John R. Houk
© April 28, 2017
Futuret left a comment to my post “Trump Profits, Deep State, Jews Run America
& Neocons” with only a link: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/04/26/the-satanists-who-destroyed-the-middle-east-are-back-in-washington/
The link’s title: “The Satanists who destroyed the Middle
East are back in Washington”. The article is a hit piece against Neocons
and Israel. Why? Prominent Neocons got caught passing classified info to Israel
pertaining to the USA’s plans toward Iran’s nuclear program under the Bush
Administration.
Jonas E.
Alexis caption for Wolfowitz: Satanist Paul Wolfowitz
I do not find too much to condemn since I am a Christian
Zionist as far as motive goes. President Bush took zero action to hamper Iran
nuke aspirations in his lame duck year before the end of his second term in
Office. And hindsight tells us that President Obama did nothing either other
than a fake deal that enabled Iran to weaponize nukes after a period of time
long after Obama would be gone from the geopolitical scene.
The Neocon accused had pure motives yet broke the law and
were prosecuted. The accused received light sentences obviously because there
was little damage to American National Security. The largest damage was knowing
how Bush was going to deal with Iran which was do NOTHING. And Israel still
withheld military action against Iran similar to their actions against Saddam
Hussein’s nuclear plant at Osirak.
Paul Wolfowitz was not even prosecuted and went on to lead
the World Bank until lust busted him for nepotism toward his girlfriend.
Wolfowitz resigned from the World Bank and again not prosecuted. (See HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE and HERE.)
Being a Neocon and a Zionist Jew are not crimes, particularly
when the politics is Conservative rather than Marxist. Sadly, many Jewish
Zionists are secular and Marxist oriented abandoning the faith of their
fathers. Abandoning the Jewish faith is what has troubled Jews since Moses
first led the Hebrew tribes out of Egyptian captivity. Jews have paid a price
for abandoning God every time. But that is a different blog post.
Vilifying Wolfowitz for being a Neocon and a pro-Israel
Zionist smacks of the kind of Antisemitism that falsely accuses all Jews of
world domination ala the fake Protocols of Zion.
It is a little rough to call Wolfowitz a Satanist just
because of being a Neocon that put America first and desired to attack Iraq out
of protecting U.S. National Interests.
Dems, Republicans, Conservatives &
Leftists all read the America (& foreign) Intelligence reports
that concluded crazy Saddam Hussein was developing nukes and chem weapons. The
Intelligence proved exaggerated (not completely wrong).
After the Iraq war about 550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium were
secretly removed by the U.S. from Iraq and transported to Canada.
Most Leftist pundits and fact checkers will tell you that the yellowcake had
been sitting around in containers since before 1991 and the 1st Gulf
War. Ergo, Saddam Hussein’s massive amount of yellowcake had not been
weaponized.
The Leftist denial largely came forth because they didn’t
want on their face over the anti-Bush slogan: “Bush lied, people died.”
Check this out the process to weaponize yellowcake:
The power of the atomic nucleus can
be harnessed in one of two ways: Fusion, when two hydrogen atoms fuse together,
and fission, when the nuclei of larger atoms are split open. Both release
tremendous amounts of energy, and both are used in nuclear weapons. In nuclear
energy plants, scientists rely on nuclear fission. Plants split open molecules
of highly enriched Uranium. Uranium ore is found in the Earth's crust and mined
in Canada, Australia, Niger, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Namibia. In order to get
it to become "highly enriched", it has to be processed, and this is
where complicated chemistry and physics come into play. First it's made into
"yellow cake" uranium through a number of chemical reactions, and
then it's centrifuged until the final fuel is at least 5 percent U235 and 95
percent U238. This highly radioactive combination of the two uranium isotopes
is extruded into tiny ceramic pellets which are embedded into metal rods.
The rods are placed into the core
of a nuclear reactor, which is where the fission takes place within a highly
controlled containment structure. …
(How Uranium Becomes Nuclear Fuel;
By TRACE DOMINGUEZ; Seeker.com;
5/2/15)
Here is a simpler example of weaponizing yellowcake:
1 Uranium ore The
mildly radioactive ore is mined from underground or open cast deposits. Iran has mines at Gchine on the Persian Gulf and at
Saghand, in the middle of the country.
2 Yellowcake When ore
comes out of the ground it can be less than 1% uranium oxide. Uranium oxide is
leached out of the ore with strong acids or alkaline solutions and dried to
'yellowcake', which is more than 80% uranium oxide. Iran has mastered this
process.
3 Conversion Yellowcake
is processed into a gas, uranium hexafluoride. Iran's conversion plant is at
Isfahan.
4 Enrichment Uranium
hexafluoride can be fed into centrifuges which separate out the most fissile
uranium isotope U-235. Low enriched uranium for civilian reactors has a 3%-4%
concentration of U-235. 'Weapons-grade' uranium is 90% enriched.
5 Fuel fabrication The
uranium hexafluoride can be converted back to uranium oxide, which is pressed
and baked into pellets. The pellets are put in metal rods, which are used in a
reactor. Iran has yet to master this stage.
6 Reactor The fission
of U-235 produces energy which heats water into steam that drives turbines. Iran
has a research reactor in Tehran and an industrial-scale one at Bushehr.
7 Reprocessing Uranium
and plutonium can be removed from the spent fuel, and reused. The plutonium can
also be used to make weapons. (Weapons-grade uranium process explained;
By Julian Borger; The Guardian;
12/5/10)
Saddam Hussein the means to weaponize nukes but appears not
the patience for the complicated process to take place. The world can thank
Israel for hampering that process. Israel bombed Saddam Hussein’s nuclear
plant:
Thirty-five years after Operation Opera – the
Israeli air attack that destroyed Saddam Hussein’s nuclear reactor at Osirak,
retired IAF officers and Mossad agents revealed hitherto unknown details of the
operation on Friday.
In an exposé aired on Channel 10, Col. (Ret.) Ze’ev Raz, who led the
June 7, 1981 raid, said that …
(35 years on, IAF pilots recall daring
mission to bomb Saddam’s nuke reactor; By TIMES OF
ISRAEL STAFF; Times of Israel;
6/4/16 6:34 am)
The only way for Saddam Hussein to weaponize his yellowcake
is with a little help from a potential ally – hmm … like Russia.
Speaking of Russia and Iraq. It was a proven fact that
Saddam Hussein has a very active chemical weapons program.
Discover The Networks (DTN) has a detailed account of
the mystery of Saddam Hussein’s chemical weapons ranging from the exaggerated intelligence
reports that inspired President G.W. Bush to invade Iraq through about 2006
when actual chemical weapon cache was located in Iraq. Again, the Left has
downplayed chemical weapons discovery as old or defective, but I do not
completely buy it. Here are the last few paragraphs of the DTN report:
Eventually, Wurmser said, Sunni
insurgent groups did gain access to the shells in 2005. “There were to my
memory at least two attacks on our soldiers using chemical weapons-rigged
shells as [improvised explosive devices]. Fortunately, they were ineffectively
weaponized and soldiers were wounded but not killed.”
Wurmser, however, grew more frustrated over time. “After waiting a year—during which we asked that the source of the batches be traced and followed to the location where the shells were being retrieved—we continued to see the trickle, but then discovered nobody was making any effort to track the source to the location of retrieval,” he said. “Instead, we were continuing to try to buy up some of the stuff in the market.”
After the U.S. found thousands of the old chemical-weapons shells, Wurmser and others at one point argued that they had an obligation to declare the stocks of chemical weapons under the Chemical Weapons Convention and destroy them. The United States was, after all, the occupier of Iraq and had assumed the country’s sovereign responsibilities as a signatory to the convention.
“It was all for nothing; Rove wanted the issue buried,” Wurmser said. (WMD: PRE- AND POST-INVASION INTELLIGENCE; DTN)
Wurmser, however, grew more frustrated over time. “After waiting a year—during which we asked that the source of the batches be traced and followed to the location where the shells were being retrieved—we continued to see the trickle, but then discovered nobody was making any effort to track the source to the location of retrieval,” he said. “Instead, we were continuing to try to buy up some of the stuff in the market.”
After the U.S. found thousands of the old chemical-weapons shells, Wurmser and others at one point argued that they had an obligation to declare the stocks of chemical weapons under the Chemical Weapons Convention and destroy them. The United States was, after all, the occupier of Iraq and had assumed the country’s sovereign responsibilities as a signatory to the convention.
“It was all for nothing; Rove wanted the issue buried,” Wurmser said. (WMD: PRE- AND POST-INVASION INTELLIGENCE; DTN)
At least pertaining to Saddam Hussein’s chemical weapons, I
find this Conspiracy Theory very credible:
Russian special forces troops moved
many of Saddam Hussein’s weapons and related goods out of Iraq and into Syria
in the weeks before the March 2003 U.S. military operation, The Washington
Times has learned.
John A. Shaw, the deputy
undersecretary of defense for international technology security, said in an
interview that he believes the Russian troops, working with Iraqi intelligence,
“almost certainly” removed the high-explosive material that went missing from
the Al-Qaqaa facility, south of Baghdad.
“The Russians brought in, just
before the war got started, a whole series of military units,” Mr. Shaw said.
“Their main job was to shred all evidence of any of the contractual
arrangements they had with the Iraqis. The others were transportation units.”
Mr. Shaw, who was in charge of
cataloging the tons of conventional arms provided to Iraq by foreign suppliers,
said he recently obtained reliable information on the arms-dispersal program
from two European intelligence services that have detailed knowledge of the
Russian-Iraqi weapons collaboration.
Most of Saddam’s most powerful arms
were systematically separated from other arms like mortars, bombs and rockets,
and sent to Syria and Lebanon, and possibly to Iran, he said.
The Russian involvement in helping
disperse Saddam’s weapons, including some 380 tons of RDX and HMX, is still
being investigated, Mr. Shaw said.
The RDX and HMX, which are used to
manufacture high-explosive and nuclear weapons, are probably of Russian origin,
he said.
Pentagon spokesman Larry DiRita
could not be reached for comment.
The disappearance of the material
was reported in a letter Oct. 10 from the Iraqi government to the International
Atomic Energy Agency.
…
A second defense official said
documents on the Russian support to Iraq reveal that Saddam’s government paid
the Kremlin for the special forces to provide security for Iraq’s Russian arms
and to conduct counterintelligence activities designed to prevent U.S. and
Western intelligence services from learning about the arms pipeline through
Syria.
The Russian arms-removal program
was initiated after Yevgeny Primakov, the former Russian intelligence chief,
could not persuade Saddam to give in to U.S. and Western demands, this official
said.
…
The Russian weapons were then sent
out of the country to Syria, and possibly Lebanon in Russian trucks, Mr. Shaw
said.
Mr. Shaw said he believes that the
withdrawal of Russian-made weapons and explosives from Iraq was part of plan by
Saddam to set up a “redoubt” in Syria that could be used as a base for
launching pro-Saddam insurgency operations in Iraq.
The Russian units were dispatched
beginning in January 2003 and by March had destroyed hundreds of pages of
documents on Russian arms supplies to Iraq while dispersing arms to Syria, the
second official said.
Besides their own weapons, the
Russians were supplying Saddam with arms made in Ukraine, Belarus, Bulgaria and
other Eastern European nations, he said.
“Whatever was not buried was put on
lorries and sent to the Syrian border,” the defense official said.
Documents reviewed by the official
included itineraries of military units involved in the truck shipments to
Syria. The materials outlined in the documents included missile components, MiG
jet parts, tank parts and chemicals used to make chemical weapons, the official
said.
…
Also, an Arabic-language report
obtained by U.S. intelligence disclosed the extent of Russian armaments. The
26-page report was written by Abdul Tawab Mullah al Huwaysh, Saddam’s minister
of military industrialization, who was captured by U.S. forces May 2, 2003.
The Russian “spetsnaz” or
special-operations forces were under the GRU military intelligence service and
organized large commercial truck convoys for the weapons removal, the official
said.
Regarding the explosives, the new
Iraqi government reported that 194.7 metric tons of HMX, or high-melting-point
explosive, and 141.2 metric tons of RDX, or rapid-detonation explosive, and 5.8
metric tons of PETN, or pentaerythritol tetranitrate, were missing.
The material is used in nuclear
weapons and also in making military “plastic” high explosive.
See also: “Are Syria's Chemical Weapons Iraq's Missing
WMD? Obama's Director of Intelligence Thought So.” (By MARK HEMINGWA; Weekly
Standard; 4/10/17 11:45 AM)
Under the failed Neocon paradigm of nation-building to
transform a despotic nation into a nation of laws, in which citizens were able
to choose between war or the prosperity of a Western economy, would benefit
U.S. National Interests.
The reason the paradigm failed in Iraq (& for the most
part Afghanistan), is Islam. Islamic theopolitical brainwashing has existed for
several centuries. Islamic brainwashing washed the Christian ethics that
dominated the Middle East prior to Islamic imperialism that began in the late
600s AD.
Such brainwashing would take another several centuries of
deprogramming to eliminate the violent and intolerant social structure of
Islam. Iraq was a learning experience. Only nations amenable to Western
principles would ever successfully be molded (Germany & Japan).
Calling Neocons evil merely because nation-building among
Muslim nations is quite erroneous! Equally erroneous is vilifying Neocons for
being pro-Israel as if being a Conservative Zionist is evil.
I am not pleased with Zionist that have a Marxist slant. Those
Zionists are leading Israel to destruction much like the American Left is
leading America to destruction. The curse is Marxist-Communism and not
Neoconservatism or Zionism.
JRH 4/28/17
