Saturday, February 28, 2015


West-Islam civ clash

As a blogger I am huge fan and very appreciative of the Norwegian essayist that still posts under the pseudonym Fjordman. In saying that I was very gratified to come across a tribute to Fjordman’s posts of his first essays on a tenth anniversary of the first post at his long unused blog (perhaps not online anymore – I haven’t checked). The tribute was posted on February 20, 2015 on the blog Tundra Tabloids.

Update: As I was Googling Fjordman for this post I ran into a Gates of Vienna post written by Fjordman himself talking about this 10th anniversary of his first blog post. I will include that post after the Tundra Tabloids cross post.

JRH 2/28/15
20/02/2015 13:30

In honor of Fjordman’s ten year anniversary, I republish the first ever blogpost under the name of Fjordman. Sadly, his first ever post could have been penned today with just a few subtle changes. It’s largely through Fjordman’s excellent essays that many of us came to know places such as Malmö, Sweden, or about Muslim rape statistics and government indifference to them and to daily plight of the citizens of the countries that they are sworn to protect.

We owe much to this man who has asked from us so little, who no longer is able to call his home country ‘home’ because of the demonization of his character by the Norwegian political power structure, its media, academy and politicians. Fjordman has had to pay a high political price for his justified views, which is all the more galling, seeing that the politicial (sic) iron triangle just mentioned, still insists that anti-Western Islam is not the problem, only those (like Fjordman) who dare point out how wrong that assumption is.

Fjordman Report banner

Sunday, February 20, 2005
Muslim Rape Epidemic in Sweden and Norway – Authorities Look the Other Way

Numbers released in January 2005 indicate a sharp rise in the number of rape charges in Malmö, Sweden’s third largest city:

Thomas Anderberg, responsible for statistics at the Malmö Police, says there was a doubling of the number of reported rapes by ambush in 2004, following what was already a decade of steadily increasing numbers of sexual crimes. – I think that’s great news, says Anna Gustafsson, head of the Domestic Violence Unit at the Malmö Police. She suggests that the increase is due to the fact that women who otherwise wouldn’t press charges for rape now choose to contact the police.

In other words, Gustafsson claims that we are dealing with a “technical” increase, not a real one. However, national statistics reveal that reported rapes against children have almost doubled in Sweden during the past ten years:

According to Swedish Radio on Tuesday, statistics from Sweden’s National Council for Crime Prevention show that the number of reported rapes against children is on the rise. The figures have nearly doubled in the last ten years: 467 rapes against children under the age of 15 were reported in 2004 compared with 258 in 1995. Legal proceedings continue this week in a case involving a 13 year old girl from Motala who was said to have been subjected to a group rape by four men. (Note: These four men were Kurdish Muslims, who raped the girl for hours and even took photos of doing so)

The number of rape charges per capita in Malmö is 5 – 6 times that of Copenhagen, Denmark. Copenhagen is a larger city, but the percentage of immigrants is much lower. And it’s not just the rape statistics that reveal a scary increase in Malmö or Sweden. Virtually every kind of violent crime is on the rise. Robberies have increased with 50 % in Malmö only during the fall of 2004. Threats against witnesses in Swedish court cases have quadrupled between 2000 and 2003. During the past few decades, massive immigration has changed the face of Sweden’s major cities, as well as challenged the viability of the welfare state. In 1970 Sweden had the fourth highest GDP per capita among developed countries with income about 6% above the OECD average. By 1997 it was at fifteenth place with an average GDP per capita 14% below average. Malmö has a heavy concentration of Muslim immigrants in particular. According to some estimates, it will be a Muslim majority city in no more than 10 years. Crime is rampant in the growing ghettos:

Becirov runs the Islamic Center of Malmö, on the outskirts of Sweden’s third-largest city. Some immigrant neighborhoods in the city have (official) unemployment rates exceeding 50 percent. Swedish authorities have failed to lift up the area, and seem to be giving the Islamic Center of Malmö a great deal of leeway in attempting to do so. An article that appeared in 2003 noted that “a few” of the 6-to 10-year-old girls were wearing headscarves. On a visit in January 2005, fully 80 percent were covered in class–only a handful were not. In a fit of absent-mindedness, Sweden has suddenly become as heavily populated by minorities as any country in Europe. The percentage of foreign-born is roughly equivalent to the highest percentage of immigrants the United States ever had in its history (on the eve of World War I). Rosengård appears to be all-immigrant. The public schools have virtually no ethnically Swedish children. There are stories–familiar in other parts of Europe where immigrants from the Muslim world have recently settled–of students harassing Jewish teachers and defacing textbooks that treat Jewish themes. Crime is high.

Is it unfair and “racist” to suggest a link between the influx of Muslim immigrants and the growing number of rapes? Not if we compare with the situation in neighboring Denmark, where this trend has been evident for years:

If one leading expert is to be believed, the sharp rise in the number of rapes in this over the last 5 years is largely attributable to a group of unemployed and alienated immigrants. ‘Over the last 5-10 years there has an increasing tendency to marginalise and alienate immigrants,’ says Professor Flemming Balvig, a criminologist at Copenhagen University. ‘As a result, many second generation immigrants have reacted against this through various types of criminal activity, including rape.’

Alarmed at last week’s police statistics, which revealed that in 68% of all rapes committed this year the perpetrator was from an ethnic minority, leading Muslim organisations have now formed an alliance to fight the ever-growing problem of young second and third-generation immigrants involved in rape cases against young Danish girls.

As Robert Spencer has demonstrated, rape can indeed be linked to Islamic teachings of Jihad, and even to the example of Muhammad himself, his Sunna. Above all, it is connected to Islamic notions of the role of women in society, and their behaviour in the public sphere. An Islamic Mufti in Copenhagen sparked a political outcry after publicly declaring that women who refuse to wear headscarves are “asking for rape.” Apparently, he isn’t the only Muslim in Europe to think this way:

The German journalist Udo Ulfkotte told in a recent interview that in Holland, you can now see examples of young, unveiled Moroccan women with a so-called “smiley”. It means that the girl gets one side of her face cut up from mouth to ear, serving as a warning to other Muslim girls who should refuse to wear the veil. In the Muslim suburb of Courneuve, France, 77 per cent of the veiled women carry veils reportedly because of fear of being harassed or molested by Islamic moral patrols.

Hijab, the Islamic veil, is thus not “just a piece of cloth”. It serves as a demarcation line between proper, submissive Muslim women and whores, un-Islamic women who deserve no respect and are asking for rape. The veil should more properly be viewed as the uniform of a Totalitarian movement, and a signal to attack those outside the movement. Judged in the light of the Mufti who said that women who don’t wear it are asking for rape, how on earth can the veil be said to be about “choice”? The freedom to choose not to be raped if you dress in a normal fashion in your own country? Is that what freedom is about in Europe in 2005?

Even though Sweden, unlike Denmark, has almost no public debate about immigration, frustration is very much present underneath the surface. 75 % of Swedes think that many people in their country “dislike” Muslims, more than in any other European nation surveyed. Even in Holland, which recently witnessed violent clashes with Muslims after the murder of Islam-critic Theo van Gogh, the rate is lower than in Sweden. But you’re not supposed to talk about such issues in Sweden. That would be “racist”:

Swedish laws prohibiting “hate speech” against racial minorities have been vigorously enforced. There have, for example, been a number of gang-rapes of Swedish women by Muslim immigrants. But Swedes must be careful what they say about them. On May 25, neo-Nazi Bjorn Bjorkqvist was convicted and sentenced to two months in prison for writing, “I don’t think I am alone in feeling sick when reading about how Swedish girls are raped by immigrant hordes.” [“Jag tror inte jag är ensam om att må dåligt när jag läser om hur svenska tjejer har våldtagits av invandrarhorder”]

All in all, we must say that there is strong circumstantial evidence indicating that the rise in rape charges in the city of Malmö could very well be real, which puts the Malmö Police assertion that this is “great news” in a rather curious light. And the problem is not just limited to Sweden. It exists in Norway, too:

Rape charges in the capital are spiraling upwards, 40 percent higher from 1999 to 2000 and up 13 percent so far this year. Police Inspector Gunnar Larsen of Oslo’s Vice, Robbery and Violent crime division says the statistics are surprising – the rising number of rape cases and the link to ethnic background are both clear trends. But Larsen does not want to speculate on the reasons behind the worrying developments. While 65 percent of those charged with rape are classed as coming from a non-western background, this segment makes up only 14.3 percent of Oslo’s population. Norwegian women were the victims in 80 percent of the cases, with 20 percent being women of foreign background.

An incredibly revealing article that tells us all we need to know about the multiculturalist fetish in Europe and some parts of North America, not to mention the need for change within Islam. Apparently, the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet reported that 65 percent of rapes of Norwegian women were performed by “non-Western” immigrants – a category that, in Norway, consists mostly of Muslims. The article quoted a professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo (note: her name is Unni Wikan) as saying that “Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes” because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. The professor’s conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West needed to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: “Norwegian women must realize that we live in a multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.”

In January 2005, Norwegian media reported that 2004 saw the highest number or rape charges ever recorded in the capital city of Oslo. Strangely enough, there was now no mentioning of how immigrants were grossly overrepresented in rape cases. Why not? Unless there has been a sudden and unexplained drop in the number of immigrants raping Norwegian women between 2001 and 2004, which is unlikely, the statistics should be at least as staggering in 2005 as they were before. If they are not revealed, it can only mean that “somebody” didn’t like the numbers presented in 2001, and decided to bury them. That “somebody” must be a person at the very top level in the police, maybe even in the government. If so, that is disquieting. What is even more disquieting is that the media are equally silent about this. How come no journalists are digging into the material? And where are all the professional Feminists, in a Scandinavian nation brimming with them?

The conclusion one may draw from this is that the authorities in Sweden and Norway know about, or should know about, a disturbing amount of Muslim immigrant rapes of native Scandinavian women, yet choose not to make this information known to the public. Perhaps it would be just too politically incorrect to reveal the negative effects of decades of naïve immigration policies. Perhaps it would also destroy too many multicultural pipe dreams among the intellectual elites, who have built their current careers and reputations on advocating how culturally and economically enriching this new population mix would be. So in the end, the safety of young Scandinavian women is sacrificed in order to keep the glossy image of a multicultural society intact. It is a chilling demonstration of an Eurabian continent that now appears to care more about not upsetting relations with its immigrant population than about protecting its own citizens.
Edited by John R. Houk relying largely on spellcheck. Many British influenced words were left untouched and some words left alone out of uncertainty.
Ten Years On

By Fjordman
February 20 2015

If you appreciate this essay by Fjordman, please consider making a donation to him, using the button at the bottom of this post.

Today, February 20 2015, is exactly ten years since the first time I published an essay under the pen name Fjordman. Time flies. I had been active on the Internet for several years before that date, but I did not have my own website. I did not imagine that I would still be writing so many years later. Yet here I am.

The first essay I published as Fjordman was about the very high number of rapes in Sweden, and how this may be tied to mass immigration. I no longer write about this subject as much as before, but the number of rapes in Sweden is at least as high ten years later.

I was among the first to discuss in English the problems caused by Muslim immigration in Malmö, Sweden’s third largest city. I was often accused of exaggerating or making things up. Meanwhile, Malmö has evolved from stabbings to car bombings. Unfortunately, many of the problems I deal with in my essays have worsened, all over the Western world.

My first blog post got quite a few comments and thousands of readers. That is because it was linked to by Little Green Footballs (LGF). It is hard to believe now, but when I launched my Fjordman blog in February 2005, I got a lot of help from LGF. Back then, Charles Johnson’s LGF was still a large and relevant website. It helped point readers to myself, Gates of Vienna and many other writers such as Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.

I recently visited LGF, which I had not done for a very long time. Charles Johnson still posts. On Google, he is now called a “political blogger, center-left provocateur.”

Those who have followed my writings since the beginning will recall that the period of the LGF Wars was one of the nastiest events I experienced as Fjordman (until Mr. Breivik showed up). That was when Charles Johnson decided to suddenly switch sides and attack all of his former allies in the nastiest and most dishonest manner possible.

In hindsight, we clearly won this conflict. Today, Mr. Johnson is completely irrelevant, whereas I, Gates of Vienna — and for that matter Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch — are still publishing and actually being read.

The moral? Have patience, and continue stating what you believe to be true based on factual evidence. This will not always be pleasant in the short run, but it will eventually pay off.

Looking back, my view is that the most positive development that has taken place over the last decade is that awareness about the Islamic threat among the general public is now much greater than it was some years ago.

Unfortunately, this knowledge still has not led to any significant change in policy among Western ruling elites. They continue to promote mass immigration and open borders, no matter how many terror attacks occur or how much insecurity our societies suffer from. U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama is arguably an even worse appeaser of Islamic aggression today than he used to be seven years ago. Alternatively, perhaps he is just showing his true colors, since he does not have to worry about being reelected anymore.

Furthermore, the darkness represented by Islamic sharia and Jihadist barbarism is spreading and deepening. That is a sad fact. One only has to look at the videos of mass beheadings produced by the self-proclaimed Islamic State (ISIS) in the Middle East to realize this. These videos are now watched with great enthusiasm by militant Muslims in cities across the Western world.

I did not know the film director Theo van Gogh when he was murdered by a militant Muslim in the streets of Amsterdam in 2004. More recently, however, Muslim terrorists have been targeting people whom I know and have met multiple times, also in Scandinavia. Since 2005, I have joined the rapidly growing number of people in Western Europe who can no longer have a publicly listed address or telephone number. The threat seems to be getting closer every year. It is no longer abstract.

I have experienced many ups and downs over the past decade. Needless to say, being dragged into the events caused by the deranged mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik in 2011 easily constitutes the low point of my adult life so far. I was forced to evacuate my home and go into forced exile from Norway due to the extremely negative and largely baseless media exposure I received because of this case and Breivik’s so-called manifesto. The weeks after the deadly July 22 attacks is the only time that I have ever seriously considered giving up writing. After a while, I decided to continue. Yes, I lost the protection of a pen name. However, many people write under their real names, even if they face harassment for it. I see no reason to do less than they do.

The most positive thing that has happened to me in the past decade has to be all of the wonderful people I have met. This may sound like a terrible cliché, but I really have been blessed to meet many courageous, funny, smart and wonderful individuals while doing this work. They are one of my main sources of inspirations to keep on going. I am eternally grateful for their company.

Donate to Fjordman

For a complete archive of Fjordman’s writings, see the multi-index listing in the Fjordman Files.

Friday, February 27, 2015

Bin Laden is Dead, Buried at Sea or Blown to Bits

Bin Laden in Hell 4 - 72 pig demon sluts

All other speculation is Conspiracy Theory
John R. Houk
© February 27, 2015

Below is an exchange between myself (John Houk) and Robert Cold. I suspect there are many things that I and Robert agree upon; however in my humble opinion Robert relies too much on Conspiracy Theory as authenticated Conspiracy Fact. After setting the stage with the exchange between us I will proceed to demonstrate why I believe Robert’s assertion are unproven Conspiracy Theories with little concrete evidence in fact. Everything else is pure speculation.

John Houk Manuel Bush had many things I disagreed with, being a terrorist is not one of them. Robert, although it is a bit suspicious that Osama was dumped into the ocean, but I have heard enough SEALS to believe the freaking terrorist who will be credited for starting WWIII in the future that I am convinced it was NOT a body-double - That's just moronic conspiracy theory.

Robert Cold Hey John Houk don't still believe that the navy dumped Osama into sea do you? It came out long ago that, even that was a lie. Where have you been? Even crewmen on board the ship have blown the whistle on that one. You really need to do investigative journalism if you are going to be in journalism. There are enough re-writers already. Too many in fact.
Yesterday at 3:09am · (2/26/15)

Robert here are the facts about bin Laden’s burial at sea:

Every source that claims he was not buried at sea have no proof except for the Obama Administration’s refusal to show photos or video. No proof means it’s speculation rather than an exposé!

On the other hand there are credible reasons for not showing photos and videos. All the reasons have to do with the politics of appeasement and Obama’s policies of stroking the Muslim mind so to avoid offenses – like that is working.

The only Conspiracy Theory that came close to a smoking gun was the notorious WikiLeaks hacking … err … I mean intercepted some emails from STRAFOR vice-president Fred Burton communicating this:

‘… believes the body was “bound for Dover, [Delaware] on [a] CIA plane” and then “onward to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Bethesda [Maryland],”an email says.’ (Leaked: Bin Laden not buried at sea, body moved on CIA plane to US; [meaning Russia Today as in Putin propaganda machine]; 3/6/12 09:29 – updated 3/6/12 14:28) further reports that the WikiLeaks stolen email quotes Burton as saying:

"If body dumped at sea, which I doubt, the touch is very Adolph Eichman like. The Tribe did the same thing with the Nazi's ashes," Burton commented in another email. Eichman was one of the masterminds of the Holocaust by Nazi Germany. He was captured by Mossad agents in Argentina and, tried in Israel, found guilty and executed in 1962. His body was cremated and his ashes were scattered at sea over the Mediterranean.

"Eichmann was seen alive for many months on trial before being sentenced to death and executed. No one wanted a monument to him so they cremated him. But i dont know anyone who claimed he wasnt eicjhman [sic]. No comparison with suddenly burying him at sea without any chance to view him which i doubt happened [sic],"Stratfor CEO George Friedman replied.

"The US Govt needs to make body pics available like the MX's do, with OBL's pants pulled down, to shout down the lunatics like Alex Jones and Glenn Beck," Burton says in another message.

In another missive Burton says Osama’s body “is a crime scene and I don’t see the FBI nor DOJ letting that happen.”

WikiLeaks began publishing Stratfor emails in late February. The archive was obtained by the hacker group Anonymous, which successfully attacked one of the firm’s servers. More than 5 million emails were apparently stolen. [ uses italic to indicate the email from Burton and STRATFOR CEO George Friedman.] (Ibid.)

Let’s talk about facts Robert. The story came out in 2011. STRATFOR debunks Putin propaganda with this info:

In February 2013, Fox News (1) reported that the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have obtained emails that were part of 2.7 million emails they downloaded from Stratfor Global Intelligence (a geopolitical intelligence firm providing strategic analysis and forecasting). (2)

The emails were then posted on WikiLeaks, but Stratfor claimed the hackers may have forged and altered many of the emails.

The official company response was that Anonymous were thieves and the company would not be victimized a second time by defending or explaining to the public about their stolen property of confidential emails.

The report also mentioned that members of the offshoot hacking group LulzSec were arrested by the FBI around the same time that the emails were leaked.

When the AFIP was closed in September 2011, it was moved to the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) in Washington, DC. According to the US National Library of Medicine, the AFIP was located at 6900 Georgia Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20306 as part of the Walter Reed complex. (7)

By the time Osama Bin Laden was killed, the AFIP was in the process of shutting down the Georgia Avenue location and moving across campus to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. It’s very unlikely if the body was being transported back to the US instead of being buried at sea that it would have been taken to the AFIP.

It’s pointed out on various online forums that Burton’s later emails state that he was mistaken and that Bin Laden had been buried at sea. It’s evident that these emails were simply one person’s speculations about what might have happened or what was going to happen. Yet, they became a centerpiece of a conspiracy theory about the disposal of the terrorist’s body.

The facts were distorted by the speculation of someone perceived as an authority and were taken as inside knowledge. This untruth was repeated over and over as a truth and soon became a commonly held belief. (Why Some Believe Bin Laden Was Not Dumped At Sea; By SallyPainter; Top Secret Writers; 12/9/14 10:00)

Now here is the political reason bin Laden was buried at sea rather than made public. When the SEALS gunned the old Islamic terrorist down, they were not finished taking out vengeance on the murdering creep’s corpse. Several SEALs took turns emptying their magazine into the already dead body. Essentially this made bin Laden unrecognizable. If photos were released I suspect most Americans would say, “I want a turn.” BUT Obama is a Leftist concerned about reelection in 2012 and concerned about the poor feelings of global Muslims that a dead Muslim got what he deserved. Here’s some Breitbart excerpts from 2014 (again way after Conspiracy Theories emerged):

Special operators involved in the mission to take out Osama bin Laden say the reason photos of his body weren’t released is because they would have shown a body riddled with bullet holes.

Carried in a report published by the Daily Mail, “the report from a website well known within the intelligence and armed services community claims that the sheer number of times Osama bin Laden was shot is the reason why the government never released photos.”

The “Special Operations Forces Situation Report” describes how “operator after operator took turns dumping magazines-worth of ammunition into bin Laden’s body.”

The report has raised questions about whether excessive force was shown to the man so singularly identified with the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and Shanksville, PA.

SEAL Team Six member Mark Bissonnette wrote about taking down bin Laden in No Easy Day. In the book, he described firing extra rounds into bin Laden’s body because the terror leader was “still twitching and convulsing” after the first shots. (REPORT: OSAMA BIN LADEN 'SHOT MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED TIMES'; By AWR HAWKINS; – National Security; 3/14/14)

Even a Chechen newswire extremely friendly to Islam believes bin Laden was killed by SEALs but has a different reason for bin Laden’s kill photos not ever being shown. This sentiment is the current closest thing that gives a reason bin Laden wasn’t dumped in the sea (entire article):

When Obama announced the assassination by his thugs of Sheikh Osama bin Laden (may Allah have mercy on him), and then different versions of what happened began to appear in western media, people familiar with methods of democratic propaganda and disinformation immediately expressed their doubts about the trustworthiness of all these stories.

Too obvious was an American desire to present Sheikh Osama bin Laden in a negative light, to insult and humiliate his memory and say things just the opposite of what his character and background had been.

The American refusal to provide at least photos or video of the body of bin Laden and a dubious story of a burial in the sea, according to the canons of Islam, further strengthened the suspicion that the Americans were simply lying.

What did not help, either, were obviously staged scandals and leaks of "classified information" about a storm of the house of Osama bin Laden and his assassination, which were periodically distributed in the form of interviews, books and TV shows.

The last leak of disinformation were recent statements of an alleged former bodyguard of the Emir of al-Qaida, A certain Abdul Fattah said that bin Laden supposedly blew himself up with a martyr bomber's belt with which he never parted. That is why the Americans did not show his body, he claims.

However, the story is false and intended to hide the truth about bin Laden's martyrdom.

So what did really happen in the Pakistani city of Abbottabad in the night of May 2, 2011?

The question is answered by the wife of Sheikh Osama bin Laden, a native of Yemen, Amal al-Sada, who was with her ​​husband at the time of the storming of the house where he accepted martyrdom. (After the publication of this news, it was deleted by the administration of TwiMail, but the text is also posted on YouTube and has not been removed so far).

Amal al-Sada told the real story of the Sheikh's martyrdom, and revealed the secret of the disappearance of his body.

Here is her story:

- "When the attack started and soldiers began to descend from helicopters, the brothers, who were in the house at the time, entered into battle with them. The clash was heavy and intense.

American soldiers and the Pakistani army soldiers were those who attacked our house. They acted together.

There were so many of them. They quickly spread all over the yard and the house. A fierce battle followed.

At the time of the assault, Osama was in his room. He immediately took a gun and ran to the window. In the first few minutes of the shooting, a bullet hit him in his face, and he immediately accepted martyrdom, Insha'Allah.

And it was the grace of Allah for the Sheikh.

The Americans, after a while, entered the room and found Sheikh Osama martyred.

They took the body, carried him out of the house and loaded into a helicopter which belonged to American marines.

When the helicopter took off, while it was in the air, there was a very loud explosion. Probably the helicopter was shot down. It caught fire and exploded in the air. Parts of the helicopter fell to the ground. Everyone in the helicopter was killed, and their bodies were torn to pieces. The same happened to the Sheikh's body.

The Americans wanted to show the martyred Sheikh Osama around the world to demonstrate their victory, but Allah destroyed their plans.

Allah took away from them even the body of Osama bin Laden. They were left with nothing, so the Americans had to come up with a story about his burial in the sea. Allah protected Sheikh in life and protected him from his enemies after his death.

May Allah grant him martyrdom and Gardens of Firdaus in higher degrees of Paradise!"


In addition to this story, recall that some time after the events in Abbottabad, in August of 2011, the Americans leaked, through Fox TV, that in Afghanistan, the Mujahideen of the Islamic Emirate had shot down a helicopter which belonged to "Team 6" of the American navy who participated in the storm of the house of Emir of al-Qaeda. 22 "SEALS" thugs were killed. Obama expressed his condolences to the families and friends of the marines.

It is possible that this leak was an attempt to cover the losses of Americans killed in the helicopter with the body of Osama bin Laden and the marines in Abbottabad on the night of May 2, 2011. (Americans lied. Sheik Osama bin Laden's wife tells truth about his martyrdom; By Department of Monitoring; 6/15/13 01:09)

Frankly I don’t place a lot of stock in Muslim propaganda than I do with Putin propaganda; however one thing is for sure, bin Laden was killed May 2, 2011, shortly after 1:00 am PKT by SEAL Team 6. The only dispute here is was he buried at sea or get blown up in a crashing helicopter.

Mr. Robert Cold, these are the facts.

JRH 2/27/15
Spellcheck editing ran by the Editor. In some cases the “ignore” button was pressed.

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Muslim Comment Returns me to Benghazi

John R. Houk
© February 26, 2015

Every once in a while I get comments from posts many years in the past that are usually spam marketing promotions. I usually delete the spam comments when my notifications alert me they have arrived. However on 2/15/15 I received a comment from a person identifying himself as tarek smith (probably a pseudonym) to the March 10, 2011 post entitled “What Might Happen to Libya’s Weapons Cache?” on my NCCR blog.

In looking back at the 2011 post I realized that the thoughts were a precursor to the eventual Benghazi slaughter of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, State Information Officer Sean Smith, and Navy Seals Glen Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods.

As the title suggests the relatively short post based on a STRATFOR analysis involved wondering what happened to Muammar Gaddafi’s weapons cache after the various Libyan rebel militias managed enough unity to defeat and execute old the Muslim dictator/supporter of anti-Israel/anti-American terrorism. Keep in mind this is before the Benghazigate suspicions that Obama was illegally sending that weapons cache to Syrian rebels fighting Bashar Assad. If that is indeed what happened to the weapons cache it is likely that much of those weapons fell into the hands of al Qaeda supported Jabhat al-Nusra (JN – 12/2014 PDF) or ISIS terrorists as well (See Also HERE).

Tareq’s comment is translated by Google Translate from Arabic text. Go to the NCCR comment with the date-link below to view that Arabic text. Google Translate’s translation is in rather broken English. If one has a better translation feel free to post it in the comment section. Some of the words Google couldn’t figure out are in transliterated English text.

 The reason the comment piqued my interest, after I took the time to try to decipher it, is that Tarek seems to be calling on all good Muslim bros to unite against the Radical Islamists inserting politics as much as the Islamic religion. Or if my guess is incorrect Tarek may be calling the government the West seems to be supporting a treasonous entity and to support the Islamists.

From the links I looked at below, it seems the West is supporting the government located in Tobruk while the more radical Islamic militias are supporting a government established in Tripoli.

If you have read my past posts you probably realize I am what Leftists and Muslim apologists would label an Islamophobe. The reason for that is I am just down right against anything Islamic. Islam is Islam rather it is radical or the so-called moderate. Both so-called camps view the Quran as absolute truth and place a lot of stock in the Hadith and Sira which are not quite as absolute as a the Quran but many Muslims to one degree or the other find quite authoritative.

Due to this Muslim love for their Islamic revered writings (NOT holy to me) Islam is an evil religion vis-à-vis Christianity or Judaism for that matter. The Quran specifically denigrates the Divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ, rejects the Crucifixion, rejects the essential Resurrection that Christians believe can restore humanity to God Almighty and reject Christian mainstay orthodoxy such as the Trinity – Father, Son and Holy Spirit are ONE God expressed in three persons. The Quran twists and fabricates the Holy Scripture of the Old Testament (Jewish Tanakh and thus the first five books of Moses Christians call the Pentateuch and Jews call the Torah) AND the New Testament. This Quran twisting and fabricating eliminates Islam as part of the Abrahamic religions (as far as I’m concerned) and only leaves Judeo-Christianity. If that makes me an Islamophobe I embrace the term. I just don’t embrace the literal meaning of the term which would go something like an unnatural fear of Islam. I don’t have an unnatural fear, rather I have a theological loathing of Islam. Even as much as I loathe Islam I work very hard to take a ‘What Would Jesus Do?’ (WWJD) mentality toward that theopolitical ideology. Most of the time I am successful with WWJD but admittedly there are moments that the loathing steps over the line. God have mercy on me.

JRH 2/26/15
tareq smith Comment

Links that may help you decipher the broken English of Google Translation:

o   Post-revolutionary Politics in Libya: Inside the General National Congress (PDF) - © 2013 The Atlantic Council of the United States

o   The Road to Tripoli – 5/18/11

o   National Conference for the Libyan Opposition – Wikipedia page was last modified on 7 November 2014, at 02:55

o  Libya profile – BBC 1/19/15 last updated 06:57 ET

Appeal to Libya rebels honorable particularly followers of the National Conference and the Islamists all year in Libya.

Dear brothers in Libya - rebels nationalists and Islamists in Libya united, united, united for the sake of Libya before it is too late. The enemies of Libya on the doors and start laying the fingers of the Arab betrayal of eastern Libya and customers from inside Libya and guest resort also is not clean is Daafairse- if Daash [Blog Editor: or Daesh – pejorative name for ISIS, ISIL, IS (Islamic State)] Libya accepted work Under the leadership of the rebels in Libya.

Welcome if they refused the leadership of Libya rebels and the legitimate Libyan Amthelh b Libyan National Congress [Blog Editor: Apparently Libya currently has rival governments] must get rid of them quickly before Etjzrua and Imitdoa in Libya. Where these Islamic[s] their appearance can accept sometimes between the good people of the principle of Islam is one, has always been recognized help to his brother Muslim but matter [of] fact is mixing between politics and religion, and the entry of the wicked intelligence Alognih guise of religion through the intercalation of religion and an introduction to some of the good people seducer [Blog Editor: Perhaps “seducing”] them and pushed them to the forefront of polishing the scene and behind them the bad guys managing general framework and funding from suspicious sources of intelligence - foreign with traitors customers in the Libyan interior. [These] taking advantage of the good people, the truth is decent title for this; Right is intended to Batal. So who wants to help the rebels brothers in Libya Islamists and Qumien-- seek for the good of Libya and the future of the people. Alliba- must accept the Libyan administration hundred b percent people of Mecca know Bashaabha? Those who refuse to work under the leadership of the Libyan National Congress in the interest of Libya urgent and necessary to Shooting outside Libya violently because [of] the enemy and holds a foreign agenda pose the greatest threat to the existence of Libya and its people unabated or Takhir. [0kl – Blog Editor: I have no good guess for “0kl”] anything away from the leadership conference seeks to work outside the system under the National Libyan leadership, the leadership of General National Congress, which emerged from the largest segment of the Libyan people.

Otherwise should be classified as an enemy of Libya and its people, whatever the gloss image and logo is, an enemy of Libya must Dhardhm outside the border and rehabilitation of Taban seducer of their people Alliba0erjoa guidance and reconciled to Msthakaha.