John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© January 25, 2020
If you’ve ever Islamic revered writings such as the Quran,
Hadith, Sira and various Muslim theologians commenting on the big revered three
AND you are not an adherent of Islam, YOU ARE AWARE ISLAM IS EVIL toward all
things non-Islamic.
Even though those revered writings designate Jews and
Christians as People of the Book (because a Muslim dare not say Holy Bible),
it is written of them THAT failure to submit to the superiority of Islam is
death.
I’m a Christian that refuses to relegate my faith to an
inferior position submitting to Muslim lies about Jesus Christ the Son of God
Crucified to death on a Cross and arisen three days later to His Glorified life
fully human and fully God. Christian beliefs labeled as blasphemy in Islam.
It has been quite some time since I have posted on Islam
exposing that belief system as deficient, contrary and downright
anti-Christian. And so I have been saving some posts from other blogs and
websites exposing a nefarious Islam (primarily from Sheaholliman's
Weblog) which I will cross post here (probably with a
little spellcheck applied).
If you are Facebook poster be careful. Sharing may land you
in Facebook Jail. As you will read in an Editor’s note, I’m serving restricted
time in Facebook Jail until April 18. I’m restricted to only Groups I moderate,
but I got a feeling a full restriction is in my future for I also will not
submit to Fascistbook Censors.
JRH 1/25/20
Your generosity is always appreciated - various credit, check
& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account:
OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee.
BLOG EDITOR: I’ve apparently
been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after
criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing
Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protestor restrictions.
Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I
choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely.
Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are
banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT
CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in
pop-up on 1/20/20: “You're temporarily restricted from joining and posting to
groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”
*******************
VIDEO: What is the Quran?
17.1K subscribers
- Jan 17, 2019
Adapted, in part, from Bannister, An Oral-Formulaic Study of
the Qur'an.
Citations are all in the pinned comment.
For more on differences between the accounts, see here: https://youtu.be/MMvGyNBCoXo
Email me at: islamcritiqued@gmail.com
What is the Quran? Is it the word of Allah? Or is the Quran
the word of...
The Mishnah?
2 Enoch?
3 Enoch?
Testament of Solomon?
Apocalypse of Abraham?
Book of Jubilees? Testament of Levi?
Life of Adam and Eve?
The Book of the Cave of Treasures?
The Gospel of Bartholomew?
+++++++++++++++++
“Hating and Loving” for Islam
01/17/2020
Originally FrontPageMag.com
During a New Year’s Eve Islamic terror attack that took place in
Russia minutes before the clock struck midnight, two Muslim men—Akhmed
Imagozhev, 22 and Mikail Miziyev, 18—drove their car into and stabbed to death
two police officers, one a married father of four. Other officers
subsequently shot one of the jihadis dead, while hospitalizing the other.
An image of the two Muslim men posing with knives was later
found on social media (right). Beneath it appears the words, “love and
hatred based on Tawhid!”
This is hardly the first time this ostensibly oxymoronic
phrase appears in connection with Islamic acts of terror. After launching
a successful attack that killed two policemen in the Kashmir Valley, the
militant commander of Kashmir’s Hizb al-Mujahidin—“the Party of Jihadis”—justified the murders by saying, “We love and hate for the sake of Allah.”
In this otherwise cryptic motto lie the roots of Islam’s
conflict with the rest of the world. “Loving and hating” is one of
several translations of the Islamic doctrine of al-wala’ wa’l-bara’ (which
since 2006 I have generally translated as “Loyalty and Enmity”).
The wala’ portion—“love,” “loyalty,”
etc.—requires Muslims always to aid and support fellow Muslims (including
jihadis, for example through funds or zakat). As one medieval
Muslim authority explained, the believer “is obligated to befriend a
believer—even if he is oppressive and violent toward you — while he must be
hostile to the infidel—even if he is liberal and kind to you” (The Al Qaeda Reader, p. 64 ).
This is a clear reflection of Koran 48:29: “Muhammad is the
Messenger of Allah; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers,
merciful among themselves.”
But it is the bara’—the “hate,” the
“enmity”—that manifests itself so regularly that even those in the West who are
not necessarily acquainted with the particulars of Muslim doctrine sense
it. For instance, in November 2015, after a series of deadly Islamic terror
strikes in the West, then presidential candidate Donald Trump said, “I think
Islam hates us. There’s something there that — there’s a tremendous
hatred there. There’s a tremendous hatred. We have to get to the bottom of it.
There’s an unbelievable hatred of us.”
This “tremendous” and “unbelievable
hatred” is not a product of grievances, political factors, or even an
“extremist” interpretation of Islam; rather, it is a direct byproduct of
mainstream Islamic teaching. Koran 60:4 is the cornerstone verse of this
doctrine and speaks for itself. As Osama bin Laden once wrote:
As to the relationship between
Muslims and infidels, this is summarized by the Most High’s Word: “We renounce
you. Enmity and hate shall forever reign between us—till you believe in Allah
alone” [Koran 60:4]. So there is an enmity, evidenced by fierce hostility from
the heart. And this fierce hostility—that is, battle—ceases only if the infidel
submits to the authority of Islam, or if his blood is forbidden from being shed
[i.e., a dhimmi], or if Muslims are at that point in time weak and incapable.
But if the hate at any time extinguishes from the heart, this is great
apostasy!… Such, then, is the basis and foundation of the relationship between
the infidel and the Muslim. Battle, animosity, and hatred—directed from the
Muslim to the infidel—is the foundation of our religion. (The Al Qaeda
Reader, p. 43).
Similarly, the Islamic State confessed to the West in the context
of Koran 60: 4 that “We hate you, first and foremost, because you are
disbelievers.” As for any and all political “grievances,” these are
“secondary” reasons for the jihad, ISIS said:
The fact is, even if you were to
stop bombing us, imprisoning us, torturing us, vilifying us, and usurping our
lands, we would continue to hate you because our primary reason for hating you
will not cease to exist until you embrace Islam. Even if you were to pay jizyah and live under the authority
of Islam in humiliation, we would continue to hate you.
Koran 58:22 goes as far as to praise Muslims who kill their
own non-Muslim family members: “You shall find none who believe in Allah and
the Last Day on friendly terms with those who oppose Allah and His
Messenger—even if they be their fathers, their sons, their brothers, or their
nearest kindred.”
According to Ibn Kathir’s mainstream commentary on the
Koran, this verse refers to a number of Muslims who slaughtered their own
non-Muslim kin (one slew his non-Muslim father, another his non-Muslim brother,
a third—Abu Bakr, the first revered caliph of Islamic history—tried to slay his
non-Muslim son, and Omar, the second righteous caliph, slaughtered his
relatives). Ibn Kathir adds that Allah was immensely pleased by
their unwavering zeal for his cause and rewarded them with paradise. (The Al Qaeda Reader, 75-76).
In fact, verses that support the divisive doctrine of al-wala’ wa’l-bara’ [Blog Editor: an
excellent post on this doctrine HERE] permeate the Koran (see also
4:89, 4:144, 5:51, 5:54, 6:40, 9:23, and 60:1). There is one caveat, captured
by Koran 3:28: when Muslims are in a position of weakness, they may pretend to befriend non-Muslims,
as long as the hate carries on in their hearts (such is taqiyya;
see here, here, and here for examples; for other Islamic
sanctioned forms of deception, read about tawriya, and taysir).
Little wonder, then, that America’s supposed best Muslim
friends and allies—such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar—have issued
fatwas calling on all Muslims to “oppose and hate whomever Allah
commands us to oppose and hate, including the Jews, the Christians, and
other mushrikin [non-Muslims], until they believe in Allah
alone and abide by his laws, which he sent down to his Prophet Muhammad, peace
and blessings upon him.”
Indeed, because enmity for non-Muslims is so ironclad in the
Koran, mainstream Islamic teaching holds that Muslim men must even hate—and show that they hate—their
non-Muslim wives, for
no other reason than that they are “infidels.”
If Muslims must hate those closest to them—including
fathers, sons, brothers, and wives—simply because they are non-Muslims, is
there any surprise that so many Muslims hate foreign “infidels” who live oceans
away—such as Americans, who are further portrayed throughout the Muslim world as
trying to undermine Islam?
In short, jihad—or terrorism, war on non-Muslims for no less
a reason than that they are non-Muslims—is simply the physical
realization of an overlooked concept that precedes it: Islam’s unequivocal
command for Muslims to hate non-Muslims.
++++++++++++++++++++++
Posted by Islam Critiqued
17.1K subscribers - Sep 7, 2019
In this video we: destroy the "Islamic Awareness"
article related to this topic, demonstrate the Quran relies on the Alexander
Myth, respond to more anticipated objections from Muslims (using Maududi), and
explore some of the tangled mess of traditions elsewhere in Surah 18 and
beyond. In doing so, we issue a strong challenge to Muslims regarding their
theology of the Quran.
++++++++++++++++++
Posted by Islam Critiqued
17.1K subscribers - Aug 30, 2019
In this video we demonstrate the sloppiness with which the
Quran mixes various genres of tradition, historical and ahistorical. Patreon
here: www.patreon.com/islamcritiqued. Email here: islamcritiqued@gmail.com
++++++++++++++++++++
Posted by Islam Critiqued
17.1K subscribers - Dec 20, 2019
Adapted from: David S. Powers, "Muhammad Is Not the
Father of Any of Your Men: The Making of the Last Prophet"
+++++++++++++++++++
Posted by Mohamad Faridi
4.83K subscribers - Dec 3, 2018
Around the world, people who leave the faith of Islam face
state persecution, imprisonment, torture, and even execution, as well as
violence, death threats, and ostracization from their own communities.
Many ex-Muslims risk so-called honor killing, forced
marriage, kidnap, and communal violence at the hands of their families for
"bringing shame" on their community. In Western countries, ex-Muslims
are often thrown out of the family and face isolation and exclusion.
Mohamad grew up in a devout Muslim home, obediently
following her parents’ orders to practice the rituals of Islam. But God was
calling her to freedom and love. He was calling her to true faith. He was
calling her to give up everything.
His Testimony is a remarkable spiritual journey from Islam
to Christianity. It is also the untold story of how he ran from her father’s
threats to find refuge in America. Most of all, it is the story of a young man
who made life-changing sacrifices to follow Jesus—and who inspires us to do the
same.
++++++++++++++++++++++
Sacred Deception – Taqiyya – Political Islam
Posted by obbop
January 23, 2020
Originally from Political Islam (11/14/14)
“I’d like to talk to you about what I find a fascinating
topic that is the topic of Islamic ethics, but in particular, a part of Islamic
ethics which is called sacred deception or Taqiyya. Let me give you a few
ethical rules that come from the Hadith: a Muslim does not cheat another Muslim
in business a Muslim doesn’t kill another Muslim a Muslim doesn’t touch another
Muslim’s wife and a Muslim doesn’t lie to another Muslim.
You notice something here? That’s right. You and I are
left out because you see Islam is not a symmetric ethical system. The golden
rule is symmetric. “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” That
is, there’s a balance here; the other and yourself are seen as equal. But in
Islam if you’re a Kafir, you’re never equal to the Muslim. Islam does not have
a golden rule. The Kafir is always inferior.
Now then, let’s talk about lying and deception. First
let’s start with the fact that Allah has 99 names and one of those 99 names is
he is the best of deceivers. But Allah is also the best of plotters and
schemers so given that, it isn’t too surprising that we find in the Koran
16:106 “Those who disbelieve in Allah after having believed, who open up their
hearts to disbelief will feel the wrath of Allah and have a terrible
punishment.” In other words, apostates can be killed or otherwise punished. But
it goes further. “But there is no punishment for anyone who is compelled to
deny Allah in words but whose heart is faithful.” So in other words, a Muslim
can lie about Islam if it serves Islam. And one of the ways he can serve Islam
is that the Muslim is not discriminated against.
Here we have another in Koran 3:28: “Believers should not
take Kafirs (unbelievers) as friends in preference to other believers. Who ever
does this shall have no relationship left with Allah.” (In other words, if
you’re a real friend [to a Kafir], you’re no longer friend of Allah). “ . . .
unless you but guard yourself against them [Kafirs], taking precautions.” What
this is interpreted to mean is that a Muslim can act friendly but he’s not
actually the friend. That’s what is wrong. In other words, a Muslim may never
give preference to a Kafir over a Muslim. There are, by the way, no less than
12 verses which say that a Muslim is not the friend of the Kafir.
Now let’s turn to the Hadith. “Mohammed: ‘Who will kill
Ka’b bin Ashraf who has offended Allah and his prophet?’ A Muslim: ‘I will
Mohammed. Would you have me do so?’‘ Yes. ’‘In order to kill him, I will need
to deceive him. May I do that?’ Mohammed: ‘Yes.’” So, the Muslim deceived Ka’b
bin Ashraf and he did kill him. What is this? This is the Sunna of Mohammed; it
is possible to lie to the Kafir as long as it advances Islam. This is the
nature of Taqiyya.
Now there is another way in which a Muslim can lie.
There’s a hadith, a fairly well-known hadith, in which there are three reasons
for Muslims to lie. One is jihad, that is the struggle against the Kafir. So a
Muslim can lie to you anytime he needs to advance Islam. The other is a Muslim
a lie to another Muslim if it will make the situation better. And a husband and
wife may lie to each other as long as it smooths the relationships in the
household. So deception is part of Islam. Allah is a deceiver. Mohammed was a
deceiver, and therefore, every Muslim can be a deceiver. It is so special that
it has a name, Taqiyya. So the next time you’re hearing something about Islam
that just doesn’t sound right, and it comes from the mouth of a Muslim, you’re
right. It’s not right. It’s a lie. It is Taqiyyah.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Guide to Islam And Islamic Extremism
Jan 23, 2020
What is Islamic Extremism
Islamic extremism is a term that will cause many of us to
have nightmares, imagining some person in our dreams with a mask and a turban,
screaming Islamic phrases out as they jump with no fear into a crowd of people
and blow themselves up. But what is Islamic extremism?
I imagine what standards you are viewing this against would
change or alter your perception of what is extremist or not, so to keep things
simple, how about we stay within Western Based perceptions. These are rather
simple, an Islamic extremist is anyone that feels their religion gives them the
right to try to dictate to people in the West what our interactions not only
with them should be, but when forceful suggestions don’t work violence is
acceptable.
What is the difference between Islam and the other
Abrahamic faiths
Before I get too much into this, I need all to understand
the differences between the faiths. While Jews believe that their faith is held
sacred, the more orthodox may turn ornery if they feel you are infringing on
their right to practice their faith, but as a rule, they would never dream of
trying to force others to convert, they just want to be left alone. Judaism has
made conversion hard to prevent people from converting for frivolous reasons.
The violence one can read in the time of the early advent of Judaism, such as
the Exodus, the conquering of the land wiping out of the people, this is not
pertinent to Judaism today, the violent parts are rejected universally.
Christianity while more an outgoing faith in the way of
proselytizing, the true teachings of the faith teach that this must be done
with love, violence is rejected, forgiveness is to be handed out freely. Before
anyone says that Christianity was very violent in the past, you are correct,
but this was not due to the teachings, this was due to the politicization of
the faith.
Islam
But Islam is different, and please, don’t take this as
saying that all Muslims are violent, in fact, that majority of Muslims are
peace-loving people who as a rule have no problems living with people of other
faiths. But this is where the similarities end, Islam was founded on violence,
it teaches in its core teachings that violence is acceptable, in fact, will be
needed in the end to force all to submit to the faith; if you are truly
going to delve deep into the faith, there is little you can do to get away from
this.
But what is Islam? At its most basic component, you have to
look at what Islam means, it means submission. Submission to whom? It is
submission to Allah, and this was directed and taught by what they consider as
the highest prophet, Mohammad. Mohammad in his teachings that were recorded in
the Quran left little to choice (he never wrote the Quran, he was illiterate,
others recorded what they heard him say), he openly stated he was the final
word on all, what he stated did change over time. Early verses of Islam more
peaceful in nature, later in life Mohammad was far from peaceful, these
teachings take precedence over all others, thus the more peaceful verses when
it was better to live in peace due to a lack of power are superceded
later with verses telling them to be not peaceful, naturally a Muslim will not
ever offer up this information, instead will continue to quote the peaceful
verses even though they know they gave way to the later ones.
Unlike Judaism and Christianity, both which did have parts
that dictated how to treat others, with the Jewish law you have parts
that dictated how a Jew should live, it never gives mention to how a none Jew
should live their life. Judaism wanted their people to live separate, not make
demands on the rest of the world to satisfy their faith. Christianity as well
tells its people to give to G-d what is his, to man what is his, and live your
life within a way that is permitted within the system, that is unless the
system is in direct violation of your faith (you saw this with martyrs in Rome
in the advent of Christianity).
But Islam does not make this distinction, it tells its
rulers how to rule, what their outlook should be towards others. Any land
conquered under the name of Islam is held in holy trust (that has always been
the core of the problem with Israel, not over some imaginary right to heritage
as the “Palestinians” love to claim). To this day materials in Islamic nations
speak of the part of Spain by its Islamic name, Libya’s Gaddiffi made a
statement once about taking back over holy land in Spain, they were going to do
so not by war, rather by using the Europeans own political correctness against
them; sadly this is looking more and more probable as time goes on.
In Islam Sharia is the law of the land, all laws, even in
more secular nations like Egypt are still very much influenced by Sharia. A
good example is if you go to the most moderate of Islamic majority of states,
such an Egypt or Indonesia, it is illegal for one to convert an Islamic person
out of their faith, but it is 100% legal for any Islamic person to convert or
proselytize one from another faith to Islam. Even divorce in Indonesia is
controlled by the Islamic faith. In their 1974 Marriage Law they have laws
for each faith to marry and divorce, they set up the different customs to
handle divorce, but Muslims only have unwritten customary (adat)
law and Muslim religious law.
Another problem is honesty. Judaism and Christianity teach
you should be honest, not lie, but Islam teaches it is perfectly acceptable to
lie your head off, so long as it promotes Islam or is protecting you in some
way. And this is not just my understanding, Islam teaches this rather plainly.
Quran (16:106) – Establishes that there
are circumstances that can “compel” a Muslim to tell a lie.
Quran (3:28) – This verse tells Muslims
not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to “guard
themselves” against danger, meaning that there are times when a Muslim may
appear friendly to non-Muslims, even though they should not feel friendly.
Quran (9:3) – “…Allah and His Messenger
are free from liability to the idolaters…” The dissolution of oaths is with
pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong but
were evicted anyway. (The next verse refers only to those who have a
personal agreement with Muhammad as individuals – see Ibn Kathir vol 4, p 49)
Quran (66:2) – “Allah has already
ordained for you the dissolution of your oaths…”
Quran (40:28) – A
man is introduced as a believer, but one who had to “hide his faith” among
those who are not believers.
Quran (2:225) – “Allah will not call
you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your
hearts”
Quran (3:54) – “And they (the
disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best
of schemers.” The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara,
which literally means ‘deceit’. If Allah is supremely deceitful toward
unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to
do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)
This is a problem when dealing with Muslims, more so when
doing this with nation states. They are taught that they can lie if it aids
them, they can make treaties with none believers, these should only be used as
a means to build back up strength so you can attack again. I have told many, if
you hear one thing but see another, I would never go by what I hear, rather
what I see.
Treatment of none Islamic people in Muslim Majority
Nations
In many places they either don’t allow other faiths to live
in their land (Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, EAU), or if they do they have to live in a
subservient role to Islam, Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Iran, and the rest of the Arab
world. In the past, all people not Muslim had to always stay in a submissive
way, had to pay Jizyah {Jizhya} (الجزية)
this was a tax all unbelievers were supposed to pay for not being Muslim. This
was not so much intended as protection money, in the way of extortion, it was
meant to humiliate, to show that they were beneath the Muslim’s, as such they
were obligated to pay this, so they could live. Here is what the Quran says
about it:
Quran 9:29 [Blog Editor: My
Word Doc would not acquire the Arabic characters for the below translation. To
read the original you will go to the LINK then scroll to this point.]
Fight those who believe not
in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by
Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they
are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing
submission, and feel subdued.
Dr. Peter Hammond, a researcher that has spent his life
studying Islamic migration, the effect on the surrounding population, the
interaction of the Islamic migrants on the general population, made a rather
startling and troubling find concerning their demands on the nation and the
people. In his book Slavery, Terrorism and Islam he breaks
down Islam’s interactions with the society around them as they grow, rather
than give my own quotes, I will quote him:
When politically correct and culturally diverse
societies agree to ‘the reasonable’ Muslim demands for their ‘religious
rights,’ they also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it
works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).
As long as the Muslim population remains around
1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving
minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in
articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:
United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from
other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the
jails and among street gangs:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate
influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
They will push for the introduction of
halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation
jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature
it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. (United States
).
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling
government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic
Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to
establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they
will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their
conditions ( Paris –car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam
will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting,
jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
At 40% you will find widespread massacres,
chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of
non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of
Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:
Albania — Muslim 60%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and
genocide:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the
Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a
Muslim:
Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%
Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their
blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.
I think one of the best quotes I have seen concerning this
came from Leon Uris:
‘Before I was nine I had
learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother;
me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the
clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us
against the infidel. – Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’
Conclusion
So are all Muslims bad? Of course not, they are far from it,
the problem we have today is the press is so intent on covering for all
Muslims, they either ignore or disregard the bad ones in their midst. In other
cases they try to say incorrectly that groups like ISIS are not true Muslims, I
would beg to differ, they are actually doing nothing that Mohammad himself did
not do.
In other cases they give such low expectations, when places
like Saudi Arabia say that women now have more value than livestock, the left,
and feminist groups for their part, explode in their praise of them for
their enlightened outlook.
Sadly these are the same feminist and women rights activist
that seems to think what they stand for has no bearing with Islamic women or
for Western Women victimized by Muslim males. Rather than stick up for the
Western woman being attacked, sexually molested and raped by Muslim migrants,
they attack them, saying it is somehow their fault, maybe they should have
dressed better (we all know if it was a rape from a Western male, they would
never dream of making this claim, nor would they blame the woman for such a
heinous act).
You see this in the press, rather than say there is a
terrible problem with Islam, they blame it on the economy, lack of jobs,
western ideology being forced on these people. And while doing this they ignore
there are two forces at work within Islam in the present, one is looking to
bring it back to its more radical ways when it was at its height of power, they
dream of recreating a Caliphate again.
The press ignores this, makes excuses for them, or says look
at the peaceful Muslims, what about them? The bottom line is like with many
groups, the peaceful ones are irrelevant, they do nothing to change the
narrative of the radicals, thus giving them power by their silence, the ones
that do speak are quickly attacked or dispatched. In other cases people who
speak out are ostracized by the whole, they are seen as somehow being traitors
to Islam.
In the same way that you had peaceful loving Germans in WW2,
peaceful loving Chinese under Mao, and equally loving peaceful people under
Stalin, they did not drive the narrative, their silence gave power to the
minority, end the end they were irrelevant to what was driving the narrative in
those countries.
By not exposing this you give power to the radicals and make
the voices of the peace and change even more irrelevant. In the cold war, we
did not say look at how peaceful the majority of the Russians were, we took
groups that wanted to bring freedom to the Soviet system, recognized and gave
them both support and resources to do something, they soon became many and
changed the system from within. We need to do the same with Islam, stop
empowering tyrants and radical dictators, we need to start aiding the ones
trying to drag Islam into the 21 century.
You do have heroic people within the Islamic community,
Egypt’s ruler openly called for a dialog to bring Islam into the modern age, to
reject the violent bent seen in the Koran. Sadly most of the press was silent,
the Western powers, for the most part, ignored this, under Obama instead we
have catered to the more violent, then ignoring the radicals, calling them JV
or amateurish; while the US has changed this outlook under Trump, seems he is
more willing to push to call out the radicals, to be fair he is also willing to
embrace the ones that started most of this last wave of radicalness, the
Saudi’s.
But then even within a society as closed off and radical as
Saudi Arabia is, we see cracks in that growing within that society as they try
to move more towards getting away from their radical ideology. Today there are
calls for women to drive, openly having a dialog with Israel, actually allowing
Jews within their nation and having leaders go to Israel. The Saudi’s and other
more orthodox Islamic states seem to be changing, but then there are pulls from
nations like Iran that are pushing to bring more fundamentalism, just what they
see as the proper way.
Islam can pull itself from the past, but if it does not, we
need to be ready to call it out for this, not make excuses for them. We need to
see support, aid and giving open alliance to leaders that are pushing for a
more modern view of Islam, openly call out the ones that aren’t, and in nations
like Saudi Arabia and the other nations around them, we need to let them be on
notice, now more is the West going to turn a blind eye towards spreading of
radicalism, but we will be quick to notice and praise when they make moves to
stop it.
1.
Indonesia Department of
Information, Introduction to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of the
Year 1974 on Marriage 5 (Nov. 1975), supra note 1, at 5. See also INDONESIAN
LAW 1949-1989: A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF FOREIGN-LANGUAGE MATERIALS WITH BRIEF
COMMENTARIES ON LAW 167 (S. Pompe ed., 1992). https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Ministry_of_Communication_and_Informatics_(Indonesia).html
I know some will say that there is no support for this, if
you feel this way, please go to this article that looks at polling around the
world and in the Middle East, it is very enlightening.
0Censor.com
Site owned and operated by Benton Media Corp.
+++++++++++++++++++
BLOG EDITOR: I’ve apparently
been placed in restricted Facebook Jail! The restriction was relegated after
criticizing Democrats for supporting abortion in one post and criticizing
Virginia Dems for gun-grabbing legislation and levying protestor restrictions.
Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I
choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me completely.
Conservatives are a huge portion of Facebook. If more or all Conservatives are
banned, it will affect the Facebook advertising revenue paradigm. SO FIGHT
CENSORSHIP BY SHARE – SHARE – SHARE!!! Facebook notified me in
pop-up on 1/20/20: “You're temporarily restricted from joining and posting to
groups that you do not manage until April 18 at 7:04 PM.”
_________________________
Examine Islam
Don’t be Fooled by
Supremacism, Lies and False Peace
John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© January 25, 2020
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/62799055/GettyImages_1061325392.0.jpg){kind=link}
No comments:
Post a Comment