John R. Houk
© July 15, 2016
France had another Islamic terrorist attack last night in
Nice in which at least 84 people died. The death count might still rise because
I understand many people are still listed in critical condition.
In saying this I found a couple of email notifications that
have either a video editorial or information relating to the Nice attack. The
first I think you may have some interest in is from Daniel Pipes. The Pipes
video is about if Europe does not change its Multiculturalist ways the
continent will be so Islamized that the phrase “Eurabia” will be closer to reality than a scar
tactic theory coined by Counterjihad writers. Pipes goes on to predict that
European voters will eventually reject the Multiculturalist paradigm of the EU
elites and begin voting for nationalistic and/or anti-immigration political
parties. He cites the recent close election in Austria. I could cite the recent
Brexit decision by UK voters. Daniel Pipes does have a warning about the
political swing of European voters and I’ll let listen to the video hear that
warning.
The second email notification is from The Counter Jihad Report looking at the Nice attack through the
lens of Former Special Forces Master
Sergeant Jim Hanson who is the Executive Vice President for the Center for Security Policy (CSP). Hanson believes there
should be less attention to beefing preventative security and more efforts in
destroying the Caliphate ideology of various Islamic terrorist organizations
such as ISIS, al Qaeda, Boko Haram and the like.
For me the most interesting parts of the post are two
videos. The first video is a little over an hour of the Fox & Friends early show which includes the thoughts of Jim
Hanson. The video shows how horrendous the Nice attack was. The second video is
a three-minute or so video that explains the ideology of Islamic terrorists.
JRH 7/15/16
*******************
VIDEO: Jihad Awakens Europe
Posted by Gatestone
Institute
Published on Jul 15,
2016
At least 84 people were murdered yesterday in France's third
major Islamist terrorist attack in less than a year. Daniel Pipes talks about
Europe's crossroads: Will Europeans succumb to Islamization, or will they rise
to fight radical Islam and hold onto Western values? How it looks so far...
++++
Nice Attack: Cut Down the Black Flag, Target Sharia
July 15, 2016
Former Special Forces Master Sergeant Jim Hanson, currently
the Executive Vice President for the Center for Security Policy, has an answer
to the problem of constant terror attacks. First, though, he dismisses
the strategy of attempting to prevent attacks by adding additional levels of
security. “Even in a police state, you couldn’t secure every gathering,”
Hanson said, noting that this was just a simple delivery truck like any other.
Published on Jul 15, 2016
Subscribe to my channel for daily
updates...Subscribe and Share -----------------------Thank
You----------------------
#Fox News Show Playlist: https://goo.gl/pLnE16
#Fox News Show Playlist: https://goo.gl/pLnE16
“You have to look at the people who are conducting these
terror attacks,” he told “FOX & Friends.” A focus on methodology
won’t work, as the truck attack plainly shows: “It’s not guns, it’s not
bombs, it’s not trucks,” but rather “the ideology of sharia and jihad that
motivates them to kill.”
Hanson is the author of Cut Down the Black Flag: A
Strategy To Defeat the Islamic State. Unsurprisingly, he
believes that destroying the caliphate is an important part of the solution.
However, he argues that the caliphate is only a symptom — albeit a major
one — of the real problem. “You start in the Islamic State. You start
with their caliphate, and you cut down their black flag there. But… that’s not going to solve
the problem, that treats a symptom. The ideology of sharia, which calls
for a holy war of jihad, is something we need to deal with.”
Citing a poll that sharia law enjoys large-scale support
among Muslims worldwide, Hanson crossed into disputed territory.
CounterJihad has reported on this controversy before.
The central issue to empirical science is the ability of
others repeating the experiment to replicate your findings. If you
replicate the same findings using the same methods, that’s telling. If
you replicate the same findings with both the same and different
methods, that’s even more suggestive that you’re on to something. Every
poll of Muslim populations, regardless of its methodology, shows strong support
for sharia.
Last summer, the Center for Security Policy commissioned a
poll that found 51% support for sharia among American Muslims.
There were critics who pointed out that this poll was an online poll, and
one that only surveyed those who opted in. However, the Pew polling
service found that half
of American Muslims are recent immigrants, chiefly from countries
in which their global survey of support for sharia tops 80%.
Three of the leading countries for Islamic immigration to the United
States are Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. The figures for those
countries are 91%, 84%, and 99% respectively.
When you find the same thing no
matter how you study the question, you’re probably finding something that’s
really there.
Hanson’s solution
of targeting sharia also enjoys strong support from the American people.
A recent poll conducted by a firm out of Atlanta found that more than
seven in ten American voters think Muslim immigrants should be screened
for the ideological belief in enforcing sharia law. More than 80% of
those who agreed say all immigrants ID’d as Sharia adherents should be barred
from entering the United States.
The popularity of
the solution does not mean that it will be enacted, at least not for the next
few months. A recent survey of US President Barack
Obama’s calendar shows that he never met with former National
Director of Intelligence LTG(R) Michael Flynn. He and his
administration’s top officials did meet with the Council on
American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which has been proven in Federal court to be
linked to the Foreign Terrorist Organization Hamas. In fact, CAIR has had
hundreds of White House meetings.
Both of President
Obama’s likely replacements have described the France attacks as acts of war,
and both seem clearer-eyed than President Obama about the nature of the threat.
However, asked which one was more likely to take the threat seriously,
Hanson gave the nod to Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton would be too
hamstrung by political correctness, he argued. Only Trump was likely to
move strongly against Islamic terror.
***
Posted by CounterJihad
Video
Published on Jun 29, 2016
This video is a primer on Sharia law, violent jihad and what
the Muslim Brotherhood calls "Civilization Jihad"
__________________
Nice Islamic Terrorist Attack Thoughts
John R. Houk
© July 15, 2016
_______________
Jihad Awakens Europe
About Gatestone Institute
"Let
us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare
to read, think, speak, and write." — John Adams
Gatestone Institute, a non-partisan, not-for-profit
international policy council and think tank is dedicated to educating the
public about what the mainstream media fails to report in promoting: … READ THE REST
_______________
Nice Attack: Cut Down the Black Flag, Target Sharia
No comments:
Post a Comment