Clem DeWitt takes on the Leftists desiring to impeach President
Trump for the constitutional violation of not liking POTUS. WAIT! There
is NO such clause in the U.S. Constitution!
Constitutional Sections Regarding Impeachment
Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5
The House of Representatives shall
chuse [sic] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of
Impeachment.
Article 1, Section 3, Clauses 6
and 7
The Senate shall have the sole
Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on
Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried the Chief
Justice shall preside; And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence
of two thirds of the Members present.
Judgement in Cases of Impreachment
[sic] shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and
disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under
the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and
subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment, according to Law.
Article 2, Section 4
The President, Vice President and all
Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on
Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and
Misdemeanors.
… There Is MORE
Pertaining to the Judiciary (Impeachment Clauses; University of
Chicago – The Founders Constitution; ©
1987)
Impeachment Clause Commentary:
DeWitt includes the Leftist mania of smearing Conservatives’
character to brainwash voters to hate.
Enjoy the read.
JRH 3/16/18
********************
Is Dislike of POTUS an Impeachable Offense?
Discovered at PATRIOTS
UNITED TO SAVE AMERICA (Facebook Secret Group)
Most Democrats and their reliable, compliant, obedient Brown
Shirts that make up the bulk of the US press, are engaged in a relentless,
bloodless coup against President Donald Trump, Constitutionally elected by We
The People.
Before taking his Oath of Office, there were cries to Impeach Trump. Of course the Constitution's 'Impeachment clause' only covers Officers of the Constitution, not those in waiting. On the Floor of the People's House, Rep. Green, D-TX, has led a circus that offers Impeachment articles against Trump, articles that are not just outside the clause, they are particulars based on a dislike of Trump and nothing less, or more. The Framers, intellectually light years ahead of Trump's detractors, did not include personal dislikes for removal from Office and this Republic is better for that wisdom. If Democrats should prevail by some bastardization of the clause, the Constitution would forever be subject to on-the-spot amendment, rendering it a catch all for someone's pique, their angst, their politics.
Before the 2016 Election, daily we were treated to an accuser and another that followed the next day and the day after the next with complaints that Trump had engaged in sexual predation of a most unsavory nature. Led by Gloria Allred, a self-disgracing lawyer who listens for ambulance sirens, great theater was made public with Allred and an accuser complete with tears and tissues. After Trump was elected, the tears and tissues evaporated as quickly as did the accusers. (Lisa Bloom, Allred's daughter, would highlight the sequel with her client offering a complaint against Judge Roy Moore, Republican Candidate from Alabama for the US Senate. Tears and tissues were followed by evaporation. Allred and Bloom make up the DNC's Criminal Investigation Division when it comes to Snidely Whiplash Republicans)
Enter Stormy Daniels, latest darling of the Impeach Trump crowd. It should be noted that whatever might have taken place between Trump and Daniels took place before Trump became President. But, as steady as any drum beat, the Daniel's story on most left leaning news organizations is front and center. In print, it is above the fold, in the visual world, it leads off so-called newscasts. To some minds vacant of understanding-knowing the Impeachment clause, Daniels is the Impeachable offense that can take Trump down.
"Asked on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" whether Daniels had ever been threatened with physical harm, Michael Avenatti (Daniel's lawyer) succinctly replied, "Yes." (THE HILL). Of course Avenatti would not entertain follow up questions, instead saying "people will have to tune in to '60 Minutes' on March 25," when CBS is scheduled to air an interview with Daniels." (Yep, CBS, the network that gave us Rather and Mapes, co-conspirators to bring down President George W. Bush) Will Avenatti reveal the nature of a physical threat made against Daniels and by whom? Or is this a page from the Allred-Bloom playbook of salaciousness fabricated by shadowy, evaporating accusers?
Stay tuned as this Kabuki Theater of The Absurd continues day after day after day and all because most Democrats and most in the US press dislike Trump to the point of seeking to upend the Constitution if necessary to take down Trump.
____________________
Title determined by the Editor
from the text.
Edited by John R. Houk
© Clem DeWitt
No comments:
Post a Comment