impeachment inquiry — and several apparent inconsistencies emerged in the
whistleblower’s complaint.’
This is brought up because the whistle-blower’s sources did not
file a complaint themselves, which would have protected them; this is even more
relevant considering procedures don’t safeguard second-hand claims. (The
New York Times reported that the whistle-blower is a CIA officer detailed
to the White House. 0censor News has not confirmed The Times’ report.)
According to the whistle-blower complaint, by mid-May, U.S.
diplomat Kurt Volker sought to “contain the damage” from Trump attorney Rudy
Giuliani’s outreach to Ukraine.
But a July 19 text message conversation from Volker to Giuliani,
provided to Fox News on Thursday,
showed that Volker had in fact encouraged Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine —
even sending Giuliani a message reading, “connecting you here with Andrey
Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky.”
—
Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC)
September
26, 2019
We are seeing as this is dug into, more surprisingly by the news
outlets that are usually supporting this type of narrative, CBS, New York Times
and others, this is a hoax, it complaint set up from second-hand knowledge,
something that is not protected under the law.
In another blow to the Democrat narrative, now there are sources
within the Ukraine government that says the cutting off of funds happened a
month after the conversation between Trump and their leader, there was no
knowledge of this at the time, so claiming it was implied, as Pelosi and other
Democrats are arguing, simply does not hold up under scrutiny.
NY Times came out and
reported that the claim of quid pro quo for the aid is destroyed by this
damning article by them. he official told the New York Times that Zelensky’s
government was unaware about the aid issue until a month after Trump’s July 25
phone call in which he discussed Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
According to FOX, the whistle-blower complaint –
citing U.S. officials – claimed that officials in Kiev knew that the military
aid could be in jeopardy in early August, but the whistleblower admitted to not
knowing “how or when they learned of it.”
The more we dig into this, the more we see the shaky ground the
whole leftist plot is built on, they were so excited to see something they
thought they could get Trump with, they never bothered to check the background
first. This is a repeating pattern we see with the left, time after time
they hear something, come up breathlessly and tell the world they have him,
soon are eating crow when they find out all they had were empty claims. One has
to wonder, how much longer will we, the American People, put up with this?
+++++++++++++++++++++
Report: Whistleblower Is CIA Plant, One of Obama’s Goon John
Brennan’s Men
September 27, 2019
From the very first, John Brennan was Obama’s muscle who worked
outside the law.
Brennan handled the nasty things that needed to be done. If
you recall, during the presidential election, I ran a number of stories on the passport breach
of Obama’s passport at the Department of State. There were always questions
about Obama’s citizenship status and what kind of passport he used to travel to
Pakistan during his college years as a foreign student.
A cynical Obama said at the time:
In Portland, Ore., Mr. Obama said the
series of attempts to “tap into people’s personal records” were “a problem not
just for me but for how our government functions.”
The balls. Brennan was working for him. And laughable, considering
how intrusive his administration was in accessing private information.
“As soon as we realized that there were
these unauthorized accesses for Senator Obama’s passport files, we collected
the information, we briefed the secretary, we briefed Senator Obama’s staff,
all before we ever replied to the reporter,” Mr. McCormack said.
Reports: Whistleblower Is CIA Plant, One of
Brennan’s Men
RUSH: All right. So, here’s the CNN
headline on screen right now: “Whistleblower: Trump tried to get Ukraine to
interfere in 2020 election and White House tried to cover it up.” Now, keep
something in mind. The whistleblower never heard anything. The whistleblower
heard things secondhand and thirdhand. The whistleblower was not on the call.
The whistleblower was told things. We have, again, this anonymous, very deeply
caring, very moral person worried about American values, our values.
And Trump tried to get Ukraine to interfere
in the 2020 election. It’s the same theme! Trump interfered in the 2016
election. The Russians meddled; Trump colluded. The FBI tried to plant spies to
prove this. It did happen because the meddling happened with the Democrats. The
Democrats meddled and interfered by creating (the Hillary Clinton campaign
buying) the Steele dossier. Pardon me for revisiting this, but it is necessary
to put all this in perspective. Trump did not interfere in the 2020 election.
And the whistleblower doesn’t know what
happened because the whistleblower didn’t hear the call! The transcript of the call
has been released. What Trump was actually doing — and I’ve mentioned this two
days in a row. And, you know, our last caller, folks? Our last caller made an
actually brilliant point. All during the Mueller investigation, the Drive-Bys
are doing daily stories about what a reprobate Donald Trump is cause he wanted
to fire Mueller. He had fired Comey and he wanted to fire Mueller. Remember all
of this?
Except Mueller never got fired. It never
happened — and yet the Drive-Bys said that Trump wanted to fire Mueller every
day. Then Mueller’s report says, “Yeah, we heard that the president was trying
to fire us but that people in his media orbit talked him out of it.” Well, the
bottom line is, Mueller didn’t get fired. But the prosecutor in Ukraine did,
the prosecutor looking into the scandal of Joe Biden setting up his son with
both the Chinese and the Ukrainians to get rich without knowing or doing
anything for it! There was a prosecutor looking into it.
Biden went over there as vice president. He
has bragged about this. We’ve had the audio on this program. He was at a
Council on Foreign Relations meeting. He was bragging to people how he bullied the
Ukrainians. He said that he told them, “You’re gonna fire this guy! You’re
gonna fire this prosecutor. You’re gonna put in a prosecutor that we want or
we’re gonna withhold American aid — and if you think that this is just me, then
you get on the phone and you call Obama and you ask him.
“You’ve got six hours,” Biden said. So what
do we have? Trump didn’t fire Mueller. The Drive-Bys said he wanted to. That
makes him obstructing justice. “Trump tried to obstruct justice, Trump did
obstruct justice, cause he wanted to fire Mueller,” but Mueller never got
fired. Meanwhile, Biden and his son are under investigation over Ukraine, and
Biden goes over and bullies the prosecutor, bullies the government, demands
they fire the prosecutor looking into his son or else they will withhold money
already pledged to Ukraine.
Biden says, “And if you think this is just
me blabbering on, you call Obama. You call him right now. He’ll back me up.” So
Obama has been implicated by Biden as being part of this bullying blackmail
effort to withhold previously pledged American aid money to Ukraine unless the
prosecutor is fired. So they fired the prosecutor! Biden got a prosecutor
fired! Trump did not fire Mueller! Who is under investigation here for meddling
in elections and meddling in internal affairs? Donald Trump. And what’s he doing?
Meddling in an election again. When are the
Democrats gonna figure out that people don’t believe Trump is meddling in
elections? He’s meddling in… If anything, he’s trying to get to the bottom of
what happened to him in 2016. You’ll note… Well, you haven’t noted. This is up
to me to tell you. Not one… I haven’t seen it. Now, I must admit I haven’t seen
everything. So there is an outside chance I could be wrong here. But nobody in Drive-By Media has even referenced Trump
mentioning CrowdStrike to the Ukrainian president in
that phone call.
They don’t want to go anywhere near that.
CrowdStrike is a private sector firm, as you know, and that’s the only evidence
that we have that the Russians hacked the DNC server. This tells me that that
probably didn’t happen, either, that the Russians are probably not the people
that hacked the DNC server. But the Trump case in 2016 depended on the Russians
doing a bunch of hacking. It depended on the Russians meddling. It depended on…
When it was the Democrats that had meddled. It was the Democrats that hired
Steele.
It was Hillary. This stuff is actually
amazing, cause everything the Democrats are accusing Trump of doing, they have
done — and they’re getting away with it. At least the appearance is they’re
getting away with it because nobody’s investigating them. Ah, ah, ah! I spoke
too soon. The attorney general is investigating them, along with the FBI and
the whole of the deep state. So here, folks. Here’s a brief synonymous of what
I think the lay of the land is. The next couple of days could be critical to
getting the Trump version of this story out, meaning the nature of the
whistleblower and his lawyer.
His lawyer is a Clinton-Obama connection. I
found it hilarious today, the Democrats are asking the witness, the Director of
National Intelligence, “Do you agree that the whistleblower is a political
hack?” Because Trump had accused the whistleblower of being a political hack.
And I guarantee you the whistleblower is a political hack! The whistleblower is
not some morally offended paragon of justice (sobbing) “terribly, terribly
concerned about what Trump is doing to our government and our country and our
values.” The whistleblower is a political hack!
I will guarantee you there is some
connection to whatever the Democrats were doing to Trump in 2016. It’s gonna be
Fusion GPS. It’s gonna be somebody that’s involved in Russia-Trump colluding
who is gonna be tied to this whistleblower. I will say it right here and now:
The whistleblower is a political hack. Do you know that Adam Schiff has had the
whistleblower report since August? (interruption) What? (interruption) You
think I shouldn’t have said that? (interruption) Okay. Good. (interruption)
What do you mean, you didn’t know that?
(interruption) You thought what was…? (interruption) Oh, the whistleblower
report? (interruption) No! Adam Schiff’s had this on his desk since August!
Pencil Neck had it. This whistleblower report is just like the Christine Blasey
Ford letter, which had just been waiting there for Dianne Feinstein, in that
case, to unveil it. This has been an operation needing only a timeframe for
execution. The timeframe is they decide to go with this shortly after everybody
thinks that Pelosi has authorized impeachment.
So this is supposed to go on top of that as
the perception of evidence that Trump has done something impeachable. (dramatic
tone) “He has asked Ukraine to meddle in the 2020 elections.” That’s based on
the fact that Trump supposedly asked the guy to look into Biden. It’s okay for
Hillary to hire Christopher Steele and to create a phony document, the Steele
dossier — and it’s okay for the Democrats to take that to the FISA court and
use that as an evidence for a warrant to spy on the Trump campaign and the
Trump transition.
Oh, that’s perfectly fine. Perfectly fine.
The Russians can collude with the Democrats
and vice-versa all day long if the objective is to get Trump. At any rate, so
we have here the nature of the whistleblower and his lawyer — and, I mean,
getting it out what we think this is. Our side of the story also involves the
difference between Trump’s justified speculations that the whistleblower is a
hack and Biden’s admission to what was likely a felony! Biden has admitted to
pressuring Ukraine to dump a prosecutor to save his son, and threatening to
withhold American money if they didn’t dump the prosecutor.
Whatever Trump has done, it doesn’t even
compare to that. And this is also part of our narrative or story that needs to
be part of the drumbeat. And we need to keep reminding everybody that nobody
ever investigated CrowdStrike! We just accept some private sector company
that’s founded by a guy that hates Putin. The DNC hires them to examine their
server that was hacked, and this CrowdStrike outfit, it’s the Russians, and
that’s it? No examination, no verification, no outside independent validation.
And how about the weird relationship with
Comey’s FBI and CrowdStrike’s outsourced data investigations? I mean, these
people are thick as thieves, and they’re still running the same operation. The
operation to get rid of Trump for Trump-Russia collusion has not stopped. It’s
just taken a turn now into this latest direction toward Ukraine.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: “Whistleblower Is a CIA Officer
Detailed to the White House.” (Snort!) What did we think? I knew it! This is
part of the same intel cabal that ran the Russia collusion mess! And this guy,
the whistleblower wasn’t even there! He didn’t even hear it! In a
questionnaire… The whistleblower answered, “I don’t know” 12 different times in
a questionnaire about what he was reporting. “I don’t know,” 12 different times.
A story in the New York Times: “The
whistleblower who revealed that President Trump sought foreign help [blah,
blah] is a CIA officer who was detailed to work at the White House at one
point, according to three people familiar with his identity. The man has since
returned to the CIA, the people said. Little else is known about him.” So he
was a CIA officer. He was a plant! He was a deep state plant from the CIA at
the White House! I knew it was either gonna be this or somebody from Fusion GPS.
This guy may still be a tie to Fusion GPS,
because the intelligence community is tied in with the FBI and the DOJ — the
Obama DOJ — that tried to ramrod Trump through 2016, ’18, ’19, you name it.
This is why Phil Mudd was upset. (interruption) Yeah. I may as well as remind
you. Phil Mudd, a former deputy director of counterintelligence at the CIA, was
livid when he heard about this. Okay, what does this prove? It proves the
intelligence community is spying on the president. It proves it. Trump said it
during the 2016 campaign. They laughed at him; they mocked him.
They said, “You’re insane. You’re crazy.
Nobody’s monitoring your calls. Nobody’s tapping your wires. The CIA’s not
spying on you!” Yes, they are. Not, “yes, they were.” Yes, they are. He “is a
CIA officer detailed to the White House,” meaning not a Trumper. This is
somebody the CIA, the intel community, sent over there. This guy was put there
as a spy and did his job. I knew it. I knew it. I knew the intel community was
part of this — and, folks, nothing’s changed. Nothing’s new. It’s the same
operation. They just failed to get Trump on Russia.
Now they’re trying Trump-Ukraine. They
failed to get Trump on everything they’ve tried to get him with, but they’re
trying something new now. It’s the same thing. This guy’s no different than
Christine Blasey Ford. This guy’s no different than Christopher Steele. He’s
just part of the cabal — or she. It’s a political hack, no doubt — and don’t
tell me that CIA people can’t be political. There’s no question the guy’s a
political hack. But he didn’t directly overhear the call! Somebody told him!
Trump wants to know: Who is it that told the CIA hack?
Now CNN says, “This is very, very
dangerous! The president is now trying to find out who the leaker is. This is
very, very dangerous for America. Presidents don’t do this!” Presidents don’t
try to find out who leaks on ’em? Are you kidding me, CNN? “It’s very dangerous
for the president to be targeting an individual like this.” Very dangerous to
be targeting…? Trump is the target! For crying out loud! (pause) I’m sorry for
yelling here, folks, but I’m incredulous over all this. Not incredulous. Angry.
We’ve been played again. I knew it! I knew it.
The whole thing is a scam. It’s an
orchestrated scam. It was set up, it was planned, like Blasey Ford coming
forward to try to nail Kavanaugh, like version 2 to get Kavanaugh a couple
weeks ago, like Christopher Steele — the supposed dossier — totally made up and
used to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump. This guy, Donald Trump, is the most
spied-on president we’ve ever had — by his own country. The Washington deep
state is alive and well, and they are functioning. (interruption) I don’t know
who it is. (interruption)
No. I have no idea. I have no way of
knowing. Could this CIA guy be part of the presidential briefing team? I have
no idea. There’s no way of knowing. We’re gonna find out. We’re gonna find out
who this is. We will find… I can’t believe the New York Times has even revealed
this much. If you want to know the truth, it’s kind of a shock to me the New
York Times has gone this way. This may indicate that it’s beginning to fall
apart and they need a fall guy. (interruption) I’m not wishful thinking. The
New York Times divulging a source like this?
“Well, Rush, they haven’t named him.”
(Snort!) It doesn’t matter who this is. The American intel community is continuing
to spy on the president. Who cares who it is! I mean, it would be interesting
to know. But for the New York Times to be burning even this much of it, it…
Look, I could be dead wrong, but it could well mean that a lot of people think
this is not working out. Schiff really blew this big time today. So they might
need a fall guy. Somebody may have to fall on the sword here at some point.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
Adam Schiff is a total fraud. He is a liar
— I’m sorry — a bad satirist. He made up things Trump supposedly said to the
Ukrainian ambassador in his opening statement today. But the point is that this
plan has been in the works for a while, all the way back in August. Adam Schiff
was tweeting things back in August based on the whistleblower report without
citing it. He was tweeting things like, “President may be putting undue
pressure on president of Ukraine to meddle in next year’s elections,” little
things like that that he knew he was just setting them up.
We have learned from the New York Times
that the whistleblower is a CIA plant. And now Paul Sperry has released this bit of information.
Are you ready? Dadelut, dadelut, dadelut, dadelut, dadelut. “Rumors are now
swirling that the anti-Trump whistleblower,” the hack, the political hack “was
one of John Brennan’s old CIA humps detailed over to — planted inside — the
White House to spy on Trump and help thwart the investigation of #Spygate which
also involves Obama DOS/FBI/CIA skullduggery in Ukraine.” In other words, the
Barr investigation.
So the rumors — this stuff, it’s not gonna
get contained. It’s gonna come out. Trump is right. The whistleblower is a
political hack. The rumors are circling now that he is one of John Brennan’s
buddies. John Brennan ran the CIA for Obama. He was one of the original Never
Trumpers running the Russia investigation. He was on TV every day promising
people Trump was going to jail. He was promising people that Trump was gonna
get frog-marched. He was promising people that Trump was going to be found
guilty of treason.
And then when the Mueller report came out no
collusion, Brennan was out: I must have been given false information. No, your
efforts bombed. Your efforts failed. So the whistleblower, one of John
Brennan’s old CIA buddies planted inside the White House to spy on Trump and to
try to undermine the Barr investigation into the original FBI investigation,
like when did it begin, who’s really responsible for it.
So one way to look at this is this, Mr.
Snerdley, the FBI was tasked with taking out Trump in the Russia investigation.
The CIA has been tasked with taking Trump out on this Ukraine business. So
who’s it been next? When this one doesn’t work, what’s the next one? Because
there is gonna be one.
In fact, I’m gonna make a prediction to
you. This Ukraine thing is gonna blow over because Trump didn’t do anything.
Biden did! The guilty party here is Joe Biden and his son Hunter. Trump didn’t
do anything. So this is not gonna amount to anything either and there isn’t
gonna be an impeachment. There will not be a formal impeachment inquiry. Do not
doubt me. And yet in a few months guaranteed we are gonna be going through this
exact scenario that we’ve been through this week with an entirely new
revelation that Trump is meddling in something, that Trump is trying to steal
the 2020 election.
They’re just gonna keep recycling this with
different details. Trump meddled with Russia in the first one, now he’s
meddling with Ukraine, now he’s asking Ukraine to take out his political
opponent. When this bombs, they’ll come with something else or they’ll have
Kavanaugh 3.0 or something. But this is all they’ve got.
They can’t win 2020 on policy. Some of
their biggest donors are telling the Democrats, “If it’s Elizabeth Warren, we
are out. We don’t want any part of her presidency. We’re tired of being
targeted anyway. We’re gonna vote for Trump.” I have anecdotal evidence to back
up that, by the way. That would be my friend who’s making speeches and these
oil people and banking people are coming up to him and telling him the same thing.
So, Mr. Snerdley, are you surprised that
it’s a CIA friend of John Brennan’s perhaps? It has to be a spy. The one thing
that I knew it wasn’t, it’s not some moral, clean and pure as the wind-driven
snow, deeply concerned American really, really shocked at what Trump did.
That’s not who this is. That’s what they want us to believe. There’s somebody
in there that found out what Trump did and was so morally, morally outraged by
it that he had no choice but to come forward.
They want us to believe that there’s some
cabal of CIA agents so, so, so offended over what Trump is doing to our great
country that they cannot not come forward. That’s not what this is. It’s a spy.
It’s a plant. It’s all part of the effort that they’ve had to destroy Donald
Trump since before he was inaugurated.
So the Russia thing blew up in their face,
okay, we’ll try it later. Mueller blows up, no big deal, we’ll try it later,
we’ll bring back Kavanaugh, we’ll do anything. And they’re still not true. This
is gonna happen all the way through the election, folks.
Now I want to go back at this juncture,
it’d be helpful to play Phil Mudd. This is exactly what he was afraid of. Phil Mudd is a Never Trumper on CNN.
He doesn’t like Trump at all. He’s a typical deep stater that thinks Trump is
just a pig. They just don’t like him. They just don’t think he’s fit to even
appear in Washington and walk around and be there. He’s that big a joke.
MUDD: Boy, I’m about ready to blow a
gasket. Can you explain to me, A, why it’s the U.S. intelligence community’s
responsibility to listen to the president of the United States speaking to a
foreign leader? And, B, why the U.S. intelligence community — under the rules
provided by the Democrats in Congress — are responsible to report to the
Congress what the president of the United States says?
FREDO: Hold on a second! What if he did say
something to a foreign leader that sounded like a promise that went over the
line enough that somebody of good conscience said, “He’s not supposed to say
things like this?”
MUDD: Well, pardon me, what the heck is
“over the line”? The president can say what he wants to Putin. He can say what
he wants to Kim Jong-un. The president can say what he wants. It’s not the
responsibility of the intel guys to go police the president and go snitch on
him to the Congress. Ridiculous!
RUSH: I couldn’t believe this when I heard
it. That’s why I keep playing this sound bite. I could not believe it. You
notice Fredo’s question? So Fredo is totally accepting of the idea that when
there’s a Republican in the White House, we need somebody in there “policing” the
guy. We need somebody monitoring and spying to make sure the Republican doesn’t
do something that’s gonna hurt us all. It’s perfectly fine! “What’s wrong with
that?” Fredo says, in another public expression of sheer ignorance — happy,
sheer ignorance.
Mudd told him straight, “What the heck is
‘over the line’? The president can say what he wants” to anybody. It’s not the
intel community’s job to spy on him and start snitching! And what Mudd… This is
political. So Fredo then says, “Okay. Well, if you don’t let people spy, what
is the mechanism…?” Get this: “[W]hat is the mechanism for policing the White
House?”
This is Fredo Cuomo! As though there has to
be a mechanism for the White House to be policed. If it’s not the intel
community, who is it? Fredo Cuomo is entirely fine with the CIA being the
overall judgmental authority on the executive branch. Now, Fredo doesn’t
realize he’s saying this, but that’s what he’s saying. (impression) “Well…
Well, what’s the mechanism for policing the White House if it’s not these guys
in the CIA?” And here was what Phil Mudd answered to that…
MUDD: Quit! Quit and you could talk to the
media if you want. You can write a book if you want. If you don’t like what the
president does — whether you are the secretary of defense, whether you’re the
national security adviser, whether you’re Rex Tillerson — you go quit. You
don’t go say, “Well, I have a secret avenue to the Congress,” that, in my view,
is inappropriate, “to go explain why the intel guys have to collect intelligence
on the president.” Exactly, by the way — exactly — what the president alleges
happened during the campaign!
RUSH: Bingo! And they all denied it. They
all said Trump was a fool, they all said he was a paranoiac, they all said he
was crazy — and this is one of the reasons Phil Mudd’s not happy about this,
because it establishes that Trump was right! It further establishes that the
media is perfectly fine with the CIA spying on the president of the United
States.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I tell you one thing this means. It
means that Trump, even in the West Wing, is still surrounded by a bunch of
disloyal spies who are on no doubt leaking to the media — sorry, leaking to the
Democrats, leaking to the Democrats in the media and the Democrats up on
Capitol Hill. That is a reality. He hasn’t been able to clean it out — and even
if he cleans it all out, they send other people up there to replace the people
he cleans out and there’s still spies. We’ve got Pelosi out there now
(sobbing), “This is just a horrible week for our country! Our dear president is
guilty of colluding and trying to meddle in the 2020 election.”
The timing of this is rather curious. There
are still a lot of questions about this and why they dropped this card now. I
think it goes along with their big impeachment push. But I think they also may
be getting nervous about Barr’s investigation too. I know a lot of people think
that’s not gonna amount to anything. A lot of people told me, Mr. Snerdley,
that they think Barr’s gonna say, “Yeah, we found some stuff, but none of it’s
prosecutable, none of it (muttering),” and that we’re gonna be let down again.
It may be. But even at that, I think some of these people are worried about it,
what will be learned and maybe uncovered or reported.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: John in Savannah, Georgia, great to
have you, sir. Hi.
CALLER: Great. Great to be here, Rush.
Thank you.
RUSH: You bet.
CALLER: Schiff is digging the hole deeper.
He’s digging the grave deeper. The man is incapable of telling the truth. It’s
evident in his so-called mea culpa. In the parody — what he blows off with a
parody. He knew he stepped on it, stepped in it, and even then he introduces a
second lie with the so-called message that he wants to get out. This is gonna
blow up in their face like a Chinese or Ukrainian firecracker.
RUSH: Wait a minute. Oh, it blew up in his
face like a firecracker, you say?
CALLER: Yeah. Yeah.
RUSH: Well, why do you say it blew up in
his face like firecracker? He almost got away with it!
CALLER: He almost got away with it, but if
you listen to your audience — look at Rachel’s call, my call — we’re seeing
through it, Rush. We’re seeing through it. People are seething. You’re exactly
right.
RUSH: Oh, oh, oh. Okay. That’s actually
comforting. That’s true. He didn’t get away with it with you, and he didn’t get
away with it with Rachel. I was reacting to how long it took Republicans to react
to it. It was outrageous what Schiff did! I don’t have time to play it again,
but go to RushLimbaugh.com, my friends, and you can listen.
++++++++++++++++++++
Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to
Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share
until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve
experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation
of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by
sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.
______________________
Who's the Whistleblower's Puppet Master?
The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and
enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of
America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind. Copyright
© 2019 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.
____________________
Whistleblower Account In Question, Ukraine Did Not
Know Funds Cut Off Until Month After Call
_________________________
Report: Whistleblower Is CIA Plant, One of Obama’s
Goon John Brennan’s Men
