Sunday, March 31, 2019

Britain Criminalizes Truth – Ask Jayda Fransen


By John  R. Houk
© March 31, 2019

While I was surfing around my Social Media connections I ran into a post on the soon to be dead G+ related to British Counterjihad activist Jayda Fransen. On G+ someone had shared a Youtube video of Ms. Fransen for support because she was found guilty of violating the UK’s Hate Speech laws. When I clicked to watch, a message informs you the video is unavailable on G+ but can be viewed at Youtube.

Ok, no problem. I clicked to go to Youtube. I get there and a content warning is plastered on the video telling you to be aware of offensive content and making sure you know that before you proceed. ALSO Youtube disabled the like, share and embed access.

TALK ABOUT CENSORSHIP!

I watched that roughly 9½ minute video. There is NO visual nudity, blood and gore. There is NO description of nudity, blood and gore. There is NO graphic profanity or even PG rated profanity. Now this is a lady reputed for her raw language a la fellow persecuted Counterjihadist Tommy Robinson. Jayda Fransen has the same raw language reputation. BUT NO SUCH RAW LANGUAGE IS IN HER PLEA FOR SUPPORT VIDEO censored by Youtube.

I’m not sure how I pulled it off due Youtube restrictions on downloading video, but I managed to do so. Since Ms. Fransen asks to share her video, I’m going to upload it to Facebook. But keep in mind I have had my share Facebook Jail and Censorship. Even if the upload is successful, Facebook may pull an unjust Youtube and restrict or remove the video under the lie it violates Facebook Community Standards.


VIDEO: Jayda Fransen - Enemy of the State

Facebook Video Link:

You should be aware the British Press treats Counterjihadists as Far Right Extremist purveyors of hate. Certainly many if not most of the British Counterjihadists have a raw language issue and a past history riot provocations that both Left and Right-Wing Extremists are guilty. (Interestingly, one rarely if ever read negative reviews of Leftist provocateurs in the European Press.)

Below is a Press-friendly profile of Jayda Fransen – Cuz it’s her website:


Jayda was born in South East London in 1986.

Jayda practised and studied law for many years before founding a recruitment consultancy.

Jayda has been involved in the counter jihad struggle for many years before joining Britain First.

In 2014, Jayda was elected Deputy Leader of Britain First.

Jayda has stood in elections to Parliament and the Greater London Assembly.

Jayda also served as Britain First press officer and has taken part in numerous high profile TV documentaries.

Jayda is a devout Christian from a Catholic background.

Jayda has risked her life on many occasions confronting dangerous Islamists and terrorists, such as hate preacher Anjem Choudary.

For many years Jayda has endured police persecution and harassment at the hands of the establishment.

Jayda was sent to prison in March 2018 for 'harassing' a migrant paedophile rape gang in Ramsgate.

And here are some not so friendly British Press on Ms. Fransen’s Hate Speech violations and court experience. These actions – keep in mind – in America would be laughed at as crimes because have the First Amendment:

A former deputy leader of far-right group Britain First has been convicted of stirring up hatred during a speech about Islam in Belfast.

Jayda Fransen, 33, was found guilty over a speech at a rally in August 2017.

She was also convicted for separate comments at a peace wall in the city.


The judge, when convicting Fransen, of Moat Avenue in Donaghadee, County Down, described her words as "a general, vehement attack against a religious group".


The court heard that Fransen told those gathered at the rally that there was no moderate version of Islam and that: "These people are baying for our blood."

She added: "Islam says every single one of you wonderful people here today deserves to be killed."

Those attending the rally were then told it was time for the world to come together against "the one common enemy".

The judge told the court: "I'm satisfied these words were intended to stir up hatred and arouse fear."

He also found her guilty over a separate, filmed incident at a Belfast peace wall in December 2017.

'Menacing in nature'

On that occasion, the court heard that Fransen declared the "Islamification" of Britain will lead to similar walls to separate the two sides.

She claimed the country was "descending into civil war" and said it was time to "rise up against the biggest threat against the entire world".

Confirming a conviction for that episode, the judge said: "I'm satisfied the words were menacing in nature."’ (Jayda Fransen: Ex-Britain First deputy leader convicted over hate speech; BBC; 3/29/19)

AND HERE:

‘A former deputy leader of far-right group Britain First has been convicted of stirring up hatred during a speech about Islam in Belfast at a rally in August 2017, according to media reports.

Jayda Fransen, 33, was also convicted for separate comments filmed at a peace wall in the city, the BBC reported.


The group gained international notoriety in 2017 after US President Donald Trump was condemned by the UK prime minister's office for retweeting anti-Muslim videos posted on Fransen's Twitter account, MEE reported. A spokesman for Prime Minister Theresa May said at the time: "British people overwhelmingly reject the prejudiced rhetoric of the far right, which is the antithesis of the values that this country represents - decency, tolerance and respect. It is wrong for the president to have done this."’

I have to wonder how many Brits “overwhelmingly” agree with PM Theresa May?

Story continues…

‘‘The judge described Fransen's speech as "a general, vehement attack against a religious group" and told Fransen to return to Belfast Magistrates' Court for sentencing in May.


The court heard that Fransen told those gathered at the rally that there was no moderate version of Islam and that "These people are baying for our blood," the BBC reported.

She added: "Islam says every single one of you wonderful people here today deserves to be killed."

Those attending the rally were then told it was time for the world to come together against "the one common enemy," the BBC said.

The judge told the court: "I'm satisfied these words were intended to stir up hatred and arouse fear."’ (Ex-Britain First deputy leader Jayda Fransen convicted of hate speech: Reports; By MEE staff; Middle East Eye; 3/30/19 21:14 UTC – Updated 3/31/18 1:20 UTC)

The British Judge is vehemently outraged with Jayda Fransen for telling the truth about Islam according to the theopolitical religion’s own revered writings. ERGO, she is being punished by the force of law … for telling the truth!

JRH 3/31/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:



Saturday, March 30, 2019

Do YOU Want European Multiculturalism?


Shrug Off Islamophobia & Xenophobia Accusations

John R. Houk
© March 30, 2019

Some fairly intuitive people have noticed what most would think an unusual cooperation between agendas related to Islam and Left-Wing ideology. I am certain more would publicly speak about this odd pattern of cooperation between Muslim Apologists and Leftist Multiculturalists except for the politically correct labeled fear: Islamophobia and Xenophobia.

Merriam-Webster on Islamophobia:

irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against Islam or people who practice Islam

English Oxford Dictionary on Islamophobia:

Dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force.

On a personal level I do not an irrational fear or prejudice against Muslims or all things Islam. I do have a great cognitive understanding of how Islamic revered writings command Muslims to treat non-Muslim. Let’s look at a couple of examples that trust me are ONLY the tip of the iceberg against non-Muslims. Islamic scholar/expert Robert Spencer shows a Quranic surah used by apologists to prove how nice and peaceful Islam is contrasted with another surah that brings better context to the first:

In reality, Qur’an 25:68-70 warns Muslims not to kill the soul which Allah has forbidden to be killed”; it does not contain any blanket prohibition on killing someone. The Qur’an also tells Muslims to “kill them wherever you find them” (2:191); again, “kill them wherever you find them” (4:89); and “kill the polytheists wherever you find them” (9:5). So clearly killing is permitted, and indeed, commanded, under certain circumstances. (Does Allah really command Muslims to kill non-Muslims? By Robert Spencer; Jihad Watch; 4/4/18 5:34 PM)

For a deeper perspective on Islam and non-Muslims:




Then there are Leftists with a Multiculturalist agenda. These ideologues are Open Borders, One World Government and Marxist Cultural Utopian friendly folks. If you criticize Muslim migrants, Muslim immigrants or any immigrants that refuse assimilation into the nation and culture moving to then you practice Xenophobia.


Dislike of or prejudice against people from other countries.

Cambridge Dictionary on Xenophobia:

extreme dislike or fear of foreigners, their customs, their religions, etc.

For the record I have no problem with foreigners coming to America for a new or better life. I do have a problem with foreigners moving to America desiring to impose cultural norms different from American culture and heritage. If a foreigner does not like America, for God’s sake don’t move here.

These thoughts were inspired by an email alert sent from Rachel Ehrenfeld via ACDemocracy. Ehrenfeld writes about European Union (EU) leadership and an apparent Open Borders Multiculturalism eradicating the separate natural cultures of Europe which is actually complying with an ongoing Islamic Dawah transforming Europe to an Islamic culture more and more every day.

This is meaning to America TODAY because of the Dem Party’s Open Borders Multiculturalist agenda is hauntingly similar to EU Multiculturalism.

JRH 3/30/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:


*******************
‘New Europe’ and the Islamist Agenda

March 29, 2019


The European Union’s Progressive-Left post-nationalist leadership is set on challenging the sovereignty of nation-states, by eliminating borders and letting in millions of Muslims.   This policy has already contributed to moving the “old” European continent towards a new Europe, occupied by new people with a new culture. Apparently, opening the continent to millions of mostly unqualified migrants who refuse to assimilate, and who drain the coffers of their host countries, seems like the preferred solution to the negative birthrates among the Europeans.

On August 30, 2010, as he was folding his tent near the Vatican, on his last visit to Rome, Italy, then Libya’s leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, forewarned: “Europe runs the risk of turning black from illegal immigration; it could turn into Africa. There is a dangerous level of immigration from Africa into Europe, and we don’t know what will happen. What will be the reaction of the white Christian Europeans to this mass of hungry, uneducated Africans? We don’t know if Europe will remain an advanced and cohesive continent or if it will be destroyed by this barbarian invasion.”

Kaddafi urged the Europeans, “imagine that this could happen, but before it does, we need to work together.” He proceeded to offer the Europeans a deal, asking for a modest fee of 5bn euros, to stop the mass migration to Europe, which as he predicted, are costing billions of euros annually.

Despite the already increasing number of African migrants and Middle Eastern refugees of the evolving Arab Spring, the Europeans accused Kaddafi of blackmail and dismissed his offer. A few years later, after more than 1million refugees flooded the continent, the EU caved in to Turkey’s Islamist President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan demands of more than 6bn euros, to temporarily prevent refugees from entering Europe.

In addition to Kaddafi’s “business proposal,” the Europeans overlooked Kaddafi’s public Dawah sermon, in which he called on Europe to convert to Islam. His handing out Korans to five hundred young Italian women, impressing upon them that “Islam is the “ultimate religion. If you want to believe in a single faith, then it must be that of Mohammed,” was dismissed as one of his publicity ploys, thus overlooking the significance of his performing the Islamic religious duty, the Dawah (calling on infidels to join Islam). Incredibly, European and other Western nations continue to ignore Islamic leaders calls on Muslims residing in the West to spread Islam.

Six months later, when Libyan Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated rebels joined the “Arab Spring,” NATO began its military intervention to depose Kaddafi. The chaos that ensued after his death in October 2011, created a vacuum that was swiftly filled by local and foreign jihadist groups, including al Qaeda and ISIS.

Libya’s coastline’s strategic importance as a step-stone to Europe was not wasted on ISIS. By 2015, ISIS has been shipping more than a million Muslim and African “refugees”  and to the Italian island of Lampedusa, just 162 nm from the Libyan coastline. It is unknown how many members/supporters of ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other jihadist groups arrived in Europe via Libya as “refugees.”

As the refugee crisis worsened, Turkey’s Islamist President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who aspires to take over and Islamize Europe, demanded a hefty ransom and other political concessions in exchange of helping control the flood of refugees. The Europeans conceded to most of his demands.

European nations and central institution’ decades-long denial of the threats posed by radical Islam, have been focusing instead on alleged ‘root causes’ of Islamist terrorism, and on attempts to accommodate and appease them, by codifying the Islamic narrative, imposing political correctness with new draconian hate- speech laws, has played into the hands of the radicals who are set on expanding the Islamization of Europe.

Widely publicized declarations by Islamic religious and political leaders and activists that Islam is not merely a religion but also a universal political and social system are not new or secret. They are advertised in all languages on the Internet and on the social media pages of global radical Muslim organizations. The Facebook pages of Hizb ut Tahrir, for example, says: (quote)
“Islam is the only system that united people of all races and religions in history and will unite them once more when it returns.”

You don’t have to take my word for it. Instead, take a look at our dedicated website news.acdemocracy.org, which provides original documentation of statement made by radical Islamists leaders, official representatives of major Muslim organizations, as well as political leaders in the West who support them.

Let’s begin with the Doha based Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the very influential spiritual leader for the worldwide Muslim Brotherhood – for many years he was on Interpol’s red alert, but last November was removed without an official explanation – who has issued many Fatwas on the duty of all Muslims to spread Islam. His fatwas have been published on his website; on Islam-online – the brotherhood’s official website, and for many years, he issued them on his widely watched TV program on al Jazeera.

According to Qaradawi, “Occupying Europe and defeating Christianity will become possible with the spread of Islam inside Europe until it becomes strong enough to take over the whole continent.”

After al -Qaeda attacked the U.S., Qaradawi explained that Islamizing Europe would be “the beginning of the righteous Caliphate’s return.”

Al-Qaradawi declared: “Islam will return once more to Europe as a conqueror and as a victorious power after it was expelled twice from the continent…I assume that next time the conquest [of Europe] will not be achieved by the sword [i.e., war] but by preaching (dawah) and spreading the ideology [of Islam]….The conquest of Europe …and the expansion of Islam will reach all the areas where the sun shines and the moon appears [i.e., the entire world.” Few, if any Europeans, took him seriously.

Instead, advancing the Islamist agenda seems to suit the Progressive-Left post-nationalist leadership everywhere. Like the Muslims, though for different reasons, they are set on challenging the sovereignty of nation states. Both aim at changing the European continent, by creating a new Europe, occupied by new people and a new culture. For the Europeans, opening the continent to millions of Muslims, who drain the coffers of their host country, seems as the solution to the negative birthrates among the Europeans. Oddly, they are convinced that the newcomers, as the old Europeans, would submit to Brussel’s dictates.

Why should they? The Europeans were never interested in assimilating Muslims. Instead, they talked about integration, which they miserably failed. They also failed to acknowledge the rise of radical Islam, especially in large concentrations of Muslim neighborhoods. And little attention, if any, has been given to the constant preaching by local Imams and Islamic scholars, many who visit Europe to inoculate the newly arrived, as well as the second and third generation of Muslim migrants against assimilation.

These preachers also warn against temptations readily available in Western secular societies, urging instead, to “spread the word of Allah.”

In September 2015, at the height of the refugee’s crisis in Europe, when more than 1 million refuges flooded Europe following the German Chancellor’s controversial decision of open border migration.   Fatima Benhatta, a Canadian representative of the U.K based international organization Islamic Relief, which has ties to Hamasissued the following statement on the Syrian mass immigration to Europe.

“…My prayer, O Allah, open their [European countries that welcomed Syrian refugees] breasts to [accept] Islam and provide them with the testimony [pledge of allegiance to Allah and Mohammad].  I swear by Allah that they deserve the prayer. What is the achievement of Syrians coming [to Europe]? Islam will be spread even more among them [Europeans], their [Muslims] ratio [in society] will increase and the Syrians will be victorious [conquering Europe], Allah Willing…” (archive)

Incidentally, Fatima is friendly with Canada’s Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, who on March 17, 2019, after the awful Christchurch terrorist attack on Muslims,  chose to visit a Muslim Community (SNMC) mosque in Ottawa to express his solidarity with the Muslim community. That mosque, however, is known for hosting a Saudi imam who prayed for killing Jews and Christians.

Also in late 2015, the popular Islamist activist Saeed Rageah, who was born in Somalia, raised in Saudi Arabia, and according to his online bio, “found his way to North America,” in the late 1980s’, visited  Sweden to address Muslim refugees and immigrants. In his speech, which was posted on YouTube-  Rageah enlightened his audience, saying: “The reason that Allah brought you here is so you can carry the message of Islam to the people. Why? Because each one of us has the responsibility to call people to Allah.”

Rageah has also delivered sermons calling on all Muslims living in the West, to Hire only Muslims: “Use only truck-and cab drivers that are Muslim! Use only doctors who are Muslim. — “If you want to do anything just ask if that individual is a Muslim or not. If he is not, then look for a Muslim, because I’m sure you’ll find a Muslim. I’m sure you’ll find a Muslim in that field…”

Shaikh Abdool Hamid, who like many other Islamic scholars from all over the world have been educated at Medina University, the Saudi version of the Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University, in the former USSR.

Hamid is a popular lecturer who serves as Imam in several mosques in North America.  He regularly holds sermons calling to impose Islam, with instructions on how to advance the transformation of Western secular nations into an Islamic society.

He argues that while “it may seem from one perspective that Islam took over…it is really [taking] over in order to enhance the lives” of the people. He also calls on the newcomers to become politically active, because “changing society cannot happen unless we become involved in the political process.” The involvement in the political process, he explains, “is necessary to bring Sharia (Islamic Law) because Islam is universal.”

But what should be done to the infidels who reject the Invitation to Islam?

When such an invitation, the Dawah, does not convince all non-believers to convert, the Hadith provides the next step. According to the book “The Gardens of the Righteous” [Blog Editor: 346 pg PDF English translation via al Islam] – which was written by a Sunni scholar in the 13th Century, and published and distributed with modern commentary in the United States, and on social media by the Islamic Circle of North America, “Islam strives to achieve global dominance by jihad.,, Until Islam Becomes Victorious or We Die in the Attempt. ”

The Saudi Salman bin Fahed al-‘Auda, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s International Union for Muslim Scholars, who in 2017 was not allowed into Denmark and in September 2018 sentenced to death by a Saudi court, is famous for asserting that the solution to Islamic distress — that may bring about the fall of America and the Western world — “exists in one word which is Jihad.”

As al-Auda explains (quote) -“The West, and above all the United States, and Western culture, in general, are undergoing a historical process that is deterministic. This process leads to its total collapse, sooner or later.” He sounds like most Democrats turned progressive socialists’ Presidential candidates in the US…. Doesn’t he?

According to al-Auda and many other Salafi scholars – Jihad is intended to accelerate that collapse. And importantly, he reminds us that Jihad is fought not only on the battlefield.  “Weapons are not only the rifle, the bullet, the airplane, the tank, and the cannon. Not at all!When thinking about weapons to advance Jihad, think about the economy as a weapon, money is a weapon…”

Anyone critical of the Europeans’ open border policies, and the Islamization of Europe is labeled Islamophobe by the radical Left and leaders of wide-spread, well-funded Muslim organizations who use lawfare as an economic warfare against their critics.  Joining them are the leaders of the European Union, who willfully ignore the Islamic threat, in their haste to turn the European continent to a new, pinker version of the former USSR. The EU’s central bureaucracy delude itself into believing that they will be able to control the fast-growing radicalized Muslim population, as they have the secular Europeans.

Europe’s Left -leaning central institutions, and Europe’s leading Islamic organizations fight to protect their opacity. Both groups fear that transparency would foil their plans. Thus, they stigmatize their opponents as irrational and hate mongers to silence and abuse the legal system to punish them.

However, there is nothing irrational with those who dare to identify the threats posed by these two groups. The “Visegrad 4” – made of four Central European nations that for decades lived under Communism: Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary, joined in opposition to the EU’s post-nationalist, no-borders, “New Europe”, pro -Muslim migration agenda.

The Polish government, which resists the EU dictated quota of Muslim refugees, has instead “rolled out the welcome mat” for some 2 million economic migrants from Ukraine, who are seeking” a better life after the Russian invasion of 2014.”

At the forefront of the opposition to the EU’s efforts to end its member nations’ sovereignty, and creating a “new Europeans” with masses of Muslim migrants/refugees, is Hungary’s outspoken Prime Minister Victor Orbán.

The Ottoman’s Empire’s 158 years rule over Hungary (1541-1699), has not been forgotten. And Mr. Orban seems intent on preventing the history of Islamic oppression from repeating itself. Despite EU threats and sanctions, he continues to argue that “Without the protection of our Christian culture, we are going to lose Europe, and Europe will no longer belong to the Europeans.”

Would Europe catch up with Poland and Hungary? Could Europe get its act together before it’s too late?
________________________
Do YOU Want European Multiculturalism?
Shrug Off Islamophobia & Xenophobia Accusations
John R. Houk
© March 30, 2019
_______________________
‘New Europe’ and the Islamist Agenda

Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld is Founder and President of the New York-based American Center for Democracy, and the Economic Warfare Institute. Dr. Ehrenfeld has authored academic and policy papers and more than one thousand articles. Her books include FUNDING EVIL: How Terrorism is Financed – and How to Stop It (2011) • EVIL MONEY (HarperCollins, 1992,1994). Her latest book project is on The Economic Warfare against the U.S. from Within and Without. • NARCOTERRORISM (Basic Books, 1990, 1992).

Copyright © 2019 | The American Center for Democracy is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Your contribution is tax-deductible to the fullest extent of the law.

Friday, March 29, 2019

An Intro to Justin Smith’s ‘A Monstrous Conspiracy’


Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor
By Justin O. Smith
© March 29, 2019

We Americans who are not gullible or not brainwashed by the self-destructive Left, fully realize that political corruption has been transforming American culture, morals and thoughts for quite some time. That corruption is so pervasive that elitists would protect that transformation at any cost. Trump’s election as President undoubtedly is viewed as a threat to further change.

Hence, Leftist elites and GOP RINOs were (and still are) willing to break the law to keep Americans in submission to transformation. If you are an American willing to abandon the foundational principles that has been the cornerstone of the American rule of law under a Christian moral influence, simply keep looking the other way when the Mainstream Media and Left-Wing Dems LIE about Trump to keep their change progressing.


If you want a return to what has made America great and good, then fight with your voice and vote. If your voice and vote is rendered useless by Leftist transformative laws ignoring the Constitution and your Bible, then it will be time to take a page from Leftist activism. FLOOD YOUR STREETS with voice and action. Even if that action includes taking up arms, then remember our Declaration of Independence:

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

… That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. …

HOPEFULLY the obvious stated by Justin Smith helps you to wake up that a Dem Party dominated government becomes destructive to the Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness bestowed on every human life by the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God is under threat.

JRH 3/29/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:


***********************
Sedition, Espionage and Near Treason 

By Justin O. Smith
Sent  3/28/2019 10:37 PM

The Mueller probe was based on dark and black propaganda lies and a sinister machination started in late 2015 by the Obama Administration and presidential candidate, former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton to subvert and undermine candidate Donald Trump's presidential campaign, the political system and our Republic. The investigation was a sham; and even though it recently found collusion had not occurred between President Trump and Russia to influence the 2016 election, Mueller's investigation was part and parcel of a deliberate attempt by the powerful establishment ruling class to hold onto power, through the use of the levers of government to effect a soft coup. 

CNN, MSNBC and The New York Times struggled to digest the parting spoiled meal Robert Mueller served them, accelerating the death throes of the Obama and Clinton manufactured false narrative surrounding RussiaGate. And while many Democrats and other socialist and communist anti-Americans, such as former CIA Director John Brennan, are left eating crow flavored french fries, Mueller did leave one last poison pill in his statement, as he stated that "while this report does not conclude the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." 

From late 2016, political operatives with deep ties to the Clinton family circulated two different dossiers smearing President Trump as a Russian puppet and traitor to America, while useful idiots in both parties assisted in advancing the false Russian collusion narrative into the upper echelons of Obama's Intelligence Community. CIA Director John Brennan, DNI head James Clapper and FBI Director James Comey leveraged the false dossiers to operate an illegal surveillance campaign against Donald Trump and his inner circle. And after Donald Trump's victory, the operation continued as an effort to neutralize the election results and unseat President Trump as an illegitimate president and a traitor to America. 

"Russian collusion" and numerous leaks from Comey, Brennan, Susan Rice and the creation of a special counsel were all part of a preemptive defense of assorted crimes committed by Obama officials, such as illegally leaking classified information to the media, deceiving the FISA court, lying to the FBI and Congress and obstructing justice. All of this was to divert attention from their wrongdoing, and there never existed any evidentiary reason to appoint a special counsel, other than to make a crime fit the man, Donald Trump, just like they used to do in the old Soviet Union. 

Does the full Mueller Report mention that the Steele Dossier, the document that formed the basis for his investigation, was manufactured and bought by Hillary Clinton associates and employees? Does it note the repeated use of this falsified document to improperly and illegally prolong the inquisition? How could Mueller not acknowledge such revelations? And if not, what sort of investigation has this been? 

By May of 2017 and the beginning of Mueller's investigation, the Steele Dossier was already denounced as a fraud. FISA transcripts of surveillance conversations had already revealed no direct evidence of collusion, as FBI agent Peter Strzok warns his lover and fellow FBI agent Lisa Page that "there's no big there there". 

How many legitimate investigators and how many Americans are asking: Was the FISA judge in on this conspiracy, or was he unaware of it? America has already witnessed numerous activist liberal Leftist judges try to stonewall legitimate executive orders from President Trump designed to protect America, revealing serious questions about our judicial system and the rule of law. 

Thirty million dollars and two and a half years later and after 2800 subpoenas, 500 warrants, and 500 witnesses, America is notified there wasn't any Russian collusion or any obstruction of justice, and that in and of itself is, ipso facto, an exoneration. Whatever Mueller's intention, his innuendo absent of formal charges was a transgression against the spirit of the American justice system. It will be most interesting to hear any forthcoming explanation, before the House Judiciary Committee. 

Just hours after the release of the Mueller Report, President Trump exclaimed: "It began illegally. And hopefully somebody is going to look at the other side. This was an illegal takedown that failed ... ". 

Representative Devin Nunes has promised to make criminal referrals to Attorney General Barr on FBI and DOJ officials who perpetrated this RussiaGate hoax. Nunes stated: "This is the unraveling of the biggest political scandal in American history ... this dates back to late 2015 ... this began as ... nothing less than a Clinton/ Obama operation with a bunch of dirty cops at the FBI and career DOJ officials." 

Paul Sperry, author and former fellow at the Hoover Institute, rightfully notes: "President Trump called the investigations of him and his advisers 'illegal'. That is not hyperbole. What the Obama FBI and DOJ pulled was worse than Watergate. AG Barr must now hold the dirty agents to account by impaneling a grand jury investigation of the investigators.”

In the end, Watergate brought down a president over a far less serious crime than the numerous crimes that have occurred at the direction of Obama underlings. Does anyone really believe President Obama was completely in the dark regarding the sedition, espionage and near treason being perpetrated against the nation? 

Every quisling and each person and each organization that perpetrated and advance the Russia hoax, literally the entire Democratic Party in both houses of Congress and every news media personality at The New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC, CNN, NBC, and CBS should go out in their back yards and blow their brains out, or slit their wrists in a warm bath, but they won't, because they know no shame over their attempted treasonous coup. So, they should be rounded up in busses at the FBI and DOJ for criminal conspiracy; continue on to the Democratic National Committee, and arrest every member of the Clinton campaign with the knowledge of this monstrous conspiracy; and, prosecute them all in batches just like Nazis at Nuremberg. 

President Trump should do all he can to encourage U.S. Attorney William Barr to prosecute Hillary Clinton on anything associated with this conspiracy, including a renewed and deeper look into the mishandling of the Clinton email investigation, investigating the investigators. They must pursue the criminals and traitors to America and get to the bottom of the FISA warrant abuses and RussiaGate. They must release the FISA applications, FBI 302 forms and 1023 counterintelligence documentation that is still classified, because it will take these actions and President Trump acting with the iron will of Andrew Jackson and Ulysses S. Grant to completely drain this modern political swamp and physically wrest our beloved America from that rapidly approaching iron grip of tyranny. 

The instigators of this coup attempt have damaged America in untold ways and they must be brought down and exposed, along with their collaborators. From start to finish, this sorry episode in history has shown Americans that two sets of rules exist in America, one for the elite and one for the common average American, and that the justice system works to punish anyone challenging the rule of the establishment elite. That's poison to our freedom and liberty in America.

By Justin O. Smith
_____________________
An Intro to Justin Smith’s ‘A Monstrous Conspiracy’
Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor
By Justin O. Smith
© March 29, 2019
_____________________
A Monstrous Conspiracy
© Justin O. Smith

Edited by John R. Houk
Source are Links by the Editor


Thursday, March 28, 2019

Breaking: Rep. Doug Collins Releases Nellie Ohr Testimony Transcript Before House Judiciary Committee — Contributing ‘Author’ of Phony Dossier


And yet more evidence Dems tried to hide showing the true meddling in the 2016 election was the Obama Administration, the Crooked Hillary Campaign AND probably Russian influence.

JRH 3/28/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:
Please Support SlantRight 2.0
*******************
Breaking: Rep. Doug Collins Releases Nellie Ohr Testimony Transcript Before House Judiciary Committee — Contributing ‘Author’ of Phony Dossier

By Jim Hoft
March 28, 2019


In December 2017 the head of opposition research firm Fusion GPS admitted in a court filing that his firm paid Nellie Ohr, the wife of senior Justice Department official Bruce Ohr, to help dig up damaging information on then-candidate Donald Trump.

The connections between Nellie Ohr and the ‘Spygate’ scandal were hidden at a distance for months.

As noted previously at TGP, Nellie Ohr is a Communist sympathizer connected to Russia as well as a corrupt Never-Trumper.

Author Diana West at the American Spectator posted an article on Nellie Ohr last year.  Nellie Ohr is “the “dossier” spying scandal’s woman in the middle.”

To one side of Ohr, there is the Fusion GPS team, including fellow contractor Christopher Steele. To the other, there is husband Bruce Ohr, who, until his “dossier”-related demotion, was No. 4 man at the Department of Justice, and a key contact there for Steele.

What’s more revealing about Nellie Ohr is the men in her life are protecting her involvement in the Russia scandal:

Notably, the “dossier” men in her life have tried to shield Ohr from public scrutiny, even at professional risk. Her husband, as the Daily Caller News Foundation reports, failed to disclose his wife’s employment with Fusion GPS and seek the appropriate conflict-of-interest waiver, which may have been an important factor in his demotion from associate deputy attorney general late last year.

Under Senate and House questioning, Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson consistently failed to disclose Nellie Ohr’s existence as one of his firm’s paid Russian experts, let alone that he hired her for the red-hot DNC/Clinton campaign Trump-Russia project.

Even Christopher Steele may have tried to keep Nellie Ohr “under cover.” Steele, put forth as the “dossier” author ever since its January 2017 publication in BuzzFeed, does not appear to have let on to his many media and political contacts that he had “dossier”-assistance from at least two fellow Fusion GPS Russian experts, Nellie Ohr and Edward Baumgartner. Baumgartner, interestingly, was a Russian history major at Vassar in the 1990s when Nellie Ohr taught Russian history there.

It appears that the men in Nellie’s life did all they could to prevent Nellie Ohr from being outed for being involved in the dossier because she also has links to the CIA and therefore to John Brennan.

Now this…

New evidence suggests Nellie Ohr was working for the CIA and Fusion GPS when she passed on the junk Trump-Russia dossier and information on the Trump Children to the DOJ-FBI.

Via The Last Refuge – Conservative Treehouse:



WordPress embed
https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1103887139219988482

The latest FOIA requests indicate Nellie Ohr was working for the DOJ in 2015-2016.



WordPress Embed
https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1103888596526751745



WordPress Embed
https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1103889807204220930

On Wednesday night during his interview with Sean Hannity – President Trump called Nellie Ohr the author of the phony dossier.

Nellie Ohr has deep involvement with the creation of this fraudulent document.



WordPress Embed
https://twitter.com/JerryDunleavy/status/1111270245820518400

On Thursday Rep. Doug Collins released the Nellie Ohr testimony in front of the House Judiciary Committee.



________________________
© 2019 The Gateway Pundit – All Rights Reserved.


Black Lives Matter Leader Loses Lawsuit Against Fox News Host Jeanine Pirro


Jeanine Pirro scored a legal victory winning civil case when suit was brought against her by undoubtedly Marxist Black Live Matter (BLM) DeRay McKesson for defamation. Perhaps Fox News should pay attention to the Free Speech ruling and make sure Judge Jeanine returns.

JRH 3/28/19
Your generosity is always appreciated:

********************
Black Lives Matter Leader Loses Lawsuit Against Fox News Host Jeanine Pirro

Published March 27, 2019 at 5:12am
Modified March 27, 2019 at 5:16am

Fox News host Jeanine Pirro has scored a courtroom victory over Black Lives Matter activist DeRay McKesson, whose defamation lawsuit against Pirro has been dismissed.

During a 2017 broadcast about injuries suffered by a Baton Rouge, Louisiana, police officer, Pirro said that McKesson “was directing” violence against the officer. McKesson then sued.

According to his decision, New York State Supreme Court Justice Robert Kalish, sitting in Manhattan, said Pirro had the right to express her opinion.

In his ruling, he said Pirro’s own lawyer labeled her style “loud, caustic and hard hitting.”

“Pirro’s lack of temperament, and caustic commentary is what she is known, celebrated and frequently criticized for,” Kalish wrote.


“However divisive one might find the subject two-minute sequence, the law of this state protects the expressions of opinion it represents,” he ruled.

Further, Kalish wrote that much of what Pirro said was based on a lawsuit filed by the injured officer, who has sued McKesson.

“(T)his Court finds that Pirro’s statement’s describing the (lawsuit) qualify as a substantially accurate report of a judicial proceeding and therefore are absolutely privileged from liability for defamation,” the ruling said.

Kalish also said that taken as a whole, Pirro did nothing for which she could be sued, although some of her statements were not fully accurate.

“Moreover, although the statement that the plaintiff-officer ‘was injured at the direction of DeRay McKesson’ may cause a reader to believe such if it is read in isolation, viewing the entire video sequence as a whole it is clear that Pirro is expressing her opinion that the plaintiff-officer should be allowed to pursue his civil complaint against McKesson on the theory that McKesson may be held liable for the violent events that occurred during a demonstration that he allegedly led considering the allegations of the plaintiff-officer,” Kalish ruled.


Kalish wanted to be sure his opinion was not read as an endorsement of Pirro.

“That the Court find’s Pirro statement’s to be protected statements of opinion does not mean this Court agrees with Pirro’s opinions or condones her behavior or rhetoric. This Court is not blind to the undertones in this segment,” Kalish wrote.

Kalish had revealed he was no fan of Pirro’s last year during a hearing on the case, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

“She was a judge. She was a former district attorney,” Kalish said then. “You’d think she’d understand what we are dealing with. … You’d think she would give a very clear and accurate statement. You’d think she’d know better.”

McKesson, who calls himself a “leading voice of the Black Lives Matter movement, greeted the news of the dismissal of the case with a jab at Pirro.

“I’m obviously disappointed. But as Fox argued and the judge recognized, when you have a certain reputation, less is expected of you,” McKesson said, according to the New York Daily News reported.

In his ruling, Kalish noted Pirro had been suspended by Fox News, which had “no bearing” on the case.

Pirro was suspended by Fox after comments she made about Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar.

She has missed the last two shows. Fox has not said if she will return on Saturday.
___________________
Jack Davis is a freelance writer who joined The Western Journal in July 2015 and chronicled the campaign that saw President Donald Trump elected. Since then, he has written extensively for The Western Journal on the Trump administration as well as foreign policy and military issues.